20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1

By | May 7, 2010, 12:39pm PDT

Summary: In Part 1, these are the first ten reasons why students should not buy an iPad, which I consider to be nothing more than an ‘expensive paperweight’.

I’ve made my mind up at long last, just as the announcement was made of the iPad pricing to those outside of the US. I will not be getting an iPad, nor do I suggest any essay writing, university studying student to get one either.

Just because I live in the United Kingdom, the same iPad model is nearly £40 ($58) more expensive because of tax. Though, this forms only a tiny reason why I will not be getting one. Sam Gustin wraps up a mutual feeling in one single, simple sentence:

“Beware: Apple also built the world’s most infamous paperweight. One word: Newton“.

Just because I can, here is the first installment of my twenty more reasons not to get an iPad.

1. You can’t type on a flat surface.

The design and ergonomics of the device have either been thought about too little, or thought about so much that they’ve managed to somehow flip back round again to a stupid way of thinking. You see all these pictures and adverts of users propping up their iPad at an angle an their knees, but what about those who can’t just pop their knees up on the same surface?

Of course, you could shell out for an iPad dock and an iPad Bluetooth keyboard, but then that would only transform it into a low grade, slightly upper-class netbook like device. You’d have to carry more stuff around with you and it defeats the object of having an ultra slim and portable device, frankly.

2. It breaks really easily.

I know this video seems a bit Clockwork Orange at first, but stick with it until about 1 minute in or so. With only a few drops from waist height onto a carpeted floor, it scratches and the screen screws up. Even though the glass screen seems to be scratch-proof even to a six-inch nail, the under parts seem fragile at best.

I wouldn’t really suggest buying something so likely to break after a couple of drops and a simulated beer, let alone last that long with spendthrift students who dispose of technology like the Mafia do with their enemies.

3. Universities are not full prepared yet.

Students will want to use the device in, on and around campus. But in some universities, their networks are not prepared for the bandwidth costs or usage, and some have outright banned the device until further notice until issues are fixed.

4. Content over 3G is disappointingly poor quality.

Some news reporters have shown clearly the poor quality of video transmitted over the 3G network. Though video calling has never been as popular as the industries had hoped, users of instant messengers who want to add that personal touch to their conversations will be disappointed by the poor video quality.

That would be the case, had Apple included a damn camera with the device. But sure, Wi-Fi has higher bandwidth than 3G at the best of times, but video playback on a screen size of this device just looks horrendous.

5. The glossy screen is awful to look at.

Those who have an Apple MacBook will know how painfully awful the glossy screen can be in a high-light environment, to the point where you could almost pluck your eyebrows or do your make-up in the mirror-esque screen display… or, whatever people do with mirrors, I guess.

The same can be said about the iPad. Forget working outside on a warm, summer’s day, because you’ll be blinded by the reflection of the sun; burned into your retinas for life.

6. Reading e-books is tiring on the eyes.

There have been quite a few posts about the iPad’s capabilities to read e-books in comparison to e-ink technology on rival devices such as the Kindle. It is of two major opinions - both colleagues of mine, Matthew Miller and Jason Perlow - that the iPad is probably not the best device to have for reading.

Perlow’s post sums it up nicely, while Miller is supportive still of the iPad’s efforts. Both are worth a read, and you can decide for yourself.

7. Flash will never be supported.

In a major tit-for-tat battle, the iPad and other Apple mobile devices will not include or support Flash. The popular web plug-in wasn’t included when the device was first released, suggesting it could just be late to the game. But as time prevailed, it turned out that it was an absolute, definitive ‘no’.

8. Apple royally screws over developers.

Mobile developers are a key player in keeping the mobile industry ticking over, with no age restrictions on developers allowing even the younger entrepreneurs to make their millions.

But with the Apple lock-in license agreement, it now means you cannot use any product other than Apple’s own tools to develop applications for the iPad. Even the federal authorities are investigating this as an antitrust enquiry, which roundly proves that Apple has a too-strict approach when it comes to iPad application development.

9. Digital rights restrictions stifles innovation and application freedom.

Again with the applications, but it has made Apple’s monopoly on the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad immeasurable to other device manufacturers. But the Electronic Frontier Foundation has criticised Apple’s move towards using digital rights restrictions on the operating system to make only Apple-approved applications installable on the devices.

It is also stated that Apple itself, and via “any other authority” can remotely disable and delete applications, media and data on the iPad as and when they choose.

10. Share and print? Probably not going to happen.

PC World said last month just after the announcement that the iPad not only doesn’t have a file browser but no printing support. Those putting finishing touches onto an essay or researching something quickly will have to email it to themselves only to print from another computer. You can share and export files through iTunes, but this would mean iTunes would be required on the other machine to download it again.

- - -

Part 2 will be published on Monday. You can find Part 2 over here.

Do you agree or disagree with anything on this first list?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Talkback Most Recent of 136 Talkback(s)

  • Best piece on iPad I've seen so far
    I agree with every single point the author makes here. Assuming the user has more than bare hands available -- and most university students worldwide seem to have discovered the backpack -- it will be just as feasible to carry a netbook and have full control over communications, writing, and publishing. And even Flash!
    Well done, Mr. Whittaker. (Disclosure: I was a university student 50 years ago, and even then I had a briefcase at my disposal, though no electronics.)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jonrkc
    7th May 2010
  • Hello Good Sir
    Zack must be on the debating team. Every point he makes can be argued quite easily. We all have come to know that he loathes Apple...at least as a blogger...Apple articles get lots of hits if you strike the right chord$. I find his articles tedious and lacking imagination...shame for such a young person.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    CowLauncher
    8th May 2010
  • RE: RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @CowLauncher Your being a very tough critic of our poor lad. Give him time to grow. I can't wait for Monday's final ten points. I just hope one of them isn't that the iPad is a poor underwater reader or can't be used in the shower.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    8th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • "tedious and lacking imagination"?
    @CowLauncher
    Well, I guess if someone is pointing out the endless shortcomings of a product you happen to like the situation will feel tedious. And lacking imagination????

    Well, seeing as how this appears to me to be nothing less then an article holding itself out to be a factually based critique, I'm not quite sure what increased levels of imaginative writing would do a service to anyone reading this.

    The fact is, as I have been saying from almost the first day of release of the iPad is that it appears to be a very expensive interesting toy with quite limited ability to do things people are used to doing with computer type devices, and so for those purposes it really is an overpriced paper weight.

    Sure, some people out there have found some quite handy uses for the iPad, keeping in mind that if in a world of almost seven billion people, if a couple of million at least cannot find something good to use your product for then you really have created a dud.

    Keep watching because I swear iPad sales will drop off significantly in the near future, and unless a few key things change with the iPad it will go down as a footnote in computing history as the invention that roared like a shot out of a cannon for a brief period then thudded to the ground without much fanfare or impact.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Cayble
    28th Sep 2010
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @jonrkc I agree whole heartedly. This is very well written and to the point.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    blueskip
    10th May 2010
  • Well written?!?
    WTF are you talking about?!? There are FUNDAMENTAL grammar errors in almost EVERY SINGLE SENTENCE!!!!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DeusExMachina
    10th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • RE: RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    That's ok, Zack. By the time you depart university life, Flash will be irrelevant. And the iPad will be into a future generation model. At that time, I'm sure you will rethink your position.
    By the way, from experience, eye strain is not an issue - reports to the contrary. However,outdoor viewing is almost unacceptable.
    The iPad was never designed to be a primary computing device although it comes close.
    But to characterize it as an expensive paper weight is a phrase I would expect from a middle school sophomore just coming to grips with the concept of outrageous hyperbole.
    As for print support-there are apps for that. Personally, I have the HP printer app installed - an iPhone app but it works.
    But the other side of the printer coin can best be summed up by the phrase "Welcome to the green world of Apple. With an iPad, you don't need processed tree pulp to share an idea. There are other ways"
    Oh, as for viewing iPad material under poor indoor lighting conditions, I have to ask, does the UK suffer from poor indoor lighting? Over here in the States, we use something called light bulbs when reading indoors. You should try it someday.
    Finally, I typed this comment from my iPad while watching the TV news in my home. It was a little slow since I didn't use my Microsoft Bluetooth keyboard but it got the job done. No big deal.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    7th May 2010
  • ZDNet Blogger

    RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @kenosha7777 I finish my undergraduate university degree this time next year. Are you saying that HTML5, Silverlight and equivalents will take over Flash altogether? In the space of a year?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    zwhittaker
    7th May 2010
  • RE: RE: RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @zwhittaker Well, Zack, suggesting that Flash would be completely irrelevant throughout academia, especially within a year's time frame might amount to a historic example of arrogant hubris on my part. (I was thinking more of a two to three year timeline)
    However, a quick review of Apple's website detailing iPad ready web URLs indicates that a considerable shift away from Flash based content has already occurred. In fact, I even view BBC based news accounts (thru the BBC iPad app) with HMTL5 support on a daily basis. (Hey, I'm retired and I have the time. Besides, ever since Tom Baker, I've been a fan of British based information and entertainment.)
    Honestly, however, I have been amazed at the pace of major web URL sites adopting HMTL5 support. And, in a year, Apple is projected to have sold around 10 million iPads, give or take a few million. That does not include their iPhone mobile device sales. That amounts to a lot of influential customers using these devices and thus increasing the economic pressure for HMTL5 adoption over Flash.

    That, and the additional blog reports that both Apple and Microsoft agree on the adoption of HMLT5 content over Flash based content just means that the tide has already turned against the continued adoption of Flash. (BTW, another recent opinion on this matter was voiced by the creators of the web browser, Opera, in which the opinions of Apple and Microsoft regarding Flash based content were, more or less, endorsed.)

    Now, I didn't mention Silverlight or Apple's new web based app development tool called Gianduia. (See AppleInsider's recent blog post regarding Gianduia.) But, you have to agree, Zack, that the time frame rate for Flash irrelevancy is increasing on a daily basis. It just might happen in a year's time but I would be more conservative in that estimate.
    Regards,
    Mike
    PS .. Good luck on your studies.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    7th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @zwhittaker He's probably dumb enough to believe just that.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    blueskip
    10th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @zwhittaker
    both Apple and M$ have recently explained why it just isn't the way of the future. I doubt that it will disappear that fast, but it will likely go pretty quick.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    RedVeg
    10th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    Yes. That is exactly what we are saying.... I am a site developer that is even now removing flash content from clients sites. I don't understand this inability to move on... Flash is like IE6 it was great for what it did at it hay day but it is now antiquated tech. Shame on Adobe for not keeping pace.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    james@...
    10th May 2010
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @kenosha7777 The iPad was never designed to be a primary computing device although it comes close.

    Oh... Really??? But then again that's NOT how Jobs and Apple have been spinning it. Why, they've got that abortion of an "office suite" iWorks for the iPad written just for it.

    Why is it then that executive types figured they could sync the presentations they spent weeks writing and perfecting only to find that iWorks on the iPad butchered important bits of their documents to the point of making them unusable? They only found out that there were key portions removed after they'd left the office and were basically screwed.

    And if things couldn't get worse, the iPad committed the cardinal sin of syncing the truncated document back over the SOURCE files, eradicating the original copy, and the removed portions - thus forcing the poor schmuck to be hoping the gods of Backup were smiling on them..

    Sounds to me that Apple was indeed trying to pitch the iPad to be AS GOOD as a laptop. Remember, this is supposed to be a "Magical" and "Revolutionary" device. And it may actually fit that bill - provided you're not using any "fancy" features like footnotes, speaker notes, etc...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Wolfie2K3
    9th May 2010
  • RE: 20 anti-'expensive paperweight' iPad reasons: Part 1
    @Wolfie2K3 That's a sad tale. Just curious but was your example based upon a personal experience? (Not that the answer would condone what your example portrayed .. I'm just curious.)

    But I stand by my statement that Jobs and Apple did position the iPad in a niche between a laptop and a mobile smartphone. Personally, I would have used my laptop for an important business meeting instead of trusting a new tech device (no matter how good or promising that tech device is.)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    9th May 2010
    • Flagged
  • Well said Kenosha--
    @kenosha7777
    Seems like the author of the article set out to bash the IPad by repeating every negative comment he could find from other IPad bashing bloggers. Doesn't show any real objective reasoning based on actual IPad use.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ktodack
    10th May 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources