Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
Summary: For those Windows Home Server (WHS) loyalists hoping against hope that Microsoft might reconsider its decision to cut Drive Extender from the coming 'Vail' release, your prayers have NOT been answered. But the RCs of Vail and Aurora are out, as of February 3.
For those Windows Home Server (WHS) loyalists hoping against hope that Microsoft might reconsider its decision to cut Drive Extender from the coming 'Vail' release, your prayers have NOT been answered.
Microsoft is delivering the Release Candidate (RC) test build of Vail -- Windows Home Server 2011 -- on February 3, and there is no Drive Extender included. There's also no Drive Extender in "Aurora" -- Small Business Server 2011 Essentials -- a Vail sibling for which Microsoft also is delivering an RC build today. (Aurora is a hybrid cloud-on-premises small-business server, for those who need a refresher.)
In case there is any confusion: Drive Extender is gone. It is not coming back. Period.
Both the Vail and Aurora RCs are public, and available for download as of 10 a.m. PT today via the Microsoft Connect site. Microsoft is calling these the "final, pre-release versions" of both products, with the release-to-manufacturing (RTM) code due in the first half of calendar 2011.
(The WHS team signed off on the RC earlier this week, as the tweet, pictured above -- which the team quickly removed -- indicated.)
The RC version of the products includes a new wizard for deploying storage and migrating folders. The wizard simplifies the process of detecting storage, formatting a disk, assigning a volume and moving a folder to the new volume, according to Microsoft officials. Microsoft also is making available "Learning Bites for Essentials," which are 10 five-to-six-minute videos that go through self-service IT tasks available to those using the Small Business Server 2011 Essentials product.
The decision by Microsoft to cut Drive Extender from Vail late last year made for a lot of unhappy Vail users and testers. A number of them created a petition, requesting Microsoft reconsider its decision. Despite the thousands of (mostly angry) comments, the Drive Extender lobbying has not influenced the team.
Drive Extender, which was part of the first Windows Home Server release, provided for storage pooling of multiple hard drives and automated data duplication. Microsoft officials cut the feature after they (indirectly) said it was too buggy to merit inclusion in the final products. Microsoft is advising customers to use products from various storage OEMs instead.
I've seen rumors that some members of the Vail team, unhappy with the product's directions, were seeking to "decouple" itself from the other small-business server teams at Microsoft and be moved to a different part of the company. But Director of Windows Server Marketing Manlio Vecchiet said that was not a possibility (or even something he had heard about).
Along with the RCs, Microsoft provided an update to the "Colorado" platform software development kit, which provides information and tools for developing add-ins to extend Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials.
I'm curious to see what testers who are still interested in Vail and those kicking the tires of Aurora think of the near-final RC builds....
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
www.awwgame.com
Not interested any longer
WHS version 1
Wow, who will pay for this castrated product????
Dude, you said "who cares" all along, even saying that DE
You're just a [i]propeller-headed troll[/i], so why even post?
Hey, no offense, but, this castrated product will not sell very well.
Doesn't matter to me, I'll still buy it.
I use it for Media sharing and backups, DE was something I tried, but didn't really need.
Agreed. After reading the comment below
from rshol, WHS for $99 sounds [b]alot[/b] more simple and far less complicated, but I'm not too concered about DE myself.
One disk on the desktop, one for the server: Done.
I have two 750G sata HD's in a RAID 1, and still haven't even scratched the surface in terms of hard disk usage, so DE is not a loss, at least not to me. Other people, sure that's a valid concearn, but how many, I really don't know.
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
Microsoft is going to tick a lot of people off.
Ron Burgundy, I won't disagree with you
on that they'll tick off people because some really liked it, I'm just wondering what percentage? I know this isn't a large sampling by any means, but out of 4 people I know who use WHS (not including myself) none are setup with DE.
They just use one drive. I'm not saying its not a good feature, the ability to throw a second drive in to have it mounted and extended, I'm just curious as to whether it's a heavily used feature, that's all.
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
Yes, it was *the* reason I built a WHS server. I have 4x1TB drives in use, currently backing up nearly 2GB from my primary desktop, plus storing backups of my other desktop and laptops.
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
Are you talking about WHS V1?
As with WHS you don't use IE to administer it, and you don't access your files using a browser.
Now I haven't played around with Vail, is that the version that requires what you just said?
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
filezilla support SSL encrypted sessions, and i have installed ssh on a windows host before as well.
these might be useful to you if you still have your WHS v1 system online
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
The problem I found with Filezilla and the WHS FTP plugin are that there are difficulties (at least I had them) making the FTP shares the same as the SMB shares, because of the way WHS creates the shares (I guess). I tried FZ and even installed several ssh servers, but none of them worked well, including sshd in Cygwin.
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers
filezilla on WHS to look at the DE managed shares has to be set to run as an actual user, not the system account, and to look at the UNC name of the share
this can be crippling if you want to have multiple users with different permissions accessing the shares via FTP...
the only way i was able to work that piece was to rig multiple instances of Filezilla, each using different ports
RE: Windows Home Server 'Vail' Release Candidate (minus Drive Extender) goes to testers