Groklaw 2.0: PJ Leaves Groklaw but legal news site to continue under new editor

Groklaw 2.0: PJ Leaves Groklaw but legal news site to continue under new editor

Summary: Pamela Jones, editor of Groklaw, the leading open-source legal news and analysis site, is leaving Groklaw but the site will continue under Mark Webbink.

SHARE:

Pamela "PJ" Jones, editor and creator of Groklaw, the leading open-source legal news and analysis site, has kept her word. After eight years, PJ is leaving Groklaw. The site though will continue under the guidance of Mark Webbink.

Mark Webbink is also Executive Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, a research and development arm of New York Law School's Institute for Intellectual Law & Property. Webbink is also a board member of the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC). Before that, he was Red Hat's Senior Vice President and General Counsel. In short, Webbink knows intellectual property (IP) law and open source about as well as anyone on the planet.

Still, stepping in for PJ won't be easy. While "only" a paralegal, her unflagging efforts lead to Groklaw becoming the go-to site first for SCO legal news and analysis and then the whole world of IP law and its effects on open-source software.

In her good-bye note, Jones wrote she "wouldn't be writing any more articles for Groklaw. I intended to finish the Comes v. Microsoft exhibits as text and perfect some of our other collections and then I would retire from Groklaw, knowing as I did that the research we have done together will remain useful no matter what happens in the future."

But, after being "bombarded with messages asking me to keep the community going or to tell you where to assemble elsewhere," she decided that to she needed to "leave Groklaw in someone's hands who could keep things going." That person was Webbink. She says of him that He "will make Groklaw the place to go to when you want to understand the law and all things FOSS. " I think PJ's right. I've also known Webbink for years and he'll do well by the site.

That said, I did ask PJ a few last questions as she leaves the Groklaw to refocus on her own private life.

SJVN: From where you stand what was the biggest accomplishment?

PJ: The biggest accomplishment of Groklaw was building the community so that it's now a FOSS [Free and Open-Source Software] legal resource. The power it has to alter the course of litigation is extraordinary. No law firm has access to the depth of research that Groklaw as a community can do. By the way, it was lawyers who really saw what we were doing and appreciated it first.

Personally, I'm most proud of our trial coverage. And I'm proud of obtaining and making public the BSDi settlement agreement, which SCO was using as a club because the terms were hidden until we published them. It felt good to shut their mouths about that. I have some more documents to share, by the way, some early contracts between AT&T and the Regents. That's going up as soon as I can finish, but it will be Mark that publishes.

SJVN: What's your biggest regret?

PJ: Regrets? Actually none. Honestly, doing Groklaw was the most fun I ever had. There were unpleasant aspects to it, because Linux has powerful enemies and they surely tried to make me regret doing Groklaw. But I just loved it. The only regret is having to stop. That is hard. But I know it's the right decision, for a lot of reasons.

SJVN: Do you feel like all the time and energy you poured into Groklaw was worth it?

PJ: Worth it? Are you serious? :) How many people can say they did something that really mattered? I can. It's the most wonderful feeling, and I feel genuinely satisfied and creatively fulfilled. I had a creative vision, something no one had tried before I tried it, and it worked. It actually worked. What could be more fun than that?

So on that note, I bid PJ's public life adieu and wish that she has more years of fun in her life now that it's her own again. And, on a personal note, I'd like to thank her for her years of hard work carried out despite private and public attacks on herself and her integrity.

Thanks Pamela. You really did make a difference for the good.

Related Stories:

SCO is dead, SCO Unix lives on

Mission Accomplished: SCO Loses, Groklaw Closes

Judge tells Oracle, Google to narrow Android patent claims, prior art references

Here we go again: Novell's antitrust suit against Microsoft isn't dead yet

Barnes & Noble says Microsoft is attacking Android with its patent-infringement claims

Topics: Enterprise Software, Legal, Open Source

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

10 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I wish her the best

    As she can now move onto writing more fiction, just something more intersting and less predictable then the fiction "she" wrote on Groklaw

    From the first sentence you always knew what the ending would be, the rest in between an unproductive use of time, as it was unnecessary.
    Tim Cook
    • Her work was so much fiction ...

      @Mister Spock ... that she was RIGHT on almost everything she said.

      Her fiction was so boring and predictable, that even SCO used her work multiple times during the process.
      wackoae
      • Yeah...

        @wackoae

        And.
        lost.
        TriangleDoor
      • And?... They Lost Because Their Claims Were Bogus

        @TriangleDoor
        SCO lost because their claims were bogus, just as she claimed they were. Using her work wouldn't magically make them win a case that she said they should lose.
        CFWhitman
    • That wasn't very "Vulcan" of you.

      Bad enough that you have the cheek to call yourself "Mr Spock" in the first place, but to denigrate PJ and Groklaw when History has proved them <b>right</b> is just petty and spiteful.

      Your mask is slipping.
      Zogg
  • Groklaw doesn't need to be just about SCO

    The work done by PJ was kind of revolutionary (or evolutionary if you want to be pessimistic). She provided very detail analysis of the SCO case, always backing up her words with verifiable facts and data. Sure, she wasn't a fan of SCO ... but even SCO quoted her work multiple times during the process.

    What made her work so revolutionary was the quality of her words, that while sometimes legally technical it was maintained in a "human readable" words (ie: not in legalize language) . It also showed the huge value of "crowd sourcing" in the legal world. A lot of her supporting documentation was found by the "minions" of volunteers .... documents that were always verified for authenticity before posting.

    In the hands of the right group, Groklaw can grow beyond the SCO case. I think that if Mark Webbink continues with the basic style of PJ, he could potentially take the Groklaw into a new and positive direction.
    wackoae
  • RE: Groklaw 2.0: PJ Leaves Groklaw but legal news site to continue under new editor

    Microsoft opens crowdsourced legal site ?CrockLaw? http://newstechnica.com/?p=3252
    DavidGerard
  • Links are wrong

    Some of the "related stories" links are wrong -- notably "mission accomplished" goes to the android story.
    wcroth45
  • 'How many people can say

    they did something that really mattered? I can.' Yes, PJ, indeed you can ! Thanks for all the work you did, and thanks for leaving Groklaw in the hands of someone who can carry on its proud tradition !...<br><br>Henri
    mhenriday
  • Groklaw -- Infinite Spin Machine

    Facts about Groklaw

    1. Groklaw and PJ have never contributed ANYTHING to Linux except usenet blog postings and SEO smear tactics -- groklaw is an SEO smear site.

    2. PJ is Bruce Perens. Although there is a real PJ person who knew Bruce at OSRM, Bruce has been calling the shots at Groklaw. They are "bowing out" because the money went away. How do I know this? Because I had access to emails from groklaw and perens (and torvalds) from a Federal Lawsuit I filed against groklaw, et al.

    3. Groklaw belongs in the archives forgotten. It has done nothing but HURT linux and business around it.

    4. The IBM lawsuits never had anything to do with Linux, this is all spin FUD from groklaw to justify its worthless existence. They were about stupid contracts over Unix code, not Linux. This FUD was created by Perens and Novell and IBM and never had anything to do with Linux kernel development. And none of these parasites have ever contributed ANYTHING to Linux.

    To Perens and his cronies -- good riddance. Linux is better off without them.

    Here is a review of their "tactics" http://www.jeffmerkey.com

    Jeff Merkey
    jeffmerkey