ie8 fix

British MPs call for prison sentences over data protection breaches

By | October 27, 2011, 5:49am PDT

Summary: UK Parliament’s justice select committee’s latest report suggests breaches in data protection law should be bolstered and include prison sentences for serious offences.

British politicians have called for increased penalties for those who break the Data Protection Act 1988, including greater fines and even prison sentences for serious breaches.

The ministers that sit on the UK parliament’s justice select committee issued a report stating that the penalties at present are too lenient, and do not offer sufficient deterrent to those who financially gain from selling on information to advertisers or third-parties.

Members of the committee, who authored the report, want the Information Commissioner’s Office to gain wider powers, and enable private sector organisations to undergo information audits.

Google recently underwent a privacy policy audit as part of the UK’s investigation into the wireless data capturing controversy.

The Information Commissioner’s Office, the UK’s data protection agency, is tasked with ensuring the Data Protection Act 1988 — which stems from the European Data Protection Directive — is enforced by individuals, business and government.

The Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham, said in a press release: “I welcome the support of the Justice Committee”, adding:

“The Ministry of Justice still has not given a response to the previous administration’s public consultation of two years ago. We need action, not more words. Citizens are being denied the protection they are entitled to expect from the Data Protection Act.”

“We shouldn’t have to wait a further year for the 2008 legislation to be commenced when today’s highly profitable trade in our data has little if anything to do with the press”.

One consideration is the ‘hidden laws’ that many are unaware of.

In the case of colleges and universities outsourcing their students’ data to the cloud, academic institutions either knew of the legal implications of laws such as the Patriot Act but were outweighed by localised financial concerns, or were entirely ignorant of external laws and their subsequent breaches under UK and European data protection laws.

Businesses and private companies alike could face prosecution if the laws are clarified, changed or amended, as recommended by Parliament’s justice select committee, as in some cases data is taken outside of Europe without the data owner’s consent.

The knock-on effect would be huge for the UK economy, but data loss and breach of protection laws could offset the balance nonetheless.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit. Details of which are restricted, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Punishment of a person might not stop a company...
John L. Ries 27th Oct
@misceng
...but it will discourage employees from committing crimes on the company's behalf.

Personally, I find dissolution or revocation of licenses, combined with forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment of the responsible officers an appealing punishment for corporations convicted of felonies.
Who is responsible for the data though? The school? Or the cloud provider who actually, you know, has the data.

Also, how do you imprison a company?
@Aerowind There is always a "data controller". See ZDNet's Patriot Act series -- can't link to it from here -- and look at Part 3, which will explain all.
0 Votes
+ -
How do you imprison an company?
John L. Ries 27th Oct
@Aerowind
If it's a corporation, you imprison the responsible officers. Otherwise, you imprison the owner(s).
0 Votes
+ -
Put murdoch in jail
Reality Bites 27th Oct
since he is one of the biggest hackers on the planet.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, no doubt
HollywoodDog 27th Oct
@Reality Bites ... is there no racketeering law there, or CCE (continuing criminal enterprise) law?
0 Votes
+ -
Real punishment
misceng 27th Oct
Punishment of a person will not stop a company, they will just claim he/she was solely responsible and carry on as before. Fixed monetary fines are not fair as a small company will go bust for a minor breach and a multi national will just regard it as operating expenses. Proper punishment is a fine which is all or a large proportion of annual profits then the shareholders will make the company behave.
@misceng
...but it will discourage employees from committing crimes on the company's behalf.

Personally, I find dissolution or revocation of licenses, combined with forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment of the responsible officers an appealing punishment for corporations convicted of felonies.
I love this. The government will have to lock itself up after hitting itself with MASSIVE fines because they are the BIGGEST source of unlawful data breaches that exist and are getting worse each year.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix