Acer and ViewSonic sign Microsoft patent deals covering Android, Chrome OS devices

By | September 8, 2011, 5:49am PDT

Summary: Microsoft added two more OEMs to its list of companies agreeing to sign patent-protection deals with the Redmond vendor to cover Android- and Chrome OS-based devices.

After a hiatus of a couple of months, Microsoft is back to announcing more patent-protection deals with vendors selling Android and Chrome OS devices.

On September 8, Microsoft announced that both Acer and ViewSonic have signed patent-licensing agreements with Microsoft.

The Microsoft patent agreement with Acer includes patent coverage for Acer tablets and smartphones running Android. Microsoft officials declined to say if Acer paid Microsoft royalties as part of the agreement. Update: Microsoft is now saying that Acer is paying Microsoft royalties as part of the agreement.

The agreement with ViewSonic covers ViewSonic tablets and mobile phones running Android and Chrome OS. In ViewSonic’s case, Microsoft will be receiving undisclosed royalties from ViewSonic as part of the arrangement.

Microsoft is using its patents as a way to try to fight Android’s growing dominance in the mobile space. Microsoft has convinced a number of makers of Android and Chrome OS devices to sign patent protection deals over the past year. Among those who’ve signed IP arrangements with Microsoft include OEMs and independent hardware vendors such as General Dynamics, Velocity Micro and Wistron. HTC paid Microsoft an undisclosed amount a year ago in a similar patent-protection deal.

Companies that are fighting against signing Android-related patent protection deals with Microsoft include Barnes & Noble and Motorola.

The Microsoft-Motorola patent fight recently kicked off with a trial before the U.S. International Trade Commission. The final judgment target date in the case is March 2012.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Acer and ViewSonic sign Microsoft patent deals covering Android, Chrome OS devices
dsfwrryd32-24353600993189123216773693375797 Updated - 10th Nov
What's interesting take steeler jerseys advantage of aggravating is to decide an internet site that can claim me and my peers in a little promptly however steelers jerseys blogs internet page varies. Htc brpittsburgh steelers jerseys avo.
I think saying "using its patents as a way to try to fight Android?s growing dominance" is a rather negative slant. Microsoft is using its patents to get paid for all the work that went in to getting them. Because protecting IP is what patents are all about. Microsoft would and has sued others over patents.
@Skippy99 I agree, if Microsoft was trying to stunt androids growth they'd be suing to block the sale of these devices.. like Apple, who is genuinely afraid of the android platform.
0 Votes
+ -
Totally agree
toddybottom 8th Sep
@ccrockett@...
MS is using patents to make money. Apple is using patents to harm the competition.

Both are actually perfectly acceptable. Business is business.
0 Votes
+ -
a sucker is born every minute
The Linux Geek 8th Sep
@Skippy99
it's only a matter of convincing you that M$ has 'IP'.
The community refutes these allegations and the so called M$ innovation.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm confused then...
wolf_z 8th Sep
@The Linux Geek

Aren't HTC et al part of the Android community? They actively participate in its development. They certainly aren't refuting the allegations. Guess MS convinced the community, hmm? At least the part of it that makes money...

Or are you trolling because you're really ABL?
@Skippy99. Seriously Skippy, you need to look at some of the patents in question, which I have done - the patents verge on ludicrous. If I recall, it was another article from ZDNet that had the link to the full patent text between Barnes&Noble/Microsoft, chase it up, do your homework. Assumptions that patents are used by the 'innocent' to protect their investment is well due for an overhaul. This was once the case, and intent of the patent system - but not in the IT industry.

Patents should be doing good, but abuse is creating serious harm with vague patents and patent trolling being a serious tax on innovation.

The effect of patents is the opposite of the original intent - patents discourage innovation - you invest hundreds of thousands in developing something new, but there's 100,000's patents, some vague and some quite trivial doing nothing, just waiting to pounce and steal some of your eventual profit (or just bludeon you if you look like competing with the big guys) - THAT is NOT the INTENT of patents - stifle innovation with the threat of questionable and opportunistic law-suits.

The problem is, that fighting patents is hard work and not always successful, even when the patent is both prior art and obvious (which a patent should not be). The patent office, lawyers, and judges are really bad at recognizing what is 'obvious or prior art' in our industry.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Acer and ViewSonic sign Microsoft patent deals covering Android, Chrome OS devices
LoverockDavidson_-24231404894599612871915491754222 8th Sep
There must be a lot of merit to these patents if more and more companies are signing agreements with Microsoft. Its funny they are making money off the competition and turning around and using it to develop Windows Phone 7.
@LoverockDavidson_

A lot of merit? It's easier and cheaper to sign on than fight. Barnes&Noble are doing the hard lifting for everyone else.

In reference to Barnes&Noble/Microsoft case, how about this: you know the old progress bar at the bottom of the screen that tells you something is happening?

How about putting that visual indicator over the screen object being refreshed instead of the bottom of the screen? That's one patent in question - Barnes&Nobel are saying that this is 'obvious', because as they say, it can be either INSIDE or OUTSIDE of the visual area - there is no other option. THIS is the type of thing going on in patents. Not only is it obvious, but it has been prior art for a long time too. Neither point makes it a definite win in the court room.
0 Votes
+ -
Obviously if they want to buy Windows 8 at a reasonable price it may be safer to put up and shut up.

It's certainly a bit more risk free.
@albionstreet

Doesn't that sound similar to what the DOJ punished Microsoft about several years ago? I kind of doubt that Microsoft would be trying that game again.
0 Votes
+ -
Select members only?
albionstreet 8th Sep
Well with iDevices now choosing what software gets in, it certainly looks like you can now choose your own rules.
0 Votes
+ -
Unbelievable, this can be just what I nfl wholesale accustomed to be scanning for! This submit just saved me alot of searching near to
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Acer and ViewSonic sign Microsoft patent deals covering Android, Chrome OS devices
dsfwrryd32-24353600993189123216773693375797 Updated - 10th Nov
What's interesting take steeler jerseys advantage of aggravating is to decide an internet site that can claim me and my peers in a little promptly however steelers jerseys blogs internet page varies. Htc brpittsburgh steelers jerseys avo.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix