Another reason Microsoft wants Skype: Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers

By | May 10, 2011, 9:52am PDT

Summary: Online advertising is one of the big reasons Microsoft has purchased Skype, according to Microsoft and Skype management.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and Skype CEO (and now Microsoft Skype Business Unit President) Tony Bates didn’t share any product roadmaps during their press conference explaining the backstory of Microsoft’s $8.5 billion acquisition of Skype.

So while Microsoft and its newest communications partner are planning to integrate Skype with Microsoft’s Lync, Messenger, Outlook, Hotmail, Xbox Live, Windows Phone and other products, we still have no particulars or dates. (The pair said they would do so closer to when they receive regulatory clearance of the deal.)

However, Ballmer and Bates did attempt to explain why Microsoft bought the VOIP/video conferencing vendor, despite the fact that Microsoft already has a bunch of products that deliver most of the same capabilities.

The Skype brand — one with the advantage (shared by Google) of having its company name commonly used as a verb — is one of those reasons. Another is the rapid growth of video content. Skype currently is seeing 40 percent of its traffic coming from video chat, Bates said today. But the one that stood out most to me is something many arm chair quarterbacks haven’t mentioned: Advertising.

We already know that online advertising is of huge importance to the Softies. Ballmer said recently that online advertising, currently contributing $3 billion in revenues per year to Microsoft’s coffers, is the fastest growing part of Microsoft’s business. And Ballmer and his advisers seemingly are seeing potential advertising dollar-signs dancing in their heads with Skype.

In explaining how Microsoft plans to “monetize” Skype, Ballmer mentioned advertising several times during his press conference remarks. Bates mentioned advertising, repeatedly, as well.

“Video itself we think as an overall market for both advertising and for rich communications around collaboration and finding ways to create that engaged user base is going to be one of the fastest-growing areas of the market,” Bates told press conference attendees. “We estimate 45 percent growth just in video-based ads over the compound annual growth rate in the next few years.”

Skype’s current “premium services” (a k a, its paid communication offerings) are another place where advertising could figure in a major way.

In March 2011, Skype announced plans to allow advertising and signed up some big brands — including GroupOn, Nokia, Universal Pictures, and Visa. The advertising appears in the Home tab of Skype for Windows. Meebo, Ad2One and Stroer Interactive will be selling advertising for Skype, the company announced at that time.

“This move represents the first time that advertising will appear in Skype, giving brands a unique opportunity to be part of the Skype experience, which has enabled millions of people around the world to do things together when they’re apart through voice and video calling, instant messaging, conferencing, and more,” said Skype’s press release.

I’m wondering how the Microsoft acquisition will alter these plans….

Microsoft has some substantial challenges ahead with Skype, as noted by UBS analyst Brent Thill in a note to clients today. Thill noted that only five percent of Skype’s customer base are paying customers (9 million of 170 million connected users). Additionally, Skype’s revenue growth has been declining — it was 45 percent in 2008, 30 percent in 2009 and 20 percent in 2010.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Another reason Microsoft wants Skype: Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers
homeioy2101-24353661230128005455707022297048 Updated - 10th Nov
I just along these lines web site you'll find and that is essentially awarded i truly several love successful numerous improved justification, using this method maintain the fabulous determine. bears jerseys,cheap peyton hillis jersey,cheap troy polamalu jersey,cheap wes welker jersey,cheap desean jackson jersey, You will learn need to an extra convenient understand of the virtually anyone is considered to be than what he is doing as you are they can be there is no charge up some of price for you to.
will start now, followed by all of the problems of converting the backend infrastructure to use Windows server.
0 Votes
+ -
So pathetic...
adornoe@... 10th May 2011
You don't have a life. Your whole existence revolves waiting for the name Microsoft to show up on your screen and then to bash the heck out of the company, no matter what the topic, good or bad or indifferent.

Try to get a life, or at least visit a psychiatrist.
problems.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Shut the f*ck up, a$$hole
blind obedience 10th May 2011
@adornoe@... the teabagging f@ggot.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
So, what's happened to your "ahh so" and "search & destroy" user ids?

But, no matter, I see that you're still behaving like the brainless twit that you are.
  • Flagged
@adornoe@...

Very well said...that's actually true...:-)
@adornoe@... The correct expression money, money, money instead of advertisers, advertisers, advertisers.
Termopan
@DonnieBoy Microsoft really overpaid for this. Hopefully Microsoft's own key brands along with the key technologies in Skype will help make that money plus more. Microsoft should have said at the negotiating table, shutup, we are paying US $1 million for this mishandled crap, take it or leave it.

I think Microsoft's weak spot is negotiating good deal in the post Gates era. Look at what they were willing to pay for Yahoo! back in 2008, that was a ridiculous amount of money for what at the time and still is seen as a batter bruised Internet Company.
@Mr. Dee
My question is how is Microsoft going to address the redundancy between Messenger and Skype they are direct competitors .Is MS going to ditch the Messenger brand? But Messenger has more users than skype . (???)
Seriously 8 Billion for Skype is way.. too much. MS has the technology what they are actually paying is for the brand name.
Lets hope they have something major planned for it ;not just intergrating it to Xbox ,Windows phone.
@DonnieBoy the culture desn't clash as much as you would think. Today's MS for the common worker is much more open than it was in a traditional sense. It's not Google "grow some weed o your desk" open, but it's not IBM either.
0 Votes
+ -
This is exactly why I think was not worth the 8 billion

Microsoft really overpaid for this. Hopefully Microsoft's own key brands along with the key technologies in Skype will help make that money plus more. Microsoft should have said at the negotiating table, shutup, we are paying US $1 million for this mishandled crap, take it or leave it.

I think Microsoft's weak spot is negotiating good deal in the post Gates era. Look at what they were willing to pay for Yahoo! back in 2008, that was a ridiculous amount of money for what at the time and still is seen as a batter bruised Internet Company.
0 Votes
+ -
You must have edited it
John L. Ries 10th May 2011
@Mr. Dee
Your previous post is still visible and is unflagged.
@Mr. Dee

FWIW, I see the post as flagged. Yes its flagged, but I can still see it.

Hans
@Mr. Dee more money than brains, typical of corporate types.
0 Votes
+ -
The goal was just to keep it out of the hands of Google.
@trentreviso I concur... and then we have the patents, if any viable. A non-platform specific alternative to Skype is now important. //S
@trentreviso
Maybe. Historically, Microsoft could have used anti trust law to prevent Google from buying Skype. Maybe they didn't consider that to be a safe bet.

Regards,

Hans
They should be able to make their money back on Skype considering its user base. Now they not only have just Windows users, but Mac and linux users as well. More people to put advertisements in front of.
@LoverockDavidson
To make 8.5 Billion dollars in advertising??? Yeah, in a hundred years...
0 Votes
+ -
MS can make some money from advertising...
John L. Ries 10th May 2011
...but I doubt it's going to be anywhere near what they're paying for Skype. Likewise, people might think it cool to Skype from their Xboxes, but I don't think it's going to sell many more boxes, or make people want to pay more for them.

I don't see a viable business plan here.
@John L. Ries

I could almost see MS using Skype as *the* communications channel in xbox and all the other stuff for gaming, API wise. If they place it on devices as a service that any application can use (games on Xbox, messaging on phones, etc) that might make some kind of technical sense.

Regards,

Hans
0 Votes
+ -
Can MS swallow and integrate Skype successfully?
RoadWarriorMatt 11th May 2011
Any company that can successfully work through the absorption and gradual fusion of Great Plains, Solomon, Axapta and Navision can certainly manage the familial co-existence (for now at least) of a Skype...
0 Votes
+ -
I think most people are overthinking this...
GoodThings2Life 11th May 2011
Microsoft did this for two reasons:

1) Stop Google/Facebook/etc. from taking it first
2) Patents (if any viable)

I look for them to pretty much leave Skype as it is with two exceptions:

1) Windows Live / Lync Server Integration... contacts on any of those platforms will be able to talk to each other.

2) Advertising (as is the point of the article)... before an audio/video chat there will be a 30-second ad, plus a text or small-image-based ad on the main and IM windows... just like Windows Live Messenger.

Looking at it this way makes the pricetag a no brainer (especially since Google was reported offering $4-5 Billion). The advertising will pay quite a bit of it back, and the integration will add customer interest. Plus, consumers can pick whatever "Brand" they like... Windows Live or Skype, and businesses will be using Lync.
0 Votes
+ -
Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers.....
bluebeard66 Updated - 13th May 2011
This move represents the first time that advertising will appear in Skype, giving brands a unique opportunity to be part of the Skype experience, which .....blah, blah, blah

Meaning: This move represents a unique opportunity to completely ruin something useful, by forcing crappy ads into people's faces. Because that will make our lives SO much better - we really don't get bombarded enough already.

The reason I dumped MS Messenger (years ago) was because of the flashing, jumping ads constantly distracting me.....and irritating me to the point where I vowed NEVER to put a penny in the pockets of the advertisers. And nothing I have seen since has convinced me that Microsoft has learned better.

It's not that I mind advertising per se. Love 'em or hate 'em, Google do advertising extremely well - discreetly! For the most part, you'd hardly notice (well, almost). At the very least, they don't annoy the hell out of me. And occasionally, I do click on a link.

Now Skype have been annoying me for a while. I made the colossal mistake of purchasing a little Skype credit some time ago. The result was a little green box constantly appearing to tell me that I had Skype credit, and why not use it to call someone? (Yes. I know. I paid for it. There's the balance written just under my name. Furthermore, I am aware of what I can use that credit for - I am not a complete cretin. Without stupid suggestions. And definitely without nagging).

Then came the newer version of Skype, and a new plague of nag screens - which, again, had the effect of irritating me to the point where I will NEVER again hand over a single cent to Skype.

It may be time to start looking at alternatives. I tried Google Talk(?) a long time ago, and I think they stopped developing it. Anyone have any ideas??? (It needs to be simple enough for my mother to install and use, thank you!)
I escort really bayan escort do not understand vip escort the business istanbul escort I know, but ankara escort really I do not izmir escort know Can.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Another reason Microsoft wants Skype: Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 9th Oct
Excellent submit. I completely concur reebok jersey with the stuff you might have penned.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Another reason Microsoft wants Skype: Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
I tremendously liked shopping at this. I believe I'll that a seem thru your other posts cheap authentic nfl jersey !
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Another reason Microsoft wants Skype: Advertisers, advertisers, advertisers
homeioy2101-24353661230128005455707022297048 Updated - 10th Nov
I just along these lines web site you'll find and that is essentially awarded i truly several love successful numerous improved justification, using this method maintain the fabulous determine. bears jerseys,cheap peyton hillis jersey,cheap troy polamalu jersey,cheap wes welker jersey,cheap desean jackson jersey, You will learn need to an extra convenient understand of the virtually anyone is considered to be than what he is doing as you are they can be there is no charge up some of price for you to.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix