ie8 fix
Click Here

Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?

By | October 31, 2011, 1:57pm PDT

Summary: PC maker Asus has let the cat partially out of the bag regarding its Windows 8 tablet plans. It seems apparent, however, that there are at least two Win 8 tablets coming from Asus before the end of next year.

There’ve been a number of rumors as to exactly when Microsoft’s PC partners would deliver the first Windows 8 tablets.

But one of those partners, AsusTek, has spelled out — at least to some degree — in its own Q3 2011 Investor Conference slide deck from October 31, what’s coming and when. (I believe the original report on this comes from netbooknews.de.)

Here’s the slide (page 31):


(click on slide to enlarge)

WoA means “Windows on ARM.”. GTM is “go to market.”

I’m not sure what the “ticket for selling Windows 8 tablet” is.  Maybe it’s the typical Microsoft upgrade/tech guarantee coupon — the chit Microsoft gives customers who buy new PCs close to the date when a new operating system is released, allowing them an automatic upgrade to the later OS. (But on ARM-based Windows tablets, such a coupon wouldn’t make sense since there are no ARM tablets running Windows 7. Hmm.)

My read on this slide is Asus will launch two new “hero products” in tablet form in Q3 that will be designed to run Windows 8. Will these be ARM-based Windows 8 tablets or Intel-based ones — or both? I’m not entirely sure, and I’d argue you can’t tell definitively from this slide. (The same slide in the deck also mentions two other “hero products” running Android coming from Asus in Q1 of 2011.)

The growing bet among Microsoft watchers is Windows 8 will be generally available by the fourth quarter of next year (which assumes a Windows 8 Q3 release to manufacturing date, I’d speculate). And those dates jibe with this slide.

Microsoft and its partners still have yet to deliver to testers an ARM-based version of Windows 8. Most of my contacts are expecting Microsoft to launch all versions of Windows 8 (Intel/AMD and ARM) at the same time next year, rather than on a staggered basis. But that mention of a “ticket for selling Windows 8 tablet” that is listed underneath the mention of Windows on ARM (WoA) has got me wondering if this will be the case, after all.

What’s your read on this slide?

Update: One of my contacts familiar with Microsoft’s OEM policies and procedures e-mailed me his take on Asus’ slide. The “ticket” reference, he says, “means they are a premiere partner.”

“They get first access to Win8.  Q3’12 is likely the earliest a hardware OEM can release Win8.  If they aren’t part of the ‘WoA Alliance,’ they’d get second dibs on access to Win8 which would delay their rollout until after RTM launch,” he said. He also wondered whether the ARM version may be available to partners earlier, as it will be an OEM-only deliverable.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

37
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

pipocef 32 rhg
bmakrekdw87-24378992122499342394364578694986 22nd Nov
smkaip,ezvcbclp59, tbufa.
The only reason to run windows is for windows APP compatibility. If MS doesn't provide a compatibility layer (they said they won't) then all you end up with is a brand new software eco-system that is starting from scratch. And with multitasking limited to two onscreen apps, it's like good old DOS days...

I don't understand what the point of buying one will be; for better or worse, the software ecosystem is all about IOS, followed closely by Android.

I'm sure not going to buy a Win 8 ARM tablet and then look at my iPad friends who'll have millions of apps to pick from. It's no different than the issues Blackberry is facing - how to attract developers to a marginal ecosystem.
0 Votes
+ -
@croberts
I believe that applications written for Windows 8 ARM tablets will run on Windows 8 PCs. So while you are correct that this is a new ecosystem, it is a new ecosystem with a billion compatible devices in it.

"I'm sure not going to buy a Win 8 ARM tablet and then look at my iPad friends who'll have millions of apps to pick from."

Very good point and I agree with you. The question is, how quickly will devs start writing Win 8 ARM tablet compatible applications knowing that their $0.99 app will run on a billion devices? Time will tell but I suspect that within a year, there will be tens or hundreds of thousands of compatible apps, assuming MS can approve that many.

Edit: Let me correct the "billion" devices before anyone complains since of course there are not a billion Windows 8 machines out there. There will almost certainly be over a hundred million Windows 8 PCs out there within a year of release if we go by even Vista's slow uptake numbers. The main point still stands though: Windows 8 ARM tablet apps will run on an incredibly high number of devices making it an appealing platform for developers.
@toddybottom

Actually, I'm pretty sure there's well more than a billion Windows machines out there...
@toddybottom No they won't. Because Windows PCs don't use ARM chips, they use x86 chips. So Windows vendors wanting to support both now have double the support burden, having to redo all their testing and development--and ongoing maintenance--for both architectures.

We saw how this panned out with multi-architecture support for Windows NT back in the day--it failed. Proprietary software vendors simply cannot afford the cost, when their software is so expensive to develop as it is.
@toddybottom Well, I will be skipping Windows until they ditch the stupid looking tiles! I am perfectly fine running Windows 7 for awhile longer and with the revolt from the desktop community I would not be surprised to see the tiles gone by Windows 9.
0 Votes
+ -
Java apps don't need to be recompiled for different platforms because they don't access the hardware directly. This is the same approach with Windows 8 tablet applications. They will not access the CPU directly so ARM or x86 doesn't matter.

Windows 8 isn't out yet so there is no way of being absolutely sure how things will work but if things are going the way MS is advertising, Windows 8 tablet applications will run on Windows 8 PCs using the exact same techniques that allow Java apps to run on any platform.
@toddybottom "Java apps don't need to be recompiled for different platforms because they don't access the hardware directly"--irrelevant, because one thing we know for a fact is that Microsoft won't be using Java to write its apps.

"This is the same approach with Windows 8 tablet applications. They will not access the CPU directly so ARM or x86 doesn't matter." Unfortunately that's no help to all the tens of thousands of existing Windows apps already written in C++ and the like. What are they supposed to do? Throw it all away and start again? That's a recipe for the destruction of Microsoft.

So, to make it clear again: multi-architecture support is something Microsoft and its proprietary third-party software vendors have already tried, and failed to get working. They simply cannot afford the development and support costs.
Software written for the WinRT API (the Metro style apps) will run on all platforms without any change (it is CPU agnostic) and therefore have a fairly large device base on day one.

If the Windows Phone Marketplace is any indication of the application catalog velocity (35 000 apps in less than a year), one can expect a rapid growth on this front if Microsoft opens it for publishing before launch (which is likely to occur).
0 Votes
+ -
"we know for a fact is that Microsoft won't be using Java to write its apps."

Considering I never suggested that MS was using Java, I have no idea where you came up with this. My point, clearly lost on you, is that many platforms are CPU agnostic, java being one of them. For you to say that an application can't run on both ARM tablets and x86 desktops is clearly incorrect since java apps can run on both ARM tablets and x86 desktop and x64 desktops and itanium desktops and PPC servers, etc. MS has made quite clear that the WinRT API will be implemented on both x86 and ARM so it is fairly certain that WinRT apps will run without recompiling and without redesign on both Windows 8 x86 desktops and Windows 8 ARM tablets. Will it work well? Who knows, we'll have to wait and see.

"multi-architecture support is something Microsoft and its proprietary third-party software vendors have already tried, and failed to get working"

Yes, .NET is clearly a failed platform. There are only a few million .NET developers.
@toddybottom - More to the point, most managed .NET code will run unmodified on x86, x64 and ARM. Any managed code that IS platform-specific is pretty easy to isolate and customize.
@ldo17 - Windows didn't "fail" as a multi-platform OS because 3rd parties couldn't port their code to other platforms - it "failed" because nobody bought Alpha/MIPS/PowerPC machines upon which to run NT.

The same will not be true for ARM-powered devices. There is a pent-up demand for machines that will last 10+ hours of continual use on a single charge.

That fact that most ISV's have already done a lot of work to make their code non-platform-specific in order to create 64-bit versions of their apps will only make them easier to port to ARM.

ISV's who've written their apps using .NET will largely have little/nothing to do for their apps to run on ARM.

And, no, it doesn't double support and maintenance costs to port an app to ARM. It costs SOME (time*resources*effort), but it's nowhere near double. If the vendor sees enough demand for their products to be ported to ARM, they'll be able to afford to do so.
0 Votes
+ -
@toddybottom "Considering I never suggested that MS was using Java " ... and then you go on to talk even more . about using Java . Make up your mind, whether you think using Java is relevant to this discussion or not!

"Yes, .NET is clearly a failed platform." Glad we agree on something! Does Microsoft's own Office use Dotnet? No. Does Adobe Photoshop use Dotnet? No. Do any PC games use Dotnet? No. So what possible interest is Dotnet to the average Joe/Joanne who is supposed to be buying Windows 8 on ARM? None whatsoever. Theoretically it was a good idea, but in practice it has failed. QED.
@bitcrazed Oh, they bought Alpha, MIPS and PowerPC machines, all right--lots of them. But you are right, they didn't buy them to run NT, because there weren't many apps available. And of course the proprietary Windows software vendors couldn't be bothered to port their apps to the RISC machines because there was no market for them. Do you see the chicken-and-egg dilemma here?

The same thing will happen with ARM.

"There is a pent-up demand for machines that will last 10+ hours of continual use on a single charge." Unfortunately, Windows isn't going to be the one to provide that. Didn't you see that clunky Windows 8 tablet they were handing out at BUILD? Overweight, underperforming, and no doubt overpriced if they weren't getting it for free--just like any Windows tablet released over the last 10 years, right back to when Bill Gates proclaimed that tablet PCs would be "the most popular form of computing in America in 5 years", in that Comdex keynote he gave in 2001.

Windows on ARM will be a failure. Just like all previous attempts at cross-platform Windows, and for exactly the same reasons.
@croberts
Sure, if you don't need, then don't have to, simple. But there will be good number of apps to begin with because apps written for .NET Framework would run smoothly, ok, UX of them may not be as great, but those app developers could easily fix the UX to meet Metro requirements, very easy path to migrate in fact.
@croberts
I agree with you completely. Compatibility with legacy apps is of no value.
I like how in light of the success of iOS and its inability to run Mac apps, someone decides to complain that ARM tablets have to be able to run legacy C++ apps in order for them succeed.
0 Votes
+ -
32 vs 64-bit
AsifHussain1 31st Oct
You're going to have to look at whether or not MS will bother to use 32-bit ARM chips, also.

There's confusing information out there about that.

Some sources say "no 32-bit ARM for Windows", supposedly because it will cause fragmentation.

If true, you'd have to wait for the 64-bit chips, which aren't due until 2014! (annoucement 2 days ago)

The Asus memo implies 32-bit Windows on ARM, since 2011 launch.

I'm as confused as anyone.
Oops: I meant "32-bit Windows on ARM, since 2012 launch"
@johndow1 - ARM have only just announced the details of their 64-bit port. Volume availability of SOC's with 64-bit ARM cores are still a couple of years away. 64-bit ARM SOC's are most likely to first appear in servers and server blades.

Windows 8 will run just fine on 32-bit x86 or 32-bit ARM.

New Metro-style apps written in C#/VB.NET/Javascript should run unchanged on ARM devices. C/C++ code will require recompilation to generate ARM binaries, regardless of whether the app is a Metro-style app or a traditional Windows app.

As such, only native code is impacted by a change from 32-bit to 64-bit and even then, most cleanly written code should port with the minimum of fuss. This is especially true today because apps that need to be ported to 64-bit have already been ported and have, therefore, had most of their architecture-specific code cleaned up already. Porting most code to ARM (be it 32-bit or 64-bit) will largely just require a recompilation.
@johndow1
Love Quotes Tagalogs
Choose the greatest love quotes tagalogs for you

Tagalog Love Quotes
Check the best tagalog love quotes for 2011

tagalog quotes
Get the best & greatest tagalog quotes for you
@johndow1 No confusion. ARM tablets will be 32-bit. Given the "Metro App" model little to no chance of fragmentation as it's a 'thin' architecture. Microsoft has a solid vision for the Windows 8 ecosystem and is taking the right steps to make it happen. It's going to be great for developers and even better for consumers.
@johndow1
You don't need 64bits on a device that will probably only have 1 to 2 gigs of RAM. (BTW the iPad 2 only has 512meg) Do not mix 64bits with higher performance, this is a misconception.

Arm tablet will be for the general public or the buisiness user that only need office and no other custom apps. If more than 30000 apps could be created for the WP7 in less than a year I can only guest at the number of apps that will be created for Win8 in the next few months before the first HW is available.
0 Votes
+ -
Sweet!!!
rhonin 31st Oct
I'll be an early adopter - sign me up.
Windows is my bread and butter.
Everything else is a "fill in the gap" and "see if it works".
Now if they had apps that would run on any OS.....
and ported by those that write the apps.

So, whatever apps people might want, will eventually be coming to Windows 8. Nobody wants to create apps that won't run on Windows 8, especially when, no doubt, it will be hugely popular, just like XP and Win7, with the only difference being that, Windows 8 is expected to have a much wider set of form-factors and a much wider audience.
0 Votes
+ -
bearing
ysbearing 31st Oct
slewing bearing http://www.1stbearing.com
Even though MSF 7 was everything it's supposed to be, we are still talking about a year away. I fail to see how you can calculate the evolution of other systems allready in play. This may be one of the most incredibly difficut things that MSF may have ever undertaken but the process has gone beyond agonizingly slow to unbearable.
By 2012 iPad and android would have exhausted the market. PC market would have converted to mac or chrome market. I am not sure if ms would have any audience. Win8 to begin with is good but this late, means too late.
@krishnansriram
Yeah you are right "world is ending in 2012 and people are not going to produce anymore". /sarcasm
and that nobody will ever make a new purchase or get tired of their PCs/laptops/tablets/smartphones, and that, nobody will ever have to purchase a new service plan, which is where the smartphones purchases are done.
"applications written for Windows 8 ARM tablets will run on Windows 8 PCs" you will have to buy a new computer and if you have to change the motherboard then you have to buy new windows microsoft says they are taking over all of the computers and ipads and tablets they are pay it all you will see
0 Votes
+ -
What the heck was that?!?
adornoe@... 1st Nov
Drinking and posting are not recommended, especially when other people have to suffer the consequences of trying to decipher what you're trying to say.
0 Votes
+ -
Clue-o-meter reading zero again...
spdragoo@... 2nd Nov
@jt59

If a person's PC will run Windows 7, it'll run Windows 8, so there won't be a need to run out & buy a new PC.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting
symbolset 2nd Nov
Asus does not have to commit fully to Windows 8 on ARM tablets now. They can make Android tablets now and still be a premier launch partner for Windows 8 tablets. I wonder if HP and Dell know about this option.
0 Votes
+ -
bearing
ysbearing 2nd Nov
It's so good.thank you.http://www.1stbearing.com
Mt2 online 24 saat akdif sunucu tan??t??m sitesi add url ekle add urele free add
yemek tarifleri - Face - chat - servar tanitimi
servar tanitimlari - server tanitimi - server tanitimlari
sex hikayeleri


metin2 indir - gm komutlari - metin2 gm komutlari - metin2 hile - metin2 hileler - metin2 hileleri
0 Votes
+ -
pipocef 32 rhg
bmakrekdw87-24378992122499342394364578694986 22nd Nov
smkaip,ezvcbclp59, tbufa.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix