Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
Summary: A number of financial analysts and company watchers (including yours truly) have wondered whether the company's seeming lack of an immediate strategy to directly address the growth of the iPad and Android consumer slates would come back to bite it. Not too surprisingly, Microsoft officials are insisting that Windows PCs and tablets are what customers want and what they will get.
In spite of all the recent "Microsoft is dead" articles, it looks like the company is still quite alive, at least when you look at its just-reported Q1 fiscal 2011 results.
The company reported fiscal first quarter net income of $5.41 billion, or 62 cents a share, on revenue of $16.2 billion, up 25 percent from a year ago. Sales of Windows 7, Office 2010 and Xbox all contributed to the strong quarter.
A number of financial analysts and company watchers (including yours truly) have wondered whether the company's seeming lack of an immediate strategy to directly address the growth of the iPad and Android consumer slates would come back to bite it. Not too surprisingly, Microsoft officials are insisting that Windows PCs and tablets are what customers want and what they will get.
Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Peter Klein said during Microsoft's earnings call today that he was confident that the growth of tablets would expand the overall market for PCs. Bill Koefoed, head of Microsoft investor relations, said the company had not seen a "material shift" from low-end PCs to tablets. In other words, as Silicon Alley Insider paraphrased, "iPad? What iPad?"
Based on the latest numbers, it's easy to see why the Softies are claiming they aren't worried. Results for the combined Windows/Windows Live division were impressive -- even when they were adjusted for the deferral of $1.47 billion resulting from the Windows 7 upgrade program. (That program involved sales of Windows 7 to OEMs and retailers before general availability to consumers in October 2009.)
According to the company's breakout:
"Microsoft estimated that total worldwide PC shipments from all sources grew approximately 9% to 11%. OEM revenue increased $1.8 billion or 93%. Including revenue and units associated with the Windows 7 Deferral in the prior year, OEM revenue increased $364 million or 11%, while OEM license units increased 5%. The OEM revenue increase was driven by PC market growth, PC market strength among business customers, and the mix of versions of Windows licensed, partially offset by lower Windows attach rates in China and year-over-year changes in inventory in our distribution channels. Other revenue increased $125 million or 13%, driven primarily by commercial and retail sales of Windows 7."
Microsoft execs continue to insist that there are slates/tablets in the pipeline from a variety of partners, some of which will debut this year and some next year.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
They are playing this very close to the vest...
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
come :
[ H T T P : / / T A .G G / 4 O R ]
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
Yeah, people love to repeat that "competition is good for users" mantra but it's not true when half of the players in a given market are phoning it in (so to speak.) The half-baked crap being dumped into the market by most of these companies will actually hurt users when they get suckered into buying them. At this point, there are only one or two phones I'd want to own. If there were indeed true competition, with a batch of companies truly trying to compete, not just dumping beta products into the bargain bins in the hopes of snagging the profits of 2-year contracts, then the consumer would benefit. As it stands, not so much.
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
So many people are buying these things just to check their email or read an E-book (or so they claim they do), but I think they are just trying to look "cool".
I happily prefer my laptop with REAL keyboard and mouse and REAL functionality.
Maybe this is why Microsoft isn't "rushing" out to make an I-Pad competitor. They are probably working on something that is going to be a lot more functional.
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
That's exactly what's good about an iPad. It's not a replacement for a laptop and it doesn't try to be. I use mine every day while commuting to and from work - to read, check e-mails, do crossword puzzles, etc. A laptop would not be as useful for this (mine stays in my bag until I get to the office).
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
RE: Microsoft: iPad? What iPad?
You need to give-up thinking about technology and go back to scratching flint to make fire. You really don't have a clue!