When the cloud fails: Why universities went public anyway

When the cloud fails: Why universities went public anyway

Summary: The recession changed everything for higher education, including IT spending. But are universities trading in privacy for lower costs?

TOPICS: Security

The failure of the Amazon cloud and slow recovery of the web service over the past day has questioned the increasing reliance on the cloud, and whether regardless of backup systems and distributed datacenters, can in fact the cloud be innately trusted to provide the highest of uptime?

Several prominent websites fell foul of Amazon's cloud failure, including Foursquare, Reddit and Quora, when a datacenter in northern Virginia hit networking errors.

However, universities, often with vast IT resources host their own solutions and services from the very heart of their campuses, have shifted from a private cloud to a public cloud approach; like Amazon's or Microsoft's competing platform.

But the global financial crisis in recent years -- something we as consumers and businesses alike are still acutely aware of as we continue to recover from the recession -- changed everything for universities, especially those in the United Kingdom.

The UK and the US were hit especially hard. With this, considering the vast majority of UK universities are public sector funded, and heavily subsidised by government.

During the recession, university budgets became tighter and more difficult to manage. Alongside this, small and medium businesses also struggled to maintain the upkeep of their internal IT infrastructure. The education sector was notably suffering, thus universities in particular were offered long-term financial respite during the global financial crisis by two major competitors in the growing cloud market: Google with its Apps for Education product, and Microsoft with its Live@edu service.

Both services are offered to educational institutions for no cost to the institutions or the students. It seemed like a no-brainer. Either a university could slash its degree programmes or internal development strategies, or it could wipe out the costs of its IT spending to an outsourced free agent.

Microsoft rolled out a beta version of its then upcoming email solution server, Exchange 2010 to Live@edu students, designed to gather anonymised feedback to improve the product before it is widely released to paying enterprise, non-education customers. Microsoft's stated goal is to help students familiarise themselves with the technologies "they are likely to encounter in their future workforce".

Google, however, with little motive other than to compete with its long-running rival, gains further credibility and references from these universities, schools and colleges to paying enterprise, non-education customers.

The recession caused many organisations and public sector universities in Europe, the UK in particular, to rethink their budgets and spending. With this, IT infrastructure suffered as costs for maintenance alone, without taking into account upgrades and existing contracts, became difficult to manage.

When two competing free services came along, offered by world leading technology companies, Google and Microsoft, universities began adopting outsourced cloud solutions as part of their extended, unmanaged infrastructure.

Between mid-2008 and early-2010, during the worst of the recession in the United Kingdom, dozens of universities, schools and colleges in the UK signed up to either Google Apps or Microsoft's Live@edu service, with most favouring the latter.

And that concludes today's brief history lesson.

Related content:

Topic: Security

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Message has been deleted.

  • RE: When the cloud fails: Why universities went public anyway

    There may have been a monetary component, but I think most universities saw it as a way to gain control of their IT facilities. Acaedmic institutions' IT departments are the last refuge for the Linux likers and the ABMers. Academics and students have put up with years of lack of integration and failed and obsolete technologys, that resulted in regular failures. <br><br>That's not to say some universities were lucky enough to get talented IT people whose main aim was to help the students and staff rather than following their own hobbies, bit I believe these to be in the minority.<br><br>So I'd suggest another reason universities are going for Microsoft or Google cloud offerings - they provide more integration and better functionality and less downtime than the patchwork of technologies put together at the whim of their IT staff.
  • RE: When the cloud fails: Why universities went public anyway

    I've sorta got an issue with the headline, it makes it sound like if they had stayed on premise that they wouldn't have had down time. I'd be willing to bet that most universities saw an increase in their uptime when they went to the cloud.