Microsoft vs. Android
Summary: If you can't beat them, sue them.
It’s pretty clear that Microsoft, a many-time failure at mass-market tablets has decided that if they can’t beat Apple and Android at popular tablets, they’ll sue them instead. That’s my only explanation for Microsoft suing Barnes & Noble, Foxconn, and Inventec over their Android e-readers.
Microsoft, we now know, from Microsoft’s Horacio Gutierrez, Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property & Licensing, that Microsoft was trying to win by litigation even before Microsoft commercially released Windows 7 tablets. Gutierrez wrote, “We have tried for over a year to reach licensing agreements with Barnes & Noble, Foxconn and Inventec. Their refusals to take licenses leave us no choice but to bring legal action.”
Now, I’m no lawyer nor am I a patent expert, but Microsoft’s patents strike me as the kind of bogus software patents that are a perfect example of why software patents are a horrible idea. The patents cover such “patentable” ideas as “Loading Status in a Hypermedia Browser Having a Limited Available Display Area” and “Selection Handles in Editing Electronic Documents.”
Be that as it may, the are currently valid patents and Microsoft will try to use them to gain the money its own tablets will never see. I agree with Pamela Jones, editor of Groklaw, the legal technology site, who describes Microsoft’s motives as “Instead of developing a competing product, they want to just skim off the top from the work of others.” Amen sister.
So, why isn’t Microsoft just suing Google? A legal expert familiar with the situation told me, “Microsoft will bring a series of lawsuits this year in order to tee up the lawsuit it will eventually bring against Google.”
The lawyer continued, “This is just one more step in a patent war that's going--to spread throughout the IT industry. It will be years before it reaches maximum intensity, and years more before the fire begins to die down. Most of this decade will be spent in the fight, which will reduce innovation, destroy tens of billions of dollars in value, and offer a field day to certain non-US competitors. We warned people years ago about this, and now the Free World will be hurt, as everyone will be hurt, by the patent wars resulting from the companies' incautious embrace of state-issued monopolies on ideas.”
I wish they were wrong, but they’re not. Instead of ideas and products, we’re in for years of litigation instead of innovation.
See also:
- Microsoft throws down the gauntlet at Android tablets
- There's more than one way for Microsoft to compete with Android
- Microsoft sues Barnes & Noble, Foxconn, Inventec over Android e-readers
- Apple sues Amazon over 'App Store' trademark
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
These are just junk vague general software patents that allow Microsoft to
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
It's pretty obvious that WP7 beats Android (no matter which version) hands down. Keep trying Donnie, that's the only thing you're good at - being trying.
Only to you....
Only to you......I tried a Win7 phone and it was the worst phone in the store. And to sue with bogus patents that all have prior art? Sounds too much like SCO, a desperate company, going down for the last time, grabbing at anything to keep from drowning....Pathetic.
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
Anyway, Tony, if what you are saying is true, WP7 should be doing amazing numbers in sales. It's not. Android and iOS phones are completely crushing WP7 and anything Blackberry.
I can't say which OS is better since I've never used WP7, I can only say I think the WP7 interface is fugly as hell from videos and pictures I've seen of it. However, I can say that they came to market with a sub-par product far too late in the race. WP7 should have come out about 5 years ago. Even then it would be struggling.
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
it develops meaning from a business model stand point they have the money to slow competitors in order to try and catch up on avenues they are behind in while still leading in such things like windows os and game platforms.
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
While I do like microsoft and wp7 in noway does wp7 beat android in anything other then microsoft suite software compatibility. Overall usage, custom setup, apps, and user friendliness android is king over microsoft, apple ios, palm os, sybian, rim attempts or any other you ty to compare.
Do not appologize, ExploreMN
it is ZDNet's fault for changing the website for the worse.
Are you implying you are now a patent lawyer?
You claim the patents bogus, but a company the size of Microsoft would have proffesionals experienced in these technology matters.
Could you please offer us information as to why we should belive you, and not them?
:|
Correct, That is the same reason that Apple is suing many companies
at the moment DonnieBoy, because they have an item that nobody wants.
That is based on your logic, so it must be true.
:|
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
Fluff girls on parade
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
Or...
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
In the end all software patents do is waste money on lawyers that should be spent on innovation.
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
Yes because Microsoft is in free fall. They should be completely finished by the end of the year when people stop using everyone of their products including the ones that they license to other companies. Android will take over everything and Linux will rule. lol
Remember IBM...
Why? 'Cause IT times change. Look up DEC and Exxon Computer Division if you're still in doubt.
RE: Microsoft vs. Android
you have a point but i fail to see how one compares Microsoft with IBM. Why are they similar because IBM was once the leader so that must mean Microsoft also has to fail because that's the way it always happens. One big difference is Microsoft has many successful businesses but i know someone will just reply with(windozes and offices) but if people were being honest they would know that there are many other businesses that they have which are successful. But we all know that they are failing because they don't dominate every market they enter. The markets that they do dominate however is always in decline. Please explain why Microsoft is going to be the new IBM.