Yahoo, WPP join Microsoft in questioning Google-DoubleClick merger

Yahoo, WPP join Microsoft in questioning Google-DoubleClick merger

Summary: During a panel on "The Changing Landscape" at the MiXX 2007 Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) conference in New York on September 24, Yahoo and WPP Plc representatives joined a Microsoft official in voicing their worries about the $3 billion proposed Google-DoubleClick deal.


Microsoft isn't the only one questioning whether a Google-DoubleClick merger would be good for advertisers and consumers.

Yahoo, WPP join Microsoft in questioning Google-DoubleClick mergerDuring a panel on "The Changing Landscape" at the MiXX 2007 Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) conference in New York on September 24, Yahoo and WPP Plc representatives joined a Microsoft official in voicing their worries about the $3 billion proposed deal.

The panel moderator, New York Times Editor Saul Hansel, asked participating panelists whether the Google-DoubleClick deal should be approved. Representatives from Yahoo, WPP took pains to answer carefully and vaguely, but their concerns still came through.

Michael Walrath, founder and CEO of Right Media, which Yahoo acquired in April, totally avoiding answering Hansel's question, but made it clear that he wasn't in favor of it. Yahoo officials previously have indicated they believe the Google-DoubleClick merger deserves government scrutiny.

The U.S. House and Senate and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission are looking into potential market-competition concerns surrounding the deal. Google asked the European Commission to investigate the implications of the deal, as well.

David Moore, Chairman and CEO of 24/7 Real Media, of which WPP completed its acquisition in July, said there shouldn't be "blanket approval to move forward" for Google and DoubleClick. He said there should be some constraints placed on the pair so they won't be able to do anything they want.

Karl Siebrecht, president of the Atlas division of aQuantive, the ad powerhouse Microsoft acquired earlier this year, was, not surprisingly, the least reticent to criticize the Google-DoubleClick deal.

Siebrecht reiterated that Microsoft has "concerns around market concentration implications of this merger." He said Microsoft is responding to FTC requests for information about the Google-DoubleClick deal.

David Rosenblatt, CEO of DoubleClick, who was also on the MiXX panel, quickly responded: "There's no irony there at all."

Hansel chimed in, noting that Microsoft was allowed by government regulators to close its $6 billion deal for aQuantive while being a "proven monopolist." Hansel didn't mention explicitly Microsoft's new lobbying efforts around thwarting the Google-DoubleClick deal.

Rosenblatt emphasized that "in terms of data, (DoubleClick's) customers own all of their data, one hundred percent. Any customer can take their data whenever they want. I find it unlikely any M&A (merger and acquisition) activity would change that. … To believe somehow that a Google-DoubleClick deal would make this market less competitive than is today stretches common sense."

Hansel followed up with the point that Google often offers for free various services and products for which other vendors charge. He noted that Google could offer ad serving for free and turn it completely into a commodity.

DoubleClick's Rosenblatt and other panelists noted that ad serving already is basically free and that it is the services and tools surrounding it that are the potentially lucrative business arena for those playing in the online advertising market.

"The issue is one of neutrality," 24/7 Real Media's Moore added. "For years, DoubleClick was positioning itself as the Switzerland of the ad business. With the pending (Google) transaction, it's hard for that to continue to be the case. Google is the new Microsoft, where Microsoft is becoming the nice guy now, which is really a change. So the real issue for the industry is that neutrality is getting harder and harder to find."

What do you think? Is Microsoft really now Mr. Nice Guy -- at least in the online ad space?

Topics: Banking, Google, Microsoft, Social Enterprise


Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for 30 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • just a new 'axis of weasels'!

    this is a coallition among people that hate competition.
    M$ is hoping to shift the antitrust target off its back.
    Linux Geek
    • Google deserves to be burned

      You're just jealous that large companies can actually do better.

      Microsoft is for competition, if you didn't know. Microsoft loves competition. Sometimes, what they offer beats the competition to a pulp. Other times, they fail.

      I've talked to lots of Microsofties, and they all love trying to beat the competition the best they can.

      Google has done some pretty bad things as a company too. So they're not scott free from being Mr. Good Guy.

      So obviously, you know little or state little, of what's going on out there.
  • Superpower Competition Normal

    Contending natural monopolies are a fact of life in the 21st century software and web industries. Google has been following the MS playbook and MS is fighting back at every opportunity. Yahoo is now a natural ally of MS because Google used Yahoo to bootstrap its current success. This contention is an opportunity for ISVs.
    Joe Bentzel, author "Asymmetric Marketing"
  • The beat goes on....

    It never stops.

    Embrace, Divide, Extinguish!

    The Microsoft story. They will not stop
    until something or somebody breaks them.
    Sadly, that day may never come.
    Ole Man