Microsoft gets Android tablet maker Onkyo to sign sign a patent agreement

By | June 30, 2011, 6:56am PDT

In its third such announcement this week, Microsoft officials said on June 30 that they have signed up Android tablet maker Onkyo Corp. as another of its patent licensees.

Just like the case with General Dynamics and Velocity Micro — the two previous Android vendors who signed patent-protection deals with Microsoft that were announced earlier this week — the terms are not being disclosed. However, also as in the previous cases, Microsoft is announcing that it will be receiving royalties from Onkyo as a result of the agreement.

Onkyo, headquartered in Japan, sells a variety of Windows PCs, audio components and home-theater peripherals and systems.

Microsoft is definitely trying to make a point by trickling out the patent-licensing agreements one after another. And Microsoft’s point is that Android violates Microsoft patents and companies that are betting on Android are making a risky bet.

Microsoft has convinced a number of Android and Linux-based device makers that it’s better and cheaper to pay than fight.  Among those companies with Android- and Linux-based devices that have capitulated, besides General Dynamics, Velocity and Onkyo, are HTC, Amazon, TomTom, Buffalo and others.

Barnes & Noble, so far, is not backing down, and is taking its fight public with Microsoft over its Android-based Nook.

According to B&N’s response to Microsoft’s legal complaint, Microsoft told B&N officials that the Nook infringed six patents that Microsoft claimed to own. However, B&N said that Microsoft officials said they’d share details only if B&N officials signed a non-disclosure agreement. B&N refused to sign an NDA, claiming the patents were public, as was the Nook product.

“Microsoft demanded an exorbitant royalty (on a per device basis) for a license to its patent portfolio for the Nook device and at the end of the meeting Microsoft stated that it would demand an even higher per device royalty for any device that acted ‘more like a computer’ as opposed to an eReader,” B&N said in its response.

Microsoft is believed to be collecting $5 per user for each Android phone sold from those companies which have signed Microsoft’s patent agreement. I asked Microsoft officials earlier this month if that figure was correct and was told the company had no comment. I am wondering if the Microsoft toll is higher for Android tablets. Based on the B&N comment above, I’d expect it might be.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

32
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft gets Android tablet maker Onkyo to sign sign a patent agreement
dfwekrwe72-24353634772331915415567035598172 Updated - 10th Nov
Grateful eli manning jerseys i came across , your nflshop gorgeous webblog, can comfortable so that you can save the software so i could accidentally ray rice jerseys inevitably.
0 Votes
+ -
And....
Gis Bun 30th Jun
Expect to see all the anti-Microsoft/pr-open source zealots complaining about this and the other deals. I would like to see them own a company developing some technology and spending maybe millions on it and then finding out that some other company duplicated the technology and weren't compensated for it. This would be typical of the open source zealots [not those who like open source but those who go to the extreme. Then of course you have the anti-Microsoft zealots who go against Microsoft no matter how wrong they are.
0 Votes
+ -
re: And ...
Return_of_the_jedi Updated - 30th Jun
@Gis Bun

Do the company ( Onkyo ) mentioned make ANY android tablets? The answer is NO.
It's a ploy by M$ to spread FUD.

Expect to see more of this tactic. Get any old electronic company to sign some so call NDA then tell it to the press knowing the press will report it without any proof of validity. Hence FUD is released in the wild.

PS. Who on earth would buy an Onkyo tablet. Would you? yes?
@Return_of_the_jedi Yes they do make Android tablets.
engadget.com/2010/12/27/onkyo-blesses-10-1-inch-ta117-android-tablet-with-nvidias-tegra/
crunchgear.com/2010/12/30/slatepad-ta117-onkyo-rolls-out-10-1-inch-android-tablet/
0 Votes
+ -
Like this...
Bruizer 30th Jun
@Return_of_the_jedi

http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/27/onkyo-blesses-10-1-inch-ta117-android-tablet-with-nvidias-tegra/

I guess they do or are looking to get in the market.

Just like GD is looking to get into ruggedized military applications with Android.
0 Votes
+ -
re: Like this...
Return_of_the_jedi Updated - 30th Jun
@Bruizer

I stand corrected. They did make One.
@Return_of_the_jedi
Onkyo didn't sign an NDA. They signed a 'settlement'. In other words they admitted guilt and wrote a cheque.
@Gis Bun
Take a look at the patents, those are spurious, most of them with very known previous art, so those should be easy to discard. Some are so arcane that I remember those in the DOS times (more than 20 years ago), and in use by non MS Products.
@Fox-Info What patents ? Is there any info about which patents are in consideration ? If there is a link/source please provide for the benefit of all others !!!
@Fox-Info
Good thing you're using a fake name here, you could be thrown in jail for breaking the NDA you signed, as that's th eonly way you could know what patents are in question!
0 Votes
+ -
The bigger problem is
jk_10 30th Jun
@Gis Bun There was tumor embeded in software industry at the very beginning: people think software should be free. You see those mobile apps, 99cents each, people still don't want to pay, if there is free one, they will get the free one instead, even not as good. People go to dollar store, never think too much about the cost, what can you do with a dollar? Why is that? Why people go to any store, they never expect to get anything for free, in software, they never think they should pay. And why is that? Because software (along with internet) was originally an academic thing, those professors and colllege students wrote it, and share it. They are used to it. When companies commericialize it they got upset. You knew what happened when AT&T decided to commerilize Unix. Sad thing is those get it for free mentality goes to general public. Count for yourself, how much money you have spend on software each month, comparing to you spend on bubble gums? I can be sure you use software every day.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually
WilErz 30th Jun
@ jk_10

I agree with your general point, but I think most early software was developed by hardware firms and included in the hardware prices, so appeared to end users to be 'free' (which of course it wasn't). A business model based on splitting software from hardware was where Bill Gates was ahead of most others, and being there early was a major reason for Microsoft's success.

Even though Microsoft have taken some of the rents that used to go to hardware firms, splitting software from hardware has almost certainly been good for customers. It was bad for a lot of hardware firms, who were used to high margins, protected by high switching costs.
@jk_10 - When software is described as free, it is a reference to freedom rather than price. People are encouraged to sell and buy free software.

By definition, free software must meet the following requirements:

1. Freedom to use the software however you wish.
2. Freedom to study how the software works and to make modifications if you wish (source code is a prerequisite for this).
3. Freedom to sell or otherwise redistribute exact copies of the software.
4. Freedom to sell or otherwise distribute your modified versions of the software.
M$ has to be investigated immediately by DOJ!
The whole IT industry must gang up in courts against M$ while we, the people must write terse letters to congress demanding an antitrust trial against M$ and FOSS legal protection and commitment by the government.
0 Votes
+ -
re: folks, this racketeering is getting very serious!
Return_of_the_jedi Updated - 30th Jun
@Linux Geek

Don't get all bent out of shape. There is no agreement signed. It's to spread FUD.

Until the press can prove/verify those so call NDA. It's only hot air.

"... this racketeering is getting very serious!"
No, they just only ratcheted up the FUD. Remember they are masters at this.

PS. When you see NDA, you see FUD. Cuz the patents should be public if it's on a public product.
0 Votes
+ -
Quite alot of 'experts' here
Will Pharaoh 30th Jun
@Return_of_the_jedi

I always thought you where small potatos, but you sound like a big-time expert with alot of insider knowledge!
I think I'll start believeing you, as opposed to people actually involved with these deals!
@Linux Geek Bravo resident jester !! Bravo !! Nice going ! Nice start to the day !! happy
@Linux Geek

While the do-only-evil company reaps the rewards by tying everything to intrusive ad engines?

I expect Android will cost about $10-$20/unit by the time all its mis-appropriated IP is accounted for.
@Bruizer
I hope you are not considering in that IP those 5 patents brought to the Nook suit, or most of those claims in the Motorola suit, because those patents won't pass close examination.
@Bruizer
Android does not infringe any IP.period.
Only patent trolls claim otherwise. Just read groklaw for more info.
Yea, right.

GrokLaw is so biased as to be believable only by the very gullible. Their agenda is very very clear. Remove any financial incentive to actually innovate in software.
0 Votes
+ -
Why are you still here?
jk_10 30th Jun
@Linux Geek You are hugely unpopular here. Is that why you are wearing those stuff all day long?
0 Votes
+ -
Gumbys
WilErz 30th Jun
@ jk_10

It's probably an act, like the Gumbys in Monty Python -- unless he's a real Gumby.
0 Votes
+ -
They are getting ...
Return_of_the_jedi 30th Jun
... more value out of this FUD that they would ever get out Onkyo "tablets".
0 Votes
+ -
Pure lie
p.vinnie@... 30th Jun
WOW!
MS claims royalty from B&N for patent infringement but not ready to tell which ones?
I doubt they told to those companies which signed deal with them either. It looks like they are asking protection money from small players because they do not have muscle to fight in the court.
In case of B&N I would like to see it going to court; but it is not going to happen. If B&N is selling small number of devices then MS would not like to spend money on litigation; if B&N is selling large number of devices then it will settle case out of court instead.
0 Votes
+ -
Extortion at its Finest
itguy10 30th Jun
Come on, someone has to have the cajones to tell MS to pound sand and litigate.....

Would be interesting as there could be a lot to loose for Microsoft if its IP claims would get thrown out.
"Among those companies with Android- and Linux-based devices that have capitulated, besides General Dynamics, Velocity and Onkyo, are HTC, Amazon, TomTom, Buffalo and others."

Amazon? Are you sure? Is TomTom on that list as well? I didnt read anything about Amazon paying MS royalties for Android. Can you please check your facts before you write an article? Feels like ZDNet's standards have gone down quite a bit lately.
@ALISON SMOCK
She did mention Linux, and last time when I checked Amazon and Tom Tom use Linux in their portfolio of devices.
@ALISON SMOCK pcworld.com/article/190000/microsoft_amazon_strike_patent_licensing_deal.html
@ALISON SMOCK - Amazon's Kindle is Linux, and they pay Microsoft a royalty fee for every Kindle. TomTom is Linux too.
There is something going on here that we probably don't know. It's not like htc, onkyo and co. don't have high priced lawyers on their sides.
Here's what the main issues are (I forget a few points)
1. Google does not indemnify the hardware makers so if you use their "open source" android and someone sues you...well you are on your own.
2. Microsoft had good technology and patents for their windows phones, they got lazy and made crappy products. With iphone and android resurging, they go after the guys with no patent portfolios to protect them. Simple business. If they did not use this available remedy to make more cash, I would dump them as a stockholder.
3. They are making a really good case on the back end and they are not publicizing the issues so you can't defend yourself when they put you in the cross hairs. They must be showing something to these companies and they are signing it.
4. The real issue here is apple. Unlike Microsoft, which loves to sign licensing deals and continue business as usual, Apple does not play nice. They sue you for the purpose of shutting down the device and preventing further use. I'm betting that companies are signing with Microsoft's umbrella to protect against Apple which, if they win, are more likely to shut down your product rather than license the technology.
5. Android is making a lot of money and at this rate, it is cheaper to give microsoft 5 bucks and protect yourself against the other guys rather than sit around and let things happen to you.
The real culprit here is Google but in an indirect way. They gave the OS and implementations but offered no protection. Hardware manufacturers under the concept of "open source" made the devices. No one looked to see if toes were trampled or if anyone's feathers would get ruffled.
That's the main issue with free, the person giving it to you does not defend you if you get caught with your hands in the proverbial cookie jars.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft gets Android tablet maker Onkyo to sign sign a patent agreement
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Hey, i believe you visited my web site so i arrived to "return the favour".I'm mulberry purses seeking to unearth particulars to enhance my weblog web page!I suppose its okay to utilize several your hints!!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft gets Android tablet maker Onkyo to sign sign a patent agreement
dfwekrwe72-24353634772331915415567035598172 Updated - 10th Nov
Grateful eli manning jerseys i came across , your nflshop gorgeous webblog, can comfortable so that you can save the software so i could accidentally ray rice jerseys inevitably.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix