ie8 fix

Microsoft adds an 'Office Starter' edition to its distribution plans

By | October 8, 2009, 9:40am PDT

Microsoft officials shared on October 8 more details about three new ways the company is planning to try distributing Office 2010 when the product ships next summer.

Via a post on the Office 2010 Engineering blog, Microsoft officials explained three new distribution mechanisms the company will use to get more users to try the next version of Office. The three:

Office Starter 2010: A preload that includes stripped-down versions of only Word 2010 and Excel 2010. (Stripped-down here means basic document viewing and editing only.) Starter will be ad-supported, so, free. But Microsoft is positioning it as “an easy way for customers  to try the product and eventually upgrade to enhanced versions of Office,” not as a replacement for Office. This is meant to replace the Microsoft Works trial that is often preloaded on new PCs. In spite of its name, Office Starter 2010 really has little resemblance to Windows 7 Starter Edition.

Product Key Card: This is a single-license card that unlocks Office 2010 which will be sold at major retailers and OEMs. The idea behind this is to allow users to more easily and quickly upgrade to one of the three full consumer versions of Microsoft Office 2010. There’s no media on the card; it’s just a key. This works when an Office image is pre-installed already on a new machine and the key activates it.

Click-to-Run: This streaming/virtualization technology is targeting the existing Office installed base. Microsoft has been testing the Click to Run functionality among a select group of Office testers since earlier this summer. The Office applications are streamed to you and so you can get up and going in minutes instead of a half hour or longer. You can start using the individual apps as each is downloaded to your machine. And the Click to Run version can be used alongside existing versions of Office that you might already have on your PC.

Microsoft officials aren’t yet sharing any pricing details regarding the Product Key Card or Click-to-Run.

I’m betting a lot of pundits are going to be trumpeting “Microsoft drops price of Office with Starter to zero out from Google Docs pressure!” when they read about this announcement. But that’s not what this is about.

Microsoft knows that older versions of Office are the biggest competitors to a new release of Office and that the company needs to find new ways to get customers to try Office so they’ll consider buying it. If you dig up Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie’s “Internet Services Disruption” memo from 2005, Ozzie focuses quite a bit on how Microsoft needed to do more software trials and devlop new distribution mechanisms to keep the company competitive.

Do you think any of these new distribution vehicles will get more current Office users to give Office 2010 a try? Why or why not?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
66
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft adds an 'Office Starter' edition to its distribution plans
dsfwrryd46-24353612760920570158307955770689 11th Nov
kkmizo,good post!
0 Votes
+ -
Consumer Preinstalls
Tom12Tom 8th Oct 2009
As a preinstall on new consumer computers, it makes a lot more sense than Microsoft Works.
0 Votes
+ -
Family packs, payment plans, unlimited downloads
P. Douglas Updated - 8th Oct 2009
I think if MS offered family pack bundles; partial payments over periods of time until the software is fully paid for; and unlimited downloads of the software to registered machines, MS could sell more Office and other software.
0 Votes
+ -
Office Home & Student is a family pack
Michael Kelly 8th Oct 2009
You can install it on as many as three PCs in your home. It lacks Outlook and Access, but Vista's mail and calendaring programs are sufficient for home use, and there's little need for Access at home.
0 Votes
+ -
True
Joe_Raby 8th Oct 2009
but Windows Live Mail is a better option than Windows Mail because it combines calendar features with mail, and also provides the connections to the like-named Windows Live services for Calendar, Mail, and Contacts. In Windows 7, Windows Mail is no longer included, which is good for a number of reasons (user's choice, and no redundancy).

(Photo email is also an amazing feature that wow's everybody that I show)
0 Votes
+ -
No mailer in 7
JonWayn 8th Oct 2009
Is there no email client at all included with windows 7? That sucks
0 Votes
+ -
Choice if fine I use Thunderbird
Northlite 9th Oct 2009
Most computer manufactures will be including the Windows Live mail option on their computers. If they do not it is easily downloaded and gives MS the option to show you there are other products in the live line that you may be interested in.

People complain when too much is included with an operating system and they complain when there is not enough included, clearly not everyone can be pleased.
0 Votes
+ -
In the words of Johnny Carson ...
P. Douglas 8th Oct 2009
... "I did not know that." Thanks. A trial version of Office 2007 came on my PC. I did not know you could buy it in a family pack.
0 Votes
+ -
There IS one caveat, of course...
Wolfie2K3 8th Oct 2009
You're supposed to have a family member enrolled in a school in order to be eligible for the Student edition of Office.
0 Votes
+ -
Uh?
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
How do they verify? Those editions are sold at the local Best Buy/Futureshop / Other software retailers
0 Votes
+ -
Trust
levinson 8th Oct 2009
They trust you! Or maybe they ask for a school ID when you buy it?
0 Votes
+ -
Incorrect...
Confused by religion 8th Oct 2009
There is no requirement for a student to be one of the users. It can be for 3 family members or members of the same household. It is for non-commercial use only, of course, which includes non-profits.

That is why the edition is called HOME and Student Edition.
0 Votes
+ -
Seconded
Joe_Raby 8th Oct 2009
This is correct. You don't have to be in an educational institution unless you purchase a product that says specifically on the packaging "for educational use only" to which retail copies of Office Home & Student do not.

Yes, that is correct about non-commercial use, except that NO business is allowed to use them. Non-profits must use commercial software unless they are a registered charity. Charities can buy charitable volume licensing from Microsoft at about 1/3-1/6 of retail costs depending on the product, but they must purchase in volume (5+ units, but don't have to all be the same unit)
0 Votes
+ -
The Office 2007 that requires you to be a student, and have an .edu email address) is actually Office 2007 Ultimate, for $79 (or occasionally $59).
0 Votes
+ -
Unlimited downloads
JonWayn 8th Oct 2009
I like the part about pay over time. But unlimited downloads is lunacy and will never happen.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft's pricing is what is keeping people from buying and using newer versions of Office. I still use Office 2003. It suits me just fine. I paid for it and I will use it until something compelling makes me want to pay more $$$$$ for a newer version. The new "features" of Office 2007 (like the "ribbon" interface) do not interest me. Sorry M$, I will not be sending you any more cash to slake your thirst.
I still use Office 2003 for the simple reason that I prefer the menu bar to the "ribbon". And, thus, will likely not move to 2010. I wish that MS would add an option for putting the menu bar back as in older versions.

That said, the "Home and Student" version would be fine with me, price wise, except for one thing (that also keeps me using 2003): They dropped full version Outlook, which I need. So, again, I stay with 2003. [If they had dropped the ability of Outlook to connect with Exchange Server (which I do not need) (Outlook Lite? as opposed to Outlook Express, which does not meet my needs) ... that would have been a better way of differentiating home users from business users. But I need the calendar and full support for classical .PST files.

It's called Windows Live Mail. It doesn't support Exchange MAPI. PST files can be imported. And as an added bonus, it's easy to use (separated mail folders is one of the best ease-of-use features they've added to WL Mail and Outlook 2007) and is free to download.
0 Votes
+ -
Seperated mail folders
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
What? MS finally included a feature that I had to implement myself via macros.... nice.

Now if only they would drop the stupid PST format and instead use real(in a window sense) folders and 1 file per emal instead...(Less chance of mail loss from corruption)
0 Votes
+ -
What I meant was that each account has its own set of mailbox folders by default in Windows Live Mail. That's a major shift from Windows Mail and Outlook Express, and it's much easier for consumers to understand. There are search folders for "all unread mail" and the like.

In Outlook 2007, POP3 mailboxes still get consolidated into the Personal Folders by default though, but you can change the delivery mailbox for each account in the Mail Control Panel. IMAP accounts show up separately, as does Exchange mailboxes, and HTML (Outlook Connector) mailboxes.

Both programs now leave all messages on the server by default too (unless they're deleted), so POP3 mailboxes work well if you need webmail access to them.
0 Votes
+ -
Nice
Ceridan 9th Oct 2009
Nice... now I have to search in this trial version of Outlook 2007 the different things I need.... Goodie...


PS: I really like the calendar sync they implemented... althrought it was a pain to setup a webdav IIS server.
0 Votes
+ -
um
nanotm 8th Oct 2009
you could didtch outlook since its clumsy and prone to freeze and instead use live mail, which supports .pst files and has a built in calender, and if you have a hotmail/live mail or msn account it can also be set to sync with the online calender so wherever you are you cna always retrive the info so long as you can get to the website.

personally i u/g to office 2007 enterprise edition since it was so cheap, i think it cost about ?65 when purchased with encarta and ms learning software (gotta love home and student pricing) and yes student do need access if there learning about data bases. but apart from that i like the new functionality in the various programs, the extra tweeks that make things that little bit easier to arrange data in excell etc.

really i dont much like the ribbon i always forget what tab/box i should be clicking for specific functions then again clicking the big office icon in the corner of the menu bar is a good way of getting most of them to appear.
I purchased 2007 and found out all the features I use were elimated. I reinstalled 2003,it works just fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Care to elaborate?
Heatlesssun 8th Oct 2009
Please name a feature or two that were eliminated?
Looks like MS-WORKS is back again! A dumbed down version that they may not support over the long haul. (Please convince my that I'm wrong about this.)
MS used to offer a very cheap "basic" version of Office as an OEM build that had Word, Excel and Outlook only. This was perfect for our office becuase very few people needed PowerPoint.

This new starter edition they are going to shoot themselves in the foot. Offering a reduced functionality product with the same name as the full product will only server to confuse customers. They are better off sticking with Works.
0 Votes
+ -
I will be 65 years old in a bit...
windozefreak 8th Oct 2009
...and I'm not confused. Who are all the young confused people out there??
The ribbon menu continues to be a pain for corporate
clients. My work is within the corporate IT and the
switch to ribbon is a pain for our users and our existing
office users just HATE it.

This is another example of how Microsoft is not listening
to Beta testers and users.
0 Votes
+ -
Broken Functionality
ceh4702 15th Oct 2009
I hate 2 things about Office 2007

1. Downloads are being forced to be Workbooks and the names of the Worksheets are automatically randomized with no consistency.

2. The Merge in Word is even less user friendly and the preview for labels does not work properly.

3. We use to be able to set up a database download to excell and then save a word merge and use it over and over. However, now that you have to save it as a workbook it has broken this functionality, and you have to keep running the stupid wizard over and over.

Microsoft Sucks.
0 Votes
+ -
M$ Office vs Open Office
linux-user 8th Oct 2009
So it has less features than open office, but costs more.... Let me think about this...
0 Votes
+ -
Actually...
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
The starter edition costs the same then OpenOffice... and probably wont break .doc and .docx documents... But it wont have as mutch features then OpenOffice...
0 Votes
+ -
Re: "M$ Office vs Open Office"
Joe_Raby 8th Oct 2009
"So it has less features than open office"

They going to sell Office 95 all over again?
0 Votes
+ -
How about a cup of coffee??
windozefreak 8th Oct 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed
bmonster 31st Mar 2010
I like MS Office more than Open Office. Why? Not because I'm that much of a Microsoft shill...but because of the features. If I wanted something for free...I would definitely go Open Office.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey MJ:
Joe_Raby 8th Oct 2009
Couple questions:

What does this mean to the existing lineup of trial software?:

1) "Office-Ready PC" - Office Pro trial for business PC's that can be unlucked to Office Basic, Small Biz, or Pro full OEM versions

2) Royalty OEM bundles that include Office Home & Student trial + full version of Works

Also, is this ONLY for consumers? What about businesses?

Will this be unlockable to any version of Office?

BTW: The old OEM packaging for Office came in an empty DVD jewel case with a product key inside. The new packaging is with a credit card sized product key tag that is sealed inside a folded card about the same size as a DVD jewel case, aside from the thickness. It sounds like the option for Office 2010 will not change from the current Office 2007 OEM packaging.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
this seems to be the replacement
Mary Jo Foley 9th Oct 2009
Hi. I believe this is going to replace the Office Ready PC program. Works is dead now and Office Starter is its replacement. Under the new program, three versions are unlockable using the Product Key Card: Office Home & Student 2010, Office Home & Business 2010, or Office Professional 2010.

If you're an SMB, this new distribution plan could work for you. It's not aimed at enterprise customers. MJ
0 Votes
+ -
I hate the ribbon interface, too
davidthomas@... 8th Oct 2009
Like your corporate clients, I just don't get why Microsoft is once again cramming their vision of how I must use my computer down my throat. Give me the option of using the Menus that I grew to like, with all of their many eccentricities. Oh, how I miss Lotus WordPro!
0 Votes
+ -
Ribbons...
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
The problem with the Ribbon is that it's actually pretty good interface design but since users are usually used to the regular interface, the Ribbon is badly counsidered... (I do hate Ribbon too...)
0 Votes
+ -
you can get rid of the ribbon
marks055@... 8th Oct 2009
but once you get use to it, it works great.
sounds like crapware, but its better than "Works".
0 Votes
+ -
It is... but
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
It's better then Works and better then Office 200X trials that shutdown after 30/60 days
0 Votes
+ -
Word Merge Ruined
ceh4702 Updated - 8th Oct 2009
When Office 2007 Word was redone they somehow managed to make the MS Word Merge functions work less effectively.

Also they make Excell work less effectively so that database output to Excell spreadsheets always went to a workbook.

This caused inconsistent naming of the output, forcing the user to completely have to rerun the merge wizard because the worksheet never had a consistent name inside the workbook. Before they messed this up you could do a database extract to the same worksheet and not have to change anything and the same merge document could be used over and over flawlessly. Thanks a lot for messing up a pefectly working product!
0 Votes
+ -
Pre-installs
John Speed 8th Oct 2009
Doesn't anyone remember the old AOL pre-installs? I resent giving up the disk space the registry complexities, and perhaps slower boot times. Murphy's Law is immutable. KISS
0 Votes
+ -
'Office Starter' edition
ceh4702 Updated - 8th Oct 2009
No intelligent person or business wants to see a starter edition or temporary version of anything on their new PC. This is basically junk-ware.

Lower the Price and they will come.

I will tell you what will happen. The EU is probably drawing up a law suit right now for misuse of monopoly powers.
0 Votes
+ -
It's a fine line to walk
don3605 8th Oct 2009
between having so little functionality in the free version that it just pisses people off and having it do everything the average home user needs. As long as it will translate a .DOCX file into a .DOC file so I can use OO on it, I am happy.
0 Votes
+ -
... anything but the basic finctions of Word and Excel.

Works has always lacked the file compatibility - it's time for Workd to go! Office Starter would be the perfect add-on to an OEM Windows system but they should do it like InTuit Does...

When you install the Quicken Basic (or the basic version of TurboTax), they offer you the opportunity to upgrade on the spot and tell you why you should. If you opt to upgrade, they take your money right then and there, and install the upgrade right onto your system.

With a pre-installed Office Starter edition, as soon as you launch it, it could ask you if you wanted to upgrade - and why you should.

The first upgrade could be a modest fee to get rid of the ads. Then ...

MS could include links to features not present on the "Starter" product. If you tried to use them, you would be given the chance to upgrade right then and there. If the code was already hidden away on the hard drive, all they would need to do is get your credit card number and unlock the code for the edition to which you upgraded.

That would be REALLY smart but the EU would throw a fit if it was automatically bundled. Too bad.
0 Votes
+ -
Most users don't care?!
kat313 8th Oct 2009
I happen to use Excel and Access on a daily basis, and I don't know any user of Word and Excel who stick to only the most basic functions. Perhaps you need to do some reading, or take some classes, mwagner. Although I'm no big MS supporter, I must say, you're really missing out on a lot!
So far I have no reason to upgrade from Office 2000.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually...
Ceridan 8th Oct 2009
I did upgrade visio and access(microsoft academic alliance... fun to get stuff free and legit).

I'm planning to upgrade outlook to 2007 (because of a few new features that outlook 07 has) but Word, Excel and powerpoint? is there a point to upgrade those?
0 Votes
+ -
Why CHANGE?
chaz15 8th Oct 2009
Not a lot wrong with Office 2003. Office 2007 is great IF you like the ribbon interface.

I suspect most businesses unless on an annual paid license for updates will stick with PREVIOUS versions of Office rather than upgrade. especially with the Credit Crunch!!!!
0 Votes
+ -
So 2 copies of each on board ?
Clockwork Computer 8th Oct 2009
Plus more licences, keys and a stack of totally
non-productive garbage as well.
Shockingly, Microsoft hasn't changed one bit,
still doing anything to muddy the waters.
No wonder business is locked to XP
with this sort of rubbish being offered
as a "replacement".
Still no idea and no products.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft adds an 'Office Starter' edition to its distribution plans
dsfwrryd46-24353612760920570158307955770689 11th Nov
kkmizo,good post!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix