ie8 fix

Gartner: 42 percent of PCs will be running Windows 7 by year-end

By | August 9, 2011, 6:08am PDT

Summary: Windows 7’s share of the PC market is continuing to grow steadily, while Apple’s, Linux’s and Google’s shares are making slow inroads, according to new worldwide PC usage data from Gartner Inc.

By the end of 2011, 42 percent of PCs in use worldwide will be running Windows 7, according to new forecast by Gartner Inc.

Gartner is also predicting that 94 percent of new PCs will ship with Windows 7 installed this year, analysts said on August 9.

Improvements in IT spending in 2010 and 2011 are accelerating deployment of Windows 7 in the U.S. and Asian Pacific enterprise markets, Gartner said.

“However, the economic uncertainties in Western Europe, political instability in selected Middle East and Africa (MEA) countries and the economic slowdown in Japan after the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 will likely lead to slightly late and slow deployment for Windows 7 across those regions,” analysts warned.

Other predictions from Gartner’s “Forecast Analysis: PC OS Market, Worldwide, 2008-2015, 2011 Update”:

  • “Windows 7 is likely to be the last version of Microsoft OS that gets deployed to everybody through big corporatewide migration. In the future, many organizations will also use alternative client computing architectures for standard PCs with Windows OS, and move toward virtualization and cloud computing in the next five years.”
  • “By the end of 2011, nearly 635 million new PCs worldwide are expected to be shipped with Windows 7.”
  • Apple’s share of the PC market continues to grow. By the end of 2011, Mac OS will be on 4.5 percent of PCs worldwide, up from 4 percent in 2010. By 2015, that number could reach 5.2 percent.
  • Linux’s share on the desktop will “remain niche” over the next five years, with below 2 percent share.
  • Google’s Chrome OS, Android and webOS won’t gain any significant share on PCs in the next few years.
  • In 2012 will the market will “reach the point of crossover between Windows-specific and OS-agnostic applications for enterprises, as 50 percent of the applications will be OS-agnostic.” In the consumer market, that crossover already has happened, as a result of the growing acceptance of Web applications.

In June of this year, analysts with Forrester found that Windows 7 was running on 21 percent of corporate desktops, with Windows XP still on 60 percent of all business PCs.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
76
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Gartner: 42 percent of PCs will be running Windows 7 by year-end
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
It will be this kind of a fantastic supply nfl jerseys 2012 that you're offering so you give it absent for entirely complimentary.
Good. The faster folks hop onto a modern OS, the better. Windows XP needs to die a quick and painful death.
@Cylon Centurion
Yes. Apple will have bright future ahead.

BTW this may save MS. You know if they will release DX11.1(12), then they will skip WinV. So Win7 need to have good market penetration. On the other hand any XP machine with DX11 level hwd can run OpenGL 4.2 happy

However the day MS will stop releasing security updates for WinXP, WinXP should be considered crime on computer connected to the net.
@przemoli

It should be considered crime now, TBH. XP is as insecure as they come. sad
@przemoli

I don't want to use XP, but I certainly won't be using FreeBSD, no matter how much lipstick Apple puts on that OS/x pig. If you want to move forward from XP, you don't go backwards wink
@Cylon Centurion -- What in the hell is your problem? XP is just fine and will be around (supported) for two more years and much longer after support ends so get over it.

I'd like a full disclosure from you as to what your financial or other interest is in Windows 7. It is an un-mitigated piece of crap IMHO and no safer than XP.

I'm awaiting your disclosure!
@Rodo1

I have no "interest" in it, minus the fact that I am a huge proponent of constant upgrade cycles. Those grasping to older more problem prone technology cause more problems then they don't. 10 years is way too long to be using such insecure and problematic technology.
I have no "interest" in it, minus the fact that I am a huge proponent of constant upgrade cycles.

Well you could have fooled me, given your hysterical statements up above. People will switch over when they're ready, not when you're ready.

Those grasping to older more problem prone technology cause more problems then they don't. 10 years is way too long to be using such insecure and problematic technology.

Given the outrageous retail price they charge, 10 years is fair.
@Scorpio,

Apple users don't have problems rushing out to buy overpriced junk, I have yet to see anyone still using 10 year old Macintosh equipment.
Apple users don't have problems rushing out to buy overpriced junk, I have yet to see anyone still using 10 year old Macintosh equipment.

Well here's a clue. This isn't about Apple.

Doh.
@Scorpio

Same principal. Apple has an aggressive update cycle. According to Wikipedia, Lion is the only currently "supported" release, with Leopard and Snow Leopard getting security updates only. It's a very aggressive update cycle, but people still buy into it.

That's the kind of update cycle I wish more people would take.
0 Votes
+ -
No answer, ScorpioBlue?
William Farrell 9th Aug
@Rodo1
You always bring MS into an Apple argument, so why not the other way around? Is it because he's using Apple as an example to use your words against you?

Or was it an honest mistake?

When someone makes the statement Given the outrageous retail price they charge, 10 years is fair , the first thing the majority of people think you're talking about is an Apple product!

Come
@Rodo1

You have been completely, totally misled if you think XP is as secure as the later OSs. It's simply not true. I'm just in the process of cleaning up a fully patched XP box with quality, up-to-date AV. The non-admin user clicked a business oriented link in Google search results and installed both a rootkit and a trojan. The AV immeditely caught the rootkit, but the trojan did all kinds of damage before I got it cleaned out. This would not have been possible with Vista or Win7 because malware running in the non-admin user context would not have been able to write or change files outside the user profile.
@Rodo1
You always bring MS into an Apple argument, so why not the other way around? Is it because he's using Apple as an example to use your words against you?

Well for one thing I'm not @Rodo1, but if you want to believe that I am then please do so.

Or you don't know who to respond to properly in the tree.

So which is it?

And for another thing I don't bring up Microsoft in every Apple discussion, even though you'd like to deflect this conversation here and believe so.

When someone makes the statement Given the outrageous retail price they charge, 10 years is fair , the first thing the majority of people think you're talking about is an Apple product!

Nope, the first thing I think of is XP and the disaster MS had when it abandoned Longhorn back in 2005. Thanks to that boneheaded decision, they are now stuck with an OS that will last almost 14 years.
That's the kind of update cycle I wish more people would take.

But I don't own an Apple so I really don't care. That doesn't concern me.

But I still have an XP machine that I use on occasion. That's where this article comes in.

Try to stay on topic, will ya. wink
@DaveN_MVP

You have been completely, totally misled if you think XP is as secure as the later OSs. It's simply not true.

No, you're misled. Win7 is just as prone to zero day as WinXP or Vista ever have been.

The non-admin user clicked a business oriented link in Google search results and installed both a rootkit and a trojan. The AV immeditely caught the rootkit, but the trojan did all kinds of damage before I got it cleaned out. This would not have been possible with Vista or Win7 because malware running in the non-admin user context would not have been able to write or change files outside the user profile.

Isn't that the claim for WinXP as well (and Win2K and WinNT)? That a non-privileged user can't install system-wide software within their context? Yet it happens all the time in all descendants of WinNT.
I'd like a full disclosure from you as to what your financial or other interest is in Windows 7. It is an un-mitigated piece of crap IMHO and no safer than XP.

Yeah, I'd like to know that too. It seems to be an obsession with him.
@DaveN_MVP -- Since you are so enamored with the security of Vista/Win7, perhaps you would like to read this:

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9218916/Malware_turns_off_Windows_UAC_warns_Microsoft?taxonomyName=Security&taxonomyId=17

Also, in yesterday's patches, several were for the same problem in both XP and Vista/Win7. Windows 7 is a whole new operating system? Quit fooling yourself.

I've been involved with Windows for over 20 years, and I am tired of "the best and most secure Windows yet" BS.

Your sample of one fails to impress!
I never believe the post-PC era scenario
some writers are trying to make us believe.

PC is here to stay.
0 Votes
+ -
@iluvmsft

I agree. Horse and buggy are here to stay. Ask an Amish.
0 Votes
+ -
Bad analogy...
adornoe@... 9th Aug
because, that "horse and buggy" will still be running circles around anything else out there, no matter what the platform or form factor.

Let us know when a full-blown OS starts being less powerful and less capable than whatever else you think is out there now that will become the future.
@adornoe@... First point Tablets while new have as they develop had increases in processing power like the iPad to iPad2. From the original iPad to today the OS has had several upgrades and with each the abilities of the OS have increased.... As a matter of fact iOS 5 will soon be out and it won't stop there. The most important part/question is just how many people actually need/want a full blown OS?

Pagan jim

adornoe@...
08/09/2011 10:13 AM
Flag
and the tablets, iPads and others, are still very far behind the capabilities of the full-blown OSes and hardware which accompany those OSes.

So, the iPad got "upgraded" to iPad2, but the upgrade was mostly cosmetic with a thinner and lighter weight gadget. Whatever bits were upgraded in the OS within, was very minor and not even worth mentioning. There's not much difference between what an iPad can do and what the iPad2 can do. And neither the iPad or iPad2 can come even close to the power and features of a full-blown PC running a full-blown OS. When those tablets start doing what the PCs and Macs can do, then they will stop being tablets. Media consumption devices are capable of doing only a minor part of what a full-blown PC with a full-blown OS can do. Those tablets may have their "function" in today's world as media consumption devices, but they're still very lacking in most areas that people want.
@iluvmsft

Snarky Amish comments aside, find everyone you know who owns one of these "competing" technologies that's predicted to wipe out the PC - iPad, Android, every other phone, etc. Of everyone you can find who uses one of these things, ask them if they've disposed of their clunky old PC or Mac. And I guarantee they have not.

All of these technologies supplement the PC, but none replaces it. I am sitting across the room from a woman who is writing a Word document and she's currently on page 7. Do you really think she'd rather be writing it on her iPhone? All these post-PC people are nuts.
@DaveN_MVP
"All of these technologies supplement the PC, but none replaces it"

I was looking for a good statement, and you exactly represented that. To do productive work, you need a PC, atleast for next 5 years. Tablets are just for browsing, multimedia and show-off. Just sit with an ipad and a PC and compare the typing speed, the answer will be obvious. I have a lot of friends, who have already bought an iPad and they still need a PC, when they want to do real work. Bottomline, PC's are not going anywhere in next 5 years atleast.
and millions of users will continue to flock towards Mac and Linux and dump Windows and there's nothing Microsoft can do to stop them because even according to Forbes Microsoft is less innovative than Google and Apple
@shellcodes_coder

LOL! Desktop Linux? Please. If people are really "flocking" to Linux, why hasn't its market share been past 1% in the past year?

If people are "flocking" to Macs, why hasn't Windows market share decreased dramatically?
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion

The answer to your questions is call neglected perception. Hence you only see and hear what you want to see and hear.

PS. Desktop LInux user since 98. I'm I missing something?
@Cylon Centurion
Yes Linux share have been past 1% this year (and last, and previous to that, and...).

Its mean that Linux is growing as fast as Internet. (Macs are faster, Win7 is also fast).
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion Linux is a failure and will continue to be a failure on the desktop.
@Cylon Centurion Linux is a failure and will continue to be a failure on the desktop.

Thanks to vendor lock-out (by a certain, unnamed monopoly) and other assorted irregularities.
"@Cylon Centurion Linux is a failure and will continue to be a failure on the desktop.

Thanks to vendor lock-out (by a certain, unnamed monopoly) and other assorted irregularities. "

*yawn*. Linux will forever remain a failure on the desktop by the sole fact that consumers don't want it.
*yawn*. Linux will forever remain a failure on the desktop by the sole fact that consumers don't want it.

Microsoft never gave them a chance to want it.

If you do fall asleep, please don't wake up. wink
@Cylon Centurion

Fine with us 'nix users, let the PEBKAC monkeys use "OS for numpties" and stay out of our hair, keeping their poor security practices to themselves.
@Cylon Centurion

Market share implies sales. Linux is free.
@shellcodes_coder

"...millions of users will continue to flock towards Mac..."

And that's why Mac may just crack 5% in 20 years?
0 Votes
+ -
@Samic
Millions of Windows users have moved to Mac, that's my point. Yes Windows still rules the PC market but that's changing now because of competition people have realized better products exist and move to those products. Dude, try OS X before saying that again. You'll never want to use that Windows crap again after doing so
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Mac marketshare is stagnant
adacosta38 9th Aug
@Samic Steve Jobs said at the recent WWDC 2011 that there are 50 million active Mac users. There have been 50 million Active Mac users for the past 20 years now! Its the same users that keep buying Apple products over and over again.
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder and I can bet you the majority of them are running Windows 7 as their default Start up disk through Boot Camp. Mac marketshare has been stagnant, get use to it.
I agree with adacosta38, we have Macs here at school, which all boot into Windows by default, save for the graphic design department.
@shellcodes_coder

Not to overlook your Microsoft-bashing point, but I notice you said Windows, Mac, Linux. Apparently you see that no one is leaving Windows for iOS, Android, or Palm. I don't disagree that some Windows users have converted to Mac (the whole desktop Linux market isn't statistically significant) but the point is, very few people are abandoning the PC platform, if any. QED.

Oh, and on the subject of Google, they're going to have to produce a revenue-generating product other than advertising before I consider them "innovative." We've had advertising longer than I've been alive, and Google certainly didn't "innovate" it, although they do it remarkably well. None of their other "innovations" has proven marketable so far.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Mister Spock Updated - 10th Aug
That's what I like to hear being in IT. Microsoft Windows 7 is a pleasure to run as an OS. Its offers a range of benefits to the enterprise to include security, stability, compatibility, and familiarity. Once we get Microsoft Windows 7 pushed here its going to be a great day for all of us in IT.

Linux?s share on the desktop will ?remain niche? over the next five years, with below 2 percent share.

LOL!!! Even claiming 2 percent is rather generous with the numbers. LOL!!
@LoverockDavidson

We all know you do not work in IT, your comment is another fictional story.
@LoverockDavidson
Dude you are a fan boy who has never seen the light. Honestly, Windows is the worst OS out there, both Linux and OS X are far more better than Windows. Microsoft can't innovate and recently Forbes proved that point too...don't believe me Google it
@shellcodes_coder If it was that great, many persons would have formatted their OEM preloads of Windows ages ago and loaded Linux ages ago. Apparently they have not done so. The thing with the Mac is, its great hardware design, but Boot Camp is its saving grace. Most just shrink the OS X partition on a new Mac to 6 GBs and load Windows 7.
@adacosta38

To say that it does not happen is incorrect. 2 years ago blow out Vista and installed another OS, bought another laptop a month a go and blow out Windows 7.
@adacosta38

Saying a lie enough times doesn't make it true. I know many people with Macs and NONE (that means no one) have any reason to use Windows 7. The few that I know who do use both OS's complain "Why can't I do this in Windows?"
@LoverockDavidson

Security? Well, it's better than Windows 98..... Still subject to the same stuff as XP and Vista, if one believes the security bulletins published by MS.

Compatibility? Really? Well, it is pretty much compatible with most WinXP and Vista software? We run custom, in-house software that in no way is compatible with Win7. In fact, I have to run a VM with WinXP to run that software.

Familiarity? I just converted a retired couple to a new laptop. They jumped from WinXP to Win7. Two weeks later, both admit they are still struggling with the updated interface. They can't find what they want as MS decided to move things around. So all their UI knowledge from XP is useless.

And making statements like the first one, there's absolutely no way you work in IT.
Underestimating the bad economy and social unrest. More and more people and businesses are holding on to the bitter end. This trend can only continue during the "double dip recession" or what I call end of the faux recovery that occurred in our 5 year old depression.
@edkollin

As you said, businesses are looking for ways to cut costs. I don't know how much research Gartner really did, or how deeply they dug. Using non-Microsoft-powered computing devices may be a thought for some companies that hasn't been made into an action yet, but may change this prediction somewhat.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Gartner: 42 percent of PCs will be running Windows 7 by year-end
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
It will be this kind of a fantastic supply nfl jerseys 2012 that you're offering so you give it absent for entirely complimentary.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix