ie8 fix

Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much

By | March 16, 2011, 7:04am PDT

Summary: Motorola has officially announced that the WiFi-only XOOM tablet will go on sale at several retailers on March 27th for $599. This is $200 too much to compete with the entry-level iPad 2 that is selling like hotcakes.

Motorola has officially announced that the WiFi-only XOOM tablet will go on sale at several retailers on March 27th for $599. This entry-level XOOM model will be sold at Best Buy, Costco, Amazon, Walmart, Staple’s, Sam’s Club and RadioShack. This is good news and bad news for those wanting a XOOM without 3G/4G connectivity; while it is good this model is going on sale, it is $200 too much to compete with the entry-level iPad 2 that is selling like hotcakes.

The XOOM has a lot of hardware features that are quite powerful, but mainstream consumers don’t care about specifications. They are going to look at the XOOM for $599, and the iPad 2 for $499 and make a simple decision to get the latter. Motorola is playing catchup with Apple in the tablet space, and not even matching the iPad 2 price is good enough. This XOOM should be $399 to have a chance to compete.

It doesn’t help that the XOOM is not quite as solid as it should be, while the iPad 2 is, as one would expect from a second generation product. The excuse that the XOOM is the very first Android Honeycomb tablet to hit the market won’t hold water with most consumers. They want a product that works properly, and at a good price. The XOOM at $599 is neither.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

154
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
Loverock Davidson 16th Mar 2011
more like $300 too much, and that pretty much goes for all tablets.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson Blah, blah, blah. Another tablet story, another expected comment. Blah, blah, blah.
@samalie: ... compares the device to iPad2, which is much faster (according to tests), lighter, thinner, not plasticky and has actual tablet applications to use? And even though iPad's screen is about 20% less detailed than of Xoom, it is a way better in other degrees: it is IPS technology, and all of screen layers are glued together to fight parasitic refraction. And the OS does not look like clutter there.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
mrxxxman Updated - 16th Mar 2011
@samalie Very true. No objectivity. For example, he doesn't point out that based on common features, the Xoom's price is exactly the same at the iPad 32GB wifi model. Completely biased article. Boring.
@denisrs
Sorry, but the xoom has a higher resolution, more aligned with HD videos than ipad2. Thats a deal breaker for me.
0 Votes
+ -
@samalie
Actually XOOM power button is placed at odd location, and that is first flaw in the engineering. Who would realize to look at back next to camera for a power button? And how many would touch camera thinking it is power button looking at the monitor on a regular usage. Yes, definitely it is bad engineering from motorola with great hardware specs.
0 Votes
+ -
@Rama.Net Try using it for a while... the button is not in the way of the camera at all and it is in a very natural spot if you use the device in the wide screen mode.
0 Votes
+ -
@The_Omega_Man .. Are you for real? That's it?
thx-1138_@... Updated - 17th Mar 2011
.. that's your justifier .. your "killer feature" for a (..at least) $200 overpriced, paper-weight?

" ... Try using it for a while... the button is not in the way of the camera at all and it is in a very natural spot if you use the device in the wide screen mode. "

The writeup is absolutely spot on: if *any* slate / tablet OEM wants to truly compete with the iPad they had better undercut or .. simply go dodo .

If you and others could just put the raw hate of all things Apple aside, you may just have the sense to see overpricing a poor imitation of an industry / niche leading technology is the height of corporate arrogance - especially for something that is clearly a buggy clone / copycat device.

I'm glad that Motorola is about to commit public suicide in the slate~tablet market-space .. the world can do without a bunch of overpaid, unproductive, talentless, corporate exec's.

The math alone is a dead-cert for death: $599 crappy, copycat versus $499 industry leading, innovative design.

.. tell us again which bunch of mentally challenged, chimps will pay an extra $100 for that "privilege"???

I'm sorry .. i didn't mean to insult the chimpanzees.
0 Votes
+ -
@mrxxxman Actually the lack of objectivity is on your part. As mentioned in the article (if you had actually read it) the average consumer doesn't care about the spec sheet so GB versus GB isn't going to be what they are looking at. The average consumer is going to look at price first and last which gives the iPad the advantage.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson
You sound like you don't like tablets? Well, what are you comparing them to... a laptop? My laptop in no way compares to a good tablet while sitting at the airport or Starbucks, when all you want to do is check email, Facebook, or other social media. I rarely bring my laptop along for such activities.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
Loverock Davidson 16th Mar 2011
@camcost@...
My laptop does all those things you listed and more. That's why I bring my laptop along.
0 Votes
+ -
@camcost@...

That is why I have a smart phone. More than adequate for such things while in a place like an airport. If I am going to carry bulk around I rather have a laptop where I can do actual computing instead of a few quick tasks like reading/sending an email or updating my facebook status.

Of course other people may see it differently which is perfectly fine but if I am going to shell out $500+ for a device I want it to do what a $500 laptop will do. Seeing as most people (that I see) lug their laptop around along side their tablet anyway I don't see much of a difference.
0 Votes
+ -
@camcost@... And if you are going to replace a netbook with a tablet, the Xoom is much closer to one based on features and OS. Things like customization, ports, multi-tasking, memory, and the fact that you don't need an actual computer w/iTunes to set it up like you do with iPad 2.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
Pete "athynz" Athens 16th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson Agreed.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson
I got my first computer in the mid-80s. There weren't many portable computers around at the time. In my mind I created what I considered to be an ideal portable... it was quite similar to a tablet form factor. When laptops hit the market and flourished, I was surprised with their clumsy design... they are an open-and-shut book which you hold sideways! It never has been a good design, not from day one, and still isn't.

The design of a typical laptop is a compromise design. It's not all that great on your lap, on a table, held in bed, opened on an airplane, sitting in class, or any other place it might go. It is somewhat portable, but not ideally portable. A tablet is much more similar to carrying around a pad of paper, which can go anywhere with ease. That is the reason why warehouses and medical centers have been using tablet format devices for 20 years, as opposed to impractical laptop designs.

My biggest surprise is that it's taken this many years for tablets to finally find their place. But actually, it makes sense, since the input of text has always been important and an onscreen keyboard has never compared to a physical keyboard. Technology advances will keep giving us better and better alternatives to the laptop keyboard, and with each improvement, the laptop will get more and more impractical to carry around.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson True, tablets shouldn't really be much more than $300
0 Votes
+ -
@Jimster480

Yes for $300 I can live with the limitations of a tablet in their current form. Which is probably why I opted for an Archos101 for $320 for a 16GB/10" model.

I am actually interested in seeing where the development of the Hybrid Tablet/PCs go where you can get a tablet that is part of the laptop that can be removed to use the light tablet OS or is all touch running both a Full OS and a Tablet OS with the ability to switch back and forth. There are a couple out now or right around the corner but even the price on those is a little high.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson Totally agree! These tablets have less to offer than the latest China tablets that sell for less than $300. I don't call these knock-offs because they've been around long before the IPAD hit the market thanks to ANDROID.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson
never said this before, but I completely agree 100% when the iPad1 came out I laughed my self silly, the dumb thing cost $75 more than my current laptop (at the time), and I'd been using that laptop for 3+ years at that point! not to mention the laptop could out perform 4 or 5 iPad1's combined, and that was a cheap tablet (granted it was marked down $250-$300 on black friday when I bought it, but still, I bought it for $425 with a 240GB hdd, 802.11b/g, a DVD+/-RW, multiple USB ports and an SD card slot... what did the iPad have? nothing but 16GB onboard memory)

My first thought was "there goes apple making another over priced hunk of junk that you need to buy the highest end model at almost 200% the cost of the low end to have anything decent" If they had come out in the $200-$300 range I would have bought 2 iPads on launch day breaking my "no icrApple device in the house" rule (yes I make my friends leave their iPhones in the car, and no I don't get a lot of visitors)

I've been laughing at Amazon for how much they were charging for the Kindle since day one current prices on both it and the nook are very tempting, especially now that you can root and install android 2.3.3 on the nook color. Going to try and talk my wife into using o rooted nook color instead of getting her a new notebook this year. Now that the price is something reasonable. You should not pay more for less, I don't care what process the display has to go through. Price is the reason I never bought a tablet PC from toshiba 10 years ago, I laughed at them too for putting a $1500-$2500 price tag on a device with the performance of a $200 pc. I wanted one with a quad core processor in it and I would ditch my desktop for it, but by the time they were available I was no longer interested.
0 Votes
+ -
@aiellenon Do you notice a theme here? You seem to be laughing silly at companies that are selling their products like hotcakes. Based on that do you think maybe you are missing something?

"...breaking my "no icrApple device in the house" rule (yes I make my friends leave their iPhones in the car, and no I don't get a lot of visitors)"
I am sorry but that's just plain pathetic. I love my iPhone and prefer it over Android phones that I have messed with but I don't have any bias against them. I would feel like a small minded hater on a pathetic power trip if I made my friends with Android devices leave them in the car.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson I AGREE IF THEY ARE GOING TO TAKE A BITE OUT OF THE APPLE THEN THEY ARE MORE THEN 200 DOLLARS TOO MUCH
0 Votes
+ -
New math?
TheWerewolf 16th Mar 2011
The "entry level" iPad 2 is 16GB and is $499.

The "entry level" Xoom is 32GB and is $599 - which is the exact same price as the 32GB iPad 2.

Now, if you'd said "Motorola should have made a 16GB version of the Xoom for $399 and promoted the expandability of the on board storage" then, I'd have agreed with you, since like all Android devices, it can take an SD card to expand the total storage...
@TheWerewolf

You miss the point totally. You can buy an iPad for 499. You can not buy a XOOM for 499. Period. The author already mentioned - "The XOOM has a lot of hardware features that are quite powerful, but mainstream consumers don?t care about specifications."
0 Votes
+ -
@mKind

Maybe if XOOM made a 16GB version then it would be the same price so you are missing the point. While price is a good factor to go by most people do not realize that 16GB may be not enough until it is too late and Apple offers no expansion for more storage aside from purchasing a whole new iPad.

Also your assumption about mainstream consumers do not care about specifications is quite false. Maybe at the initial time of purchase they don't but that is because of an uninformed decision at the fault of the consumer or the seller of the product but I guarantee you when that 16GB of storage runs out or when something they assumed would work does not specifications comes into play rather quickly.
0 Votes
+ -
@mKind
You're missing the point. The 32GB iPad 2 is the same price as the 32GB Xoom.
0 Votes
+ -
@droid101:
iPad2 is much faster (according to tests: browsing, FPU -- Linpack, and GPU), lighter, thinner, not plasticky and has actual tablet applications to use. And even though iPad's screen is about 20% less detailed than of Xoom, it is way better in other degrees: it is IPS technology and all of screen layers are glued together to fight parasitic refraction. And the OS does not look like clutter there.
0 Votes
+ -
@mKind
If that's true then why does apple have 12 different models of the iPad with varying levels of storage? Why bother to buy something above 16GB?
0 Votes
+ -
@ bobiroc
Funny that you should miss the point, as it was EXPLICITLY laid out for you. First, Motorola's total lack of a machine at that price point, regardless of specs, is the point.
You are TOTALLY wrong about consumers caring about spec, or do you have some secret demographic data that belies the MOUNTAIN of empirical sales data that shows the contrary?
0 Votes
+ -
Careing about Specs
bobiroc 16th Mar 2011
@DeusXMachina

If people did not care about Specs then iPad 1 owners wouldn't be running out to get the faster, thinner iPad 2 with cameras now would they? People would be upgrading their phones as soon as the possibly could either or buying new products outside of them being non-functional now would they?

Answer that if people do not care about specifications?
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc
They bought the iPad 2 for enhanced CAPABILITIES, not specs. If they cared about specs, they wouldn't have navigated, EN MASS, to the lowest end model, both with the iPad 1, and now the new model.
Your contentions just do NOT match the facts on the ground.
As the great Richard Feynman said, if your theory does not match the data, you are wrong. Period.
0 Votes
+ -
@ chethammer
For the SMALL percentage that want the higher specs. And therein lies the problem for Motorola. Very few people do. Enough for Apple to make a bit of money, and provide an upgrade path to it's hard core users, but not enough to base an entire product line on.
0 Votes
+ -
@mKind Mainstream consumers don't care about specifications? Really? How do you or this yahoo who wrote this thing know? Show me the empirical data. I'm sick of iFans always claiming this argument like it's fact. It's not.

Besides people who are buying hi-tech items at these prices do care about specs. Maybe, if they cost $100 or less they wouldn't care, but they definitely care when spending $500. Now, consumers have a choice so they'll compare features (specs) and make an informed decision. The only people blindly buying an iPad 2 are current Apple users, not the general public.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeusXMachina

Really, because according to the latest sales data I saw, the drivers of iPad 2 adoption were better video, and the 32GB is outselling the 16. According to the sales data, the app environment is fundamental to the success of the platform, and Apple developers are clamoring for more RAM on the iPad. According to the sales data, the Retina display BS was important to the sales of the iPhone 4, and the Xoom has 50% higher resolution than the iPad 2. That's 1.5x as many pixels per inch.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Bought for enhanced capabilities
bobiroc 16th Mar 2011
@DeusXMachina

Um..excuse me but aren't the enhanced capabilities like the ability to video conference because of the cameras and better processing power for speed because of the specifications? You can play word games all you want but at the end of the day people do care.
0 Votes
+ -
@ tkejlboom
Yeah, here's the problem with making stuff up: The people
who know what they are talking about can tell, and will call you on it.
The latest sales data show nothing of the kind. In fact, they don't show anything AT ALL. The device sold out. Nationwide. As such NO conclusions can be reached about market preferences for the iPad 2, but extrapolating from iPad 1 sales data, you are COMPLETELY full of it. The 16 GB model outsold the 32 GB model over 5 to 1.
Also B.S. is the idea that app devs are "clamoring for more RAM". The VAST majority of users are doing just fine with 16GB. Besides which, you again evince your ignorance, as the main issue for devs is system RAM, and that is the same across all models in a given generation, in this case half a gig. Also, you might want to check your math. First the Xoom does NOT have 50% higher resolution, and it certainly does not have 1.5x pixels per inch (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you meant per inch squared.)
0 Votes
+ -
@mrxxxman
Again you don't just get to make stuff up. Sorry to burst your bubble, but the published sales research indicates that 70% of iPad2 purchasers were new to the platform.

Truth FAIL.
0 Votes
+ -
@mKind
I don't believe the point was missed. And I know that most consumers, who would even look into buying a tablet, would consider the specs. I have an iPad myself and I'm definitely getting the iPad2 but not because of the specs. Mainly because of the care taken into putting together Apple products. Truth is, with other OSs there is always a better variety and greater potential but until there is someone to compete on manufacturing, Apple will always have a spot.
0 Votes
+ -
@denisrs except by June, all those factors will be reversed.

Xoom is a better Tablet all around but it does need some software tweaks.

The benchmarks you site, are they optimized for Tegra 2, is Honeycomb opimized for Tegra 2 or are we seeing the results of only a single core of the GPU... If we are, remember there are 8 of them in the Tegra 2 ULP GPU.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeusXMachina dude you're making stuff up...

Every report noted that the 32 Gig sold out before the 16 Gig and that is quantifiable because the device sold out... We knew there was demand for the device but people clearly chose the entry level least in most situations!
0 Votes
+ -
@mrxxxman There's a lot more to it than that man... the fact that Honeycomb has 3D features enabled in the OS also takes away from the GPU and some of their tests aren't optimized for the Tegra so those numbers aren't realistic and I'm not saying it is better than the Power VR but I do feel the two are probably very close.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc Sorry but the assumption is not false. Just because you have the (supposed) need for expansion and more storage doesn't mean that the average consumer does.
0 Votes
+ -
@mrxxxman I'm sick of iFans always claiming this argument like it's fact. It's not.
OMG, Pot meet Kettle. You can't see the facts through your blind hatred so what would be the point of asking for any data. If it doesn't follow your thinking it won't count anyway. If consumers we only concerned about the spec sheet and not about price or user experience then the competition would be blowing away Apple. Apparently that isn't the case since the competition can't even touch Apple when it comes to sales.
0 Votes
+ -
@Peter Perry Every report noted that the 32 Gig sold out before the 16 Gig...
Without actual sales figures that means absolutely nothing. For example if there were 500K of the 16GB version and 25 of the 32GB version built does it really matter that the 32GB sold out first? Those were exaggerated figures but you get the point, without actual sales data which sold out first doesn't mean anything.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
mKind Updated - 16th Mar 2011
deleting duplicate post
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
mKind Updated - 16th Mar 2011
deleting duplicate post
0 Votes
+ -
Specs are for geeks
Robert Hahn 16th Mar 2011
@TheWerewolf These arguments are starting to remind me of the very early days of the PC business when IBM was running away with the thing and The Other Guys all felt they had to beat IBM on 'specs'. So they would put in weird-o graphics chips that danced circles around the IBM PC, but that no software supported; or use CP/M instead of MSDOS... Anything to avoid head-to-head comparison with the IBM PC.

Nobody cared about any of that stuff. It was IBM, or if you were really adventuresome, a 'clone' from some no-name knockoff company like Compaq.

Every single company that tried to 'out-spec' the IBM PC has either been folded into some defense contractor, or is rotting in the boneyard.
0 Votes
+ -
@Robert Hahn

I think more people care about that than you think. Be it a computer or something else like a car or a TV or anything Specifications are very important to many people. I frequently have people ask me for advice on purchasing computers or other electronics that will fit their needs. Maybe initially people go after price but when that computer or device does not do what they want it to do specifications comes into play rather quickly.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
pllamonica@... Updated - 16th Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn
you can't compare the 2 events, IBM was the hit player because at the time, as the expression went, 'no one ever got fired for buying IBM'. If you baught a clone you had to prove you were making the right choice, buying an IBM PC was a safe bet if you wanted to keep your job.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
dave95. Updated - 16th Mar 2011
@bobiroc

Well the problem for the competition is the iPad is hardly lacking in hardware spec and performance. Matter of fact, recent test shows the iPad 2s PowerVR GPU easily blowing away the Xooms Tegra 2, by as much as 3-4 times in many cases. Performance was already great on the iPad 1, now with the iPad 2 it's exceptional. Even with the iPad 1, you put it side by side with the Xoom and compare OS performance. I bet the iPad 1 would easily fly with no stutter, everything's smooth as butter. Whereas the Xoom would see problems in this area just moving from screen to screen.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4216/apple-ipad-2-gpu-performance-explored-powervr-sgx543mp2-benchmarked/2

This is why we say specs don't matter when competing with the iPad. It's already at an exceptional stand-point, and even more powerful than its closest competitor who's trying to charge more.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Motorola XOOM WiFi for $599 is $200 too much
tboonie@... Updated - 16th Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn

IBM got there lunch handed to them in a basket because of their arrogance (hmm.. sounds like Apple) and other clone PCs offered the same or better features for a much cheaper price. How many IBM PCs are there today? Zero. If Apple isnt careful, the same thing will happen to them. They need to start supporting flash and stop being so proprietary or people will move to Android, just like they did with clone PCs in the 80s and 90s.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix