ie8 fix

UK to announce website blocking proposals “imminently”

By | February 9, 2012, 8:44am PST

Summary: The UK’s Digital Economy Act, while enacted into law, is currently ‘inactive’. But website blocking measures are thought to be introduced “imminently”.

Enter the UK’s equivalent of SOPA: the Digital Economy Act 2010.

During a parliamentary hearing on intellectual property, a politician reminded attendees that Ofcom, the UK’s broadband and phone regulator, is seeking to enact website blocking measures.

Mark Prisk MP, the business minister, said that an announcement would be “imminent”. No details were given, but he did say that the proposals would be “welcome”; to whom, exactly, is unclear. It’s likely that the industry will benefit, while the general public get very little say in the matter, and technology giants such as Google will face complying with the law or face fines.

Internet analyst Dr. Monica Horten transcribed Prisk’s words:

We need an IP system that helps business and consumers to realise all the opportunities presented, which is why we are actively supporting the UK’s creators and the creative industries and why, to benefit creators, we voted in Europe to extend the term of protection for sound recordings from 50 to 70 years — a really  important step for originators of music and other sound recordings. It is also why […] we pressed to introduce measures to tackle online infringement of copyright through the Digital Economy Act 2010.”

“We are closely considering the issue around the blocking access, whether to block access to websites that infringe copyright. We will have something to say about that shortly, but, as I would like to continue to have a positive working relationship with my ministerial colleagues in the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, I shall not pre-empt what they are about to say. An announcement is imminent, and I think that it will be welcomed.

The law was introduced two years ago in the ‘guillotine’ period between two government administrations, and voted in by less than one-tenth members of Parliament in the space of two hours.

Considering it could spell the end to the free and open British web, it is one of many reasons why the law is controversial, and why so many are frustrated and angry. Also, as discovered late last year, the UK government had “no evidence” for the Digital Economy Act, leading many to question why the law was brought out in the first place.

Seeing as Spain, Sweden and Estonia have all been pestered by the U.S. government to apply changes to their respective legal systems, it would not be a surprise if the UK followed suit, with or without overt pressure.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit. Details of which are restricted, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: UK to announce website blocking proposals 'imminently'
tight! 10th Feb
The Lib Dem Lord that put the law through is paid in excess of ??40-50,000 per year as a director for the law group that worked on behalf of the Music industry big five for copyright infringement. So no conflict of interest there then.

As offered above the law was put through days before the house of lords went on a month summer break.
One of the laws states that if a site is taken down by these laws then their is no judicial right for appeal to take it back up again.
This law was in response to the US copyright stance that was taken and was quoted on the whitehouse website, that if countries did'nt implement this law then the US would refuse to deal with them....If only we could have put that to the test...
0 Votes
+ -
It is for reasons like this ...
P. Douglas 9th Feb
... why Thomas Jefferson said that the price of freedom, is eternal vigilance.
The Lib Dem Lord that put the law through is paid in excess of ??40-50,000 per year as a director for the law group that worked on behalf of the Music industry big five for copyright infringement. So no conflict of interest there then.

As offered above the law was put through days before the house of lords went on a month summer break.
One of the laws states that if a site is taken down by these laws then their is no judicial right for appeal to take it back up again.
This law was in response to the US copyright stance that was taken and was quoted on the whitehouse website, that if countries did'nt implement this law then the US would refuse to deal with them....If only we could have put that to the test...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix