ie8 fix
madison

The Mobile Gadgeteer

Matthew Miller & Joel Evans

Will tablets soon be free? Let's start with the Kindle Fire

By | September 28, 2011, 8:52pm PDT

Summary: By this time next year, even Wi-Fi enabled non-Amazon tablets will be severely subsidized so that users are sucked in and hooked to cloud-based services

Amazon finally unveiled its tablet offering: the Kindle Fire. The Fire is selling for $199 and comes with access to over 18 million movies, TV shows, songs, apps, games, books, magazines, and the web. Also, if you’re an Amazon Prime member, you can enjoy over 100,000 movies and TV shows instantly.

The above reads like a great services offering, and the services themselves are nothing new to Amazon. So, why is the Kindle Fire a possible iPad killer, and why could tablets be free?

I’ll answer the iPad killer one first. Let me start by saying I don’t think it will kill the iPad. Instead, it will give it some healthy competition. Case in point, I have an iPad 2. My children (7 and 3) love to take it any chance they get.

I was recently sent a Pandigital Nova, which is a 7″ color Android tablet. The screen isn’t the best tech in the world, but once I flashed it to the latest firmware, I was downloading apps off GetJar.com and moments later was playing Angry Birds and a number of others. To my surprise, my children attacked and said, “can I play a game on your iPad?” This demonstrated to me that for most tasks, if you can get “close enough” to the iPad / tablet experience, then a standard Android tablet will do just fine. Incidentally, the Nova is about $180 and connects to Barnes and Noble, instead of Amazon. So, far cry from the $499 of an iPad 2, and the kids don’t know the difference.

Because of the Nova’s price point and functionality, it was in the running for the best holiday gift, since it was providing most of the iPad functionality at a fraction of the price, and was most likely to be closer to $150 by holiday time.

Now enter the Kindle Fire. It’s also running Android, has a 7″ screen, but has a far better screen and UI. Its biggest differentiator, though, is the tremendous services available behind it. I won’t go into them again, since I covered them at the beginning of this article, but it’s clear that if you deliver solid hardware, that will offer seamless integration to a solid software / services offering, you have a winner.

As for tablets being free eventually, I don’t see Apple giving the iPad away, but I do see Amazon significantly reducing the price of the Fire, if not giving it away for free completely. Look at it this way, to get the full features of the Fire you really should be a Prime member. To be a Prime member costs $79 a year. So, if you take that $79 and subtract it from the $199 price of the Fire, you’re already at $120. So, Amazon is already losing money so it’s now a question of how much the company is willing to lose, to gain a true customer, who will continue to consume.

I had heard a long time ago that Amazon was playing around with the idea of giving its Prime members a free Kindle. At the time Kindle was just catching on so to me the logic made a lot of sense. After all, here Amazon has a customer willing to pay money for free 2-day shipping. So, why not give them a device that encourages even more buying behavior since the customer obviously already enjoys the ease-of-use of the Amazon buying experience. In the end, Amazon didn’t give the Kindle away for free, but most of the Prime members that I knew bought a Kindle anyway, since they already trusted Amazon.

With the above in mind it’s easy to see that the $199 for the Fire is the starting point. Soon Amazon will probably offer a discount to Prime members, and then it wouldn’t surprise me if by this time next year, even Wi-Fi enabled non-Amazon tablets are severely subsidized so that users are sucked in and hooked to a cloud-based service. As for the iPad, expect the premium pricing to remain, but Apple will also soon be pushing its cloud services front and center, especially with the iPhone 5 being announced next week.

So, should you buy an iPad 2 or a Kindle Fire? I’d say that if you are going for entertainment then the Fire is just as good, if not better than the iPad 2. I prefer the 7″ form factor, and being tied to Amazon’s services and being able to stream is going to be a key differentiator. With the iPad only coming in 10″, it makes the Fire more preferable for me as a consumer. I also think that Amazon has the streaming down, whereas streaming to my iPad is not quite where it needs to be. As a business user, though, the iPad wins hands down. This is mainly because iOS is more accepted by the enterprise and Android is still being considered more of a consumer play.

Of course, I haven’t had any hands-on time with the Fire yet. Given that, the above is all assumptions, but from my experience with a number of Android tablets out there, and from what I’ve seen on videos and pictures of the Fire, there’s nothing so far that would lead me to think that the Fire won’t deliver on its promise.

By the way, I pre-ordered two Kindle Fire devices seconds after the announcement–did you?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

With more than a decade of mobile, Internet and wireless experience, Joel specializes in taking existing brands and technologies into the mobile and wireless space.

Disclosure

Joel Evans

Joel is a serial entrepreneur with his most recent business, CronkSoftware (cronksoftware.com), focusing on consulting and building games and applications for mobile devices. Joel has consulted for Microsoft’s Windows Mobile division and advises other companies on how to incorporate mobile into their existing brands and products. Joel purchases many of his devices and others are sent for review on a 30-day loaner basis and then returned to the supplier. If any devices are provided as “keeper” Joel will clearly disclose this in his reviews.

Biography

Joel Evans

With more than a decade of mobile, Internet and wireless experience, Joel specializes in taking existing brands, technologies and services into the mobile and wireless space. Joel is currently serving as the Managing Director of Cronk Software, Inc., a company he founded to offer full-service, end-to-end mobile strategy, design and development services.

Joel is the former founder and "Chief Geek" of Geek.com, a website praised by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and others as one of world's best sources of information for technology professionals and enthusiasts.

Joel also serves as a technology expert for a number of well-known publications and regularly advises corporations, analysts, journalists and bloggers on what the future of technology will bring. He brings decades of relationships with leading game publishers, online communities and publishers, along with both hardware and software product management and delivery expertise. Joel can be found online as "JoelGeek" and you can follow him on Twitter @JoelGeek.

119
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Will tablets soon be free? Let's start with the Kindle Fire
mindfootage 1st Dec
@Peter Perry I disagree, I think we're not looking at the bigger picture. Once everyone has a window into the Amazon selling jungle, the money making potential will out weight the cost of producing a Kindle Fire. They would make the money lost on hardward back simply on advertising cost. Devices like the Kindle Fire are a true step forward for a paper-less society. I salute Amazon for what they've done here. Yes, nothing is for free. However, getting a Kindle Fire at no cost is very possible, expecially when it means sales. Free Kindle Fires = Volume, Volume = demand, Demand = pricing, the rest will be history. I predict it will be the #1 selling device this Christmas. I hope it send messages to these other companies that price does matter in an economy such as this. Especially for products that kick that old antage "you get what you paid for". I think with the Kindle Fire, you get plenty more.
No, nothing is free, they will come with $50 monthly access fees and WiFi will not be subsidized at all!
@Peter Perry WI-Fi is FREE. Broadband service is a completely different animal. The first Amazon Fire devices are not enabled for 3G or 4G service - so no access fee will need to be paid. In the future, user will be able to opt for the 3G/4G device or Wi-Fi.
@Peter Perry I think the fees, not only for network access, but for cloud subscriptions. If they give the device away for free, then the cloud services won't be free. You gotta pay for it somehow.
I fear the cloud for 2 reasons firstly because you have know choice, you will haft to put your bank and personal details to enable you to access stuff, all your games and music and photo's, will be in the cloud. secondly, which is by biggest fear of all is the security, if hackers broke into the cloud not only could they hack billions of users, they could bring down the whole system, and you can't say it wont happen, look at what happened to Sony, they said they were safe, and you know the rest, nearly six months on and there are still issues. for as long as i can i will stick with my trusty three Hard Drives
@Peter Perry

I could not agree more with you. Nothing is free!
Merv Perry
@Peter Perry I disagree, I think we're not looking at the bigger picture. Once everyone has a window into the Amazon selling jungle, the money making potential will out weight the cost of producing a Kindle Fire. They would make the money lost on hardward back simply on advertising cost. Devices like the Kindle Fire are a true step forward for a paper-less society. I salute Amazon for what they've done here. Yes, nothing is for free. However, getting a Kindle Fire at no cost is very possible, expecially when it means sales. Free Kindle Fires = Volume, Volume = demand, Demand = pricing, the rest will be history. I predict it will be the #1 selling device this Christmas. I hope it send messages to these other companies that price does matter in an economy such as this. Especially for products that kick that old antage "you get what you paid for". I think with the Kindle Fire, you get plenty more.
I could see a small child choosing any "inexpensive" 7" tablet design over an iPad. (From a young child's POV, Less weight, better handling ergonomics, etc.)

But at what age does a child express a preference for the bigger 10 inch screen of the iPad? At what age does the iPad's weight become a non-factor in choosing the 7 inch or 10 inch tablet format? At what age does a child put an emphasis on the quality of apps installed on a tablet?

For example, My 9 yr old niece took to the iPad like ducks take to Sarah Palin's Alaskan bird bath. (Don't ask! Grin.) Even at that age, she had a Google mail account and was emailing her friends. (Amazing but true. BTW, she is now eleven and tablets are "old comfortable tech" to her. How the world has changed.)

At any rate and IMO, a parent would definitely choose the more inexpensive option for a child's tablet if the child in question could discern no appreciable benefits to a larger screen tablet design or demonstrate a clear cut preference for a larger tablet screen.

However, discretionary income being what it is lately, a parent normally wouldn't buy a tablet JUST for a child. He or she would buy a tablet based on the needs of each family member. So, as tempting as the lower price of the Kindle Fire is, a parent might very well choose the higher priced tablet designs and pay the extra money for increased capability and performance.
@kenosha7777
Come on! Most children use what their parents use or buy them. when they get their first job, such as it is, they find out why Mom and Dad choose value over popular, especially when you arrive at the same benefits.

Final words: No parent in his or her right mind is going to pay $500 for a toy when the same toy can be had for $200. Plus, a child could use their piggy bank to save enough to buy the "Fire". I say Amazon might be on to something!
@windozefreak: While you are right that most kids use what their parents buy them, many parents today are effectively bullied by their kids and get exactly what they want--if they can afford it. A 7" Kindle Fire and a 10" iPad are two quite different devices in both size and capability at the moment and if the kid can convince the parent of such, then the kid will likely get what he wants.

Now, Amazon does have a huge edge on any current Android tablet with the Kindle Fire. The pricing is just about right (how many people bought a plain, old Kindle for that price or more?) and as a media consumption device only will be perfect for the task; you don't need incredible specs as long as it performs the tasks it's designed for well. I can almost guarantee that the 7" Android tablets have been wiped out by this toy. Maybe, just maybe, it will have some affect on iPad sales as well. But, the Kindle Fire is not capable of all of the same tasks as the iPad. Not yet, anyway. Depending on how Amazon develops it, the Kindle Fire will remain a reader/viewer/gamer while the iPad is still capable of truly productive work as a PC supplemental device. Android still has the capability to compete in this area, but I personally think the WinPhone8 tablets will smother Android's chances there.

A device is only as capable as the user imagines it. A Fiat 500 may be nothing but an econobox to the American point of view, yet it is raced right beside the Cooper Mini in Europe the same way we race bigger cars at the Saturday Night Races on the dirt track here. It's very possible that the Android Fire could be a Fiat 500 in that sense, but against the current iPad would probably be racing against a stock Camaro or Mustang.
@windozefreak

I was thinking about young teens and their buying wishes or habits. I don't know but I think it all boils down to a particular peer group's preference. If a teen's friends are "Apple friends" then the first choice would naturally be some Apple product.

Likewise, if a teen's peer group endorses a preference for WinTel products then that is what their first choice will be.
@kenosha7777, regardless of the level of my childrens tech savvy IQ, I will NOT be providing them with a $500 tablet anytime in the forseeable future - in my case, that would be the next 10 - 12 years. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Finally!
SElizDav 30th Sep
@nkfro
Someone with some sense! Why would you buy any tablet for a child in the first place? I personally wouldn't even buy a tablet for myself, let alone any child under 14 (if that). I would, however invest in a desktop for the child with the understanding that it be placed in a central location so that I could monitor their use. I have seen too many expensive ( and yes, to me $200.00 is expensive) electronics placed in the hands of children who then proceded to trash them. If I'm going to spend money like that, I would sooner spend it on something that gets them outside, like a trampoline or bike.
You kids said ???can I play a game on your iPad???? probably because you are playing with the Nova and they must have figured out that iPad is (for that moment) is unused happy

To be fair, they are used to iPad, a device that owned by you. Say if you actually have both Nova and iPad, try that experiment again with you playing the iPad and Nova is on your side.
@mohdyusuf

My impression from the article was that when they asked to "play a game on your iPad" that they were using iPad as a generic term, such as the Frig, Band Aid, Kleenex, etc.
0 Votes
+ -
@mohdyusuf

I know a lot of people who saw my android phone, and said that they wanted to get an iPhone too... I then slide out the keyboard and they thought it must be the newest iPhone, because they'd never seen one with a keyboard before.

I regularly have to explain that no, it's not an iPhone, even if it has the full touchscreen face.

It's sort of like people saying "google" when referring to ANY search engine...
@shryko

Apple seems to do the most advertising so your everyday clueless consumer doesn't know of anything else.
@shryko
Wait a minute - you mean there are other search engines?!?

sorry, couldn't resist.
Twice you used the word "than" when you should have used "then" in your article! I've heard of if/then statements, not if/than statements.

Example 1: "This demonstrated to me that for most tasks, if you can get ???close enough??? to the iPad / tablet experience, than a standard Android tablet will do just fine."

Example 2: "I???d say that if you are going for entertainment than the Fire is just as good, if not better than the iPad 2."
@wrath69

Example one is incorrect as you pointed out, but example two IS CORRECT as it is stated. Ask yourself the question ...better than what??? You will see that "than" is the correct word in example two.
@linux for me

I believe Wrath69 was referring to the first 'than' "...going for entertainment **than** the Fire is..".
@linux for me . I am loving the English lessons happy My wife has a tablet with Windows 7. I hate it. Wished I would have gotten an I-pad or now.... an Amazon Fire.
@tdurham
-> "My wife has a tablet with Windows 7. I hate it."

Who is the primary user, you or your wife? And how does your wife feel about it? If she's the primary user and she likes it, then your like or dislike is of no consequence.

Seriously.
@wrath69 Actually, you're right that in both examples the correct word is "then", not "than". "Than" is comparative as in either, or, neither, nor, and requires a comparison between two "choices". "Then" is a statement that doesn't require being compared to something else. As a writer I do know the difference between the meaning of words and two other words that are quite often incorrectly used are "affect" and "effect". Affect is to change something, effect is the change or the actual process of change. No matter though, the than/then issue has apparently been corrected since it's no longer in the article. So perhaps your comment affected the article and the correction is the effect.
0 Votes
+ -
Not sure of your arithmetic: Fire + Prime = $280, not $120.

The subsidized model has to be carefully managed to make it pay off. I have a Nook Color, but I've never even activated the B&N store. And right now I have 900 songs, 40 movies and 500 PDF books on that device, all courtesy of "other" sources than B&N. I stick with the Nook because it is the only mainstream tablet with MicroSD removable memory. I have 32GB of memory for $35 bucks, and can easily swap out whole "libraries" of stuff from my PC in minutes.

So I don't see completely subsidized tablets in the future, except from lock-in deals like wireless contracts, prepaid media subscriptions, or other deals where the consumer has to commit the money to cover the costs.
@terry flores
Kobo touch uses MicroSD removable memory.
@terry flores Motorola Xoom has a microSD slot.
0 Votes
+ -
Math
janitorman 29th Sep
@terry flores The article mentions "To be a Prime member costs $79 a year. So, if you take that $79 and subtract it from the $199..." and I didn't get that either. You're going to pay $199 for some device PLUS $79 a year (for how many years... five?) Let's add that up. $199 + ($79 X 5) = $594 To do what?
I don't even go to Amazon. Why would I want this, when MY e-reader cost under $100, and I download free e-books from the Gutenberg collection!
Who would want video, or the web, on an e-reader? I read, on my e-reader, to get AWAY from my computer without distractions!
0 Votes
+ -
Janitorman Has The Right Idea!
Dakota Duce 29th Sep
@janitorman

I agree whole heartedly with your.. "I don't even go to Amazon. Why would I want this, when MY e-reader cost under $100, and I download free e-books from the Gutenberg collection! Who would want video, or the web, on an e-reader? I read, on my e-reader, to get AWAY from my computer without distractions!"

As Janitorman stated.. if all you're looking to do is e-read, then the rest of the bells and whistles not only mean nothing to you.. but is useless anyways.

Way to go. It's about time someone told it like it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Dear Editor
johnfenjackson@... 29th Sep
The amount of SPAM getting through has increased consideably over the last few weeks.
Of course, they can't be free. Otherwise people will get them just to put up their own "will it blend" YouTube videos. But they'll likely be highly subsidized, following the cellphone model.

Also, if the Kinde Fire takes off, look for Apple to follow suit with a smaller, cheaper iPad. For all the bruhaha about the Kindle Fire announcement yesterday, there's no reason why Apple can't follow suit.
they need the higher margins in order to keep the investors interested in their stock, and the stock is what has Apple being called the biggest company in the world.

Apple could easily sell the iPads for $50, perhaps $100, less, but then, they wouldn't be as profitable.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will tablets soon be free? Let's start with the Kindle Fire
LoverockDavidson_-24231404894599612871915491754222 Updated - 29th Sep
The Kindle Fire may not be an iPad killer but its going to severely cut into iPad sales at the $199 price. I hope tablets can go to a near free price because right now they are way overpriced for what they do. Seems like the trend in tablets is a reduction in price and I'm ok with that.
@LoverockDavidson_ : Not at all correct - there is absolutely NO comparison between the 2 devices other than perhaps being called "tablets". iPad features are head, shoulders, waist and knees above the Fire.
I???d say that if you are going for entertainment then the Fire is just as good, if not better than the iPad 2

Not sure how one could come to this conclusion without having used the device first, but let's put this aside for a sec. How could one ignore the largest selection of apps, and largest selection of games and other entertainment content on iOS, spanning all category and catering to all demographics. Amazon Appstore while good is not even close to comparison to iOS. Features like front and back cameras on the iPad for Facetime with friends. iPod integration. The solid Garageband for creating music (helps to have a mic). iMovie. Apple's Much longer battery life on the iPad. Larger screen. Airplay.
@dave95.
Because most people cannot use 10,000 apps, they have a real life. Most people use between 5-10 apps, so I hear. Many people have a camera that's better than those offered on tablets/phones. These devices are so small until they can be dropped in a pocket or purse, hardly noticed. It seems a large group of people is going to the cloud for their music. I can readily see why people would ignore your preferences.
@windozefreak

You mean throughout the lifespan of their tablet, they will only ever use 5 - 10 apps? With a name like Windozefreak, I have to ask this question. How many Windose PC software have you used since you first started using Windose OS? Me, I've used, bought and downloaded (freeware) thousands of software for my PCs over the years. By your logic, I would have stopped purchasing software sometime in 1993.

The point is, iOS have the largest selection of Apps bar none. If you're going to compare the two devices on entertainment value then you can't ignore that simple fact. When it comes to keeping the kids entertained, would you choose the game consol with the fewest game selections or the one with the most titles spanning all categories?

Regards to users going to the cloud for music. Apple is also going to the cloud with iOS 5. They also have the largest selection of 3rd party music services in the app store that offers cloud storage, streaming of music etc. You don't have to use iTunes music if you don't want to.

Regards to camera. I don't care about taking pics with the iPad. I mentioned a camera because it offers up a growing trend to users (especially teens), and that is video communication.
@dave95.

The iPad has it's place and uses, sure, but don't try to make the iPad into something greater than it is, there are many things it's not good for.

First, until the iPad offers the ability to write apps on the iPad and try them out immediately, then it's just a so-so device. I shouldn't have to pay to become an iPad/iPhone developer just to learn how to write apps (assuming I have an aptitude for that kind of thing).

Second, have you ever taken a photo with an iPad? I have, it's like holding a board up in front of your face and then hoping that when you managed to hit the shutter button that you didn't move the iPad making the photo blurry. Yet people still try it all the time, and with marginal results.

Lastly, of those thousands of apps, how many of them are really worth downloading and playing? Sure, there's a zippo lighter app, but I don't see people flicking their zippo app at a concert and waving it in the air like a real lighter or a small, palm sized smart phone.
@PollyProteus
Agree 100%

@dave95
About windows Apps: When I first started using PCs, back in 1983, I downloaded every app I ever heard of. Plus I use to type in all those games from PC magazines. I was experimenting! However, as I learned the true power of computing and determined what a computer could do for me, I became selective in the apps I acumulated and now use just what I need for my accomplishments, which numbers about 25 apps. My computer runs better to, by not being loaded down with the latest and greatest that is not. That's how I do it.
@PollyProteus

Is Zippo the new Fart App? How can I take you seriously with such a question about apps worth downloading?

http://www.apple.com/ipad/from-the-app-store/

@windozefreak

Don't know if you have kids but I am constantly asked to download the latest cool app on my iPad or iPhone. These tablet devices are mainly for entertainment/consumption first and productivity second, so it's understood the app count will be greater on such a lifestyle device. It's like saying most kids will only need 3- 6 games for their DS.

I'm sure you've heard the marketing phrase "there's an app for that". Many times while I am out living my "real life", in the real world. I may need features from my phone or iPad that I did not think of downloading before. Like a tip calculator for instance while eating in a restaurant. Or maybe a translator app at the airport before heading off to latin America. A new recipe app for the great food I discovered in Latin America. These are lifestyle devices, the number of apps certainly matters.
@dave95.: That said, the iPad can do far more than what you, windozfreak and pollyproteus seem to accept. While I do agree that some people have better cameras than the iPad's, do they carry them around all the time? I don't--even though I have two different cameras for that specific purpose. Do these people only have 5-10 apps? No, though as windozefreak says, they may only use 5-10. On the other hand, I use far more than just 5-10 as I use my iPad for many more purposes, including productivity.
PollyProteus likes to believe that the iPad is little more than an entertainment toy; obvious by his/her complaint about app development and argument about poor app selection with her complaint about a "zippo lighter" app. Sure, such is probably available, but what about Pages, Keynote, Numbers and even Photoshop Express? Those four apps only barely touch the list of real productivity apps available.

No, the Kindle Fire isn't likely to be competitive in the productivity area, but as an entertainment device I believe it will become unmatched until Amazon's own limitation rear its ugly head. I don't see Amazon marketing it as a productivity tool when one of their best-selling devices is the iPad itself. What I do expect to see is a reduction in popularity of almost that entire top twenty when, as so many techies put it, tablets are nothing but media consumption toys. After the Kindle Fire gets started, only true productivity tools will remain high in that list. By the way, the iPad 2 holds 5 of the top 20 right now.
0 Votes
+ -
Screen size.
craig.toshack@... 29th Sep
Do movies and other contect look small on the 7" screen. Or would an Asus TF101 be better as it has a 10" screen? And it does what the Pandigital or any other Android based tablet does. Including the firmware upgrade.
Yep, I grabbed two, one for my ten year-old and the other for my eight-year old. I can see children and non-tech savvy people loving the Kindle Fire.
@dcfemella : Hoo boy!!! And watch your credit card balances escalate with all the nice things they manage to buy from Amazon on them!
Have to wait & see about all this. I checked the Apple web store, & an iPad2 with wi-fi and 64 Gb RAM cost $799! And that is with NO upgrade capability. All of the Android tablets I've seen are less than that, but most can use a microSD card for more storage.
@Starman35: The 16GB model costs $499 which is the closest match in internal storage and capability, the 32GB model is $599 and the 64GB model is $699, all with Wi-Fi only. Add $130 to the price if you want to add 3G. And this is also why Android tablets haven't really been able to compete effectively with the iPad--they simply can't undercut the price and retain comparable specs. The Kindle Fire doesn't even try, relying on the Cloud for most of its storage and a smaller size for portability. I might agree with the "no upgrade capability" for the iPad, but with the exception of the SD card slot, the majority of Android tablets don't have any either. To me, the SD slot is a crutch, not a feature.
I doubt anything with be an iObject killer. I feel this way because most of your iPeople are already so invested in the iStuff that it would be nearly impossible to pull them out of it. It would just be too much trouble to try to move all of your stuff over, not to mention having to repurchase stuff for your new object that already runs on all your iObjects.
0 Votes
+ -
Asus
craig.toshack@... 29th Sep
The TF101 also has a good touch screen. I'm just saying. But you are right that 7" is good for the kids. How much memory does the Pandigital have? Who wants to be tied to the Amazon services? As good as they may be. There are other options out there right?
0 Votes
+ -
Why Not free?
TweetyPacer 29th Sep
At one point, many years ago, no one would have believed free mobile phones! But today, you can get some amazing phones for free or 1 cent (AT&T) because they hook you with the services. Kindle Fire has lots to offer and "free" is not out of the question.
@TweetyPacer

The difference is that Amazon and Apple don't have any 2-year contracts to lock you in. Currently, you can buy an iPad or one of the Kindles and never order anything else from Apple or Amazon. They're hoping you do, of course, but until there's some sort of bi-annual contract or minimum purchase requirement it'll be tough for them to figure out the numbers. Remember the Columbia Record Club? They would give you 10 or so free albums, but then you'd have to buy a certain amount over a time period. If they did that they might be onto something.
@lippidp they could just say "sign up for a 3 year amazon prime subscription and get the kindle fire free!"

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix