Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux

By | March 7, 2011, 10:24am PST

Summary: Mark Shuttleworth talks about his vision for the November 2011 version of Ubuntu Linux: Oneiric Ocelot.

Well, we dodged a bullet. Instead of Octopoid Octopus, Mark Shuttleworth, founder of Ubuntu Linux and its parent company Canonical, has chosen Oneiric Ocelot for Ubuntu’s November 2011 version name.

Unless you’re a film maven, your first question is probably: “What’s Oneiric!?” I know it as a film criticism term for dream sequences in a movie. Or as Shuttleworth explained, “Oneiric means “dreamy”, and the combination with Ocelot reminds me of the way innovation happens: part daydream, part discipline.” I’ll buy that. But, let’s get down to brass tacks: What does this mean? What can we expect from this version?

For starters, you should keep in mind that the next version of Ubuntu, Natty Narwhal, is going to be quite different from the current version of Ubuntu. The most striking difference is that starting with Ubuntu 11.04, Ubuntu will be using the Unity desktop instead of GNOME 3. In addition, it will the April Ubuntu will be using several new default applications, including Banshee to play music, and its windowing system will be based on Wayland instead of the X Window System.

Those are big changes, and I expect Oneiric Ocelot to introduce far less changes and include a lot more polishing of the new features. Shuttleworth indicates that he sees it in rather the same way: “Our desktop has come together beautifully, and in the next release we’ll complete the cycle of making it available to all users, with a 2D experience to complement the OpenGL based Unity for those with the hardware to handle it. The introduction of Qt means we’ll be giving developers even more options for how they can produce interfaces that are both functional and aesthetically delightful.”

I suspect Shuttleworth wrote that last before the news broke that Nokia seems to be spinning off its Qt business. That’s a story I’ll look into more deeply later. For now, suffice it to say that both Ubuntu and KDE, which also depends upon the Qt toolkit, have reason to be concerned for its future.

Looking at the business side, Canonical, which now supports OpenStack, Eucalyptus Systems’s platform, and Amazon’s Elastic Computing (EC2) for its cloud offerings, will be cutting down how many cloud platforms it will support. Shuttleworth wrote, “In the cloud, we’ll have to tighten up and make some firm decisions about the platforms we can support for 12.04 LTS [Long Term Support]. UDS [Ubuntu Developer Summit] in Budapest will be full of feisty debate on that front, I’m sure, but I’m equally sure we can reach a pragmatic consensus and start to focus our energies on delivering the platform for widespread cloud computing on free and flexible terms.”

Shuttleworth then gave a brief pep-talk on the state of Ubuntu today. “Ubuntu is now shipping on millions of systems from multiple providers every year. It makes a real difference in the lives of millions, perhaps tens of millions, of people.”

He concluded, “Natty is a stretch release: we set out to redefine the look and feel of the free desktop. We’ll need all the feedback we can get, so please test today’s daily, or A3 [alpha 3], and file bug reports! Keep up the discipline and focus on the Narwhal, and let’s direct our daydreaming to the Ocelot.”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

135
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
Home Grown IT 1st Jun
I installed Mint on a usb drive and was so impressed that I did a full install on and old Acer Aspire One. It blows Windows 7 away for performance and installed flawlessly. The windows programs I do run installed under wine and just worked. Why oh why does ZD allow these trolls to post drivel??
0 Votes
+ -
For starters, you should keep in mind that the next version of Ubuntu, Natty Narwhal, is going to be quite different from the current version of Ubuntu.
Linux people say this about every new release and yet its always the same on the desktop. "This time its going to be different!" Sure it is. Its still going to have the same bug ridden linux kernel underneath, still going to compile that source, still going to have sound and multimedia issues, still going to have security issues. I wouldn't put much faith in this version of ubuntu being any different than the previous ones, this is based on past history.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson

Actually the desktop in 11.04 is going to be very different. I've been reading a lot on it as well just seeing the desktops you will notice a huge difference. I know most users will be switching from 10.10 or older versions to Linux Mint. There are a lot of people not happy with the looks and functionality of the Unity Desktop and would rather of kept up with Gnome. I'm personally very disappointed with the direction of Ubuntu 11.04 and will stick with 10.10 or move to Mint.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
threeblackdots Updated - 7th Mar 2011
@audidiablo

Linux Mint isn't switching fully over to GNOME 3. It too is retaining the classic interface (as is Ubuntu but default is only Unity).

Mint also has the advantage of shipping on average a month after a regular Ubuntu release (and having no real time timetable it has to follow). It is understandable that Ubuntu hold back on shipping Gnome 3 because the final release is scheduled only a month after Gnome 3's set final release date. Moreover, Gnome 3 is still very much a work in progress as evidenced by the recent decision to remove Window buttons completely. Adapting to such changes rapidly would be very difficult especially as key deadlines in Ubuntu's release cycle have passed.
0 Votes
+ -
@audidiablo You realize that Mint is based on Ubuntu? They won't be able to update it much if Ubuntu moves to wayland, considering that the new builds will be running wayland.
0 Votes
+ -
Please don't feed the trolls!
rahbm 7th Mar 2011
@audidiablo
If you ignore it, it might just go away (if we're lucky).
0 Votes
+ -
how about some real improvement
dgurney 7th Mar 2011
"would rather of kept up with Gnome"

What is that supposed to mean: "would rather of"?

Anyway, let's see some legitimate UI enhancements, and not idiotic regressions like transparent panels and cheeseball wedding-video transitions.
0 Votes
+ -
@audidiablo I'm definitely one of those users. Unity on the 10.10 Netbook version is terrible. I'm not sure what I'm going to do yet but 11.04 is not in my future.
@Loverock Davidson

What a dead-set clueless moron.
For the love of all thats holy - get this clown out of here!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
nomorebs Updated - 7th Mar 2011
@GWCC : What clown? Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols? OK, that clown is a delusional fanatic with little objectivity and not enough smarts to realize, once and for all that Desktop Linux is DOA. All these marvelous stories about the next version of Ubuntu which is an irrelevant Desktop OS and not getting any better for most desktop users, are a waste of time. His and anybody's.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@GWCC

If people stopped feeding Loverock Davidson the troll, he would probably go away and find another place to get attention.
@Loverock Davidson

dude, when was the last time you used linux? back when windows 3.2 came out? You do realize that it is far superior to what it was years ago right? I haven't had multi-media issues in linux for years, kernel works great, and you can get most popular software in binary form for the major linux builds, and in a conveinent software repository that updates all the software in your system from one place.
0 Votes
+ -
@KBot

There was no such thing as Windows 3.2 and I've been using Linux since Kernel 1.94.

Ah, the good old days when AUDIO ACTUALLY WORKED! There was OSS and ALSA and they worked. The didn't require freaking server processes (hello Pulse Audio) in order to make noises come out of the speaker.

You're a lamerz! You install binaries instead of compiling your own optimized versions using the -O flag and don't spread the compiling out over all your Linux machines using DistCC? Loserz!

Yes, a repository that updates all your worthless software that does absolutely nothing and 9/10 breaks something else.
  • Flagged
@kyleoster

I can't tell if you're sarcastic or serious. Audio works fine in ubuntu, never had any problems.

Software works fine on ubuntu for all my needs and i use it daily for many applications

updater works great and keeps my software in check

I do plenty of compiling when I need to, why the hell would I go through the hastle of compiling everything on a machine unless i was building a linux module from scratch just for fun? Geeks like me do things like that but Linux can be used by the casual computer user with about as much training as one would need going from one OS to another. don't be an @$$ get your facts straight. oh and sorry, I guess I meant windows 3.1 I didn't start using computers until Windows 95.
0 Votes
+ -
the audio is broken....
sparkle farkle Updated - 8th Mar 2011
my latest install of ubuntu 10.10 makes all sorts of annoying buzzes when changing levels, none of which showed up on my debian mint system. They also changed the default level of the system overall. Unfortunately the mint system would not install correctly the second time I installed it, (since the desktop was broken, my number keys went away on my keyboard, and finally the network just stopped working.)
The new kde desktop is terrible, and looks like a mix of windows and mac desktops. The program menu is clueless. Video is worse than ever, and I hope someone finally gets it right. Debian's x install is jerky, and I have a decent card and went through the trouble of installing the ati driver.

all in all not very compelling. Totem wouldn't even work on debian 6. The whole field is out in the woods again.
0 Votes
+ -
Freedom of speech is paramount. If it sucks, it sucks.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
snoop0x7b Updated - 8th Mar 2011
@kyleoster : You don't need Pulse to make audio work. You can still use straight up ALSA... Pulse and Jack are just userspace wrappers for ALSA to make it behave in a more friendly way for various programs so they don't have to reinvent the wheel for multisource streams and things like that.

Also, ALSA is fairly recent, previously OSS was the standard.
0 Votes
+ -
@KBot and @kyleoster

KBot was correct. Please see Windows 3.2 @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.2#Windows_3.2
0 Votes
+ -
@KBot
I totally agree with you on all accounts

@kyleoster
Audio works but just like in the old days you have to compile for audio cards that aren't so popular or have proprietary drivers case and point my laptop's Broadcom Modem/Dolby Sound Room audio card it needed a driver before the audio would work or I could use the modem to dial out on my Dial-up internet.

And Binaries work well if you have a BASE (or you don't know what your doing) install of the OS it is designed for, not if you have'd added or removed stuff, and the repository won't break things you got through it, installing your own stuff and updating through the repository BIG mistake.

My dad had the same preconceived notions about a lot of what you said he doesn't trust Pulse and wouldn't upgrade from Mandriva 2006 Powerpack until I showed him he could finally put away his old notebook with the procedures for pretty much every linux operation
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson Not sure what your talking about. But 11.04 is going to be very different. Infact its going to be so different that I'm moving to Fedora. Since they are dropping my favorite desktop in favor of their own proprietary one and a graphics system that nothing supports, including the drivers for my graphics card.
0 Votes
+ -
elementary-school spelling
dgurney 7th Mar 2011
@Jimster480
"Not sure what your talking about"

What his what is talking about?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
Peter Perry Updated - 7th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson it is dumbass... I don't know if it will be better but it certainly will be different.

0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
WhatsamattaU Updated - 7th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson Do you have no honor, sir? You know, or should know that the days of users having to compile from the source are long gone. What sound and multimedia problems are you talking about? Be specific. Oh yeah, you can't because you don't actually know anything first hand about Ubuntu.

How do you live with yourself after telling such blatant lies? You probably comfort yourself with your MS paycheck.
0 Votes
+ -
@WhatsamattaU

I use Ubuntu daily for development and I am a fan of gnome. But for multimedia, there is only one OS that prioritizes multimedia threads correctly. That's why my home machines are Windows. Linux's scheduler is still hampered by its roots as a server and it regularly bogs down with a lot of multimedia. Even the real time kernel has issues, although it is an improvement. But, I would never use the RT for a desktop.

So, LD is right about its media failures. But he is wrong about the UI. Both gnome 3 and Unity are taking chances that OSX and Windows never could and if nothing else they will have some people asking some hard questions about how old the Windows and OSX interfaces look.
0 Votes
+ -
speaking of development
dgurney 7th Mar 2011
@WhatsamattaU
Has anyone implemented Grand Central Dispatch (libcdispatch or whatever it is) for Linux? In contrast to all of Apple's anti-power-user and anti-developer moves, GCD is pretty damned cool.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson You're still a dipshit.
I suspect you still haven't tried a recent version of Ubuntu, if you're still talking about compiling things all the time. I would also suspect that you're posting here, just to try to start a flame war.
This, in my humble opinion, just as you've expressed yours.
0 Votes
+ -
Why?
Vasiliw 7th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson

I have a question what do you use? Considering you bash on any thing UNIX based I assume you have a large Windows logo tattooed on your back. I am also assuming you must have the latest WP7, and every computer system you use has Windows 7. Every one is entitled to their opinions and I love my Win7 Laptop but I prefer Linux simply because I don't have to maintain all the updates and Anti-Virus. I also plan to get a Mac and just a year ago I hated Mac but I tried Snow Leopard and I think it's the best OS Apple has ever designed. So don't bash, please be OS Agnostic.
0 Votes
+ -
A waste of time
rahbm 7th Mar 2011
@Vasiliw
"So don't bash, please be OS Agnostic."
That's like asking a hippo to be a gazelle.
0 Votes
+ -
@Vasiliw

He's stated in the past that he likes FreeBSD, though it's been a while since he's tooted that horn.
@Loverock Davidson Same old FUD from the same old MS moron. Get a real job troll boy.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson

Well thanks for that really interrrrrr ZZZzzzzz.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey Bill
x-windows user 8th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson
Bill, Isn't stealing ideas from Linux bad enough? Now you try to pull the wool on Linux users like you did to Windows users when you told them that Windows 7 was the fixed version of Vista, It's the same old buggy crap.
At least Linux does more than bugfix between major releases.
0 Votes
+ -
If you think Windows 7 is
Michael Alan Goff 8th Mar 2011
"just a bugfix", then you seriously don't know anything about Windows 7
0 Votes
+ -
Re: If you think Windows 7 is
Isocrates 9th Mar 2011
@goff256

And you seriously lack reading comprehension.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, insults!
Michael Alan Goff 9th Mar 2011
I am slain by your razor-sharp wit, good sir.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson It actually is different because it marks a milestone on Ubuntu's new window manager, Unity. If you'd been paying attention to articles about Ubuntu rather than just trolling comments without reading, you'd know why it's different. But then again it makes our lives easier when you act consistently, because we then know to just not bother reading your comments.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
mwirz@... Updated - 8th Mar 2011
Oh
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson you kinda got no idea. Just another windows advocate? Feel you have to put down the competition?
A linux server will usual have a much greater up-time than any windows server:
http://qualapps.blogspot.com/2009/03/linux-vs-windows-uptime.html
though some have mentioned that freeBSD could be an even better option than linux?
http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html

Ubuntu is not linux. Having said that, this article IS about Ubuntu, and Ubuntu HAS been going through some real significant changes throughout the releases. I would think the changes are indeed so significant, that it is the changes themselves that are the cause of consternation amongst its users. Some changes have been put in place, in the opinion of some people, before they are ready. The sound issues we had at the introduction of pulse-audio (a very major change in the Ubuntu ecosystem) were a bit like this. Yet now with the release of Ubuntu 10.10 some time ago, pulse-audio is smooth, and works better (at least for me, a non-power user) smoother and more flexibly than had ALSA.
As for security issues; that's a laugh. Security issues can be found easier because we all have access to the code, and they can be fixed quicker. A huge difference to the closed source black-box of windows, which anyway has tones of security issues, some of which we don't know about yet.
As for 'still going to have to compile that source'. Like I said, i'm no power-user. Yet i've managed to setup my system completely without, I believe, having to compile one single application. And i'm a developer! So I use quite a wide range of applications! A quick browse of Synaptic or the newer Ubuntu software centre, do a search with some keywords for what you are looking for, and tada! Its on your system!
Removing X will be a major change. For good or for bad. Hopefully for the good!
0 Votes
+ -
The LD macro lives!
ottojschlosser 7th Mar 2011
Nice to see you haven't lost your wonderful consistency, LD.
0 Votes
+ -
Quite honestly, I think LD is a closet Linux user, and just doesn't want anyone to know it...
0 Votes
+ -
@TTGIT Guy
No he runs a Mac.

Loverock said Linux was dead then he said almost dead.
He can never get it start.

Sure looks alive to me.
@choyongpil

wait was that sarcasm when you said he runs a mac? cus if he does, he realizes that mac uses unix which is what linux is modeled after right?
@Kbot,
Sarcasm, a running joke others have posted.
0 Votes
+ -
were all waiting for Lovie to out of the closet and admit what he has truly become .......... you know it does take some, like Lovie to understand what they really are and come to grips with it ............ were all saying a prayer he has a speedy recovery ............ you know he has the same problems as Charlie Sheen has ........... the next thing you know we'll see Loverock with a new program ......... Lovie's Korner happy
it has came a long way from the 7.x version, but i'm still in love with slackware.
0 Votes
+ -
@Anthony E I used ubuntu in the 5.x Version. And yea its come a long way. But going to wayland is a mistake. they should have done a spinoff and introduced it a bit over time. Not forced everyone from something they like onto something they don't know anything about, and nothing supports, and is in alpha.
0 Votes
+ -
The FUD never really ends...
kevinfishburne 7th Mar 2011
I'd love to see LD's system compared to mine. Two 24" 1080p screens, quad-core 3.5 GHz CPU, 8 GB DDR3 RAM and 64 GB SSD. All my data is stored on a file/web/print/etc. server with a 6 TB RAID5 over gigabit ethernet. I run a small business, do finances, plan construction builds, develop a game and other apps, download and watch movies/music/etc., create graphics and compose music, all with Ubuntu 10.10. Yeah, Linux sucks alright. Sorry for feeding the trolls, but what an ass.
0 Votes
+ -
How to waste money
rock06r 7th Mar 2011
@kevinfishburne

So in other words, you have a $10,000 hardware system with a 50 cent OS? Exactly how does that make any sense?! Not to mention that your hardware has NOTHING to do with the comments made by any other moderator??
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beyond Natty: The next version of Ubuntu Linux
anothercanuck Updated - 7th Mar 2011
@rock06r It goes to the point that Linux users have more money to spend on hardware.
Windows = $319 (BestBuy, Win 7 Ult.) = A monitor and a 1/2, or 8Gb DDR3
Office = $499 (BestBuy, Office Pro = 1 SSD, or 1/2 the raid unit.

And before anyone asks, 'Where are you buying your software?', remember, I use Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
@rock06r No way that's 10,000$ worth of hardware. But guess what Watson (over 1million$ worth of hardware runs)? I'll give you a clue, it's free software that has a penguin mascot.
You sound like quite the guy. Unfortunately I can do most of what you are talking about with my son's wii.

Just get Windows 7 and find out what a real OS is all abouit.
mmmmmmmmmmkay? wink
I installed Mint on a usb drive and was so impressed that I did a full install on and old Acer Aspire One. It blows Windows 7 away for performance and installed flawlessly. The windows programs I do run installed under wine and just worked. Why oh why does ZD allow these trolls to post drivel??

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix