Microsoft Big Brains: Brian Harry

Microsoft Big Brains: Brian Harry

Summary: Here's Profile No. 2 in my Microsoft Big Brains series: Brian Harry, Technical Fellow and Product Unit Manager for Team Foundation Server.


Just before retiring from day-to-day responsibilities at Microsoft, Chairman Bill Gates said that he expected Microsoft's 22 Technical Fellows to get a lot more publicly visible -- now that they wouldn't be living in his shadow. While some of the Microsoft fellows already have been active on the public-speaking circuit, many of them are not widely known outside the company.

I'm launching this series -- "Microsoft Big Brains" -- to help remedy that shortcoming. In the coming weeks, I am hoping to profile as many of the company's tech fellows as to whom I can get access.

Microsoft's Technical Fellows came to the company via a variety of different routes. Some of them run divisions inside the company; some focus on particularly thorny technical issues that may span a variety of product units. Regardless of where they sit in the organization, the fellows all have been charged with helping Microsoft craft its next-gen products and strategies, much the way that Gates used his regular "Think Weeks" to prioritize what Microsoft needed to do next.

Microsoft Big Brains: Brian HarryThis Week's 'Big Brain': Brian Harry Claim to Fame: Product Unit Manager running a 120-strong unit focused on Team Foundation Server How Long You've Been With Microsoft: 14 years (since Microsoft bought his version-control-tool company One Tree Software) More About You: Before joining Microsoft, worked on e-mail development at DaVinci Systems. Once Microsoft bought One Tree, worked on Microsoft SourceSafe and then Microsoft Repository. Wasthe Development Manager for the Common Language Runtime (CLR) and then Product Unit Manager for several years. Is based in North Carolina Your Biggest Accomplishment (So Far) at Microsoft: Played a major role in getting the .Net Framework effort started Team(s) You Also Work With: Developer Division, Server and Tools, Office, Windows Why Stay at Microsoft? "I can work on pretty much whatever I want. I can pick a problem I am passionate about and get hundreds or thousands to marshall around that. It's an adrenailne rush to do that."

Microsoft is pushing hard to get into the application lifecycle (ALM) management space, as anyone who's been trying to keep up with all the recent news around Microsoft's "Oslo" modeling products and strategy is well aware.

But ALM isn't just about modeling. In its broadest sense, it's about collaboration, that buzzword darling of the Web 2.0 set.

"My whole career has been about developers and/or some kind of collaboration product for developers," says Harry. "Now I get to work on a collaboration product for developers."

Harry's guiding principle is he works on products for which he would be a potential customer, he says. That's why he has focused on technologies like ALM and .Net/CLR during his Microsoft tenure.

Speaking of the .Net and the CLR, there is still plenty of work to be done, Harry says.

"One problem the CLR has faced is deployment. Silverlight is obviously a big asset here, but deployment and Visual Basic integration are quite still a challenge," Harry admits. ".Net has been wildly successful in the server space, but has been less so in the client one."

"We still live in a dual world: CLR developers and unmanaged developers," Harry continues. "We need to bridge the gap and to have one programming model. Right now, the (Microsoft) Developer Division still has to target two different programming models. The proof point will be when Windows and Office embrace .Net as a first-class model for their applications. Windows APIs (application programming interfaces) need to come out as .Net Framework classes."

For all of the “Microsoft Big Brains” profiles, check out the Big Brains page.

Topics: Software Development, CXO, Enterprise Software, Microsoft, Operating Systems, Software, Windows


Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for 30 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • More Microsoft Sagacious Thinking

    Heh. The Big Brains name had to be thought of by one of Microsoft's many overpaid adolescent gamers.
    • Why?

      Why do people so dislike Microsoft?
  • Great, until .Net goes out of fashion.

    Microsoft's past is strewn with several hundred technologies which seem to have been forgotten about. And like ".Net" most of them had fairly meaningless names.
  • Once they have collected their initial "fee"

    which is always the first thing they do..... Microsoft must "discover" additional technology, in order to maintain their revenue stream continuum.

    Some of you vassals had better tighten up and start innovating, lest ye be put to the wheel and whips drawn on you.

    Let it not become necessary for Microsoft to get nasty, eh?
    Ole Man
  • Sounds like a sweet deal

    They bought his company. He probably arranged a good contract deal, hence he still chills there.

    So SourceSafe is another 'bought' innovation. Microsoft keeps bring the 'wow' to me. Everything a new revelation "They didn't make that neither"
  • The WOW starts NOW!

    Although I did not get any WOW! from Vista, or any other recent Microsoft products, I do have to admit that I said WOW! to myself after reading this. WOW! it is amazing how these people think. I guess the very definition of a dying empire is that the people in charge do not understand. WOW!