More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Summary: Bloomberg Businessweek has an interesting report citing those infamous "people in the know," claiming that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is readying a management shakeup which will "place more senior product executives who have a strong engineering background."
Bloomberg Businessweek has an interesting report citing those infamous "people in the know," claiming that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is readying a management shakeup which will "place more senior product executives who have a strong engineering background."
The thinking: Microsoft needs more technology-minded top dogs to help the company compete (or at least to provide the outward impression that engineering prowess still matters in Redmond).
If this comes to pass, it won't be business as usual at Microsoft. As I've blogged numerous times, since Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates retired from his day-to-day duties at the company, many engineering-focused Microsoft managers (whom I and others call "Bill guys") have left the company, as the more management/sales-focused cadre of "Steve's guys" have risen to prominence.
Ballmer's appointments of Qi Lu and Kurt DelBene -- two more engineering-centric managers -- to "Presidents" hasn't gotten the recognition by company watchers that Ballmer wasn't simply favoring the suits. In fact, Bob Muglia, the Server and Tools President who announced in January he was leaving the company this year, led a number of Redmond tea-leaf readers wondering if yet another of the engineering-centric crowd was abandoning ship. I've heard from some Wall Streeters that Microsoft execs were hinting that Ballmer was seeking someone more management-focused to take Muglia's spot. But the latest BusinessWeek story leaves me wondering whether that's the case....
There are a number of in-house candidates that might be the kind of engineering-focused leader with a combination of cloud and server chops that Ballmer might opt to elevate if that's the direction he's leaning. I've mentioned Server and Cloud Senior Vice President Amitabh Srivastava as a possible presidential candidate. Others could include Microsoft Online Services Corporate Vice President Ron Markezich; Business Platform Senior Vice President Ted Kummert; Corporate VP of Management and Security Brad Anderson; or Senior Vice President of Technical Strategy (and Midori maven) Eric Rudder.
Until this latest report, I was thinking Ballmer might go outside the company and bring in someone more focused on upping the margins Microsoft makes on databases and systems management wares.
In any cases, given the Softies are finishing off their internal mid-year reviews, the annual Microsoft reorg announcements could happen any time now, like they did last year.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Ballmer is just trying to hold on to his job.Weren't Muglia and Ozzie engineers?
Perception vs. reality?
Perception is all they have left
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
They appear to be doing much better with their offereings
:|
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Microsoft doesn't need saving. They make far, far more revenue and profit than Google. They dominate every segment of the market they are in except mobile. So what is this saving crap? You know what needs saving? Linux.
The string of Google's failures
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Funny...I thought Google was a successful company.
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Apple?
Steve Jobs is no more an engineer than Steve Ballmer. Jobs's strengths are excellent taste in terms of industrial design, and a good ability to spot trends. He's had non-technical design input on Apple's products from the beginning (e.g. the physical styling), but I doubt he's ever written a single line of code, much less done any hardware engineering. Design talent, not engineering talent, is where (especially) Microsoft and Google lag behind Apple, and the CEOs have a lot to do with that.
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
You don't have a damn clue. You might as well go shove your head back up Job's butt. Then again, anyone with the name iPad-awan has to be an idiot to begin with.
Good luck, Microsoft.
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
Business guy/salesman with great vision.
A wise strategy, Mr B.
www.timacheson.com
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?
www.timacheson.com, probably we have different tastes of technology, but I don't like any MS-based web server. That site doesn't impress me.
Good move
I do agree with Userama that it's difficult for engineers to place themselves in the place of non-technical customers, but I also think the superior engineer overcomes this by communicating with his users.
RE: More engineers at the top: Just what the doctor ordered for Microsoft?