Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
Summary: PC maker Asus has let the cat partially out of the bag regarding its Windows 8 tablet plans. It seems apparent, however, that there are at least two Win 8 tablets coming from Asus before the end of next year.
There've been a number of rumors as to exactly when Microsoft's PC partners would deliver the first Windows 8 tablets.
But one of those partners, AsusTek, has spelled out -- at least to some degree -- in its own Q3 2011 Investor Conference slide deck from October 31, what's coming and when. (I believe the original report on this comes from netbooknews.de.)
Here's the slide (page 31):
WoA means "Windows on ARM.". GTM is "go to market."
I'm not sure what the "ticket for selling Windows 8 tablet" is. Maybe it's the typical Microsoft upgrade/tech guarantee coupon -- the chit Microsoft gives customers who buy new PCs close to the date when a new operating system is released, allowing them an automatic upgrade to the later OS. (But on ARM-based Windows tablets, such a coupon wouldn't make sense since there are no ARM tablets running Windows 7. Hmm.)
My read on this slide is Asus will launch two new "hero products" in tablet form in Q3 that will be designed to run Windows 8. Will these be ARM-based Windows 8 tablets or Intel-based ones -- or both? I'm not entirely sure, and I'd argue you can't tell definitively from this slide. (The same slide in the deck also mentions two other "hero products" running Android coming from Asus in Q1 of 2011.)
The growing bet among Microsoft watchers is Windows 8 will be generally available by the fourth quarter of next year (which assumes a Windows 8 Q3 release to manufacturing date, I'd speculate). And those dates jibe with this slide.
Microsoft and its partners still have yet to deliver to testers an ARM-based version of Windows 8. Most of my contacts are expecting Microsoft to launch all versions of Windows 8 (Intel/AMD and ARM) at the same time next year, rather than on a staggered basis. But that mention of a "ticket for selling Windows 8 tablet" that is listed underneath the mention of Windows on ARM (WoA) has got me wondering if this will be the case, after all.
What's your read on this slide?
Update: One of my contacts familiar with Microsoft's OEM policies and procedures e-mailed me his take on Asus' slide. The "ticket" reference, he says, "means they are a premiere partner."
"They get first access to Win8. Q3’12 is likely the earliest a hardware OEM can release Win8. If they aren’t part of the 'WoA Alliance,' they’d get second dibs on access to Win8 which would delay their rollout until after RTM launch," he said. He also wondered whether the ARM version may be available to partners earlier, as it will be an OEM-only deliverable.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Someone has to explain how Win ARM tablets make sense
I don't understand what the point of buying one will be; for better or worse, the software ecosystem is all about IOS, followed closely by Android.
I'm sure not going to buy a Win 8 ARM tablet and then look at my iPad friends who'll have millions of apps to pick from. It's no different than the issues Blackberry is facing - how to attract developers to a marginal ecosystem.
I believe the compatibility is for the other direction
Edit: Let me correct the "billion" devices before anyone complains since of course there are not a billion Windows 8 machines out there. There will almost certainly be over a hundred million Windows 8 PCs out there within a year of release if we go by even Vista's slow uptake numbers. The main point still stands though: Windows 8 ARM tablet apps will run on an incredibly high number of devices making it an appealing platform for developers.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
Actually, I'm pretty sure there's well more than a billion Windows machines out there...
"applications written for Windows 8 ARM tablets will run on Windows 8 PCs"
We saw how this panned out with multi-architecture support for Windows NT back in the day--it failed. Proprietary software vendors simply cannot afford the cost, when their software is so expensive to develop as it is.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
Ido17: That is the reason for using WinRT
Windows 8 isn't out yet so there is no way of being absolutely sure how things will work but if things are going the way MS is advertising, Windows 8 tablet applications will run on Windows 8 PCs using the exact same techniques that allow Java apps to run on any platform.
Re: Ido17: That is the reason for using WinRT
"This is the same approach with Windows 8 tablet applications. They will not access the CPU directly so ARM or x86 doesn't matter." Unfortunately that's no help to all the tens of thousands of existing Windows apps already written in C++ and the like. What are they supposed to do? Throw it all away and start again? That's a recipe for the destruction of Microsoft.
So, to make it clear again: multi-architecture support is something Microsoft and its proprietary third-party software vendors have already tried, and failed to get working. They simply cannot afford the development and support costs.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
If the Windows Phone Marketplace is any indication of the application catalog velocity (35 000 apps in less than a year), one can expect a rapid growth on this front if Microsoft opens it for publishing before launch (which is likely to occur).
Ido17: I can see this is a waste of time
Considering I never suggested that MS was using Java, I have no idea where you came up with this. My point, clearly lost on you, is that many platforms are CPU agnostic, java being one of them. For you to say that an application can't run on both ARM tablets and x86 desktops is clearly incorrect since java apps can run on both ARM tablets and x86 desktop and x64 desktops and itanium desktops and PPC servers, etc. MS has made quite clear that the WinRT API will be implemented on both x86 and ARM so it is fairly certain that WinRT apps will run without recompiling and without redesign on both Windows 8 x86 desktops and Windows 8 ARM tablets. Will it work well? Who knows, we'll have to wait and see.
"multi-architecture support is something Microsoft and its proprietary third-party software vendors have already tried, and failed to get working"
Yes, .NET is clearly a failed platform. There are only a few million .NET developers.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
The same will not be true for ARM-powered devices. There is a pent-up demand for machines that will last 10+ hours of continual use on a single charge.
That fact that most ISV's have already done a lot of work to make their code non-platform-specific in order to create 64-bit versions of their apps will only make them easier to port to ARM.
ISV's who've written their apps using .NET will largely have little/nothing to do for their apps to run on ARM.
And, no, it doesn't double support and maintenance costs to port an app to ARM. It costs SOME (time*resources*effort), but it's nowhere near double. If the vendor sees enough demand for their products to be ported to ARM, they'll be able to afford to do so.
Re: Ido17: I can see this is a waste of time
Re: "nobody bought Alpha/MIPS/PowerPC machines upon which to run NT."
The same thing will happen with ARM.
"There is a pent-up demand for machines that will last 10+ hours of continual use on a single charge." Unfortunately, Windows isn't going to be the one to provide that. Didn't you see that clunky Windows 8 tablet they were handing out at BUILD? Overweight, underperforming, and no doubt overpriced if they weren't getting it for free--just like any Windows tablet released over the last 10 years, right back to when Bill Gates proclaimed that tablet PCs would be "the most popular form of computing in America in 5 years", in that Comdex keynote he gave in 2001.
Windows on ARM will be a failure. Just like all previous attempts at cross-platform Windows, and for exactly the same reasons.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
I agree with you completely. Compatibility with legacy apps is of no value.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
32 vs 64-bit
There's confusing information out there about that.
Some sources say "no 32-bit ARM for Windows", supposedly because it will cause fragmentation.
If true, you'd have to wait for the 64-bit chips, which aren't due until 2014! (annoucement 2 days ago)
The Asus memo implies 32-bit Windows on ARM, since 2011 launch.
I'm as confused as anyone.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
Windows 8 will run just fine on 32-bit x86 or 32-bit ARM.
New Metro-style apps written in C#/VB.NET/Javascript should run unchanged on ARM devices. C/C++ code will require recompilation to generate ARM binaries, regardless of whether the app is a Metro-style app or a traditional Windows app.
As such, only native code is impacted by a change from 32-bit to 64-bit and even then, most cleanly written code should port with the minimum of fuss. This is especially true today because apps that <b>need</b> to be ported to 64-bit have already been ported and have, therefore, had most of their architecture-specific code cleaned up already. Porting most code to ARM (be it 32-bit or 64-bit) will largely just require a recompilation.
RE: Will Asus' coming ARM-based Windows 8 tablets be available in 2012?
<a href="http://tunaynababae.com/">Love Quotes Tagalogs</a>
Choose the greatest love quotes tagalogs for you
<a href="http://tunaynababae.com/">Tagalog Love Quotes</a>
Check the best tagalog love quotes for 2011
<a href="http://tunaynababae.com/">tagalog quotes</a>
Get the best & greatest tagalog quotes for you