ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Chrome 15: The Best Browser keeps getting better (Review)

By | October 27, 2011, 11:42am PDT

Summary: There are no major improvements in Google’s Chrome 15, but the minor upgrades are enough to keep it on top.

Say hello to Google's Chrome 15 Web Browser

Say hello to the Chrome 15 Web Browser

Google’s new Chrome 15 is better than ever. This release boasts a new tab page, which makes it easier to get to your Chrome apps and most visited sites. Under the hood, there are also several significant security and performance improvements.

Before launching into those, let’s go over the basics for those of you who haven’t used Chrome. The Chrome Web browser has a minimalist interface. Instead of a tool-bar, the basic interface has a combination address and search bar, the Omnibox, at the top with tabs above that. The handful of visible control buttons consist of Back, Forward, a combined Stop/Reload button, and a preferences wrench icon. That’s it.

If you add extensions, they’ll appear as icons on the right of the Omnibox. If you like having lots of tool-bars and endless interface tweaking power, Chrome is not for you. If you want a clean, fast system without a lot of fuss, Chrome will work well.

When you open a new tab in Chrome 15 you’ll see the “New” New Tab page. At the bottom of the page, you can jump from a page with your Chrome Apps to one with your most visited sites. In the Chrome 15 beta, there was a third choice, “Bookmarks,” but Google elected to not include this feature. Bookmarks are still available via either the Bookmark Bar or Manager.

Besides giving you easier navigation between online apps and your favorite Web sites, you can also organize apps by dragging and dropping them into new sections. You do this by dragging a program to the bottom of the page until a new apps section appears. You can then name the section to something useful by double-clicking on its label. For example, you can make one called “Games” to stuff Angry Birds and the like in.

A quick look at Google’s Chrome 15 Web browser

On the new apps tab, you can also go directly to the revised Chrome Web Store. Here you’ll find the latest Chrome Apps in a much easier to review and install format. Want to know more about a particular application? Click on it, or an extension or theme, and you’ll get panels with additional information, screen-shots, and reviews.

That’s all nice but the real tests of any browser these days are how secure it is, how compliant is it with Web standards, and never, ever least, how fast it is.

As for security, Google fixed numerous vulnerabilities in this update. In addition, this new version of Chrome has been set to defend its secure Web connections against attacks from BEAST, for “Browser Exploit Against SSL/TLS,” a hacking tool for breaking Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security Web site encryption.

When it comes to observing Web standards, Chrome continues to be the pick of the litter. On the Acid 3 compatibility test, which checks how well a browser complies with various Web standards such as CSS, JavaScript, and Extensible Markup Language (XML), Chrome 15 scored a perfect 100. By comparison, Firefox 7 also scored 100 and Microsoft’s Internet Explorer (IE) 9 scored a 95.

On the HTML5 Test, which checks to see how compliant the Web browser is with the HTML5 Web page standard, Chrome 15 scored 343 out of a possible 450. Firefox took second with score of 313 and IE is way back in the back with 130 points.

Moving on to performance benchmarks, I set Chrome, along with the latest releases of Firefox and Internet Explorer, on a Gateway DX4710 Windows 7 SP1 test box. This PC is powered by a 2.5-GHz Intel Core 2 Quad processor and has 6GBs of RAM and an Intel GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) 3100 for graphics. It’s hooked to the Internet via a Netgear Gigabit Ethernet switch, which, in turn, is hooked up to a 60Mbps (Megabit per second) cable Internet connection.

For my first test, I used Mozilla’s Kraken 1.1 benchmark. In Kraken, which like most Web browser benchmarks measures JavaScript performance, lower scores are better. Here, Chrome left Firefox and IE in the dust with a score of 4,048.2ms. Firefox 7 came in next with a score of 6792.9ms followed by IE with a dreadful 17,051.9.ms.

On Google’s own JavaScript V8 Benchmark Suite, where higher scores are better, Chrome, to no surprise, won again. This time it scored 7,913. Firefox came in next at 3,775, with IE behind it with 2,193.

On the oldest JavaScript test, SunSpider 0.9.1, , where lower results are better, IE finally won one with a score of 252.6ms, Chrome in next with 298.4ms, and Firefox came in last with 303.5ms.

Finally, I tried the trio of popular browsers on the beta Peacekeeper Web browser test suite This test looks not only at JavaScript performance but at HTML5 compatibility, video codec support and other Web browser features as well. With Peacekeeper, higher is better and Chrome once more won out with a score of 2,303. Firefox and IE were both far behind with scores of 1,699 and 1,626 respectively.

Put it all together and what do you get? You get the best popular Web browser available today. Download Chrome yourself and see. Chrome is available for Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Stories:

Firefox partners with The Evil Empire

Internet Explorer is the safest Web browser!? Ha!

Firefox 7: Better Memory Management, Meh Performance (Review)

Google Chrome Web browser kicks rump, takes names

Google adds off-line mode to Gmail, Calendar, Docs apps

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
93
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Chrome 15: The Best Browser keeps getting better (Review)
karismasand07 25th Nov
@LBiege The best thing would be to go with Google Chrome Eminem Quotes
Too bad speed isn't everything. Every modern browser is fast enough to not matter. Chrome will never have anything equivalent to NoScript, so I'm sticking to Firefox.
Even Google is giving up on Javascript and developing own new Dart language to move forward.
@LBiege That is just silly. Google is releasing a Dart to ECMAScript cross compiler to support JavaScript in the browser. Dart is an alternative to JavaScript. Just like F# is an alternative to C#, does that mean Microsoft is giving up on C# on the server? Of course not.
0 Votes
+ -
@LBiege Google is struggling to be competitive browser because Mozilla and Internet Explorer dominate this niche.
http://www.zuarticles.com
@LBiege Don't worry SJVN, all these haters can keep on hating. I love Chrome just as much as you do. Not really sure why everyone is getting all riled up over this article.
@LBiege The best thing would be to go with Google Chrome Eminem Quotes
@Aerowind

I'm with you, firefox 8 beta is a very good browser. Can't stand chrome's omnibox.
can u dont hype why are u fan of chrome it seems google made an operation system in a month that you kill your self to prove chrome is best ok chrome is best in fact chrome is one of best browser in market come on be fair ie and is as good as chrome
@mkkrmt So who wants to take a stab at translating this garbled up mess?
@Bates_ Can you not hype that you are a fan of Chrome. It seems that google made an operating system in a month. You will kill yourself to prove that chrome is the best. Ok chrome is the best. In fact chrome is one of the best browser in market. Come on, be fair on IE. It is as good as chrome !!! grin
@Bates_ LOL doesn't say much for the user base...WOW
Linux Chrome 15 requires glibc-2.11. Worse, (as far as I can find) earlier versions that would work with earlier versions, say glibc-2.10, seem to have been completely removed.

I'm not going to go through the effort of installing a completely new release, with all the headaches that is for a machine with lots of other apps (including many manually compiled scientific apps) and heavily customized user environments just for a new browser. Particularly when it means I'll have to spend hours and hours "re-compiling the scientific universe."
@cjcoats
On the upside, your OS was free. The rest of us weenies that paid for an inferior OS get the install without compiling.
@cwallen19803@... Way to be trite. This is a legitimate concern. How do you know cjcoats is running a free version of Linux anyway? Perhaps he is running RedHat or SuSE.
@cwallen19803@... "Free" means little when the OS you get doesn't do what you need and less of what you also want.
@cjcoats

Fedora updated perfectly...What distro are you using?
Linux is the wave of the future, has been for 20 years or so. It is the main help OS for those that are trying to break the habit of playing with themselves.

Forgive me, I jest, use it if you like it, but quit trying to shove it down everybody else's throat, if the OS was so great on PC/Mac it would be more than 1% long before now.

Like religion, can not fight with reality.

Firefox, since version 4 is almost worthless to me, MS needs to get out of the browser market, Chrome works with everything, it seems. Damn good thing we do have a choice of something now-a-days.

Dime to a dough nut, I can buy a computer with any OS I want, but you will pay for a computer.

Do not like MS OS?? Buy a computer with Linux installed, believe me, that will beat after market.
I just switched to Chrome now after years of been a loyal Firefox user. I must say Chrome seems much faster and more reliable, I think I'll be giving it a shot for a while happy
0 Votes
+ -
why downgrade to Chrome?
0 Votes
+ -
You can stay downgraded.....
linux for me 28th Oct
@William Farrell

But I will stick with the best browser, thank you. I just love the fact the the worst browser can't run on linux.
@linux for me "best" in your limited opinion.
0 Votes
+ -
What's better?
drobinow Updated - 28th Oct
@William Farrell
Frankly, I don't care what you use, but I'm curious what you don't like about Chrome. Can you tell us? How is it inferior? (I actually use Firefox but I'm looking for an alternative.)
@William Farrell wow you are like charlie chaplin. i enjoy your jokes a lot silly silly. come back to earth now and adopt the best browser ever **chrome**. and should i say stop being a jerk
Agreed speed is no longer a major selling point. Chrome, Firefox 4+, Opera 10+ and IE9 are all fast.

I ran Chrome for 6 months from March to September and have moved back to Firefox. Chrome's become very sluggish. Google are also adding very little to the front end, it's only about the back end.

Contrast this with Firefox, Mozilla are adding new features per release. Firefox 7 is significantly better than Firefox 4 was. Firefox 7 also now opens as quickly and is as snappy as Chrome but you can also configure it much more.
You claim that IE "only" gets 95% on ACID3. What version of IE are you testing? IE9 gets 100% now that the ACID3 test has been updated to remove the deprecated WebFont test.

As for your continual trumpeting of Google's V8 benchmark, what's the point in comparing JUST Javascript engine performance? There are VERY few sites where Javascript execution speed alone determines a site's performance. One also has to consider page layout and rendering into the equasion in order to get a comparative result that will actually mean anything to users.

And when are you going to compare browser results against some of Microsoft's demos and tests here: http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Views/SiteMap/ ?

Or are you concerned that you will expose your beloved Chrome to some unwanted negativity?

Your journalistic integrity was sometimes questionable. Now, it's utterly worthless.
@bitcrazed This is not the first time he has done it. On his Chrome 14 post me and other commentators had said that the ACID3 test has been modified and IE9 scores 100.
And why would it need telling. If you run ACID3 test in IE9 it shows 100.

That means SJVN doesn't even bother to test other browsers. He just comes up with numbers without actually testing anything.

He did the same thing with his original utterly wrong IE9 post where is purposely benchmarked IE9 64 bit in spite of everyone telling him that IE9 64 bit does not come with the updated Chakra Engine.

I am afraid I have to say that SJVN is a LIAR and will go to length to prove his beloved products are good.
0 Votes
+ -
@1773

Good article Steven...I used to use both Chrome and Firefox evenly,each about 50% of the time. FireFox has gotten too bloated and slower. Now almost all my internet access is with Chrome.

Linux and Chrome, the best OS with the best browser. It doesn't get any better than that, on a PC or Server.
@1773 - In most of his reviews, you can simply skip to the last paragraph to get the extent of his bias:

"Put it all together and what do you get? You get the best popular Web browser available today. Download Chrome yourself and see. Chrome is available for Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows."

He sounds like a used car salesman. I now simply read his infomerci..... errrr... "articles" to take in the comments and flame wars below them!
@1773 - sadly, I know.

I sincerely wish that ZDNet would at least demand SOME journalistic integrity of their bloggers.

I don't mind a blogger expressing their views and opinions, but they have to do so in a moderately balanced manner to remain credible.

Further, falsifying results (e.g. IE "only" getting 95% on ACID3 and not comparing browsers against Microsoft's perf tests) is just dishonest and misleading.

SJVN is essentially operating at the level of journalism that Randall Kennedy was when ZDNet busted him. Alas, ZDNet's reputation as a whole suffers when drivel like this is posted on their site.
@1773
Yep, I was one of those commenters too. It's pathetic. I knew as soon as I saw the Chrome 15 headline that it would be an SJVN article, and I knew that I'd scroll down mid-way and find the same outdated Acid3 numbers.

Why doesn't he put up some *real* compliance numbers, like IE's 97-98% pass rate for the official CSS 2.1 test suite? Firefox is next, then Opera, and WebKit comes in dead last.
@1773 - I see "linux for me" is on smoke break again from the Fry station.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@bitcrazed Why are you supporting and defending Micro$oft and IE? M$ is a criminal monopoly and patenttroll. Have you forgotten the war against Netscape and the try to get the next monopoly in the internet with IE! Shortly after that, they stopped developing for IE! Are you working for M$! Shame on you ....
@bitcrazed
Sorry to say this, but he is a proven liar. And I am not sure why Larry still kept him on rolls and allowed him to post on "In between Lines" column. The other day he was telling that nobody was buying Windows PCs because the downloads were down at download.com for PCs. But infact the graphic was showing the number of apps on download for PCs vs. Mobile. I think he is on rolls here because he just lacks reading comprehension and I think that is the primary qualification for anyone to blog on ZDNET.
@bitcrazed

After reading that IE9 has ACID3 score of 95 (which is wrong. IE9 scores 100) I decided to do some comparisons between the Chrome 14 review and Chrome 15 review both written by SJVN.

Chrome 15 :
On the Acid 3 compatibility test, which checks how well a browser complies with various Web standards such as CSS, JavaScript, and Extensible Markup Language (XML), Chrome 15 scored a perfect 100. By comparison, Firefox 7 also scored 100 and Microsoft???s Internet Explorer (IE) 9 scored a 95 .

Chrome 14 :
On the Acid 3 compatibility test, which checks out how well a browser complies with Web standards such as Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), JavaScript, and Extensible Markup Language (XML), Chrome had a perfect score. Firefox 6 had a score of 97 and IE had a 95 .


Chrome 15 : Kraken 1.1
Chrome left Firefox and IE in the dust with a score of 4,048.2ms. Firefox 7 came in next with a score of 6792.9ms followed by IE with a dreadful 17,051.9.ms.

Chrome 14 : Kraken 1.0
Chrome 14 beat its last version, Chrome 13 and all other comers with a score of 4578.5millisecondss (ms). Chrome 13 had a score 4927.7ms.; Firefox took second with a score of 7588.2ms.; and IE came in last with a wretched 17,051.9ms.

Chrome 15 : V8 Benchmark Suite
On Google???s own JavaScript V8 Benchmark Suite, where higher scores are better, Chrome, to no surprise, won again. This time it scored 7,913. Firefox came in next at 3,775, with IE behind it with 2,193 .

Chrome 14 : V8 Benchmark Suite
According to Google???s own JavaScript test V8 Benchmark Suite, where higher scores are better, Chrome 14 takes first with 7,591. The others aren???t even competitive. Firefox flops with a showing of 3,614 and IE does even worse with 2,193 .

Chrome 15 : Sunspider 0.9.1
On the oldest JavaScript test, SunSpider 0.9.1, , where lower results are better, IE finally won one with a score of 252.6ms , Chrome in next with 298.4ms, and Firefox came in last with 303.5ms.

Chrome 14 : Sunspider 0.9.1
Finally, on SunSpider 0.9.1, the oldest of the JavaScript Web benchmark tests, where lower results are better, Chrome wins again with a score of 249.9ms Here the results are much more competitive. IE 9 is hot on its tail with a score of 252.6ms. and Firefox shows well with 301.2ms.



If you look at it, IE9 scores have not changed during two reviews. The are exactly the same to the millisecond. I tried to get the same score on different benchmarks on different runs for Chrome and IE and could not get the same score.

I know that no new version of IE9 has been released but whenever comparisons are done, the entire gamut of tests is to be repeated on all browsers. I just find it hard to believe that IE9 produces the same score down to the exact millisecond everytime.

This means that either SJVN has an incredibly stable test rig that reproduces the same result for IE9 all the times or he just doesnt bother to run the benchmarks using IE9 and continues to use the old results and almost the same blog template.

You are free to go and see the respective blogs at following links.

h-t-t-p://w-w-w.zdnet.com/blog/networking/chrome-15-the-best-browser-keeps-getting-better-review/1584?tag=search-results-rivers;item10
h-t-t-p://w-w-w.zdnet.com/blog/networking/chrome-14-the-best-web-browser-keeps-getting-better-review/1469?tag=search-results-rivers;item7
@1773
Good catch. SJVN is a proven liar and salesman for Google.
@1773 Nicely done!
@bitcrazed

Unfortunately SJVN always starts from his unshakeable belief that Chrome is the best, so unsurprising he manages to find or interpret results to support that view.

I already have a perfectly good browser that comes with the OS, so why would I bother with Chrome.

In the end I'll take a browser designed by the people who wrote the OS or, if I was credulous enough to buy a Mac, from the people who modified the OS. Why would I use one from an advertising company?

Could you please show me an ad company that isn't evil? wink
@bitcrazed He lives in his own world, but provides cheap and yet funny entertainment.
0 Votes
+ -
Too bad it's so insecure
sagec 27th Oct
See: www.yourbrowsermatters.org
0 Votes
+ -
I'm running FF7. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome is the best...
itpro_z 27th Oct
...at stealing your data. No more, no less. You can keep it.
Don't worry SJVN, all these haters can keep on hating. I love Chrome just as much as you do. Not really sure why everyone is getting all riled up over this article.
@Bates: I like Chrome too - it's a good browser.

What I and others like me get riled up about is that SJVN is publishing lies and untruths as if they had some basis in reality. Take, for example, his claims that IE only gets 95% in ACID3. That was the case before they changed the ACID3 benchmarks some months ago, to remove a test for a deprecated feature (WebFonts), which accounted for the last 5%. Since the test has been fixed, all browsers get 100% on ACID3.

SJVN also continues to publish the HTML5TEsts.com results as if they too had any bearing on a browser's compliance with the current HTML5 spec ... which they don't since the HTMLTests.com site tests for features that ARE NOT specified in the HTML5 spec and then gives browsers that support these "extended" features massively inflated scores.

Also consider that SJVN also refuses to publish the results of testing Chrome against Microsoft's perf tests that test entire scenarios including layout and rendering costs, not just how fast you can calculate something in javascript alone.

I understand that he likes Chrome, but when he publishes lies in order to reinforce his own bigoted views, one has to call into question his credibility ... and the credibility of the ZDNet editorial team and site.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Chrome 15: The Best Browser keeps getting better (Review)
LoverockDavidson_-24231404894599612871915491754222 27th Oct
Now with more spyware! Remember, everything you type into Chrome becomes Google's property per their EULA.
0 Votes
+ -
From the site itself:
"Please be aware that the specifications that are being tested are still in development and could change before receiving an official status. In the future new tests will be added for the pieces of the specification that are currently still missing. The maximum number of points that can be scored is 450 at this moment, but this is a moving goalpost. "

This is testing a bunch of stuff that is not in the standard at all and according to the test's authors, never will be. It is a mishmash of features that the web site authors felt were important and has almost nothing to do with the official HTML 5 standard. MS, for right or wrong, has stated that they are focusing on the core group of features that are nearly completely specified and are extremely likely to make it into the final standards.

The interesting thing about all these "draft" and "associated" "standards" is that we are risking going back to the dark ages where web site authors might be tempted to create websites that conform to non standard features and only look good on that browser. You decried this when it was IE that was the best browser at displaying non standard content and now that IE refuses to render non standard content properly, this is suddenly a bad thing.

I challenge you to answer this post SJVN. Step up to the plate if you dare.
@toddybottom. He won't. He never does. He's WAY too cowardly and vein to do so.

What I'm more interested in though, is how the ZDNet editorial team lets him get away with posting such thoughtless, pointless, inaccurate drivel. I'd expect them to hold their bloggers to a higher quality bar than this.
@toddybottom
The problem is that the "best" browser is a pure statement of opinion. Chrome is fine as a browser but I don't think it's the best browser. I used it when I was playing with the Windows 8 developer preview and it's installed on my desktop. Ie10 was pretty unstable in the preview and I use chrome for Gmail on the desktop.

IE 9 is my favorite browser currently but even then I won't call it the best. Although since it's gpu acceleration is so good it's faster on the desktop with a Radeon 6970 in the PC. Perhaps SJVN should try something better than an awful GMA device.
SJVN, nobody cares about your biased comments. Chrome is NOT the best browser out there. The real world don't care about some artifically cooked benchmark results.

Many security researches have confirmed that IE 9 is the safest browser in the market . Also IE9 has the best hardware acceleration and also tops many speed tests.

SJVN, smart people are not going to buy your cheap stunts. GROW UP !!!
@owlnet Agreed! It seems that most of us are in agreement about the SJVN's drooling over his favorite little project and refuses to honestly consider anything so minor as security, autoritarian-like EULAs, lack of malware- I could certainly go on but most here know more about such things than I do. And if that one test is actually correct, where chrome was actually 13 milliseconds faster than ie9, then I'm absolutely shocked that I've never once been able to count in milliseconds! I'm sure those 13 thousandths of one second just slowed me down so much that my whole day was wasted-no, actually the time I waste reading anything by SJVN takes minutes out of my life; I wonder if SJVN will calculate the thousandths of seconds that amounts to...
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome is ?????
ebhb2004@... 27th Oct
I've been a Chrome fan since the beginning - or as far back as I can remember. The difference in milliseconds is not really that germain to me BUT,
since v.13 and running Mac Snow Leopard and Lion, it's main attribute is it's high-speed ability to crash and crash and etc.

I wonder how many of us are tired of these rah-rah Pollyanna reviews of Google's Chrome by ZDNet?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix