ie8 fix
madison

WikiLeaks lessons for enterprise software vendors

By | December 15, 2010, 5:55am PST

Summary: What can the WikiLeaks saga tells us about the enterprise applications landscape? There are lessons for sure.

Events in the enterprise apps landscape during 2010 have been entertaining to say the least. We started with the resignation/replacement of Leo Apotheker as CEO SAP and are ending on yet another blow to SAP in the shape of interest on damages awarded in the Oracle v SAP/TomorrowNow lawsuit. Behind these and other stories we’re left wondering what really happened though many of us, myself included, speculate based on what we think are our best insider information channels.

Contrast that with what we’re seeing in the unfolding of the WikiLeaks story. There we get what appear to be unvarnished if selected truths about the machinations of government. We’re told this will soon include potentially damaging disclosures about as yet un-named banks. It will be going some if it can outdo the analysis that Francine McKenna has been providing for several years.

Gartner analyst Thomas Otter provides a compelling personal (non-Gartner) perspective about WikiLeaks noting that:

For the last few decades we have been slowly swimming in the ever warmer pond of  a censored and spin filled press and controlled information.

Wikileaks exposes a whole lot of truths. Many banal, even trivial, but many not.

Coincidentally, I saw a TV program last evening: The War You Don’t See made by John Pilger, a British war correspondent. It talks to the way in which media is manipulated, whether overtly or otherwise. Media comment is interesting:

Pilger’s starting point is that all governments are shysters whose only interest is economic and all journalists are witless dupes. My own suspicion is that the reality is more nuanced: that self-delusion is an abiding principle of the human condition. Politicians convince themselves they are acting within a moral framework even when they clearly aren’t and journalists believe they are telling an objective truth; so the narrative that emerges is a collusion of mutual self-deception.

I often see a similar thing happening in the enterprise apps world. We get invited to conferences, are schmoozed and boozed, fed some pat line and then report as though that is the sum and substance. Yet as this year ends I wonder whether the same will be true in 2011? I already see a polarizing of behaviors among the main players.

Despite its ups and downs, SAP has continued to pursue a policy of offering open access to information about its development plans, it continues to field tough questions, takes some of us out to its labs to see for ourselves some of the edge stuff it is working upon and puts its most senior executives in the analyst coconut shy for sometimes sharp questioning. It doesn’t always go as well as SAP would like.

For example, at last week’s SAP Influencer Summit lunch with Vishal Sikka, SAP executive board member, Brian Sommer dinged him with a question Dr Sikka had trouble parrying: “What does SAP stand for?” It was a fair market based question for which Dr Sikka was not well prepared. It says something for Dr Sikka’s humanity that he responded by saying: “I’m a technologist…not a market man.” I sense Dr Sikka will be better prepared at future meetings.

Contrast that with Oracle. This is a company that is becoming increasingly secretive, some might say reclusive. Gone are the years when Larry Ellison, CEO took to the conference stage and parried any and all questions from hard nosed hacks. Instead it seems content to throw out press releases on its latest topic of interest yet provide no means of identifying who the person behind the words might be. In effect, the media are muzzled as it consistently declines to comment beyond what is in a press release.

Then we have those who are trying to find a half way house. At least in the short term. For example, I met with Aneel Bhusri, co-founder and co-CEO Workday last week. He quizzed me about how SAP has developed its blogger program since Workday wishes to build upon its recent successful analyst day. The same week I received a similar inquiry from another cloud vendor

It was telling that Mr Bhusri said while the company wants to give as much freedom as possible to people like myself it’s not quite ready to let someone as forthright as myself loose on a conference floor without some supervision. I get that. But I also sense something else going on.

The dislocation that cloud computing has caused established vendors is opening up a new window of opportunity for buyers to assess the value they get from solutions. Even our most sensitive data seems destined to go into cloud based solutions. Among these vendors, we often see far more openness than is usually associated with software suppliers. Open pricing is the norm, public support sites are springing up and vendor managed but not controlled blogs are becoming commonplace.

I regularly receive email telling me where one or other cloud vendor is doing well or failing. At times I wonder whether the people sending these emails are looking for them to become part of the public discourse. I doubt that I am alone.

In the background we see some vendors picking up on the old Oracle trick of publicly skewing information in their favor for marketing campaigns I view as increasingly hysterical. Michael Krigsman assumes:

The day [SAP INfluencer Summit day 3] began with SAP going on the offensive against NetSuite, even though SAP did not name the competitor explicitly. SAP accused NetSuite of misrepresenting facts in a recent anti-SAP marketing campaign related to total cost of ownership.This exchange is significant because it may signal the start of a shift from SAP as complacent, sleeping giant to more nimble street fighter. Whether this healthy change continues remains to be seen.

Just to be clear, I have no clue which side is right or wrong in this marketing dispute. In response to pointed questioning, NetSuite’s CEO, Zach Nelson, personally assured me that his company’s facts are correct, while SAP defends its position with equal vigor.

I think Michael’s over reaching. The Business ByDesign calculator NetSuite used was way out of date and should not have been in the public domain. That’s SAP’s problem at the time NetSuite drew comparison. On the other hand I can’t reconcile what NetSuite was saying about cost against what its customers tell me. It remains an open question to which I have yet to receive a convincing answer. Go figure? More to the point (and I have had many discussions with SAP on this topic), SAP won’t engage in the same tactics as its competition so to make the ‘nimble street fighter’ analogy in the public discourse is a long stretch. In private? That’s a different matter. SAP fumes at this kind of thing just like any other vendor but will find its own way of attacking the market.

All of which leads me towards wondering whether the software industry is about to get yet another reality check. The more that vendors act stridently in attacking competition the more you have to wonder what they’ve got to hide. Think I’m wrong? Check how US government spokespeople are accusing WikiLeaks instead of dealing with the problems the leaks expose.

Those vendors that go about their business more quietly tend to have far less unwelcome attention brought to themselves. Perhaps that’s what Mr Bhusri and others are really after. Just enough attention to help it going forward but not so much that whatever its weaknesses end up taken out of context because in truth that’s what happens a lot of the time.

As we think about what the New Year might bring, my hope is that vendors of all stripes will seek to be more open, more transparent and disclosing. Experience to date suggests that when that path is followed, buyers feel far better informed, empowered and willing to give the benefit of the doubt when things inevitably go wrong. It’s not a slam dunk because as we have seen time and again, sentiment can swing wildly.

Does that mean they all get a free pass from people like myself? Far from it but at least we have the means to contextualize the whole rather than the parts we like or dislike.

Of one thing I am certain; WIkiLeaks has shone a public light on issues that many might have suspected but few could prove. Regardless of your feelings about that organization we are seeing some uncomfortable truths that will surely demand action that make governments more accountable. The enterprise apps business is not so different. What matters now is how the enterprise vendors respond.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dennis Howlett has been providing comment and analysis on enterprise software since 1991.

Disclosure

Dennis Howlett

Dennis Howlett is committed to maintaining the independent and opinionated stance that his writings are well known for and does not enter into contracts that would limit his freedom of expression in any way. However it is important in the interests of full disclosure to inform readers of those relationships so they can form their own judgment. This page therefore lists all Dennis Howlett’s current business relationships.

Dennis’s consulting arrangements occasionally bring him into direct or indirect business relationships with some of the companies about which he writes, and/or their competitors. Where such a relationship exists, it is disclosed at the end of any article that references the company concerned.

Dennis owns AccMan, an independently produced blog covering the professional services market, primarily focused on Europe. It is currently sponsored by selected TextLink Ads and named sponsors in the ‘Sponsored Content’ block.

He is a member of Enterprise Advocates, a loose association of consultants, and analysts who are concerned with the buyer side of the buy-sell enterprise relationship.

He is a paid contributor to IT Counts, a site dedicated to discussing technology issues as they related to ICAEW members. He also advises ICAEW on certain aspects of its member outreach programs.

He is an SAP Mentor and participates in SAP Mentor webinars. He has recently produced a guide for SAP resellers wishing to record customer videos. Other than as disclosed here, Dennis maintains no business relationship with SAP and is not financially rewarded for his role as a Mentor.

Dennis maintains relationships with a range of end user organizations and in all cases is subject to non-disclosure agreement. He has no current ‘paid for’ relationships with ITC vendors except as disclosed above although certain vendors comp travel and expenses claims. For the benefit of doubt, T&E reimbursement is a common practice among European based writers. It is often the only way we can attend important events. Even so it doesn’t impact our analysis of what vendors have to say. If you believe otherwise then feel free to ignore what is written here.

Except as mentioned above, Dennis has no other investments in any tech industry participants. This page last updated 23rd February, 2010.

Biography

Dennis Howlett

Dennis Howlett has been providing comment and analysis on enterprise software since 1991 in a variety of European trade and professional journals including CFO Magazine, The Economist and Information Week. Today, apart from being a full time blogger on innovation for professional services organisations, he is a founding member of Enterprise Irregulars and an investor in a European start-up. Prior to, Dennis was technology and tax partner in a British firm of Chartered Accountants for 10 years. Prior to that held various senior finance roles across a broad range of industries.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: WikiLeaks lessons for enterprise software vendors
james347 21st Dec 2010
Nothing, move along.
0 Votes
+ -
"dont have company secrets and people wont break in to steal from you"
@cyberspammer2 how far do you go with that mantra? Is it fair to take the Coke forumula? How about downloading a software company's source code without a license? Sometimes what some call "secrets" are IP the keys to successfully implementing their strategy. Private communications are not secrets, they're just private communications. They are never meant to be shared with the general public, whether or not they are speaking well or ill of another. IMHO, there should be some respect still given for that.
0 Votes
+ -
The lesson learned should be...
mr1972 15th Dec 2010
Corporate users should demand customisable Terms of Service from cloud vendors and cloud vendors really should take a hard look at how much political pressure they are going to buckle under.

Personally I believe the only role governments should have in business is breaking up monopolies and oligopolies to insure no company or small group of companies can push or pull an entire market. However, that is not reality. The chilling reality is that Amazon reacted to the demands of just a few law makers in one country, the U.S.A. No laws were proven broken, no mediation was offered and apparently no legal recourse is available for the corporations. A sound bit was all that was required to kick a company out of the cloud.

Corporation do get involved in all kinds of politically charged areas. Energy companies may be polluters. Manufacturers may be making products people are protesting. Financial companies are doing all kinds of things that don't make sense to a lot of people. But who has the right to just shut their business down with out allowing them a proper defence?

This is one of the reasons I have been saying right along, the cloud isn't baked yet. There are clear legal procedures when a corporation has it's assets in house. There are not very clear legal procedures for when your assets are outsourced.

A company that does not negotiate a clear custom Terms of Service with a cloud vendor is only inviting the kinds of problems Wikileaks had with Amazon. A company that is proving itself more involved with politics and political correctness than with hard business and the needs of business organizations.
@mr1972 Legality of an arbitrary cut off of access to data and service is meaningless. Legal action will always be after the fact. And, as in a murder, that doesn't help the poor sot that got killed.

The fact is, anything you put out in the cloud, under the control of a single, or even small group of vendors, takes complete control from you and places it squarely in someone else's hands. If that data and application is critical to the survival of your company, loss of access will wipe you out. And taking the vendor to court over it will NEVER replace your lost business, nor will you ever recover to that level again; because none of your customers will ever trust you.

Wikileaks has survived and is stronger than ever because they were prepared for this. They had a plan in place for massively distributed mirroring on multiple hosts in multiple countries. They had all their data backed up, current, and copies in their control, not just on the Amazon servers. The thing is, they had invested in a disaster plan that over 90% of the companies using or considering the cloud will delude themselves into thinking they don't need because it will never happen to them.

Such a belief has no basis in fact.
0 Votes
+ -
Entirely correct.
FMster Updated - 16th Dec 2010
Thank you for pointing out this fact.

The "Cloud" is a nice concept. It has its flaws and its qualities, but in the end, it is nothing else than letting someone one hold your data and maintain your technological infrastructure for you, and therein lies the danger.

Yes, your provider's security matters, and a breach of Salesforce's or Amazon's servers could jeopardize the information of countless customers. Another aspect of your personal security, is the chance your provider reneges on its contract or uses its "Term of Services" to stop servicing you. Amazon has shown this too well; political pressure can force them to put down a site. Regardless of where you stand on the WikiLeaks issue, this simple fact shows your data is not safe outside of your own walls. What if you are a company running your ERP hosted in another country, and your two countries go into war? The chances are low, but the chances cannot be ignored if you're a multinational corporation running vital processes on the "Cloud".

It's what Stallman said a couple days ago; we have now entered the days of Careless Computing.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Distorted meaning
mkrigsman@... Updated - 15th Dec 2010
Dennis, you dropped off the first sentence of the paragraph you quoted, which frames the context:

"The day began with SAP going on the offensive against NetSuite, even though SAP did not name the competitor explicitly."

SAP went on the offensive against NetSuite which is quite different behavior than in the past. Talking with SAP about this, they acknowledged a new strategy and approach. Whether that continues is an open question.

Intellectual dishonesty is not a good trait in a blogger.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Distorted meaning
mkrigsman@... Updated - 15th Dec 2010
Dennis, you distorted the meaning of my quote by dropping off the first sentence of the paragraph you quoted:

"The day began with SAP going on the offensive against NetSuite, even though SAP did not name the competitor explicitly."

SAP went on the offensive against NetSuite which is quite different behavior than in the past. Talking with SAP about this, they acknowledged a new strategy and approach. Whether that continues is an open question.

Intellectual dishonesty is not a good trait in a blogger.
0 Votes
+ -
Wikileaks Lessons
Glocalings.com Updated - 20th Dec 2010
Dennis, I think cloud is simply unavoidable in a world which requires flexibly extending reach of an organisations capability. It is indeed quite challenging to fully utilise the functional aspects of applications in a secured and assured ways, keeping in mind disparate technologies. We are seeing in software application space similar kind of paradigm shift that we observed in physical product space. The design life is simply shrinking.

So you are right that more and more data and hence information could potentially be exposed to public domain. This therefore could mean than executives may be more careful in what they publicly state about their companies.

The question is, can organisations avoid cloud if they wish to? Or can they have a work around?
Nothing, move along.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix