ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Chrome 14: The best Web browser keeps getting better (Review)

By | September 18, 2011, 1:39pm PDT

Summary: Google’s Chrome 14 is another step into the lead for the best Web browser of them all.

It’s odd. When Firefox moved into its accelerated development path, Firefox really didn’t get much better. In fact, it’s been getting less stable. Google’s Chrome Web browser though just keeps getting better with every new release. Chrome 14, in my opinion, is now clearly the best Web browser for any operating system available today.

Why? Well, look at all the raw numbers. To see how Chrome 14 ranked, I put it up against the latest releases of Firefox and IE 9 on a Windows 7 box.

When it comes to Web standards compatibility, Chrome 14 is a winner. On the Acid 3 compatibility test, which checks out how well a browser complies with Web standards such as Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), JavaScript, and Extensible Markup Language (XML), Chrome had a perfect score. Firefox 6 had a score of 97 and IE had a 95.

On the recently, August 23rd, updated HTML5 Test, which checks to see how compliant the Web browser is with the HTML5 Web page standard, Chrome is king of the mountain again with a score of 341 out of a possible 450. Firefox 6.02 came in second with 313 and IE 9.0.8 came in a distant last with 141. Anyone who tells you that IE is HTML5 compliant is trying to sell you Windows. It’s not. It’s not even close.

Download.com: Chrome 14

Moving on to performance, I use Chrome 14 on all my systems. That means I use it on various Linux desktop distributions; Chrome OS on a Samsung Chromebook, Mac OS Snow Leopard and Lion and Windows XP and 7 PCs. It runs fast on all of them.

For performance benchmarking, though I use my Gateway DX4710 running Windows 7 SP1. This PC is powered by a 2.5-GHz Intel Core 2 Quad processor and has 6GBs of RAM and an Intel GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) 3100 for graphics. It’s hooked to the Internet via a Netgear Gigabit Ethernet switch, which, in turn, is hooked up to a 60Mbps (Megabit per second) cable Internet connection.

The first benchmark was Kraken 1.0. This is Mozilla’s take on the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark In Kraken, lower scores are better. Chrome 14 beat its last version, Chrome 13 and all other comers with a score of 4578.5millisecondss (ms). Chrome 13 had a score 4927.7ms.; Firefox took second with a score of 7588.2ms.; and IE came in last with a wretched 17,051.9ms.

With Peacekeeper, another JavaScript-performance benchmark, where higher scores are better, IE wins with a score of 8,343. Chrome comes in second with 7,663 and Firefox comes in a distant last with 4,588 points.

According to Google’s own JavaScript test V8 Benchmark Suite, where higher scores are better, Chrome 14 takes first with 7,591. The others aren’t even competitive. Firefox flops with a showing of 3,614 and IE does even worse with 2,193.

Finally, on SunSpider 0.9.1, the oldest of the JavaScript Web benchmark tests, where lower results are better, Chrome wins again with a score of 249.9ms Here the results are much more competitive. IE 9 is hot on its tail with a score of 252.6ms. and Firefox shows well with 301.2ms.

The results? Chrome is more standard compliant and faster than its closest competitors. Chrome has more than just that going for it though. This latest release includes some nice minor fixes and some very interesting major features.

Chrome 14: Pretty and Fast. (Gallery)

The fix I think most people will like is that print preview is now not only included, it works automatically. That’s the good news. The bad news is it doesn’t work well for Chrome on Macs. The feature, which is powered by Chrome’s built-in PDF reader, worked sporadically for me on both my Snow Leopard and Lion systems.

While that was annoying, it was nice to see the feature work perfectly on my Linux and Windows systems. Mac users may be mollified to find that Chrome 14 does work with Lion’s overlay scrollbars. You can also use the hot-key combo of Ctrl+Shift+F to activate basic support for Lion’s full-screen mode.

The two important new features aren’t going to be important to you in the short run, but it may be a different story in the long run.

The first, Web Audio application programming interface (API) lets developers create interesting sounds effects for games and applications. With it, programmers can add 3D dynamically positioned sounds sources and mix multiple sound sources. The results can be quite interesting. Try and see for yourself. I can see some very interesting games and musical applications coming out of this.

A far more significant feature is that Chrome 14 now supports C and C++ applications in Google’s Native Client SDK (software developer kit). Native client lets developers create local applications that run locally within Chrome.

What that means isn’t, as some people will have it, that Google is trying to redefine the Web. No, but what Google is doing, as has been doing ever since they introduced Chrome OS, is to redefine the desktop. What’s important about Native Client is that instead of just running applications off the Web, you’ll be able to run local applications at your machine’s full speed instead of at your Internet’s speed. In addition, since Native Clients run within the Chrome security sandbox, they’re much safer than most applications.

Put Native Client applications together with Google’s support for HTML5 local data storage for its applications and it’s clear than ever that Google wants Chrome to be just not your browser, but your operating system as well. At this time, there are only a handful of Native Client applications and those are only available via the Chrome Web Store, but I see big things coming here.

Indeed, I see big things coming for Chrome in general. It’s not only faster and more fully featured than ever, it’s also becoming more popular by the day. Indeed, in some South American countries, Chrome is already the number one Web browser. At this rate, I can see the day when it’s the number one Web browser in the world.

Related Stories:

Microsoft delivers new Internet Explorer 10 test build for Windows 8

Google Chrome Web browser kicks rump, takes names

Chromebooks Live!

Google adds offline mode to Gmail, Calendar, Docs apps

Firefox 6: A Firefox too far? (Review)

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

251
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

great
jessica887 10th Nov
it's a good place for u http://www.dori-jewelry.net/
0 Votes
+ -
Nothing I didn't expect
Michael Alan Goff 18th Sep
Artificial and pointless "performance" tests that Chrome has essentially been built around. Pointless "HTML5 Compliance tests" that are really only based on what that individual thinks is important (and not the standards committee).

Claims that firefox is unstable, while I've never had a crash (and I'm using the 'unstable nightly'). There isn't a noticeable speed difference between chrome and Firefox.

Don't let the facts get in the way, right?
@Michael Alan Goff You know, I've supported Firefox since it was just some warmed over Netscape code, and I want to like it. I can't. The 4.x series was slow as sludge. Since then, FF locks up on me all the time on Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. I'm sorry, but it's just not a very good browser any more. I wish it were. I wish the developers would focus on cleaning and stablizing the code instead of adding features and functionality. It's in real need of a complete tune-up rather than a new version.
0 Votes
+ -
subjective
Michael Alan Goff 18th Sep
@sjvn@...

As I said, I cannot notice any speed difference, lack of stability. Actually, my chrome browser has crashed more (2-3 times in the past month) than Firefox has (2-3 times in the past 3 months).

Also, those tests were useless even before chrome came out. They have no real bearing on the value of the browser. Why should I care about low JavaScript scores when webkit messes up the WYSIWYG on a few sites I frequent?
@sjvn@... Personally I disagree. I've been using the firefox beta as my main browser for the last 6 months and had no issues whatsoever. Disabled compatibility checking and all of my addons work perfectly. I haven't experienced a crash in at least 2 months (which is something I can't say with chrome) and as I speak I'm typing this from the FF9 nightly. The only thing I've had issues on the nightly with was flash, and that was fixed after 2 patches.

I honestly don't know what to say. PEBCAK? Running windows 7, can't speak for OSX and Linux.

And honestly, FF9 feels absolutely on-par with chrome, if not surpassing it a bit.

And saying that Firefox and IE flopped compared to Google Chrome on a benchmark designed by Google and used by Google to tune Google Chrome's V8 javascript engine is hardly an accurate representation of real-world performance.
@sjvn@...
I am running Firefox on Linux = no problems, and on Windows, just fine..... Before totally dumping Mac, I did have two updates of Firefox completely fail -- would not open. Doesn't matter however, as I now use Linux on my Mac Mini and it is A-OK, the OS and the Firefox browser.

For Windows, I would say Chrome or Firefox is just a toss-up, as both run excellent. Both take a good deal of RAM, and I think Firefox may still have some memory leaks, but RAM on Windows is cheap.
Doesnt change the fact that ACID3 is a crap css test and sunspider and derivatives are crap perf tests. That chrome is coded to work with non standard css to pass ACID3 is not a good thing.
@sjvn@...
Might be your machines or your setups as I find FF out does Chrome every day. i use both and FF seems to open and search noticeable faster and the chrome layout and look is pretty off putting. It has almost an apple feel of sterility to it and I ama a google fan just not so much of the Chrome line up. I even prefer Opera over Chrome. I still declare Firefox tops in the overall daily browser with zero lock ups or freezes. IE well tey fall way short of usable and I do not even consider them a contender in todays browser market.
@sjvn@... Its funny Chrome is constantly giving me messages that it can't display something or it crashes Flash sites even Google's own Youtube. Why don't you grow up no one browser is the best, they all have their strengths and weaknesses. I use Chrome and IE as I have two sites that won't display on Chrome, I won't use Firefox because it is always asking me to lessen my rule on third party cookies, it nagged once too often. Is Chrome better than IE or IE better than Chrome, the easy answer is no and you don't need artificial tests to make that statement.
@sjvn@... Are you using the Latest from your Linux Distro or Downloading it from Firefox? Both work fine for me and are quit zippy.
@sjvn@... You've become a punch line SJVN. You don't even have the credibility or objectivity to be taken seriously anymore, regardless of which browser is better.

Browser is free software to consume web content. I couldn't care less about which is better. A browser is not important enough to get into fanboy banter.
0 Votes
+ -
Not what I got
osreinstall 20th Sep
@sjvn@...

Setup:
Intel MB DP55KG
Intel i5-650
8GB Quickest Corsair Memory
ATI 5750 Fanless Video
WinXP Pro SP3

.9.1 Spider test:
206.1 on Firefox 6.0.2
232.4 on Google 14
3700+ on IE8

Have gotten 198 in the past with Spider test with earlier versions of Firefox. Also Google has smaller footprint memory. But real world performance these guys are close.

Now the most important test. Privacy. You see no matter how advanced Google gets, this is a deal breaker. Might be good as a public kiosk where tracking would be rendered useless. But for those that want to remain anonymous, forget about it.
0 Votes
+ -
Moncler Outlet
goodseo 22nd Sep
Once we talk about winter clothing, Classic Moncler Jackets and Gentlemen Moncler Coats wine out in our mind. Moncler 2011 Ski Jackets in Moncler Outlet are in various styles. Burberry ******** and Burberry Scarf in Burberry Outlet store are up to date. Find Burberry Outlet Online is easy. Please remember, there are a vast of Burberry Goods with a low price on sale in Burberry Sale and Burberry Online . Pick Up Oakley Sunglasses Cheap here is excited. The door of Oakley Sale and Cheap Oakley is open for you!
  • Flagged
@sjvn@...

Your bias for Chrome is acute Steve. It's simple, you trash Firefox with every release and you kiss Chrome's rear end with every release. I don't experience these phantom crashes you speak of, maybe your plugins are lame? Where's your missive about HTTP pipelining and the fact that Chrome doesn't have it? Pick some other topic and spare us from the severely biased Chrome fan boy talk.

Thanks,
-M
@sjvn@... Just to keep you current, IE9 now passes the Acid test 100%. May want to update your blog.
0 Votes
+ -
HTML5 hype has new twist
LBiege 18th Sep
... now that even Google is, correctly I might add, 2nd-guessing Javascript's role as a sound programming language for modern web going forward.
@LBiege

You're talking about their 'dart' project, aren't you?

I wish I knew more about that, instead of reading the gushing praise about how chrome beats all.
@LBiege

I fully agree re: JavaScript (and by extension ActionScript) being a poor language for web development. What would you suggest? C/C++ are Chrome exclusive. Asp.Net variants are exclusive to IE. Java is usable by all, but Sun dropped the ball big time on Applets...and the window was closed by the time they got it right (to Flex ActionScript.)

@sjvn

My main reason for sticking (for now) with Firefox has everything to do with add ons. If you can point me to a chrome plugin with the same capabilities as FF's NoScript, then I'll give it another go...
@Michael Alan Goff
No, I don't think so. It should be named RUST, not Chrome
Nothing wrong with Chrome, I just don't see any browser as being "the best" and despise worthless tests such as the ones that the media seem to harp on.
@Michael Alan Goff
My primary browser is Firefox on Mac OS X. I like Firefox a lot except it crashes all the time, there are some things that most definitely will crash it and there are sporadic crashes that I can't associate with any particular action or event. Crashes almost every day, sometimes a dozen times a day. The misery came once it passed version 4.x.
I am sorry they ever got into that "fast development cycle" c. They better get their act straight sooner than later or else they'll lose most of their share.

Don't let the facts get in the way, right?

PS: Those "performance" test are pointless, indeed.
@x233

If your firefox is always crashing, maybe there's something wrong with your machine.
@Michael Alan Goff
I, too, use the "unstable nightly", and it's crashed only once in 4 months (I tried to have Readability.com turn a NYTimes story into a readable HTML page without the garbage. It worked, but then FF crashed). Chrome would crash almost once a day. I see no speed difference between Firefox 9.01a and Chrome 13, but I do see that Firefox, like IE9, will render a print preview of my online bank pages (they're in traditional Chinese and Google seems to like only Simplified Chinese) but Chrome will no longer do that, so I can't print a PDF of that page using doPDF and Chrome. That's one reason I booted Chrome, which I adopted as my default browser the first time I used it. Another reason is that I'm frankly sick and tired of how invasive and all-pervasive Google is these days. It's become as obnoxious as the need to sign into Facebook or other social media (I don't use social networks and don't like being forced register just to make comments on some blogs) to see some Web content and comment on other Web content.
sjvn@'s bias is and always has been, IMHO, as subtle as a bludgeon and painfully disingenuous when he wants to sound "fair" (e.g., "You know, I've supported Firefox since it was just some warmed over Netscape code, and I want to like it. I can't."). I love Firefox nightly. I use other browsers only when I have to. When I used Chrome, I frequently had to use IE8 and Firefox4/5 to download and open PDFs.
As much as I like FF nightly, I'm not married to it. If something better comes along, I'll switch without a tear or a backward glance.
@Michael Alan Goff - I agree that the so called "Benchmark tests" are hogwash from a human perspective. What the machine measures might not be perceived at all when we sense it. What we sense could even sometimes be opposite to what the tests say. From real world usage, I find Chrome to be the fastest and IE to be the slowest (IE thinks it is doing me a favour when I ask it to open a tab in a crowded window). If one tab crashes in IE, all open IE windows go down with it. Don't even think about opening a PDF link directly in IE. Everyone freeze till it decides to complete the download.

But universal webpage compatibility wise, still nothing to beat IE with Firefox coming in close. Chrome surprisingly does not display certain webpages properly (I do not know if you have the webpage developers to blame on this).

The most irksome thing about Chrome for me has to be the fact that they long stopped giving standalone releases which I can install offline. Every time I need to jump through Google's hoops to get my reward. Downloading and setting up Firefox is a snap (and you thought logically speaking that tech companies will be the best and fastest to adapt to their competitions strengths.) Don't download stuff into my comp behind my rear; don't go the Windows way Google.
0 Votes
+ -
Moncler Jacken
goodseo 22nd Sep
Backpacks and Tote Bags of Coach Factory Outlet are economical. We offer Factory Direct Coach Outlet Poppy small Bags and Coach Chelsea Shoulder Bags. It is easy to find Coach Outlet Online here. Customers left many reviews in Juicy Couture Outlet here for the excellent Juicy Couture Tracksuits and Juicy Couture ******** . Please feel free to contact us if you like Wholesale Juicy Couture ******** or other Juicy Couture Bags here. Welcome to join Juicy Couture Outlet 2012 online. Let Warm Moncler Jacken keep accompany with you in this winter. Moncler Westen are great choices as well. Moncler Outlet is here!
0 Votes
+ -
Agree
runbei 18th Sep
Michael has a point. Google seems to have fallen into the trap of technical excellence at the expense of not caring what users want. To take one small (for Google) but perhaps large (for users) example: why won't Google do this simple, obvious, easy, user-pleasing thing and give us a bookmarks/history sidebar. This profoundly useful feature in Firefox remains bafflingly absent from Chrome. Why? Hm, could it be that like Microsoft, Google knows better than its users. Oh. Well. Sorry. This insignificant person offers most humble apologies to Great Corporation.
@runbei Is there a way to do that without an Apple/MicroSoft/fill in the blank patent infringement? I have been living without the bookmarks/history sidebar successfully.
@carlson1@... Is there a way to do that without an Apple/MicroSoft/fill in the blank patent infringement?

Since FF does it, I assume so.
@runbei

You do know that chrome brings up bookmark automatically when you open a new tab, right? Or that you can bring up the bookmarks at any time by hitting "Ctrl-Shift_B", or by going through a menu. Going through the menu also gives you the history. You can also just long-click on the back arrow.

Maybe you just want Chrome to be Firefox. I suggest that Chrome is outstanding in the way it keeps a minimal interface so that the CONTENT has more space on the screen. Just my opinion.
I agree that they do not seem to be very caring about what user want/need. I still do not see an easy way to sort my bookmarks. I really want to be able to just right click and select 'Sort by Name'.

One other thing that I often use is the pull down bar on the address in IE to select recently typed in addresses. I do not see anything like that on Chrome.

Also, I still notice a difference in fonts between IE and Chrome on what should be the exact same pages. Chrome lettering has thinner letters and for me it is more difficult to read (it causes eye strain). I see no reason why Google decided to make adjustments to fonts that have been designed and set.

I just did a Google search using IE and the same search using Chrome and the Chrome text is much more difficult on my eyes. I can spend hours reading the fonts displayed in IE but I very quickly get eyestrain when using Chrome (two different computers yield the same font problem with Chrome. Chrome text is just ever so slightly thinner. )

I just pulled up a page of standard thread sizes from engineersedge dot com/screw_threads_chart dot htm and IE shows the text with just a bit more clarity than Chrome. Chrome shows both the black text (with less black definition) and the white text with thinner numerals.

My brother commented to me the other day that fonts are set and should not be manipulated by Google so that they fit Googles guidelines of being slightly better. Web designers pick the fonts to be used on pages because the designers want those fonts. Google should not be making adjustments and improvements to set fonts. I agree with my brother.

Overall, I still will not be using Chrome. I have it to run tests to see of Google has started listening. So far they seem to not be listening much.
@John238

I agree with you but standards-compliant browsers don't do that. I examined the screw threads page you mentioned and it doesn't style that big table.

The CSS standard says user-defined styles are honored first, followed by site styles. Only in the absence of those two styles would the browser decide the style. That's the case with the screw threads chart.



happy
Care about privacy much? Obviously not.
0 Votes
+ -
You should use Microsoft tests
LiquidLearner 18th Sep
If you're going to use Google and Firefox tests. Just saying. I'm pretty sure IE9 beats Chrome and Firefox in hardware acceleration tests and the majority of their own benchmarks. But oh well, we know you wouldn't do that. You specifically write every article to make a point you've already decided, rather than coming to a conclusion after you've done your testing. You went into writing, and testing, already "knowing" Chrome was the best browser. Anything that may disprove that is either left out or completely glossed over.

What about tracking protection in IE9? Plug-ins in Firefox? A difference of a few milliseconds on JavaScript doesn't matter. At all.
You could prove every point brilliantly but i still can't give your recommendation any serious credit because you said in this article you have a Chrome laptop... If anything, the fact that you own one of them has put me off Chrome more.

FYI... in future do proper compliance tests, not ones designed to make IE look bad... In the proper tests, IE is king.
@daniejam10
Had me with you until you said IE is king..Its not evena real browse and can no longer compete. IE is by far the worse browser out with rankings being more like FF, Opera, Chrome, then IE somewhere below
@Fletchguy

IE is not the worst browser.

You wouldn't happen to still be using XP and thus using 8, would you?
@Fletchguy
IE is below????
IE is best when u compare to other browsers...security provided by IE is still cant be matched by any of ur other bowsers
IE9 . . . still doesn't pass basic standardized tests.

Don't get me wrong - I use IE 9 at work, and it's improved, but it has market share based on the fact that it's the default on Windows, it's 'good enuff', and a truly ridiculous number of corporate internal tools are designed around IE (Even, *wince*, IE 6).
0 Votes
+ -
Best?
facebook@... 18th Sep
" Chrome 14: The best Web browser keeps getting better" I, now, no longer need a spoiler alert to know that any sycophantic praise in the headlines for Google is going to be written by SJVN. How about once highlight some of the negative aspects instead of being such a fan boi? Does it now uninstall cleanly or will I still need it on my box because it breaks other products when it is uninstalled?



The value of compliance with Acid 3? Approaching no value. The value of compliance with the non-standard standard of HTML5? limited value.
@facebook@... too bad ZDNet cannnot find better bloggers to write these infomercials...
0 Votes
+ -
The best web spyware, you mean
jorjitop 18th Sep
Yes Chrome is great if you want Google to know everything you do on the web. If you don't care about your privacy. If you think your personal information is worth nothing. If so, good luck to you.

But, if you do give a damn about your privacy, I would go with "second best", Firefox, any day.

And I am writing this on a Mac OS X.7 with Firefox 6.02 and more than 1700 tabs open. It does slow down, but is stable as a rock. I know it is less stable on Win XP and Win 7, so I would not try this many tabs open on them. And, I have not tried many tabs open on Ubuntu, but I would imagine it would be as stable as a Mac.

You can keep your Chrome and be part of the Google spynet.
@jorjitop 1700 tabs? That's crazy! Nobody could possibly need that many tabs open wink
@jorjitop Holy! You watching that many videos at once or what? And I thought having 50 tabs open was insane shocked
I did some tests of my own since its hard to trust anything written by SJVN. Below are the results. I am not making any claims. Just putting forward the results.

acid3 has been updated by its authors to remove the obsolete tests. As a result IE9 now scores 100/100. I think author should update his post to reflect the same.
I did not run html5test because it seems to award points to tests which are not part of the standard, so testing html5 compliance with non-standard tests seems wrong.
I tried running peacekeeper and the test crashed consistently on chrome. So dropping those results.
Also as suggested by some of the above commentators, I have included ecmascripttest262 test and one test from ie10 test drive (I could not find ie9 test drive tests).
I have run the tests 5 times each (wherever applicable) to eliminate any variable spikes and slowdowns.

acid3
ie9 100/100
chrome 100/100

sunspider
ie9 184.0 184.7 182.4 183.2 182.2
chrome 298.6 318.1 317.7 314.6 313.0

kraken
ie9 12852.7 12975.9 12966.8 13033.2 13104.4
chrome 3532.1 3497.0 3570.7 3543.1 3539.4

ecmascripttest262
ie9 pass: 10660 fail: 318 %pass: 97.10
chrome pass: 10558 fail: 420 %pass: 96.17

ie10 test drive particle acceleration test
ie9 60 fps
chrome 21 fps
@1773

The Peacekeeper Chrome test on my Mac ran until the very end in which it returned this error message: "Could not find result for key 6gbI. If you trying to benchmark another browser please make sure you have copied the url correctly and try again." (I liked the english phrase used in this error message, "If you trying ... ")

BTW, Safari 5.1 returned a Peacekeeper score of 8568 points on my system, the best reported so far. (I use a direct ethernet cable connection from my DSL router to my Mac for this test.)
0 Votes
+ -
@kenosha7777 Come on - you are going to hurt SJVN's feelings...
@kenosha7777
Lol crashe cuz its a mac and we wont even talk about how poor a browser safari is. It barely renders half of whats on the internet. i constantly have to show the old people who use apple ipads and iphones with a different browser why they can't see things using safari lol
0 Votes
+ -
You're ignorant.
@Fletchguy Lol crashe cuz its a mac and we wont even talk about how poor a browser safari is.

If we aren't going to talk about it then why bring it up? BTW Safari is a decent browser IMHO and much improved over earlier versions but since you are a proud member of the Apple Hater's Club and the ABAers and I'm pretty sure it's in the bylaws to not try any sort of Apple product I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you either have not tried it and relied on the ABAers and Apple Haters to make up your mind for you or tried an earlier version.

It barely renders half of whats on the internet.


Which half? Thus far Safari has been able to handle anything I can throw at it - which sites specifically are you not able to view using Safari? Come on, you can tell us...

i constantly have to show the old people who use apple ipads and iphones with a different browser why they can't see things using safari lol


Again what things - other than some flash-based crap - can they not see in Safari that they have to use on another browser on an iPad? Which is kind of off the subject as we are dealing with desktop browsers not tablet browsers.

My God man you can barely keep a coherent argument together in 3 sentences - and that's not including the various misspellings and grammar issues... not that I want to be the grammar police but come on, you should be able to do much better.
@Fletchguy

As well as not seeing Flash "crap". they also can't see any sophisticated HTML 5 that uses autoplay for audio and video. This means no voice-over or video without having to put up controls to allow the person to press a button to watch it full screen. Really a transparent attempt by Apple to force people to develop proprietary apps (yay 30%) for Apple and HTML 5 for everyone else.

Whiel Safari has significantly improved it still sucks compared to the others. As for the others, IE9 and now IE10 in Mango are the best. No matter how SJVN wants to ignore it, even a Chrome fanboi will admit that the figures support IE and it has one HUGE advantage - you don't have to go geeky and download some browser by an advertising company or download anything at all.
@tonymcs

they also can't see any sophisticated HTML 5 that uses autoplay for audio and video.

I have never returned to a site that starts up audio automatically. There is nothing more irritating than that.




happy
0 Votes
+ -
great
jessica887 10th Nov
it's a good place for u http://www.dori-jewelry.net/

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix