Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Summary: The release this week of Firefox 4 RC1 and imminent delivery of Firefox 4 presage a tougher battle for the No 2 player as IE and Chrome close in, squeeze browser share from Mozilla
The completion of Firefox 4 Release Candidate 1 yesterday -- on March 9, as advertised -- sets the stage for a big battle of the browsers in 2011.
RC1, posted late yesterday, is available on Windows, Macintosh and Linux, and its stability and performance metrics suggest that the final Firefox 4 code should ship sometime this month.
With Chrome 10 and Internet Explorer 9 on tap, it will be an interesting year.
Firefox remains the No 2 browser behind only Microsoft Internet Explorer with more than 21 percent share, but it's no secret that the other open source browser -- Google's Chrome -- continues to gain sizable market share with each quarter. Chrome now has almost 11 percent share of the market.
And, according to market tracker Net Applications, Microsoft's Internet Explorer continues to chip away at Firefox as browser usage increases in China. In January, Net Applications shows IE's share at 56 percent, Firefox at 22.75 and Chrome breaking the double-digit milestone with 10.7 percent share.
Net Applications' take a month later, in its February 2011 report, shows a 1 percent drop in Firefox usage worldwide, to 21.74 percent, and a .77 percent gain for IE to 56.77 percent. Chrome gained but only by .23 percent.
"With the new C.I.A. numbers factored in, Firefox loses global share since many of the countries it is most popular in (Western European, in particular) now have a lower percentage of global internet users. Internet Explorer gains as browser usage shifts to countries with higher percentages of Internet Explorer users."
So, what does this mean? Is Firefox caught between a rock and a hard place and destined to die?
No. What is shows is a vibrant, competitive and growing marketplace, due primarily to the rise and growth of two open source browsers.
Not too long ago, Microsoft's Internet Explorer virtually owned the browser market. Now, the browser market is a viable three-way race with lots of other specialized browsers - several of them open source -- carving out their own niches.
Open source has leveled the playing field for Internet software and paved the way for innovation. Yet, there's no doubt that Firefox is under pressure and need to continue to innovate, attract more developers and users globally and stem losses in market share.
Financially, Mozilla claims to be strong. In its financial report posted in November, Mozilla chief Mitchell Baker spoke to increasing revenues and competition as positives.
"The browser world is now intensely competitive and products are improving constantly. Firefox continues to be at the forefront of technology and user experience. Firefox brings a great product and Mozilla's vision of openness and empowerment directly to more than 400 million people in more than 80 languages. We also spur these developments indirectly by serving as an honest broker showing what Internet life can be, and encouraging others to build products that incorporate openness and individual control. This is an immense success for Mozilla," she wrote, adding that keeping the Internet open was one of the primary missions of Mozilla -- not world dominance.
For the calendar year 2009, Mozilla's consolidated reported revenues were $104 million, up 34 percent from 2008 reported revenues of $78 million in the year before, Mozilla noted.
Most of Firefox's revenues come from search engine revenue. Some of it comes from financial support of corporations, namely Google, whose continued funding is guaranteed through 2011.
It will be an important year for Mozilla and I'd look for the organization to make a big push for additional corporate funding, more marketing and increased global expansion, especially in Asia.
Rising out of the ashes of Netscape in 1998, Mozilla has accomplished more with Firefox than many anticipated and remains the only non-profit, open source vendor in the game. That's an advantage worth selling.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
This is a misleading statement. Most of Firefox's revenue comes from the search services built in to Firefox. The default search service in most Firefox versions is Google so the lion's share of search revenue comes from Google.
But Google does not "support" or "give money to" Mozilla. Mozilla earns money from Google and other search services through referrals from the integrated search features.
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
R.I.P. Mozilla. I was happy you rose out from the ashes a few years ago, but it's just your fault you are getting back there now.
After using FF4 beta, I grew to respect iTunes program much more
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
This is turned on; I meant FF4 does not "remember" groups I was creating ..
So I have re-start all of grouping again. Or, sometimes, it "remembers" some grouping, but very twisted way -- with tabs/icons of pages being messed up.
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Yes, Firefox has improved a lot with Firefox 4 RC1. I too liked it. I feel it is better than chrome.
Net Applications, with its pronounced USA bias,
Henri
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
So right! At least Google (GMail, Docs), Mozilla (Firefox, Thunderbird) and the dominant mobile platforms are finally holding Microsoft accountable for the user experience in products they have enjoyed their complacent monopoly in for years.
It's the StatCounter data that are geographically biased
There isn't a US bias in the Net Applications data. The StatCounter data, however, are severely biased. China, for example, has the most internet users of any country by a large margin, but StatCounter recorded ten times as many hits from US sites as from Chinese. StatCounter recorded more than 50 per cent more hits from German sites than from China as well. Even Thailand's 17 million internet users registered more hits with StatCounter than China's 389 million. Since StatCounter don't weight their estimates by country, these differences in hit rates imply their regional and global estimates are essentially meaningless. Their national estimates may have some validity, however, provided the samples are random.
Like StatCounter, Net Applications also get disproportionally high and low hits from different countries, with hits from China also disproportionately low. However, unlike StatCounter, Net Applications correct the resulting bias in their data by weighting country estimates by the number of internet users in that country, as estimated by the CIA. China is the elephant in the room here, because there's an enormous number of Chinese internet users, and they overwhelmingly use IE. In fact, 88 per cent of StatCounter hits from China in the most recent period were from IE, with IE-based Maxthon coming second (about 4 per cent).
The bias in the StatCounter data caused by a failure to correct for the under-weighting of Chinese internet users is probably the single most important factor in the difference between the StatCounter and Net Applications results -- and leads to a severe underestimation of IE's global share. However, another difference that favours Net Applications over StatCounter is what they actually count. StatCounter simply count hits, whereas Net Applications count unique users. This means that the StatCounter data are biased by intensity of web use: a user who browses ten times as much as average counts as much as ten average users in the StatCounter data, but not in the Net Applications data.
Overall, the failure to correct for geographical and usage differences leaves the StatCounter data looking pretty dodgy. The one advantage is the larger sample size: more than 3 million sites, compared with about 40 thousand sites for Net Applications. However, the size of the sample is actually far less important than its representativeness. A more representative sample of 40 thousand sites gives a better estimate than a less representative sample of 3 million.
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
arrogant much?
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Yes, I am now using Firefox 4 RC 1. It is too good and better than any other browser. However, I felt Opera 11 is also good.
FireFox 4 Really Fine
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
http://www.pcprogramming.com/noisecube.html
http://www.pcprogramming.com/flight.html
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Why won't these links work in Internet Explorer? :)
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Funny! Are you still using Internet Explorer? Switch to Firefox 4. It is much better and everything will work well then.
Firefox may fade away
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla
Which is one of the best things to happen. I applaud all three major browser vendors for working hard to make their latest releases better than ever.
"Yet, there?s no doubt that Firefox is under pressure and need (sic) to continue to innovate, attract more developers and users globally and stem losses in market share."
Yeah, agreed. They've been a bit slow in adding process isolation in Firefox. They really need to push that harder.
RE: Firefox 4 launch presages tougher browser battle for Mozilla