Report: Microsoft readies new maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks

By | May 22, 2009, 5:54am PDT

Microsoft is readying a set of maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks –or, as Microsoft prefers to call them, “small notebooks” — that will likely dictate which PCs will qualify for lower per-copy Windows 7 pricing.

The alleged Windows 7 netbook specs were published earlier this month on the TechARP technology enthusiast site.

Microsoft established a similar set of specs for XP and Vista netbooks, a category the company had been referring to as ultra-low-cost PCs (ULPCs). The ones it is developing for Windows 7 are designed for netbooks that have smaller screens and single-core 2 GHz CPUs, TechARP said.

(Just to be clear: Microsoft’s Windows unit isn’t confirming any of the information that TechARP is providing and updating regularly about Microsoft’s alleged plans for Windows 7. But a lot of what the site is getting surely seems plausible — and if I were guessing — is coming directly from OEMs.)

A quick refresher as to what Microsoft has said to date about Windows 7 on netbooks:

* All Windows 7 SKUs will be able to run on netbooks. But the ones Microsoft expects most netbook makers to preload are Windows 7 Starter Edition and Windows 7 Home Premium.

* Starter Edition will limit users to running three concurrent applications. Windows 7 Starter Edition, unlike XP Starter Edition, will be for sale to users in both developing and developed nations.

* Microsoft has not shared publicly what it intends to charge PC makers per copy of Windows 7. But it is said to be charging them about $15 a copy for XP when they are preloading it on netbooks — a price significantly lower than it charges PC makers per copy of XP or Vista preloaded on full-fledged laptops and PCs.

When Microsoft unveiled its Windows 7 SKU line-up back in February, I asked how the company intended to determine pricing for Windows 7 running on netbooks vs. laptops/desktops. Would Microsoft charge PC makers less per copy for Home Premium than it charges to run the exact same Home Premium SKU on a full-fledged notebook or desktop system? Would Microsoft attempt to establish itself as the judge of what is a “netbook”?

Microsoft officials had nothing more to say about my questions. But the new maximum spec list — if it pans out — may indicate how the Softies are planning to address these thorny questions.

TechARP claims Microsoft is planning to focus its strategy around SKUs tailored for the netbook market. The site says that Microsoft will be offering netbook makers plain-old Windows 7 Starter; Windows 7 Starter for Small Notebook PC; and Windows 7 Home Basic For Small Notebook PCs (China only). (Microsoft officials said in February that Windows 7 Home Basic will be in developing nations only.)

For Windows 7, “Microsoft has made several critical changes to the maximum hardware specifications allowed for Windows 7 Start / Home Basic editions, as well as the Windows XP and Windows Vista Small Notebook PC program,” TechARP said. Among these changes are:

  • “(A) greatly simplified and universal CPU criterion designed for easy understanding and management
  • Removal of the graphics and touch limitations
  • Limiting screen size to a maximum of 10.2 inches (measured diagonally) as the defining boundary between a Small Notebook PC and a full-featured laptop”

Specifically, according to TechARP’s information, Microsoft’s maximum specs for machines it will consider to be netbooks/”small notebooks” will change in the following ways:

Screen size: With XP and Vista, maximum allowable screen size was 12.1 inches; with Windows 7, it will be 10.2 inches

Storage: Maximum limits for XP and Vista: 160 GB HDD or 32 GB SDD; with Windows 7, it will be 250 GB HDD or 64 GB SDD

Graphics: With XP and Vista, netbooks/small notebooks was “less than or equal to DX9; with Windows 7, there will be no limitation

CPUs: With XP and Vista, netbooks/small notebooks had to have “single core processors that do not exceed 1 GHz frequency, or Intel Atom (N270, N280, 230, Z500, Z510, Z515, Z520, Z530, Z540, Z550);  Intel Celeron 220; AMD (MV-40, 1050P, TF-20, Geode LX, Athlon 2650e, Sempron 210U); VIA (C7-M ULV, Nano U1700, U2250, U2300, U2400 or U2500). With Windows 7, the maximum will be “single core processors that do not exceed 2 GHz frequency, and have a CPU thermal design power that is less than or equal to 15 W, not including the graphics and chipset.”

Recent reports claim netbook demand is down — which is a mixed blessing for PC makers and Microsoft, given that netbooks have been the only bright spot in an otherwise declining PC market. Whether that trend will continue through the Windows 7 launch this year will be interesting to see. I know I’m still planning on making my first Windows 7 machine a netbook.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
112
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Report: Microsoft readies new maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks
homeioy4901-24353685151921060474470391678351 11th Nov
dwsyxn,good post!
0 Votes
+ -
Windows 7 = crippled. Just use Linux
T1Oracle Updated - 22nd May 2009
Why buy an OS with all of these artificial restraints? This is what closed source gets you, a compromised product.
0 Votes
+ -
Windows 7 is not crippled
Cylon Centurion Updated - 22nd May 2009
Netbooks are perfectly capable of running higher versions of 7, just what I suspect most people will go for.

Anyway, read this:
http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/05/22/exclusive-microsoft-to-remove-3-app-limit-from-windows-7-starter.aspx
0 Votes
+ -
The whole point about netbooks were their cheap price.

If the copy of Windows 7 is going to be half the cost of the netbook rather than a a sixth just because the CPU is dual core or runs at 2.1Ghz then that isn't going to go down too well with the consumer.

Might as well buy a notebook. But what if that's not what you want? And unless there is scope for changes in the future (you know, technology kind of improves with time), then mark my words in 1 year after release most netbooks will be back on Linux.

Or Apple will have a field day with this news.

Why buy a 2.1Ghz dual core Windows 7 netbook when you can get a iNetbook for $50 more? Intel won't be happy about this artificial CPU limit, they will strike a deal with Apple.

Bad, bad move by MS. It isn't in the position to dictate to the market like it was. This really could be the beginning of the end for MS.

0 Votes
+ -
No it won't...
Sleeper Service Updated - 23rd May 2009
...people will just pay more for W7HP. If you really think people are buying boutique products like netbooks based only on price then you're being horribly naive.

No-one cares about Linux. That's been made abundantly clear by the consumers.

As for Apple? Not their market as the profit margins are too small.
0 Votes
+ -
Naive?
Bozzer Updated - 25th May 2009
You claim people will just pay more for W7HP. Just like that. Well that depends on just how much more they have to pay for their netbook just because it is 0.1Ghz over MS's limit doesn't it. And if it high enough, people may go elsewhere.

As for me being naive about people buying things on price alone, are you being serious? Price is always a majore factor in ANY purchase. And I imagine it is THE very reason people are buying netbooks.


2Ghz Netbook Win7 = $300

2.1Ghz Netbook Win7 = $400

So MS adds an extra $80 just because the CPU is over the 2Gz limit. Either you're an idiot or work for MS if you think people are going to pay the extra $100.



0 Votes
+ -
Apple
Cylon Centurion 24th May 2009
Doesn't have a netbook.
0 Votes
+ -
Neither does
Bozzer 25th May 2009
Microsoft. Nor do they have a win7 netbook.

What's your point?
0 Votes
+ -
I'll take that bet...
fr0thy2. 25th May 2009
and your mother's house you live in...
0 Votes
+ -
Oh dear.
Bozzer 25th May 2009
My mother is dead dear boy. Has been for years.
Man you people are on here too... Here you go with the LIES... What are you even talking about did you even read the article??

Hey earth to whoever you are did you not just hear that youre president is building our government and economy on borrowed money!!!

Also by the time the majority of that money hits the economy he will have set in motion a mass inflation in the price of consumer goods!!! By this time nest year you will be lucky to get a computer for under 500 bucks on sale!!!

Thes numbers take that all into account!!!

Now I ask you if you have the courage or brainpower to answer me these few questions...

Since when does a netbook have 2.16 Ghz dual core processor????

What the hell is an iNetbook?

If you are implying that you could get an Apple laptop with a small screen for only 50 bucks more than a netbook please tell me where????

Keep in mind last time I cheked the smallest laptop Apple made was well over 1000 yes one thousand dollars!!! A Windows netbook over 500 is rare BTW!!!





0 Votes
+ -
Win 7 is faster than most Linux distros!!
electroman76 25th May 2009
I agree and wonder where these people get the ideas they have....

Sometimes I wonder if they have even used Windows post 9.x !!!!!!

Grantite Vista was problematic at first, but when you think of it with all the secutiy that was added it was windows actually becoming like Linus minus the passwords...

Cancel or Allow...

LOL

In the current RC form Windows 7 is elegant, easy to use, secure and lightweight unlike Vista!!!

Windows 7 is running fine on my 4 yr old bargain notebook that came equiped with a sempron 3300 with 128K of Cache and ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 graphics!!!!

A modern netbook has 2x the horspower of this old Compaq !!!
0 Votes
+ -
Agree
Tim Patterson 22nd May 2009
I have Debian lenny with KDE 4.2.2 running perfectly on my AAO.

It's always amazed me that people would pay good money to be limited and otherwise abused. I guess ignorance has a considerable price here.
0 Votes
+ -
You don't know nuttin
no_zd_user_name 24th May 2009
pffft. What does kidz know?
0 Votes
+ -
Bedtime boys.
Bozzer 25th May 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Bedtime boys.
Bozzer 25th May 2009
Sweet dreams.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong!
Gladiatorcn 22nd May 2009
Open source also gives you whole bunch of compilation errors when you install some packages. You expect normal users use source code distribution in case that no package is available?
0 Votes
+ -
What source code?
urbandk 22nd May 2009
When has any netbook user of any mainstream distro ever had to compile anything?

Name a single mainstream program that isn't prepackaged by the major distros.
0 Votes
+ -
WHAT????
abdulbijur 22nd May 2009
when was the last time you ever tried installing something on linux???

you dont even see the source code of anything you install nowadays. The idea of being open just means that if anyone wants to inspect what the hell I am running it is freely available whereby you can put your mind at ease.

It is the stupidity of some people who have read about linux in 2001 and keep spreading wrong things about a beautiful OS.

Here is a testimonial from a first time user who installed ubuntu 8.04. This person has only used windows and mac in the past and is not really technology savvy either.

"I decided to install Linux. In my (to-date) brief experience, I have found it very easy to use (e.g. just add and remove programs at the click of a button), some very interesting looking open source software and lots of online help from the crowd.
TC says: Give it a whirl."

So follow the lead and try the OS for a change!
0 Votes
+ -
Pay no attention to Gladiatorcn...
arbiter26 22nd May 2009
Installing software in Linux is in most cases easier than it is to Windows.

Everything is managed in a central repository; you can just pick the software that you want within a program on your computer, and Linux will download and install the software automatically.

With Linux's centralized software management, there is no searching around for software on the Internet, no worrying about whether what you're installing is a trojan (everything comes from one reliable source), and less compatibility headaches. Usually, you don't even have to restart to use the new software.

This process is handled with just a few clicks from the user.

Installing software in Linux really is as simple as it sounds once you get used to it.

Also, updates are handled from the same central location; there is no waiting on 20 different pieces on software that each decide to update at a different time. With Linux, you can decide when you want to update instead of getting interrupted in the middle of work or a full-screen game.

Some people seem to like to make scary claims about Linux and "compilation errors". While Linux has its faults, software installation and updates are about as easy as they could possibly be.
0 Votes
+ -
You don't understand the target market.
Bozzer Updated - 23rd May 2009
You are completely missing the target market with regards to netbooks.

In fact, you don't need to install anything extra on a Linux based netbook. It does everything you want (with regards to a netbook) straight out of the box. Or as Apple would say "it just works"

In fact, most "normal" windows users rarely have anything more than a browser, an office ap, some kind of instant messaging.

Stop thinking like a power user.
0 Votes
+ -
Isn't Linux sort of like
John Zern 22nd May 2009
a crippled version of Windows allready?
0 Votes
+ -
LOL - nt
fr0thy2. 25th May 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong forum numb n**s...nt
fr0thy2. 25th May 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Come on man get a clue you sound like one of the Saul Alinsky types otherwise known as the Obama Zombies who flood the internet with distoritions, misinformation and outright lies!!

Lets see if you even have the capacity or courage to answer a few questions honestly!!!

Tell me how is Windows crippling the average user???? Is it not liberating them instead???

Keep in mind lesss than 1 %%% of the population are capable of using Linux!!

Now answer me this, can I have youre car?

I am guessing you would say no...

I am also guessing the reaon you would not give me youre car is because you own it?

So then if you will not just give me youre car, but think someone else should just give you their code, does that not make you a hippocrit??

Microsoft OWNS THEIR CODE!!!!

WHY SHOULD THEY JUST LET YOU HAVE IT, WHEN THEY SPENT BILLIONS OVER THE YEARS PAYING PEOPLE TO CREATE IT????

In case you did not notice they also proveided jobs in the process....

And healthcare....

Charity... And so on.....


By the logic you use anyone who has informantion should just give it out for free...

If everything went by this open philosiphy you have HOW WOULD ANYONE MAKE MONEY ???

After all if am a farmer went by this logic they would have open fields!!!!

They should just go out do all the work grow the food and then just give it away!!!

THAT IS THE LOGIC YOU ARE PUSHING!!!

THINK ABOUT IT FOR A MIN!!!

You people are actually the evil ones who want to steal, not Microsoft who when you consider the whole chain and all the realted occupations that have been created, provieds literally millions of jobs!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Won't Run on ARM Netbook Anyway
Stephen.Smith@... 22nd May 2009
ARM processor based netbooks are about to hit the market
and shave hundreds of dollars from the current prices.
Since Win7 won't run on these (Intel x86 only), will see
large exodus to Linux and Linux derivatives like Android.
0 Votes
+ -
The fanboys don't see that...
storm14k 22nd May 2009
They ignore the fact that the Linux netbooks were selling just fine before MS saw this and decided to get XP into the game. When the ARM netbooks come along it will be the same thing. The netbooks will get down to the price range where they are really worthwhile and folk will buy them with their customized Linux interfaces.
0 Votes
+ -
Your fanboys dont see that . . .
CobraA1 Updated - 22nd May 2009
"They ignore the fact that the Linux netbooks were selling just fine before MS saw this and decided to get XP into the game."

How would you define "just fine?" Netbooks really took off with Windows. People would much rather prefer working with something they are comfortable with.

"The netbooks will get down to the price range where they are really worthwhile and folk will buy them with their customized Linux interfaces."

And toss them a year later and buy a Windows machine.

Frankly, I'm sick and tired of constant customization on Linux. I just want something that works. Out of the box. I'll tweak the background and adjust the colors a bit, but I'm not interested in totally overhauling my UI every time I need to do a new install.

When I was young, it was cool. But the novelty has worn off, and I want something that just works now.

I don't feel like rewriting KDE's code to make the stupid start key on the keyboard work, and I'm not interested in unlocking dozens of icons in Gnome individually just to move them somewhere else.

Linux is hard to use. The most basic stuff is broken. Yes, broken.

Pressing the Start key to open the Start menu (represented by the K menu in KDE) is a basic function used every single day.

The fact that KDE is (a) trying to duplicate Windows and (b) misses out on a very basic function of Windows tells me it's utter BS that Linux is ready.

And come to find out, NO it can't be fixed by remapping the key. You actually have to go in and change the code to make it work, because it's because of the way the keyboard handler works apparently.

And Gnome? It's even worse! You don't unlock bars - you unlock icons. So in order to move stuff around, you have to unlock every single icon individually. And you wanna move that trash can onto the desktop? Have fun going though a mess of configuration UIs!!!!

I just don't get it - with Windows 7, it's becoming more of a fluid UI where you can just move stuff around wherever you want, pin it somewhere to keep it there, etc.

But Linux? As stiff as a board. Oh, sure, if you dig deep enough, you can eventually find what you want - but why should there be any digging at all?

KDE and Gnome are broken. Utterly broken. And it's not just the glaringly obvious things I pointed out - it's hundreds of other small things as well.
0 Votes
+ -
re: You fanboys dont see that . . .
n0neXn0ne Updated - 22nd May 2009
"People would much rather prefer working with something they are comfortable with ."

Following your logic, Win 7 won't sell either ...

It was M$ strong arm technique. Get real for once will ya.

^o^



0 Votes
+ -
...because I have a Windows box sitting right next to me that doesn't have the show desktop icon. I searched high and low to find out why its not there and why I can't find the option to put it there. The answer is to put some code in a file and do something with it to make it show up...so Windows is broken...YES BROKEN!!!

Then you say its a problem because you CAN move anything you want in the Windows UI but fault Linux for allowing you to move the individual icons on the panel??? I can move the icons in the quick launch menu on the Windows task bar so whats the difference? You can move the tasks around on the task bar on Win7 so Windows is broken YES BROKEN!!!

But hey if you want to pay for something that you can barely customize by all means do so (even though you apparently don't realize that you can). I'll take something free that I can customize to my hearts content any day. I always laugh when I'm one one of the sites I frequent we decide to post screenshots of our desktop. All the Windows folk manage to have is a different background. I half the time have something totally redesigned from the last time that all they can do it drool over.

No Linux is not broken....its just flexible. Windows is just an OS for dummies that need to be told how their computer will work. Don't fault Linux because you don't have the brains to organize your desktop.

And go back and look at the news articles when the Eee first went on sale. It was selling like hotcakes. Thats why MS decided to extend the life of XP and give it away to stop the onslaught. Otherwise you wouldn't see Windows on netbooks and probably would not see netbooks period by now. Step into reality and quit playing with your windows key.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong, find out why here.
Bozzer Updated - 23rd May 2009
The reason Windows took off was because XP was familiar to everyone AND the price was waaay low. Can you say the same about Windows 7?

No, so at that point your argument fails. Game over kiddo. All your ranting is moot.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh please...
TheWerewolf 22nd May 2009
I wish Linux fanbois would learn something about how markets work.

We keep trying this 'let's make a computer that can ONLY run Linux - and we'll make it a bit cheaper and then everyone will jump to Linux' game over and over and EVERY time we do - it flops miserably.

I was just talking to a sales rep at Best Buy who confirmed exactly what everyone has experienced: people buy the Linux netbook and within 24 hrs, most are trying to return it because they don't get what they expect.

Do you *really* think an ARM based netbook - which absolutely cannot run any Windows or MacOS apps - is going to magically be even *more* successful?

The ARM/Linux/Android netbook is going to be *SUCH* a dead-on-arrival product.
0 Votes
+ -
The netbook itself was not DOA....
storm14k 22nd May 2009
...so it would be dumb to think an ARM netbook would be DOA. Its all out amazing how the Microbrains have forgotten that the Eee was selling like hotcakes BEFORE it got Windows XP. Thats how it got XP in the first place.

And are you telling me theres a Best Buy selling Linux netbooks? Where? I'd like to go and buy one just to suppor them for selling them.
0 Votes
+ -
netbooks should run around 40.00 to 50.00 dollars
0 Votes
+ -
Sales Reps...
Bozzer 25th May 2009
I can imagine the sales reps at best buy being really clued up about netbooks, giving really useful impartial advice with regards to the pro's and con's of a netbook.

You spoke to a sales rep, wow.
0 Votes
+ -
Will people buy them? (nt)
CobraA1 22nd May 2009
nt = no text
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Right. The Linux advocates
John Zern Updated - 22nd May 2009
where the ones doing the buying, but what happens when that small minority dries up?

Why do you think XP made it's way to the netbook? You would think that if netbooks were selling off the shelves with free Linux, the manufacturers wouldn't have even botherd with Windows.

But they did, then the market took off to the point where everyone noticed.

ARM will serve a niche, but then if I want Windows, I don't buy a netbook with an ARM processor.

Who loses there?
0 Votes
+ -
Nope
eMJayy 24th May 2009
It was actually the success of Linux-based netbooks that forced MS to use their aging XP to compete in that market. The market took off, then MS noticed and responded by offering XP. The fact that Vista was not engineered to run on these machines should have clued you in to the fact that MS had no plans to support anything other than the more powerful machines of the day. They never would have expected that Linux would have been capable of actually creating a market all on their own - that used to be the sole domain of MS. Contrary to what you believe, MS doesn't actually want to support the netbook platform, because they're going to lose money as it grows very popular, especially if most people don't upgrade from Starter. They would like nothing more than to kill netbooks, but they can't, because they can't kill Linux - it's not a pure corporate entity that depends on profits as MS does. In the past, no new PC product line not sanctioned by MS would have been possible. And in the past, being able to force down the competition's market share would have been enough to force it into bankruptcy and give MS the ability to later kill all support for the product. Not so when dealing with Linux. And they most certainly don't want Linux offerings to become household names in the average consumer computing circles and in emerging markets. The reason why XP is on the vast majority of netbooks now is that MS has lots and lots of money and can offer financial incentives to OEMs that Linux can't. MS can pay for shelf space, Linux can't. And the XP netbooks generate more profit in the short term for OEMs because of their higher material cost. So they put their Linux products online rather than on the shelf, thus reducing sales of the Linux machines while boosting XP netbook market share and their own netbook profits on higher spec machines.

As for ARM netbooks, the problem for MS is going to be Google. Unlike Linux is general, Google has the resources to compete toe to toe with MS. And they have Android OS positioned for smartphones and a vast app development drive that will be ported to ARM netbooks running Android. So who loses there? Obviously, that would be MS.
0 Votes
+ -
So they're going to shave hundreds of dollars
LiquidLearner 22nd May 2009
off computers that cost hundreds of dollars? So the new Linux plan is free software, free hardware? Man, that's agressive.
0 Votes
+ -
200 or 300 dollars?
The ARM processor is no big deal. The ARM is cheap because the ARM is slow, most people are going to want a little more umpff in their processor that they would get with an ARM. People want their netbooks to run more like a notebook, not a PDA. As far as Android is concerned, please be real. I couldn't help but notice how much of the iPhone market Android phones have *not* taken. Palm's Linux offering stands a much better chance of displacing iPhone that the Google phone does.
0 Votes
+ -
Rock solid until Intel releases Dual Core Atom.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 22nd May 2009
No doubt, behind the scenes, they removed the list of processor types, hope 2 GHz is enough for Intel, however, a dual core processor is in the pipeline and there is no chance that Intel won't release it, especially when ARM and other devices are launched. They want the "premium" speed netbook market. It is a foregone conclusion if AMD releases theirs.

Intel
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/09/05/intel_pineview_debut_roadmap/
AMD
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4697

This is a big change...
Microsoft prefers to call them, ?small notebooks?

This could lead to further blurring the line (in the industry) between what a notebook really is, which could lead to further OEM pushing to just free up more specs.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
Intel has a dual-core Atom
Joe_Raby 22nd May 2009
..the Atom 330. It's only designed for nettops though.

All Atom's support Hyperthreading too, so Windows "sees" it as a 4-core processor even though it isn't.
0 Votes
+ -
I think it is logical though.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 22nd May 2009
Maybe you replied on another thread, can't find it now, lol. The Atom is logical dual core, I am thinking two physical cores that is coming soon from AMD, therefore Intel too.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
The Atom 330 IS dual core
Joe_Raby 22nd May 2009
It's the only one that is though. Go look up the specs on it.

Every Atom is "2 logical cores" though (with the Atom 330 being "4 logical cores").

The Atom 230 and 330 are the same except that the 330 has double the physical cores.

What Intel needs to do is manufacture it for netbooks. It doesn't currently have the right TDP to be applicable to slim netbooks with only passive cooling. The 330 requires active cooling or a fairly thick heatsink for passive compared to all the others (including the single core version 230).
0 Votes
+ -
Linux is too incompatible
Mr. Dee 22nd May 2009
Windows 7 Starter Edition is quite functional considering what most people are using a Netbook for. The 3 app limitation does not affect Windows Services, Windows Explorer or utilities such as Antivirus. You can have multiple instances of any of the three programs you have open. For instance, I can have hundreds of Internet Explorer windows open, hundreds of Microsoft Word open, hundreds of Excel spreadsheets. Its just that, its limited to three different types of applications.

Most Netbook users wouldn't have more than 2 applications open anyway in addition to the fact that most activities are done in the browser, (tabbed) based browsers such as IE, Ff, Chrome are not affected by the limitation which have separate processes. I can have Live Hotmail, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and various websites open without any hindrances.

So please, do the research before jumping to a conclusion.

You can learn more in Ed Botts report about it:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=844

Paul Thurrott is reporting also that Microsoft might be removing this limitation anyway:
http://digg.com/u13rr1
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong and probably.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 Updated - 22nd May 2009
I have delivered 8 netbooks, and reworked others who have bought their own (usually to dual boot). Not a single one is running only 2 applications. Skype or Chat: 100%. Browser 100%. Email 50% (some use webmail). Music player 100%.

Oops, 100% of the users I have given theirs too are over the limit. Why not just exit your music player to be allowed to open your email client? What do you mean you want to be on the phone using Skype when you are typing a word document. Silly person.

Does anyone here NOT have 3 programs running? My netbook, skype, IM, Amarok and HPLIP all autostart. Which 2 should I remove to be allowed to open my browser?

Now, the restrictions, once they start to affect OEMs (returns or bitter complaints about the "just pay to upgrade") and/or bad publicity starts to happen MS will a) update to remove the restrictions or b) drop Home Premium to a new "netbook SKU" price.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Report: Microsoft readies new maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks
homeioy4901-24353685151921060474470391678351 11th Nov
dwsyxn,good post!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix