Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap

By | June 17, 2010, 11:30am PDT

Summary: Microsoft announced Windows Embedded Handheld on June 17, bringing the company’s mobile OS count to six (or more) different offerings. How many is too many?

When Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer recently criticized Google at the D8 conference for having two different mobile operating systems, it’s surprising so few challenged the pot for calling the kettle black. Microsoft doesn’t have just one or even two mobile operating system (OS) offerings. As of today, it has a half dozen, by my count.

Microsoft announced the newest addition to its mobile OS list on June 17. The newest family member, known as Windows Embedded Handheld, is powering the new Motorola’ES400 enterprise digital assistant (EDA), launched today in New York.

Windows Embedded Handheld, like most of Microsoft’s mobile OSes (other than Windows 7), is built on top of the Windows Embedded Compact (formerly known as Windows Embedded CE) core. The first version of Windows Embedded Handheld, which is going to be shipping before the end of this year, is tailored for what are known as “enterprise handheld mobile devices” — i.e., ruggedized computers that are for custom line-of-business applications, like bar-code scanning, RFID reading, etc. A second version of the Windows Embedded Handheld platform — built on top of the Windows Embedded Compact 7 core — is due out in the second half of 2011.

Gallery: Running on Windows Embedded

With today’s announcement, Microsoft now has at least six different OS offerings for mobile phones and devices. It has two different phone operating systems — Windows Mobile 6.x (the last of the line in the Windows Mobile OS family) and Windows Phone OS 7.0. (It has three if you count the Kin phone OS, which is a modified version of Windows Phone OS 7.0.)  It has the just-launched Windows Embedded Handheld OS. It has an OS for TVs, set-top boxes, kiosks and other embedded tasks, known as Windows Embedded Standard 7.  It has Windows 7, which it is positioning as its OS for tablets and netbooks. And, as company officials said last month at Computex, it has Windows Embedded Compact 7 (which isn’t going to be released to manufacturing until Q4 2010) for PC makers who want to create slates and other consumer mobile devices that run on non-Intel processors and use less battery power.

Here’s my best attempt to explain what’s part of Microsoft’s mobile OS six pack:

What’s with the multiplying Microsoft mobile OS SKUs? Wouldn’t just one or two choices result in less PC maker and customer confusion? On the mobile front, it seems the thinking in Redmond is that more specialization and more choices will give mobile device makers more options.

The place where Microsoft is consolidating its story is on the Windows Embedded Compact front. Windows Embedded Compact/Windows Embedded CE is the lowest level platform upon which Microsoft builds its phone and mobile device operating systems. Currently, the majority of the six different mobile OS offerings run a variety of different versions of Embedded Compact/Embedded CE. Microsoft is working to get more of its mobile OS platforms to run on top of the Windows Embedded Compact 7 core.

On the development tools front, Microsoft also is working to consolidate its offerings. In the second half of next year, when the Windows Embedded Handheld 7 platform ships, it will support the same set of development tools that Windows Phone 7 will be supporting: Visual Studio 2010, Silverlight and the XNA platform, according to Microsoft officials.

Why a dedicated ruggedized mobile OS?

Today’s launch of Windows Embedded Handheld marks the debut of a new brand and new nomenclature for Microsoft in a market where it already plays. Microsoft already has a handful of OEMs, including Motorola, Honeywell and Intermec, who sell ruggedized mobile PCs and devices that run Windows CE and/or Windows Mobile.

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Talkback Most Recent of 76 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    windows embedded standard 7 is not based on CE, it is the compoentized version of windows 7, like xp embedded, and embedded standard 2009
    ZDNet Gravatar
    heath4207
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    Who cares! I think Mary Jo has got her point across, which is one reason as to why you replied. Ballmer is so worried about throwing his garbage over into another neighbor's backyard such as Google, who instead needs to worry about his own and clean it up. Does it really matter for the fact that they have 4 or 400? Microsoft states that they are giving consumer choice with their desktop version fiasco, instead they have seen a way to gather more money from upgrades. At least now they get money from the PC makers and the consumers that need an OS upgrade, instead of being able to deliver something comparable to the hardware. Microsoft will only deliver a software model that maintains or gains monetary momentum, period! Windows 7 was Vista SP3! Their Windows 7 version was forced upon them from real innovation happening at Apple with the Mac OS, and that's why they even delivered something like Vista. Not to offer every Vista user the option to upgrade for 50 dollars or less is more confirmation as to their desire to maintain this unhealthy monetary momentum. Microsoft will go bankrupt from within and no this is not about dollars and more about "sense".
    ZDNet Gravatar
    netmgr@...
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    @netmgr@... dude i was just pointing out a mistake in her chart. i actually build images using the embedded o/s for industrial controllers, so i know what the difference between them are and what they are used for.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    heath4207
    17th Jun 2010
  • Who cares?
    Those that want to be accurately informed.

    A good article. What's surprising is Mary believes MS has a roadmap;-)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Richard Flude
    17th Jun 2010
  • What's surprising is that Richard Flude
    thinks he's saying something of importance.
    (Pliney was right!)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    John Zern
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    @netmgr@...
    Get a grip. They are catered to different target markets. And Google's they are for personal consumer, not even enterprise. See your hatred towards Microsoft totally blind you. I am just wondering how Mary Jo missed that point. Google Chrome and Android Tablets/phones are targeted to the personal information systems users and may be enterprsie, where as the OSes that Mary Jo mentiones here are for different markets, like personal information system users, enterprise information system users, POS Kiosks, industrial components such as healthcare, manufacturing, flights etc. Just look at her chart and you will realize. Mary Jo I expected more than this from you. How did you miss to really read your own chart?
    --Ram--
    --Ram--
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Rama.NET
    17th Jun 2010
  • I Think You Missed her Real Point!
    @netmgr@... Although she used what Balmer said as a "Come On", what she was really getting at was that Google really only has two one size fits all mobile OS's. Whereas Microsoft is working to better custom fit mobile systems to prospective device and targeted user needs! ...more for flippancy than stating a fact!

    That said, though I don't particularly love Microsoft, their approach is more elegant than Apple's or Google's. Who are only engaged or care about, putting out more generic OS's for the masses!

    Apple is basically saying, "This is the device we're building and we cloned a down port of our generic desktop OS. You can take it or leave it. But we'll get fat, rich and arrogant off you.... so there, take that smack in the face... peasants"!

    Although Google won't get rich off the OS itself; it's OS's are simply like the generic prize included in your two boxes of Cracker Jacks! grin

    So is it about Apple's Mass Produced, One Device/One Size OS fits All System Offerings? ....or Google's 1000's of Devices with a Mass Produced One Size Fits All Free OS? .....or Microsoft's more custom marketed OS for many markets and devices???

    For that answer, we'll all have to wait to see what happens over the next few years!!! .....keeping up with the your neighbor's latest Jones'ing Cool Device (Apple) seems very faddish. Google seems like it's trading places with old Microsoft's past Generic Desktop Domination. While Microsoft may not have their device sales numbers, it'll be taking care of all the niche player's needs in Enterprise, etc and designing unique software properties that can still make a Fat Buck or 3 or 4 Billion! wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    i2fun@...
    18th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    @netmgr@... I just want to emphasize the good work on this , has excellent views and a clear vision of what you are looking for
    Coursework
    Research Paper
    Book Report
    ZDNet Gravatar
    johnny48
    5th Nov
  • ZDNet Blogger

    Embedded Standard 7
    Thanks. Yes, you are right. I will fix that. It is not based on Embedded Compact. MJ
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mary Jo Foley
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    Considering your background, I apologize for such a stringent rebuttal. Out of context for why you were conveying such information. Although not directed to you, my general comments about Microsoft's motives still stand from a consumer's viewpoint.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    netmgr@...
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    Reminds me of what Steve Jobs said recently. "For the first time ever, we will have a Mac OS Home version, a Mac OS Business version, and a Mac OS Enterprise version. And you can have them all for only $129." :P
    ZDNet Gravatar
    info@...
    17th Jun 2010
  • Brand is key to Ballmer's distinction
    I have also noted Ballmer's claim, but he has a clear distinction that does hold true. While Microsoft may have all these versions, they are all branded "Windows-," while Google carries the Chrome and Android brands. Either sides' underlying technical differentiators don't matter in Ballmer's argument. His is purely a business perspective that claims one OS brand should win over multiple brands in terms of communication and marketing; the extent to which Ballmer really understands the differences between Chrome and Android, and all the Windows "OSes" is undertermined.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Alber1690
    17th Jun 2010
  • RE: Demystifying Microsoft's mobile operating system roadmap
    When Ballmer criticised Google for having two Operating Systems, he wasn't saying "one too many", what he meant was, "Only Two?"
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Socratesfoot
    17th Jun 2010
  • Nice one;-)
    beat me to it
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Richard Flude
    17th Jun 2010
  • Headache
    I've got a headache from trying to decipher this. Seriously WTF is up with so many variations of mediocracy. I'm surprised developers can even understand the road map.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    panic man
    17th Jun 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources