Stanford Uni's bookless library: Progression or repression?

By | May 21, 2010, 3:30am PDT

Summary: Stanford University is preparing to move to a bookless library. Is this digital progression, or old-school repression?

Stanford University is making a leap in its future library programme by preparing the launch its own bookless library. Instead of checking out books, monitoring their progress and having to have them back by a certain time and day for another student, pretty much everything of theirs will be going digital.

As in this day and age, most articles are available through online library databases and via Google Books and Scholar. Many students including myself are aware of the huge impact that digitised books are having on research and studying.

You can search through them, for a start. This saves a lot of time.

Digital books means less concern with damage and acts of God (fire, flood, earthquake and the occasional meteorite), and less storage space is needed. This shift should be one of efficiency, widely available multi-user access and potentially cheaper costs overall.

But I do worry, as books should never be replaced in my opinion. Books as an option still, would be best. However I do see the upsides to both.

e-Readers are becoming all the rage, and the iPad certainly has spurred on this market with their cool, ergonomic device (…which actually doesn’t suit students specifically all that well, but nevertheless) it has opened up ‘reading on the go’. Perhaps now reading will be more accessible to students who can ad-hoc read as and when they want to.

Printing costs will go through the roof. There is no substitute for having a journal article in your hand and running over it with a highlighter and dashing on notes in the margin. You can do this on a computer, but the process of doing so doesn’t install the knowledge into your head. Physically writing something down connects - somehow - to the head, and is remembered and absorbed by the brain when you write it.

Having a paperless university - or at least making steps to move towards a bookless library - is a huge, and potentially controversial step to make on the face of it. It does mean they can expand and share with so many more students and other universities, which should be the aim at the end of it; sharing knowledge with others.

How would you feel about a bookless library?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

28
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Stanford Uni's bookless library: Progression or repression?
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
1984
wkulecz 21st May 2010
1984 looks like its arriving about 30 years late.
@wkulecz: I cannot get your point.
Is this about "intellectual activity recording"? You have already to ask for the book and check it out in a normal library.
Is this about the notes you are taking in digital format? You can still take your notes on paper.
As you say, e-books do not replace the eye-hand coordinated learning that a physical book, highlighter, and notebook bring to the learning equation. I have done dozens of research projects, with 3, 4, 8 or more library and text books spread all over a table to do side by side by side comparisons with. This is NOT a possibility with today's e-books.
Zack,

Not to debate your article, but just a couple of adjunct thoughts.

1. E-Readers - with monochromatic e-ink, they currently can't replace full-color textbooks. The iPad and other iterations of e-readers might solve that problem.

2. What if e-readers included e-margins and either touch-screen or keyboard means of adding personal notes to the text?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@RayG314 That might work. I get what you mean; it's like when you read something, often you don't take it in. Yet if you have a discussion with someone about what you're reading, it seems to be remembered. That's how I revise anyway. Though you make a totally valid point and that would make it far easier to share notes too.
@zwhittaker Hmm. Sure you don' t want to revise your stance on purchasing an iPad? (Grin)

You might be too young to know this but it's a well known "urban fact" that California and/or the west coast initiate trends that are 2 to 3 years ahead of mainstream adoption.

My crystal ball gazing still looks pretty good regarding tablet based university level text books being adopted within five years. Your iPad class device WILL become a university student's primary "text book" far sooner than later. (Knowing your abhorrence towards Apple's device, I'll let you and your friends use a Google future tablet for class studies. And, I truly hope a MS light weight tablet design becomes a reality sooner than later.)

PS. Books will NEVER vanish. Just the other day, I walked into my local library with my iPad. I showed the librarian a book's cover image from my iBook app and asked if the library had that particular book. (Hey, why buy the book if you can access a library's copy.). As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words and the librarian told me which ailse that book could be located at. It took only seconds to search out the book after consulting her computer terminal. The iPad image helped this process along nicely. Of course, I could have conducted this search alone but I enjoy the human interaction.
As an undergraduate I worked in a lab which gave me great freedom. I learned a lot and was encouraged to go to the library and get articles to read about our work. In the process of finding an article wandering the stacks I would often come across other articles of interest. This level of serendipity which is shared among other scientist, would be lost in a totally electronic library. On the flip side I fully support the digitization of library materials for ease of use, sharing and wider readership. I have spent some time working in the EU and can say that universities there would greatly benefit from more books being online.
My wife reads the online article with a window open to google search and cuts and pastes words and phrases. It would be easy to add that internally to the ebook app. Then the serendipitous aspect would actually be improved!
I've been paperless since 1994, everything on my laptop and always favour digital book over a paper one; I just like to carry one Book, my laptop..
0 Votes
+ -
To me its not about progression or repression, it looks more like an interesting project. Its great to get books to be digital if your just looking up something quickly, but I find having a paper book much easier to read if your going to read chapters.
I don't quite get the 1984 reference, since various agencies already routinely track what people are reading, but I do detect some elements of Fahrenheit 451 possibly entering the picture.

On the other hand, having books and other media readily at hand and searchable is a wonderful thing. Don't get me wrong - I love the smell and texture of books. The old bindings and aging paper gives you a sense of the history of what you are reading. However, for research, being able to quickly find what you are looking for and cross-referencing between documents has never been easier, even with texts located around the world. And although nothing is more durable than pencil on paper properly stored, digital documents are much easier to back up and distribute. They also have a convenience factor of being able to print out the selections you need so that you can highlight portions and scrible notes in the margins, just like we used to do with photocopies, only now you can also copy/paste selections into your report so that inaccuracies from mis-typing of quotations are reduced. I see digital and traditional books both having a place in the future. Digital is convenient, but transitory in the grand scheme of things as technologies and file types come and go, and print is necessary to provide longevity, so that when things get lost over time, we can still go back and rescan.
A virtual reality book, seems would cover the gap a bit.
But won't they still have to have a "check-out" policy so that only the number of works that they purchased can be loaned to students at any one time?
0 Votes
+ -
Partially progressive
sboverie 21st May 2010
For some things it works better to have a digital version; things like technical journals and periodicals. On the other hand, a physical book is more than just the words; some give a better sense of history by its apparent age.

I used to be a frequent visitor to the library during my school years and wandering around the stacks sometimes led to new things for me. One of those interesting items was an article called "Amplification of Sound by Flame". I would not have found this if all the books were digitized.

The advantage to digital media is that it is better protected from loss and easier to distribute. The disadvantage is the experience is sterile.
@Zack: I love books, specially in their more traditional (and less ecological) form. I'm not a kid anymore (Yes, I'm almost 48).
I understand what you mean when saying: "There is no substitute for having a journal article in your hand and running over it with a highlighter and dashing on notes in the margin. You can do this on a computer, but the process of doing so doesn?t install the knowledge into your head. Physically writing something down connects - somehow - to the head, and is remembered and absorbed by the brain when you write it."
I don't get your point, anyway:
- A book from a library is not the best element to support notes for your research. You take notes in your own block.
- A digital book doesn't change this. You can always take your notes on your block...
- Beyond manual taken notes, I think new generations create new ways to learn, according to the new sources available. A proven path is not bad. But, an unproven path is completelly wrong because it doesn't follow or map the old one?
- A strange example: It's proven in people younger than 25 are developing the muscles in their thumbs in a new and characteristic way, because of typing SMS in their phones. Is that so bad?
Cheers, Ra?l
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@raul62 I love books too. It's the smell - I reckon. Those proper old books you get; they just have the most wonderful smell. I'm sure it seems weird, but I just don't care happy
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with your assessment Zack about the need to write something by hand for it to sink in. But if you have a tablet computer that supports handwritting recognition doesn't that serve the same purpose with the same result?
@alamfour I've used my iPad and optional third party stylus to take a few notes already but in this case consider that the subject matter is already in a digital format. It would be easier to just "copy and paste" your section of interest and then use a keyboard (virtual or real) to record any useful notes. Or, you could go into a secured reading room and just voice dictate your notes. On the iPad, there is an app called dragon dictation that works with the iPad's built-in microphone. And converts spoken words into text. It works amazingly well.

Future tech is "here". Just ride the wave, dude, and enjoy the ride. (As it might be stated by a Stanford Cardinal)
This article should have mentioned that the library in question is one of Physics, Computer Science and Engineering. As it is, it gives the reader the impression that this is a revolution affecting Stanford's libraries in general, which is definitely not the case (yet).

These (scientific, technological) books and periodicals are not "used" the same way as books of art, literature, music scores; the former, as Pcramp writes, to "quickly find and reference", the latter to read, leaf, examine, etc. They sometimes hold high resolution reproductions of art work (the current digital libraries scan those at a lower resolution). Some have a format which makes it impossible to peruse electronically, e.g., orchestral scores: one's field of vision is much larger than what a computer screen provides.

So while digitization might help finding specific textual contents in such books, it won't help (yet) find other kind of contents (images, scores), and will not be the best to peruse special formats.
0 Votes
+ -
Folks, settle down. This is NOT a "bookless" library. Contrary to the idiot reporter at the Mercury News (a horribly-edited rag) who cannot understand basic English, there is no plan for the Terman Engineering Library to be "bookless". They are not removing all the print books. They are moving much of the collection to a temperature and environmentally-controlled location where students can still request them from. They are greatly expanding their online content--something the students at Stanford have been asking for since Sergey and Larry were hanging out bored and looking to fix the library search engine.

Second, please think about the fact that each and every one of us is discussing this online. Not in your local newspaper letter section, but in the comments of a poorly researched blog.
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix