Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes

By | August 11, 2010, 6:12am PDT

In some ways, Microsoft’s Azure cloud operating environment doesn’t seem to have changed much since the Softies first made it available to beta testers almost two years ago. But in other ways — feature-wise, organization-wise and marketing-wise — Azure has morphed considerably, especially in the last 12 months.

Microsoft started Windows Azure (when it was known as “Red Dog”) with a team of about 150 people. Today, the Azure team is about 1,200 strong, having recently added some new big-name members like Technical Fellow Mark Russinovich. Over the past six months, the Azure team and the Windows Server team have been figuring out how to combine their people and resources into a single integrated group. During that same time frame, the Azure team has launched commercially Microsoft’s cloud environment; added new features like content-delivery-network, geo-location and single sign-on; and announced plans for “Azure in a box” appliances for those interested in running Azure in their own private datacenters.

In the coming months, Azure is going to continue to evolve further. Microsoft is readying a new capability to enable customers to add add virtual roles to their Azure environments, as well as a feature (codenamed “Sydney”) that will allow users to more easily network their on-premises and cloud infrastructures. The biggest change may actually be on the marketing front, however, as Microsoft moves to position Azure as an offering not just for developers but for business customers of all sizes. (There’s more on that in Part 2 of this post, published on Thursday August 12.)

Senior Vice President of Microsoft’s combined Server and Cloud Division, Amitabh Srivastava, has headed the Windows Azure team from the start. Srivastava said Windows Azure is still fundamentally the same as when his team first built it. At its core, it consists of the same group of building blocks: Compute, Storage and a Fabric Controller (providing management and virtualization). MIcrosoft’s latest “wedding cake” architectural diagram detailing Azure looks almost identical — at least at the operating system level — to the team’s original plan for Red Dog:

Most of the work that Microsoft has been doing on Azure for the past year has been quiet and behind-the-scenes. The team regularly updates the Azure platform weekly and sometimes even daily. By design, there are no “big releases” of Azure. The Azure team designs around “scenarios,” not features. Some scenarios — like the forthcoming VM role — can take as long as a year or more to put together; something else, like a more minor user interface change, could take less and show up more quickly.

All these little changes do add up, however.

Next page: The Red Dog puppy grows up

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Talkback Most Recent of 35 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    Hi MJ,
    I had some thoughts around the advancement of Azure myself. I figure that just as they are scaling up to let other major players run Azure in their datacenters they will also scale down i.e. let us all run it on our own home machines so that we then "rent" back compute time to Azure.
    See here for more thoughts: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/archive/2010/08/01/the-one-billion-node-machine-plus-one.aspx

    -Jamie
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jamiet
    11th Aug 2010
  • ZDNet Blogger

    Azure on a PC
    Interesting idea, Jamie... Microsoft is talking now about "personal cloud," but that seems like little more than Windows Live rebranded, to me. They also are adding cloud hooks into their small-business offerings with the forthcoming "Aurora" hybrid server. I wonder if they'd go to the extent you outline... Good food for thougt. MJ
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mary Jo Foley
    11th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @Mary Jo Foley
    Yeah agreed, I do think that WL is going to be the personal cloud (in the past I've called it the "personal mainframe" - not far off). Azure is much more of an enterprise offering whereas "personal cloud" is a consumer offering - it would be interesting if they brought the two together!

    Definitely food for thought.

    -Jamie
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jamiet
    12th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @Mary Jo Foley I'd be happy if sohbet got rid of the ribbon and gave us chat users the pull-down menus that existed before Office 2007 for forum . I like getting Outlook for the portal . It has grown on me since my new Windows izlesene box had to use Outlook since chat sohbet was removed. sohbet odalari email client is mynet sohbet to cinsel sohbet weak.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    timaeus
    19th Jul
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @Mary Jo Foley very interesting read that Microsoft talking personal cloud. Keep up the good work. online diploma | graduates diplomas | undergraduate diploma
    ZDNet Gravatar
    otisa
    9th Sep
  • Wow! Very Interesting!
    @jamiet,

    I like your general idea of using Azure to expand on the SETI type distributed computing model. If security can be addressed, then it could (as you indicated) be a way for consumers to rent out use of their PCs. Maybe in countries that have significant piracy issues, MS could simply give away Windows at very low cost, and recuperate money through this scheme.

    Besides above, I think there are other interesting private cloud computing models MS could implement. I also think special virtualized servers could be set up on regular PCs within the enterprise, and computing loads could spill over onto these PCs during peak loads and other times - for companies that are adamant about keeping data on site. I also think that some Windows client PCs could be sold, with virtual servers that establish private clouds for people's homes. (These PCs would be dual functioned, establishing a relatively cheap, private server / cloud for the home, as well as serving as desktop clients.) I think selling these PCs would be so easy. "Buy a PC for your home, with your own private cloud, to store your private data, on your own equipment!"
    ZDNet Gravatar
    P. Douglas
    11th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @P. Douglas
    The idea of "spill over" is a very interesting one.

    "Buy some grunt compute from us and if you tip the scales we'll automatically put you onto this cheapo "spill-over" stuff."

    Interesting model!

    -Jamie
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jamiet
    12th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @P. Douglas

    The same advertisers that brought us Seinfeld (lets play footsie and wiggle our shorts Bill), Laptop Hunters (that got all sorts of bad press for lies (incorrect pricing and customer never actually went into an Apple store) and portraying windows as "cheep"), And Windows 7 was Macs idea (where a college kid who can't get laid and get kicked out of his dorm room (by his Mac roommate) has to watch TV in the hall because he doesn't even have a friend whom he could visit).

    I bet Kinect will cinsel sohbet not be magical either.
    IE8 had multi-process architecture before Chrome launched, and in fact sohbet was the first browser to announce the feature. gay sohbet That's why both Chrome and IE use far more memory than the other browsers. mynet sohbet Chrome is a bit more strict than IE, IE will allow tabs with the same integrety level to mynet sohbet share a single process. mynet mynet sohbet Outside of that MS beat Google to the punch. mynet Good try though. indirmeden film izle If MS came out with touch UIs for at least Word, Excel, forum OneNote, and Outlook, with super slick, and highly youtube effective integrated virtual keyboards, that would be mind blowing! I think canli sohbet that would be like lighting a rocket under PC touch computing. bedava film izle
    ZDNet Gravatar
    exibir
    6th Aug
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @jamiet Alas they don't support XP making it irrelevant for me. I haven't seen any mention of any component using Direct2D/DirectWrite unlike IE9 which truly uses these at its core. Live Wave 4 is falsely dependent on Vista by using the Windows Ribbon framework which was only ported up to Vista instead of using the Office 2010 Ribbon which is improved in fact and supports XP as well. In one of the interviews by Ina Fried, their VP says "We just decided not to support XP". Now that's evil without any real dependency on Vista. dunyanin en zor oyunu yeni oyunlar ben 10
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Arabalar
    13th Aug
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @jamiet Linux server growth has already slowed into the single digits. Microsoft server sales are already greater than Office sales. Linux servers replace only Unix servers, and Microsoft server sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix soon enough.

    Microsoft has obtained the expertise and assistance of SuSE in creating the migration tools that will ease the Linux to Windows transition. The path was already marked out.

    Linux to Windows will soon be far easier than Unix to Windows has ever been. And companies can't wait for their chance to leap into the future.

    So curb your impatience. Linux and the rest of op-en source peaked awhile ago. They'll recede soon enough. Not everything has to happen in internet time frames.
    savas oyunlari yaris oyunlari
    ZDNet Gravatar
    KralLord
    6th Sep
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @jamiet Linux server growth has already slowed into the single digits. Microsoft server sales are already greater than Office sales. Linux servers replace only Unix servers, and Microsoft server sales will surpass those for the combination of Linux and Unix soon enough.

    Microsoft has obtained the expertise and assistance of SuSE in creating the migration tools that will ease the Linux to Windows transition. The path was already marked out.

    Linux to Windows will soon be far easier than Unix to Windows has ever been. And companies can't wait for their chance to leap into the future.

    So curb your impatience. Linux and the rest of op-en source peaked awhile ago. They'll recede soon enough. Not everything has to happen in internet time frames.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    KralLord
    6th Sep
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @KralLord very good though and i see in you comment first you research about it then you give you comment such a nice read. certificate Programs | postgraduate certificates
    ZDNet Gravatar
    otisa
    9th Sep
  • The idea of cloud computing is fundamentally wrong...
    There are two things about cloud computing need to be clarified. Services regarding personal computing, web mail, video, music, social, gaming, storage, and services regarding enpterprises. The former is fine in the cloud. as a matter of fact webmail started ages ago, no one call it cloud computing. The real deal about cloud computing is the later.
    lets look at it.

    the argument about cloud computing is reduced cost for enterprises. Other than that there is no advantages over installed software. You may say a web interface allow people access from anywhere, but how many chances are there for workers to run anything on the run? Any body done a math: is it really cheaper? Lets see how much it cost to run your own software,

    1. Any PC on the market today can be a good server. You spend $500 buy a server, don't have to worry about it for 5, 6 years.
    2. Windows Server license: I don't have a number, but it is not something that would make you feel uneasy.
    3. SQL Server: you can have SQL Express for free for 50 seats or even more, this is by exprience.
    4. Hire IT person: you need to have someone take care of you network in any case.

    The biggest hurdle is other than a one person startup, why would any company in the world put their data on somebody else's data center? You may say, OK, you can put your data in your home, and still run it on the cloud, but if I put data at home, what's the point of cloud? Also the idea of private cloud, again, if private, then what's point of the cloud? Just to get a web interface?

    There are two things people are ignoring: web application can never match smoothness of local run software, centralized computing is technically wrong. The basics: We have billion PCs arround the world, they are very powerful, nobody's data center can match the computing power of that, now you are tell people to abandon these, and use computers that is sitting in some company's data centers.

    What sounds weired to me is: people talking about cloud computing like it is reality.

    Cloud computing hasn't happen yet, it will never.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jk_10
    11th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @jk_10 , when the banking system was just getting started a long time ago, there were a lot of folks who scoffed at the idea and said "why in the world would I put MY money in some central place and mix it up with other people's money. I think it is a lot safer under my Mattress. Besides, I can see, touch, smell it. It makes me feel I'm in control of MY money". Do you think like this about putting your money in the bank today? In fact, it is a lot safer to put your money in the bank than keeping it under your mattress particularly if you live in a risky neighborhood.

    Banks spend millions of dollars on security. They have some of best security experts on staff. You can also earn interest and get other advantages as well.

    Now replace "Bank" with "Cloud" and "Money" with "Data".

    The cloud trend is inevitable. You can bury your head in the sand and keep saying that the world is not changing around you, but that won't change the reality of it. Cloud is real, it is happening, and it will be a dominant computing model in the next decade. The change will not happen overnight, but the trends are unmistakable.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kpemmaraju001
    11th Aug 2010
  • RE: Microsoft's Windows Azure: What a difference a year makes
    @kpemmaraju001 The reality is people have talked about cloud for 3 plus years. Do you see any enterprise really using it? Yes, you may give me some numbers, but it doesn't matter. the best example of clouding computing eBay. eBay has its bussiness, but eBay doesn't change the business modle of the 99% of enterprises. if cloud is meant for 1% of businesses, does it matter?

    Your example of money in banks doesn't really tell the story. Data is not just data, it includes your business information. There are a lot of things that you don't want anyone outside of the company know. If there isn't a big incentive why would I put it in the cloud. I can tell you one thing, if the US goverment decide to put their files in the cloud, it doesn't take a year, you will be able see them everywhere in the Internet.

    Most of time in past, people said about trend turned out to be wrong. This one is the oddest to me.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jk_10
    11th Aug 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources