Professor's patent strangles textbook sharing on and offline
Summary: Students who don't buy in to the scheme can expect lower grades.
The realm of academic file-sharing is notorious -- is it legal to share these notes, and this is alright because we need it for the course but it's no longer in print, right? Students sharing textbooks, presentations and notes facilitated by Facebook's new Group feature came to mind -- but now, going beyond the realms of copyright infringement, it may go so far as to lower your grades.
A new patent has been granted to economics professor Joseph Henry Vogel, who is dead-set on stopping the "infringing" behaviour of devious students who share or lend textbooks -- whether off or online.
After all, gaining a college degree is business. But how do you make sure those miscreants don't go and share their coursebooks? Easy -- if you do, we lower your grade.
It works in this manner; a student must buy an online access code to sign up compulsory elements of a class. The code is purchased through buying the coursebook.
In possession of this code, you're allowed to use the course book and access restricted parts of your course. If you lend or resell, then those without the code will have their academic achievements lowered.
No code, and you cannot participate in online discussion boards, secured through the access barrier and naturally a compulsory part of a course. No sign in? Shame -- here's X percent off your grade.
Vogel wrote:
"Professors are increasingly turning a blind eye when students appear in class with photocopied pages. Others facilitate piracy by placing texts in the library reserve where they can be photocopied."
Piracy, lending and reselling are threats to the publishing industry, the professor believes. Piracy might be, but surely stopping a student from taking a book from a library is going too far?
No, apparently not. If you purchase a second-hand book, no problem -- you can buy the access code for a "discount" rate.
Naturally, publishers are rubbing their hands in glee at the idea of being able to charge multiple times for a single book. Anthem Press of London is one such publisher who is interested in the simple, albeit restrictive system.
Less money for publishers, less opportunity for professors to be published. However, attacking the centuries-old lending system for books because it's possible to get a few outdated and probably irrelevant textbooks through torrents might be going too far.
Image credit: Nate Bolt
Related:
- The Pirate generation: Are we 'unreasonable'?
- Have we raised a generation of pirates?
- The most popular websites students cite and plagiarize
- Former student ordered to pay $675,000 for sharing 30 songs
- Are today’s students truly ‘tech savvy’?
- Students file-sharing work on Facebook: Is it legal?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Been there, done that
In some ways, though, what's happening with textbooks is simply mirrroring the broader trends in publishing: back when a book was a physical block of paper or music came on CD's it was easy enough to re-sell them. But once the books is nothing more than a DRM's digital file, it becomes impossible to re-sell. And as for digital music, re-selling your old digital files is, at best, ethically questionable, given that few are likely to actually delete the original file from their computer/MP3 player.
Student strikes and antitrust issues
Not to mention that in New York the standard road to the governership is to become Attorney General and then sue the "big players" in some major industry (such as the investment bankers or insurers) so you can say you "cleaned up" a particular industry. Textbook publishers ... hmm ....
Everyone in the university education system realizes the way to REALLY make money is to get to the point where you're a full professor and then write a textbook for an introductory course such as Introduction to Western History for a required "core" course and get the university to use that as the textbook. Now, with the ability so self-publish electronically, that would be even easier.
You are ignoring a large part of the "College" experience
In these Community College courses, most used "canned" curricula. That is the course materials are purchased and tied to textbook required for the course. An integral part of the course is a CD that is included in the ~$100+ textbook. There is no "Professor" per se, just an instructor that checks that you are making progress and tallies the points from activities and quizzes in the book's CD. Purchasing a used textbook is very risky as one does not know if the CD is included or damaged. You cannot complete the course work and get a satisfactory grade without the CD that is quite illegal to copy.
A new textbook from the schools bookstore or even Amazon may be well in excess of $100. A used textbook may be as little as $35. Either price is well beyond the cost of prining these texts but they can charge that because it is and is intended to stay a monopoly market.
If this sounds like a method to insure steady revenue from those least able to afford it, then you realize the actual problem that already exists. This "Economics" Professor is just trying to "cash in" on an ongoing scheme. As sad as that sounds, it would make him one of the best "Eco" Prof's I have ever heard of.
What community college are you going to?
I agree, to a point
The first commenter is correct: in many fields, we don't need 2 year republishing cycles. That has gotten insane. Even in the sciences, introductory courses are relatively stable. What does change is the logic and flow of the presentation, and new instructional modalities are always attempted by authors, some of which are real improvements on what has been done in the past. Those won't come about if we succumb to endless cycles of used books and papers. In some ways, the current hugely successful used book business is to blame for the two-year revision cycle. With new textbook sales plummeting, you have to issue new versions faster to make up the marketing shortfall. When I was in college, we rented books from the University, and turned them into the bookstore at the end of the semester. No one minded. Today, with Google reaping untold profits on the turnover in books, and college bookstores buying back books at $0.50 on the dollar, there isn't much left over for the new market. There are plenty of parallel markets to look at the function in much the same way (pianos and generic pharmaceuticals come immediately to mind). That isn't to say there isn't greed, nor that the cost of textbooks today is not way too high.
It costs a lot more money than you think to compile, verify, proofread, and print a 700 page textbook in full color. Really. Notice that most of the conferences you attend are not distributing the program anymore? Sure, they TELL you it is because you have all this wonderful new technology that makes the pain of carrying a 5 pound program obsolete. Truth is, it simply costs too much to print. It is actually cheaper to pay a developer at 75-100 dollars an hour to create a mobile and kiosk presence for each conference than to print programs for 1000 participants. Even for 10,000 participants. You want to make textbooks affordable again? Make them the way they actually were 30 years ago. No color. Nothing over about 300 pages. If you can't do it in that length, break it into volumes. As technology has progressed, we have demanded fancier and fancier books because someone has rightfully assessed the quality of human nature that believes that the slickest display of information is the best one to buy. We all assume that if you want to really get your point across to the student, you have to wow them with color, and sidebars, and integrated problem solving. No studies showing any of it works, by the way, and some inferential studies that show it may actually interfere. But we do it all anyway, because that is the way information display has gone in the last 30 years. You want to affect change? Get the authors to start publishing the way we used to.
But you overlook an even easier way to undo this rediculous action by this professor. The patent is absurd. It isn't even original. Overturn the patent. Much simpler. I can't believe this patent was issued at all. It is an infringement on copyright fair use, and it is something that the publishers have already been doing for years (online homework and course content unlocked by code). The only difference is that he is doing it himself, rather than the publisher. That isn't patentable, unless there is something more fundamentally new in this patent. Stupid. It can't stand.
Threaten Future School Donations
Here is what I would recommend. If you attend a school that buys into these shinanigans, make a public committment never to give money to said school after graduation.
When they do call, and they will, to "keep you up to date" on what's going on at the school, and "oh by the way, would you like to donate?" Mention how the school did you no favors as an undergraduate with the textbooks, etc. and how you'll be sending your donations elsewhere.
Maybe if enough people acted this way, schools would treat their undergraduates better. Maybe the threat won't have an immediate effect, but if enough people did it, and the reasons were clear why there were no donations, maybe the schools would think twice before handing down things like this.
Lawsuits coming! (nt)
Heaven forbid we should share knowledge
it seems all wrong to me
I understand the publishers, but I do not understand the college professors.
A person goes to college and pays for the education. Why textbooks are not a part of the overall fee? What is the professor's cut out the $60 price of the book? Wouldn't it be easier to just charge an additional $20 per course, and forget about copywriting headaches?
re: it seems all wrong to me
Are the libraries evil too?
Libraries made education more accessible, now we want to go backwards...
If he wants an extra fee for profit...
If he needs the money so bad then it should be listed as a required course fee, not part of a book and have nothing to do with the student grade.
Author author!
Sutdents should boycott classes with those requirments
dsf3g - That is exactly right! Nobody needs a 17th edition algebra book. Algebra doesn't change!
text books
Bleh
killing the Goose that laid the Golden Egg
Sorry, I thought College was about LEARNING!
I agree with most of the people here, make it a point to get out of his classes, and boycott them. You let this keep going, and it will only get worse.
Education is not the point
Compare with the medical industry and sick people.
Decline and Fall