Microsoft volume licensing changes coming, but not in FY 2011

By | July 14, 2010, 12:47pm PDT

Microsoft knows its volume-licensing is going to need an overhaul if and when its customers and partners really start going gung-ho for for the cloud.

In the company’s fiscal 2011 (which runs from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011), Microsoft will be doing the ground work for an overhaul of its volume-licensing infrastructure and policies. But don’t expect any actual new programs during that period, according to Joe Matz, the Corporate Vice President of Worldwide Licensing and Pricing.

Matz spoke at a session at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference on July 13 about the company’s Large Account Reseller (LAR) program.

“A lot is changing in volume licensing,” Matz told the overflow crowd at yesterday’s session. “We’re going big with online services in volume licensing. We need to adapt volume licensing for online.”

Microsoft is working on its back-end operations, systems and policies to enable this shift, he said. In addition to making licenses simpler and easier to manage, Microsoft knows it also needs to enable greater licensing flexibility, he said.

Matz said his team’s second biggest priority in this fiscal year is to continue to modernize licensing.

“Licensing is always going to be complex,” Matz said, “but it needs to be simpler, more manageable, scalable and agile.”

The team is working on ways to allow partners and customers to attach new cloud technologies to existing licenses, rather than requiring customers to buy and manage new licenses every time they add a new technology to their existing Microsoft mix, he said. Microsoft also needs to make it easier for customers to transition from on-premises software to services on the licensing front.

He said to expect Microsoft to do more to integrate Microsoft financing with licensing in the coming year. Matz said more than 7,000 Microsoft customers in 15 countries spend billions per year with Microsoft to finance their technology purchases.

“Credit prices last year had an impact on us,” he admitted. “But we now have our model back online and getting back to growth in this space is a priority.”

Matz didn’t mention the meltdown with Microsoft’s Volume Licensing Service Center (VLSC) earlier this year. Microsoft ended up having to roll out a “version 3.5″ of the site, incorporating new fixes and updates, because many customers and partners were unable for months to access their volume software licenses and products.

In addition to discussing volume-licensing in the LAR session, Microsoft officials also shared a few interesting statistics about the company’s partner hierarchy.

Microsoft has 22,000 “major accounts,” 80 percent of which are covered by Enterprise Agreement (EA) licenses with the company. The company has another 92,000 “corporate accounts” that it targets, only 19 percent of which are currently covered by an EA. (This is the group of customers that are still running lots of Windows XP, older versions of Office and no SQL Server, company execs acknowledged.) There are 5.3 million small/midsize business (SMB) Microsoft accounts customers out there, as well. (I didn’t catch how many the company is claiming are Microsoft accounts.)

Across all categories, Microsoft still is seeing a lot of CIOs fear the unknown with the cloud, officials acknowledged, meaning there will still be “years ahead” of selling on-premises software for Microsoft’s partners.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Talkback Most Recent of 7 Talkback(s)

  • Correction MJ? There are 5.3 billion small/midsize business (SMB) Microsoft
    That probably would make Microsoft competitors paranoid. wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mr. Dee
    14th Jul 2010
  • ZDNet Blogger

    You're right
    Hi. I think the guy did say billion, but that must just be the overall size of the market, and not their share. Thanks. Fixed. MJ
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mary Jo Foley
    15th Jul 2010
  • RE: Microsoft volume licensing changes coming, but not in FY 2011
    @Mary Jo Foley
    Hmmm... Not quite "fixed" as yet happy There are only around 7 Billion people on the planet ! wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gutto
    16th Jul 2010
  • Licensing headaches, no end in sight
    Sure, you can pay for an EA which is astronomically expensive, but it's easier to manage. Trying to manage Microsoft licensing when you are on a tight budget is very complicated and time consuming. Most companies just ignore the licensing because it's too complex. And those that sincerely try to pay Microsoft and stay legal, end up overpaying because of the complexity. This is why I switched to Linux and open source, NO LICENSING costs or tracking... none, period. This is a huge bonus, and allows us to focus on our business, rather than paying companies like Microsoft.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    apexwm
    15th Jul 2010
  • RE: Microsoft volume licensing changes coming, but not in FY 2011
    Very Timely,
    I have a call with my MS rep today to discuss our SA renewal. To be compliant today from three years ago will cost us an additional $56K a year. Even more irratating is the price difference between MS vendors; the current vendor wants $76K, the new vendor wants $172K for the same amount of licenses. WTF!!!
    Believe me I'm looking at all options before I subject our company to this extortion.
    We are only a little company of 125 users.
    If it wasn't for the whiney PEBKAC's (Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Chair) on the floor I would switch them all to Open Office in a heart beat.
    Cheers
    ZDNet Gravatar
    IT_ShortBus
    15th Jul 2010
  • RE: Microsoft volume licensing changes coming, but not in FY 2011
    Spectacular web page, bookmarked the website web page with curiosity to study football shop drastically a lot more aspects!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812
    9th Oct
  • RE: Microsoft volume licensing changes coming, but not in FY 2011
    I've witnessed buy jerseys many online world logs and I can completely specific enough state that this an individual is my front runner .
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770
    11th Oct

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources