ie8 fix

Massive fines planned in European data breach crackdown

By | December 5, 2011, 3:11am PST

Summary: The European Commission could impose huge fines on companies who breach new data laws, currently under review, even if they are based in the United States.

The European Commission could directly impose severe fines against companies that breach European data protection laws, sources confirm.

The new European Data Protection Directive, set to be unveiled next month in January, will contain provisions for the Commission to impose fines of up to 5 percent of a company’s global turnover.

In a similar case, under current European law, the Commission can fine companies that breach its antitrust laws up to 10 percent of its global turnover; regardless of where they are headquartered.

Fines imposed by the Commission in line with the new directive could amass billions of dollars worth of revenue for large companies, such as Google, Microsoft, or Facebook, even in their native U.S. homeland.

Though these companies have its head office in the United States, it operates in Europe, forcing it to oblige by both U.S. and European law.

But some members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are still concerned that the law will not patch existing flaws relating to third-country legislation, and are seeking emergency legislation.

More than half a dozen MEPs from Europe’s lower house are seeking emergency legislation in a bid to enforce European law “not in the future, but today”.

Viviane Reding, vice-president of the European Commission and Commissioner for justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, said last month that the updated European data protection directive would amend current laws, used by the 27 member states as foundation legislation, as to to protect European interests from third-country legislation.

Reding said in a speech on November 29th [PDF] that the new proposals would “in concrete terms” oblige companies to “notify data protection authorities and the individuals concerned when a data breach is discovered”.

Plans in the new directive would include forcing companies to inform data protection authorities and their clients or customers that their data has been compromised.

These measures would force U.S. companies working within Europe to strengthen their data protection policies, circumventing current lax data protection laws in the region.

Recent breaches of data brought high-profile companies great embarrassment, but no legislative punishment, bar public anger and a public-relations disaster management exercise to manage.

U.S. data protection laws are currently under review, as part of the trans-Atlantic data sharing agreements.

Rosemary Jay, former head of the UK’s data protection authority’s legal office, and senior attorney at Hunton & Williams, welcomed the comments from Commissioner Reding last month, but warned that the solution to third-country laws may be more intractable than her comments suggest.

“U.S. companies are put under pressure to disclose information to the U.S. government because those companies are subject to American law, either because they are operating in the U.S. and holding data on EU citizens as a result, or the operation is headquartered in the U.S. or their EU branches are controller from the US”.

“Whatever changes are made to EU laws cannot change the US position”, she added.

“Indeed if EU laws were to be ’strengthened’ to forbid companies from making disclosures in cases in response to requirements imposed by the U.S. government agencies those companies would be placed in an even more difficult position.

“It would be ironic indeed if an initiative aimed at trying to resolve this problem made life even more difficult than it already is for business”.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit. Details of which are restricted, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I have a question
NoThomas 7th Dec
If the US companies have to follow both the EU and American laws to do business there. Do Eu companies have to follow American laws to do business here?
0 Votes
+ -
Taxes in disguise
Robert Hahn 5th Dec
All these governmental entities spend fortunes protecting their military and diplomatic data stores. The methods don't always work (see Wikileaks), but the measures taken are usually state-of-the-art. Instead of beating companies over the head, imposing fines that are just going to show up in the prices consumers pay, why don't they share some of the Secret Stuff that they are using themselves to protect data? That might actually get some data protected. Unless the real goal is to raise money while telling The Stupid People that they are "sticking it to the Man."
I wonder how they hope to modify the "Safe Harbor Agreement" that has been especially set up by Europe and the USA to handle such issues and conflicts.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@jsargent It's likely to be scrapped, at least on the most part.
They need money.
0 Votes
+ -
I have a question
NoThomas 7th Dec
If the US companies have to follow both the EU and American laws to do business there. Do Eu companies have to follow American laws to do business here?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix