Time for Google to take control of the Android update process

By | January 24, 2011, 8:34am PST

Summary: Too many customers are not happy with lack of updates for Android phones. It’s time for Google to step in and take control over the Android update process, no matter how many partner feathers get ruffled.

Android is always a hot topic on the web since it’s grown so big. Unfortunately for Google, a lot of the conversation centers around the pitiful update process that has customers venting frustration at the delays (or lack) of updates for their Android phones. I understand that the update process is complicated and involves too many entities, but Google is ultimately the company that gets kicked in the shins as its brand gets dragged through the mud over the frustrating update situation. That’s reason enough for Google to step in and take control over the Android update process, no matter how many partner feathers get ruffled.

The whole “open” concept behind Android implies that Google should keep producing its code and keeping its hands off those who are building products with it. That is the ideal process, but it’s not working when so many customers are unhappy with support. They may be mad at Samsung for the lack of updates, or their telco, but ultimately it is the Android brand that bears the brunt of customer discontent.

If OEMs have such a difficult time producing updates for handsets, then something is wrong with the process. If OEMs are holding off releasing updates for business reasons, as many customers believe, then the process is flawed in allowing that to happen. If the telcos are dragging the process down with testing delays, then the process is not working. It is time for Google to step in and address all of the issues affecting timely updates to its customers, and make no mistake, Android customers are Google’s customers.

Google needs to establish an update process for partners that paves the way for faster (and continual) updates to handsets, no matter the telco. If partners are having such a hard time getting Android updates incorporated in handset updates, then Google needs to aid in this process. Form a business group that does nothing else but gets actual handset updates into customers’ hands.

If the handset update process is not really that complicated, then Google needs to put mandates on partners requiring a reasonable (to customers) timeframe in which handsets get updated. Just because Android is open doesn’t mean Google can’t put controls on businesses using it. It is time to step up on the behalf of customers and get things right. Partners won’t like it, but they’re making too much money on Android to turn away now.

Image credit: Google

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long.

Disclosure

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has no affiliations or relationships that need to be disclosed.

Biography

James Kendrick

James Kendrick has been using mobile devices since they weighed 30 pounds, and has been sharing his insights on mobile technology for almost that long. Prior to joining ZDNet, James was the Founding Editor of jkOnTheRun, a CNET Top 100 Tech Blog that was acquired by GigaOM in 2008 and is now part of that prestigious tech network. James' writing has appeared in many print publications: Smartphone and Pocket PC Magazine, Information Week and Laptop Magazine to name a few. James' coverage of the mobile technology sector has regularly appeared in the New York Times, Salon.com and CNN/ Fortune online. Not just a writer, James has filmed numerous video reviews and how-tos that have garnered well over a million viewers. He has appeared on local news segments and been interviewed by the Associated Press on mobile technology topics. Additionally, James has been podcasting about mobile technology for years.

127
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Time for Google to Take Control of the Android Update Process
jenny55 19th Oct
This is the first time I am visiting this post.I have gathered much of it.Really a interesting firm things.
vipre coupon
update times. But, the problem is that the carriers still have way too much power.
@DonnieBoy Yes they do!!
This is the first time I am visiting this post.I have gathered much of it.Really a interesting firm things.
vipre coupon
@DonnieBoy
Very good response in amillion years. First time you made sense.
@Rama.NET BINGO!
@DonnieBoy
Carries do. But so do manufactures and their behavior is nothing short of criminal - lack of support for existing products.

I have an HTC Desire. Purchased SIM free, carrier independent. Two months after the 2.3 was released, HTC still has no official position whether my phone, released in April 2010, will ever get the update.

HTC still sells Desire. But they don't seem to support it.
@kitko Manufacturers have no incentive to spend any time and money updating the OS of their older model smartphones. They made all the money they can make as soon as you purchased phone.

Providing updates means that users will keep the phone a lot longer time .... because they don't become obsolete. They are counting on obsolescence to sell you a new model.

Apple has the App Store as an incentive to keep the iPhone updated. Android OEMs don't have that value incentive.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@kitko Actually they make most of their money on the service, not the phones.
0 Votes
+ -
Who is the customer?
pwatson 25th Jan 2011
@kitko - I understand that you paid full price for your unlocked phone. However, most people take the perceived "cheap" price for a locked-in phone and contract with penalties.

To the manufacturer, the carrier is the customer. Until the manufacturer's customer (the carrier) says that they want an update, the manufacturer will do nothing.

What we must do is stop accepting the carrier's trap and buy only unlocked phones.

Consider how we buy computers. Would anyone buy a computer that can only access the Internet by using AOL? As much as AOL would love such a situation, it is unlikely because the market will see through such a ploy.

Why do we treat ourselves so poorly when it comes to acquiring a cell phone? When carriers find that there is no money coming for their traps, they will treat us better.
0 Votes
+ -
@pwatson

the problem with everyone buying "unlocked" phones is that you still pay the same price for the service, what is the point? It is just wasting money. the carriers think they are making out good buy locking you on a contract, buy you are STILL saving $150 - $400+ off the total cost at the end of your contract.

Until carriers start charging you a surcharge for using an unlocked phone the only reason to buy one is to get a phone from another region that is not available where you live.
@kitko While I think it's a pathetic policy not to keep them updated it's not criminal and they most likely are not going to change things without a major push from Google as they make more money this way.

@JamesKendrick Actually it's the carriers that make money on the service, not the OEMs.
@kitko
How true. HTC is getting to bold and almost Apple like with somethings. I personally stopped buying their devices due to that fact and the fact that they abandoned the physical keyboard for "more iphone-ish" bull type devices. Don't get me wrong, virtual keyboards are great but physical to me is always better

I now roll with LG but back to the Android update. Case and point: Dell Streak locked to AT&T is still on 1.6 but the unlocked purchase from Dell is on 2.2. AT&T still doesn't have this in their database. It shows up as Dell Latitude (a laptop) and from what their level3 tells me no update is in the making from them for this device either. Luckily XDA Dev is around and they have the solutions.

Google Really needs to step in on this Really Big Issue with their updates.
0 Votes
+ -
It's Googles fault carriers have too much power. After the iPhone was released every carrier was yearning and scrambling for something to compete with the iPhone. Google had an opportunity to limit their power and could have established certain requirements (including updates) to use Android OS. But Google in its haste to promote Android didn't. So now here we are only a few years after Android was released, and the user base/experience is severely fragmented. No one knows if or when they will see updates from their carrier.
@DonnieBoy
You know...I hate it when people use the subject field for their reply and then have it spill into the reply area.
The subject field is for the subject and the reply area is for the reply.
Come on.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Xander_Crews It makes you pay close attention, that's a fact.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes but...
godsfault 29th Jan 2011
@Xander_Crews this is the way I prefer to reply.
0 Votes
+ -
What is unrealistic here is that
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 24th Jan 2011
probably of the millions who own Android handsets, the update process isn't even an issue for them.

I am happy if the OEMs can provide an update every six months.

The reality is that sales-wise Android smartphones didn't really take off in large volume until 2010, in spite of being around since 2008.

I think we are seeing to some extent 'growing pains' and with time, the OEMs will fall in line with expectations on a reasonable update delivery schedule, say every six months.

Those OEMs who don't may then accept the 'risk' of losing sales in the long run as their reputation/image will suffer.

James, I think this issue has been overstated in the media.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

No actually you are wrong here and the article is right:

- Sony Xperia (Which is still being sold) will not be updated past Android 2.1. It is not underpowered by any stretch of the imagination, but Sony Ericsson want to sell the latest hardware.
- Samsung has issues where some are updated to 2.2, and others not.

The list goes on. It is a real problem and I do think Google needs to step in and fix it.
@serpentmage I agree. Motorola's first Droid does not have the wifi tether option provided by Verizon because Verizon wants the customer to buy the newer phone. The result is a phone envy causing the person to keep wanting the next version of the phone.

You can root the phone and download Google's Wifi hotspot program off the web, but you won't find the average person rooting their android phone thinking it voids their warranty or "bricking" their phone.
@serpentmage
I agree and have said, Google is going to get the blame - right or wrong - because of other people's implementation. The fact is, even people who know nothing about tech will say "Google Android" that is going to be difficult to remove. They will have the same problem with their "OS"...unless they control it.
@serpentmage IMHO, this is where the customer needs to "vote with their wallet".

First, avoid products from vendors that have a history of abandoning their products.

Second, by rooting their phones and doing what they want - that is a bonus, not a drawback. On a related note, fight against vendors who try to prevent the rooting of their products.

... problems solved, if enough people agree.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

It's not an issue if you never want to install an App. Just go on using your phone and it'll work the same way as when you bought it.

But if you want to install and use apps version number is very important. If Google wants lots of people writing apps and lots of people downloading them, they do need to sort this out.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

James has it right! Sorry to disagree...."Head in the sand" takes longer to get unfair practices to be fair....

Customers pay for their life style and 'IF' as Google can do with the NEXUS brand they CAN do only if forced to it seems.

No prudent executive would think of going forward with a deal unless extensive due diligence has been completed in the areas of legal and finance. This needs to be extended to Customer current, previous, and future complaints.

?...'Due diligence' is a somewhat technical phrase used to describe a range of assignments, legal obligations, reports and investigations which take place in business...?

Suggestion: ALL senior management and Board Members must sign-off that they personally updated each and every previously sold model phone their company makes/sells and also those companies which allowed on their network said devices BEFORE any and all new devices are released. That way, the pain points would be both known and FELT not as a ?number' rather as an experiential fact.
@heredavid What Google could do here is to make OEMs agree that if they choose to not update, or to not update in a timely fashion, they will have some mechanism in place for the community to continue updating the SW from Google's open code and the underlying required (platform specific) code.

Or, to do as another article recommended - and enable a layer of virtualization between the underlying platform and the OS itself.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate
Read your post.
Riddle me this, "Why does South Korea's Tech Czar with access to any his nation's latest and greatest Android phones state today he still prefers the iPhone?"


Face these Android complainers are mad they have a pretend iPhone and they want Google to make it like a real iPhone with an Android update. It will never happen and they will always be unhappy.
@vic.healey@... Sorry, "pretend iPhone ... make it like a real iPhone" - it certainly appears that you don't know what you are talking about.

I don't want an iPhone - if I did, and could tolerate AT&T, I would have one. My Android phones have been the best, far and away, for what I want out of my phones.

If you prefer an iPhone, great - but you should atleast appreciate competition from other platforms. That is the only way any platform will continue to advance.

Drop the fanboyism ...
@vic.healey@...

Go back to your Apple blog...
@vic.healey@...
Hwang issued a retraction stressing Samsung's competitiveness.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz,: While I agree it is overblown, it kills me that they (the OEMs & Telecom providers) won't let those of us who truly want the latest and greatest, and will accept liability for any subsequent problems.

Having to run a third-party ROM, if even available, to get the latest is the truly unacceptable part of this equation. And I squarely place the blame on the aforementioned OEMs and Telecoms, not Google.
0 Votes
+ -
@trejrco_z Google has their share of the blame as well... Apple did not allow AT&T or any other wireless provider to dictate anything about the iOS updates and because of that Apple was free to offer updates to all iPhones capable of running the latest and greatest iOS. IMHO Google could have and should have taken a similar stance.
@athynz
You are right. Here all the blame should be eaten by Google. Because first of all they haven't learnt anything from Microsoft about the fragmentation and why fragmentation has occured to it, who has the real control on the OS updates etc. They have partnered with Microsoft partners, but really never learnt anything from it. Also they had been in the Apple board but there also really never learnt anything about iPhone successes reasons. They didn't have a clue about that total spectrum, IMHO. Now it is too late because these carriers and makers want a consistent revenue. The makers will see the older phones with newer OS become competition to their newer phones. Carriers will see decrease in sales. In order avoid this issue carriers and makers will increse price of the phones, eliminate BOGO promotions, decrease subsidies etc. or look at for Google to share their ad revenue with them. Afterall these are the ones that are pushing the phones and increasing the adrevenue for Google with every phone and data contract they sold. So naturally they want their fair share if Google tightens the control. The best bet for them would going after Apple or Microsoft if Google doesn't listen to them and thats what would happen.
0 Votes
+ -
What worries me...
becabill 24th Jan 2011
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate ...is the tendency for so many media companies (mostly news media) advertising that they have apps for the iPhone and thus promoting a belief that Apple has the only "smart phone" out there.
@becabill

Add the US Government to that group too. They just released a dynamite IRS app for the Apple iOS ecosystem.

It is like the Obama administration doesn't believe that Android fanbois pay any real income taxes or expect any refunds. Our government is profiling smart phone owners figuring Apple and Rim users are the only ones with real wealth.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

It really surprised me that no one commented on the fact that you think smartphones came into existence in 2008... I owned a palm TOUCHSCREEN flip cell phone on Sprint in late 2000/early 2001 and I've had a smart phone ever since. (I believe it was a kyocera device running palm 1.5 or 2.0) with a qualcomm logo on the back.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

What is unrealistic here is that probably of the millions who own Android handsets, the update process isn't even an issue for them.

Funny how when Apple "Advocates" mention that most consumers aren't worried about this feature or that feature such as HDMI out on a phone that doesn't fly with the Apple haters but now that updates are an issue with Android it probably isn't going to matter to those who own the phones.
Why get Google to do it? The source code is there for you to modify on your own. Remember, this is linux, the land of the compiler. If you don't like something or need an update you can just write and compile it yourself. That's how free software works.
@Loverock Davidson you might know how to do it but alot of people dont!!
0 Votes
+ -
@TRDRACER21
And these people are smart enough to use Microsoft (which works with everything) or Apple which works with more things past, present, and future.

The more Google attempts to "fix" this issue, the more Google will become like M$. Just sayin... Free aint so free now is it?
0 Votes
+ -
@TRDRACER21

Well maybe they should learn.

Make this "open" platform more than an empty marketing term.

There are a lot of sheep out there parroting the "I prefer Android because it's open." line but when pressed have absolutely no idea what it means or how to make use of it.

Android is "open" for networks and carriers, users are cash cows to be milked for ad views based on information that is gathered on them.

There is no nobility in Google's version of "open" source.
0 Votes
+ -
@alsobannedfromzdnet I do have to laugh at most of the people I know that are Android users. They give me a hard time about Apple's walled garden and how open Android is but these same people are all but computer illiterate and would have the slightest clue how to utilize Android in the least. They simply heard all the marketing and are parroting it to anybody that will listen even though they don't have a clue what it means.

This in no way makes me think they are in the majority of Android users or that many Apple users don't just fall for the marketing. I would really suspect that the vast majority on either platform are fairly clueless when it comes to features, capabilities and either rooting or jailbreaking.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson

That is the Linux way and an excellent solution. Who needs Google anyway to make Android better? Linux users know more than Google does.
0 Votes
+ -
@vic.healey@...
I am looking for the community to improve and update. I agree, this is the Open Source way.

Remember, droid is not M$ or iThis or that. It was developed to be different, so why expect it to be the same?
@Loverock Davidson So what version u reached now after compiling your own Android version?
0 Votes
+ -
Discontent?
jasonp@... 24th Jan 2011
The only discontent I hear is from ZDNet bloggers. When I talk to actual Android users, I hear none of it. Google seems to have taken the exact correct approach here. If customers don't like the speed in which their phone vendor issues updates, the market will work as it should and they'll find another phone vendor.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed, it's an issue only for an elite minority
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 24th Jan 2011
@jasonp@...
OEMs have just gotten their feet wet with Android-driven sales. Time will take care of everything.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate Untill that time come, Whenever you want to enjoy new Android features go & buy a new phone
@jasonp@... Well said! When the vendor doesn't do it, the community does a pretty decent job of doing it. Although, thanks to Moto's bootloader locking, my D2 is still waiting for 2.3 ... still rooted and improved, but no 2.3 yet.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@jasonp@... Every Android community forum and every carrier support forum is filled with folks unhappy with delayed updates. It is not an isolated situation, it is across the board with almost every handset released.
The problem is: they can't. Google can't turn this around totally unless they make some pretty onerous conditions. The reason is one of licensing partially and the other is that Open Handset Alliance members have the right to do exactly what they are doing.

Not saying I don't agree with you, just saying it's bloody impossible.
0 Votes
+ -
Right on, gork.
Userama 24th Jan 2011
@gorkon
Google = open (well, sorta, kinda)
Closed = control = evil = what Google don't do (well, sorta, kinda)

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix