Just throw WP7 onto a tablet. Boom. Done. It has a following of people, apps, and a very attractive UI that could be tweaked for a bigger screen. (Here is a great example: Metro UI . If Microsoft really needs an iPad competitor (I don't think they do. I think tablet PC's work just fine.), there you go.
I lied. They do. Apple needs a competitor to get its sad looking iPad into the game. There is no reason why it has to be missing basic hardware even the most tiniest of laptops have. And give it support for the Mac platform to really get under their skin.
But, in typical Ballmer fashion, they're beating around the bush. I really wish someone would rip him out of there and replace him with someone who has a clue. Sorry for being so succinct.
Some believe Microsoft is being coy about its slate plans. Others simply think the company is being clueless. I think the Redmondians are planting decoys, hoping they’ll provide cover for missteps.
Here’s my latest theory as to what’s going on, regarding Microsoft and its solution for slates (or lack thereof). Over the past couple of months, Microsoft execs have gone from saying Apple’s iPad is nothing but a crippled PC, to claiming that Microsoft and its partners have myriad iPad competitors ready to launch any day now. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said there’d be Windows 7 slates out in time for holiday 2010. And at the recent Computex conference, Microsoft execs crowed about the many Windows slates due to launch this fall.
If any of these slates were actually true iPad competitors, Microsoft would be only somewhat late to the slate party. This isn’t the case (making me happier by the day that I decided to buy an iPad to use as my on-the-go mobile device, rather than waiting for my longed-for “WinPad.”)
The “Windows slates” Microsoft showed at Computex aren’t running Windows 7; they’re running Windows Embedded Compact. That means they aren’t going to be able to run Windows 7 apps and won’t sport the Windows 7 user interface. Instead, each of these Embedded Compact slates will feature its own custom interface.
Meanwhile, the Windows 7 slates coming in time for this holiday season are going to be business-focused products. (HP execs admitted this recently, noting their coming Slate 500 device will be for business users. If there are other Windows 7 slates ready to launch this fall, I’d expect they also will be business-focused devices. These models will be PCs without lids; tablets without the stylus. They won’t have the long battery life, touch-centric user interfaces or built-in app store capabilities that have made the iPad a success.
Microsoft’s real iPad competitors aren’t going to debut until 2011 — I’d guess mid-2011 at best. Ballmer didn’t state this plainly at last week’s Microsoft Finanacial Analyst Meeting, but he dropped some hefty hints. Ballmer touted Intel’s Oak Trail processors as being key to Microsoft’s iPad alaternatives. The problem is Oak Trail chips aren’t going to be ready until “early 2011.” Once PC makers get them in hand, it will take them at a couple of quarters to build and test slates that use them.
I’m curious as to whether Microsoft will continue to try to steer its partners to use Windows 7 as the operating system powering these slates. My guess, as I told TechFlash’s Todd Bishop last week, is Microsoft may relent and allow slate makers to use the touch-centric Windows Phone OS 7 on these devices. (Microsoft could still claim that these slates were running “Windows,” since it is making sure to brand all of its operating systems as “Windows.”)
Bottom line: “WinPads” are still about a year away, I’m predicting. Expect Microsoft execs to downplay the coming Windows Embedded Compact slates and start acknowledging that this year’s Windows 7 slates are business-centric devices. Instead of risking another Kin debaucle (launching then pulling a misguided product at great cost), Microsoft is rethinking its answer to the iPad. Better late than lame….
