Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
Summary: At some point the music stops, and at some point you have to look at what you've bought and ask, is there a strategy there?
The gang at Springsource was on me this week, pushing a non-disclosure agreement about some great secret news.
The news, it turned out, was that their parent, VMWare, is buying Gemstone.
Gemstone has actually been around since 1982, when it was founded as Servio Logic. It was bought at the height of the dot-com bubble, but then divested a year later -- one day you're a diamond and then you're a stone.
VMWare, which went public in 2007, has had virtual money burning a hole in its pocket for a year, having more than doubled in value since July. EMC, which owns the majority of VMWare, has been treading water during that time.
The analysts at New York-based 451 Group have been pushing VMWare to buy, buy, buy, even offering a helpful list of targets, which includes Terracotta, Chordiant, and Mulesource, among others. (Yes, Gemstone was on the list.)
It's investor excitement over clouds and virtualization that is driving VMWare. There's an attitude of use-it-or-lose it with all that stock value.
But at some point the music stops, and at some point you have to look at what you've bought and ask, is there a strategy there? Is there value there for companies that want to virtualize their systems, that want to build their own clouds?
Or were you just an open source rollup?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
VMware is okay, but needs to fix the bugs in its Work Stations so that 32 bit VM's can work with Windows 7 Pro 64. I tried to install Windows XP Pro 32 in a VMware VM with Windows 7 Pro 64 as host. Could not connect with any flash drives at all.
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
VMWare is the Novell Netware of the late 2000's. Hyper-V will devastate VMWare in another 1-2 versions. I'm not making a quality statement on either product. Just saying that's how this works.
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
Actually, I'd compare VMWare to Citrix. Netware was a direct competitor to Windows Server. Citrix was an "add-on" that MS slowly integrated all the features of, until Citrix was nearly irrelevant. Hyper-V will do the same thing to VMWare...
What killed Novell...
While I find the VMWare management tools easy to use and very intuitive, the high licensing costs for the enterprise level products may be their downfall. History has shown that regardless of how much better a tool is, cheap will pretty much always win the day.
Ad Block Plus is client-side, and only available for one browser anyways.
VMWare is going to have too much competition
Watch Hyper-V take over for Microsoft shops, RHES (libvirt) for the Unix shops, and Canonical's public/private cloud for the startups.
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
It might hurt Microsoft, who deem open source a "cancer" (their word).
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
Comparison between Novell and VMWare are real. Novell reacted to the market by buying then's fad of Unix/Linux tools and VMWare is buying its way to new fad of Open source tools and applications.
However, VMWare is positioning itself to the change much faster than Novell did and question remains if VMWare will manage to transform itself faster than Novell and become not just a survivor but actually thrive with new changes.
RE: Is VMWare becoming just an open source rollup?
<a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli sohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">sesli chat</a>