ie8 fix

Court agrees to speed up case over Google’s privacy policies

By | February 9, 2012, 1:27pm PST

Summary: A federal court has agreed to an accelerated briefing schedule in a privacy case that could affect the rollout of Google’s new privacy policies.

(Updated 7:02pm PST)

Google’s roll out of its new privacy policy could indeed hit a snag as a federal court Thursday granted an accelerated briefing schedule in a case where a privacy watchdog group is suing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The court gave the FTC until Feb. 17 to respond to two briefs filed Wednesday by watchdog group the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). In turn, the court stipulated that EPIC is required to reply to the FTC by Feb. 21.

EPIC claims Google’s plan to change its privacy policy on March 1 violates a consent order the company signed in October as part of a privacy complaint settlement with the FTC.

In court today, the FTC argued that EPIC’s claims were without merit and that a normal briefing period was reasonable. The judge rejected both arguments.

Yesterday, EPIC asked the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., for a court order to force the FTC’s hand in regards to Google’s actions. EPIC is seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction designed to compel the FTC to enforce the consent order.

In its court filing, EPIC says the FTC’s failure to act puts the “privacy interests of literally hundreds of millions Internet users at grave risk.” EPIC says it is imperative that the court hear the case before the March 1 rollout of the new policy, which will affect all Google users.

“We believe the change is a clear violation of the consent order,”EPIC’s Rotenberg said Wednesday. “EPIC  filed the suit because the FTC has both the authority and the obligation to enforce its consent orders, and [Google's] changes will take place in less than three weeks if the FTC fails to act.”

EPIC filed the original complaint that led to the FTC declaring Google used deceptive privacy practices when it rolled out its Buzz social service in 2010. The group has also dogged Facebook over privacy issues, which resulted in a consent order between the FTC and the social networking giant.

Last week, EPIC’s Rotenberg told ZDNet, “The FTC consent orders with Facebook and Google last year were a big deal. But the real test for the FTC is whether they will enforce them this year now that the companies appear to be ignoring what they agreed to.”

A Google spokesman said yesterday, “we take privacy very seriously. We’re happy to engage in constructive conversations about our updated privacy policy but EPIC is wrong on the facts and the law.”

After Thursday’s ruling to accelerate the briefing schedule, a Google spokesman said the company had no comment.

Google created waves Jan. 24 when it announced it was consolidating its myriad of privacy policies into a single one and would look at users as one entity across all its service. The announcement touched off a privacy debate from Washington to the European Union and nearly everywhere in-between.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

John Fontana is a journalist focusing in identity, privacy and security issues. Currently, he is the Identity Evangelist for cloud identity security vendor Ping Identity, where he blogs about relevant issues related to digital identity.

Disclosure

John Fontana

First and foremost, John is employed as an Identity Evangelist by Ping Identity, which provides cloud identity security software to enterprises and cloud service providers. In his role, he tracks the identity industry and relevant issues. He does not have financial interests in any companies he covers, and opinions expressed are his own.

Biography

John Fontana

John Fontana is a journalist focusing in identity, privacy and security issues. Currently, he is the Identity Evangelist for cloud identity security vendor Ping Identity, where he blogs about relevant issues related to digital identity. Prior to Ping, John spent 15 years as a senior reporter for a variety of publications, including Communications Week, Internet Week and Network World, where he focused on enterprise topics including collaboration, directories, network infrastructure, databases, open source, ERP and security. He covered IBM, Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle, Red Hat, Google among other enterprise vendors. His work has also appeared in the New York Times, CNN, CIO and Mashable.
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Court agrees to speed up case over Google's privacy policies
jorjitop 12th Feb
@Jow_Blow
Total nonsense. Google was started by a couple of guys who developed a better search algorithm.

But, then they learned to profile people from their searches. And then they set the hook by creating Gmail which gave them more detail on their users, the content of their mail, and their contacts. Each Google app and service gave Google more detail about their users.

This was vital to Google since their main source of revenue was advertising and their plus in advertising was their ability to target users. Coincidentally, they were building the biggest database on the largest population in the world.

But Facebook, though with a smaller database (no search profiles), was able to show higher profitability because people spend more time on Facebook. So, Google had to introduce more social in the form of Google+. The ability to integrated all this knowledge was always there and they are now acknowledging it.

The risk is that all the information stored by both Facebook and Google gets leaked and private information for over a billion people will be sold all over the world. Good bye identity.
0 Votes
+ -
Federal courts?
Jow_Blow 9th Feb
Google is a Federal operation. Just how are they going to restrict an organization established with Federal funds from carrying out their NSA-CIA orders. I guess they'll put up some phony roadblocks to make it seems as though Google is legit and has to be reigned in. Don't trust it. Google from the onset was set up to profile you. They won't stopped for long. Google provides that feel-good front that makes people believe the I.T. industry was born out of people's garages. Such is not the case.
@Jow_Blow
Total nonsense. Google was started by a couple of guys who developed a better search algorithm.

But, then they learned to profile people from their searches. And then they set the hook by creating Gmail which gave them more detail on their users, the content of their mail, and their contacts. Each Google app and service gave Google more detail about their users.

This was vital to Google since their main source of revenue was advertising and their plus in advertising was their ability to target users. Coincidentally, they were building the biggest database on the largest population in the world.

But Facebook, though with a smaller database (no search profiles), was able to show higher profitability because people spend more time on Facebook. So, Google had to introduce more social in the form of Google+. The ability to integrated all this knowledge was always there and they are now acknowledging it.

The risk is that all the information stored by both Facebook and Google gets leaked and private information for over a billion people will be sold all over the world. Good bye identity.
google business practices are totally illegal, they have destroyed so many small business by offering services for 'free'. Google executives are criminals in white collar, send them to prison.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix