Windows Vista: More than 88 million copies sold
Summary: Microsoft has now sold more than 88 million copies of Windows Vista, according to company officials. Vista sales were a big part of the reason Microsoft had a more-than-solid first fiscal 2008 quarter, with earnings of $4.29 billion, or 45 cents a share, on revenue of $13.76 billion.
Microsoft has now sold more than 88 million copies of Windows Vista, according to company officials.
Vista sales were a big part of the reason Microsoft had a more-than-solid first fiscal 2008 quarter, with earnings of $4.29 billion, or 45 cents a share, on revenue of $13.76 billion.
Up until October 25, when it reported first-quarter earnings, Microsoft was saying it had sold 60 million copies of Vista since the product began shipping.
On today's call with Wall Street analysts, company officials said that Microsoft has achieved more than 20 percent growth in Vista sales for three quarters in a row. They said that 75 percent of the copies of Vista sold were "premium" SKUs (compared wtih 59 percent of the SKUs that were premium a year ago). Volume-licensing deals were up 27 percent in the Windows client space, the Softies said.
(I thought I heard Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell say during the analyst call that the company had sold 85 million copies of Vista. But the actual total is in excess of 88 million, a company spokesman confirmed.)
Another interesting data point the company shared on Thursday was how aQuantive has begun affecting Microsoft's online-advertising revenues.
Microsoft's Online Systems Business (OSB) is still in the red -- and actually got a little redder this quarter, with an operating loss of $264 million, compared to $102 million for the year-ago quarter.
Microsoft is attributing its operating loss for OSB to increased sales and marketing expenses, and increased research and development expenses. Its newly filed 10-Q, Microsoft says the OSB operating loss also includes a $58 million loss from aQuantive, encompassing a $24 million in-process research and development write-off. The OSB loss also includes a $151 million, or 63% increase, in cost of revenue was "primarily driven by increased data center costs, online content expenses, and aQuantive-related expenses."
At the same time, however, according to the 10-Q:
"OSB revenue increased driven primarily by online advertising revenue which grew $120 million or 33% to $487 million. This increase reflects growth in our existing online advertising business for search, home page, email, and messaging services and includes $29 million of aQuantive online advertising revenue. During the quarter, we also recognized $51 million of aQuantive advertising agency revenue. The increase in revenue was partially offset by a $33 million or 32% decrease in access revenue."
Back to Vista: While Microsoft's Vista sales numbers are typically sales to the channel, and not sales to customers, that's still a lot of copies of a product that gets a lot more bad press than good these days.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
The name of the game
Street language has many more colorful, easy to understand descriptors for what Microsoft and other predatory corporations are doing.
Blowing smoke and flashing mirrors. Spreading manure is the product of their best efforts.
the game
I guess thats good for Microsoft I got Ubuntu and Kubuntu free, installed on my Older Mac's and all of our PC's. Just say NO to Vista..
Just say No to Vista.
The Forums are busy
Many bought PC with XP and a voucher to upgrade all these vouchers were counted in the last quarter whether people used them or not. It's only "simpletons" that believe anything Microsoft says in regards to Vista.
Did you know you can't as a none business user buy a major Vendor laptop without Vista? Follow their forums and see how happy they are. See how happy they are when they find out Vista Home Premium does not see XP in a workgroup.
It's OK though, a super highway of disallusioned users is opening up for Linux and Mac OS. Buy a Mac and without hassle you can install XP.
Numbers are misleading.
sales to customers, that?s still a lot of copies of a product that gets a lot more bad
press than good these days.[/i]
I sure see a lot of copies of vista sitting on shelves at retail chains. I wonder what
percentage are in warehouses. Then again, Microsoft still counts unsold (by retailers)
copies as "marketshare".
Yes, you wonder
The only yardstick that paints Vista in a bad light is the success of Win2K and XP.
Apple can only wish it has such a 'failure' with its OS
Don't forget...
[b]Eligible PCs include all of the Pentium II, iMac G3 or equivalent or better
computers. You must also include any other computers (such as older Pentium
computers) on which any software will be run[/b]
I wonder how many of those are included in the "88 million"? P1's, P II's, G3's,
G4's, G5's. None of these will run vista at all. Yet I'm willing to bet they're all
counted in the "88 million" number. Like I said the numbers are misleading.
they
the only yard stick?
AS LONG as VISTA COPIES are not IN MICROSOFT hands
IF you sell something, the seller cares nothing about what you do to your copy once you open the box.
So? Retailers stock Vista shrink-wrapped ...
The geeks are laughing at Vista....
No respect among thiefs
Retail is irrelevant
I can't imagine buying an OS at Best Buy, even if I did buy a retail copy. It cheaper online.
Average users don't know about OEM discs.....
Joe sick pack doesn't buy any OS at retail. (nt)
You'd be surprised how many do....
I'm not surprised that a few do.
Joe six pack doesn't know his hard drive has crapped out, he only knows it don't work. You might be surprised by the number of reasons given for a computer being broken when it turns out to be a dead drive. Ask any ISP how many people have accused them of destroying their hard drive.
Joe six pack brings his computer in for repair, the technician uses the key off the side of the box.
If your retail store has a service department, you're doing a disservice to your customer and the store by not directing them there first.
Vendor Ripoff
Apple's numbers aren't any more accurate
They too could have been sitting in warehouses all over the world, or some could have been returned and exchanged for something else. Who knows.
Somebody said that Microsoft could be faking the numbers, but there's no proof to that, nor do I doubt MS could get away with doing that.