Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Mint 11: The "Un-Unity" Ubuntu desktop Linux

By | May 23, 2011, 2:01pm PDT

Summary: Like Ubuntu, but don’t like its new Unity interface? Then give Mint 11 a try.

I like Ubuntu’s Unity interface, but I wouldn’t use it all the time, and I know many of you don’t like it at all. Like me, you like getting your hands dirty with the operating system and Unity is meant for new Linux users. That’s why for day-in, day-out use I’m now using the Ubuntu Linux-based Mint 11.

Instead of Unity, Mint 11, which is now at the release candidate stage, uses the old Linux Mint desktop layout, mintMenu system, and the same desktop elements featured in previous releases. It also doesn’t use GNOME 3.0. That’s fine by me since I don’t care for GNOME 3 at all, but my reasons for that are a story for another day. Today, I want to tell you why I think Mint 11 is a great desktop Linux for experienced Linux users.

To put Mint 11, Katya, which is based on Ubuntu 11.04, through its paces, I first installed it on one of my main Linux workstations. This is a Dell Inspiron 530S powered by a 2.2-GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800-MHz front-side bus. This box has 4GBs of RAM, a 500GB SATA (Serial ATA) drive, and an Integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) chip set.

How well did it work? Well, after a week on it, I also installed the Mint 11 release candidate on my main work laptop. This is a Lenovo ThinkPad R61 with its 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7500 and 2GBs of RAM. In other words, it not only worked well, it had already proved trustworthy enough that I’d switched to using it on a production machine.

I was willing to make this shift so fast for several reasons. First, Mint 11 is fast. Before this, I was running Ubuntu 11.04, openSUSE 11.4, and Mint 10 on these machines, or in the case of the PC, its twin brother. I don’t know what special sauce the Mint team added to Mint 11, all I know is that it’s faster and more responsive than the other Linux distributions I’ve recently used on these machines. As for Windows 7 SP1, please, these machines are barely adequate for today’s version of Windows.

With the GNOME 2.32 interface, Mint looks as good as ever. This desktop, unlike Unity, also makes it easy for me to tinker with the operating system to get it working just the way I want. GNOME 2.32 has some GNOME 3.0 features though that I didn’t like. For example, some GNOME compatible applications have, instead of a permanently displayed right-hand slider for moving up and down a page, they have a slider that only appears when your mouse hovers over a windows right-side interface. I find this more annoying than useful.

There have also been some desktop application changes. One, which I really approve of, is the switch to LibreOffice in place of OpenOffice for the office suite. Again, the new model office suite was faster than OpenOffice. In addition, LibreOffice does much better with Microsoft Office document compatibility. Most, if not all, of the Linux desktop distributions are switching to LibreOffice. It’s a smart move.

I also like the use of Banshee, which has long been one of my favorite media-players over Rhythmbox. I’m neutral about Mint switching out gThumb for F-Spot as the default photo application.

Since this is Linux, if you don’t like the default applications, you can always replace it. Like the Ubuntu Software Manager it’s based on Mint’s Software Manager makes it mindlessly simple to add new programs. This program does have one default I don’t care for though. When you install a new program, it doesn’t give you a message letting you know when the installation is complete. Instead it simply gives you a momentary 100% installed on the bottom “ongoing action” bar and the application installation page still shows the program as not being installed. You’ll only see that the program has indeed been installed after you refresh the page.

On the other hand, the Update Manger works very smoothly. It makes it easy to keep your Mint PC up to date.

Page 2: [Installing & Upgrading Mint] »

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Talkback Most Recent of 112 Talkback(s)

  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Viper589
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    willyampz
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Viper589
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Economister
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Viper589
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Peter Perry
    24th May
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    lemuelinchrist
    24th May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    @Knix96

    Wow... the carnage, the carnage!!!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Hallowed are the Ori
    25th May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    "LibreOffice does much better with Microsoft Office document compatibility." --> Could you elaborate?

    "Most, if not all, of the Linux desktop distributions are switching to LibreOffice. It?s a smart move." --> Why is smart the idea to go for the latest fork? Why is forking so good? And no, don't just tell me "Oracle". FLOSS or not, we're living in a world of corporations. We want FLOSS and independence, but then we need corporations to pay some of the developers. I don't see any logic in the FLOSS business model...

    "I?m neutral about Mint switching out gThumb for F-Spot as the default photo application." --> gThumb was perfect for what it is. F-Spot sucks.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    beranger
    23rd May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    @beranger
    I'd avoid blanket, cliched dismissals, such as "xxx sucks" in the same post wherein I chided an author for not elaborating on and backing up opinions regarding tangential points.

    I'd make the following observation about forks. They mean potentially significant elements of a development team believe the project's priorities should change. If one agrees with the rationale for forking and one sees traction as the code is adapted to the new priorities, than one goes with the fork. If not, stay with the old code. There is the potential for NIH duplicative effort. That's undeniable. That doesn't seem to me as wasteful or pointless as religious flamewars between the forking and base project camps. Why do you care? It doesn't cost any more to run OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice, or both.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DannyO_0x98
    23rd May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    @DannyO_0x98 As a user, it cost me, even under Windows or wherevere I can choose bewteen Oo.o and LibreOffice. Which one to install? In which of them has bug #NNNNN (reported 7 years ago in Oo.o) been fixed? Oh, in none of them, because there is not enough workforce -- precisely because forking (i) diminishes the available workforce for either of the projects and (ii) duplicates the effort, supposing that there is indeed a will to fix some bugs or to add some new features?

    Many Oo.o extensions are described in on Oo.o website. Are all of them working with LibreOffice? If not, how to fix them? There have been years of development, pages and forums on Oo.o!

    To me, LibreOffice is AN ABJECTION!

    As for F-Spot, I won't stress on the fact that it's Mono-based (I don't care it's about cloning a Microsoft technology, but I don't want UNNEEDED EXTRA DEPENDENCIES in GNOME just for a single application, the same way I don't want mono in KDE either; well, of course Mint is using Mono extensively, but I was talking generically). I would nevertheless say that gThumb was the perfect application: (i) small, (ii) simple, (iii) doing what it was supposed to do. I don't need photo collection managers and all those crappy concepts for idiots -- I very much liked gThumb for what it is.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    beranger
    23rd May
  • forking
    Hi happy
    Forks can appear for many different reasons even just for testing some pet theory held by a small bunch of devs on the team. As for duplicating effort how about using copy&paste?

    Having such similar code-base allows me to use OpenOffice Extensions on LibreOffice. I have heard that they don't all work but most do. LibreOffice appears to have incorporated some Extensions into it's main code-base where a lot of users were keen for it.

    As it happens, LibreOffice has apparently allowed several previous forks to re-combine. Ubuntu didn't use OpenOffice but added some modifications and a few changes making it Go-OO rather than OpenOffice proper but Go-OO has now had all it's modifications incorporated into mainstream LibreOffice. Several long out-standing bugs have been cleared up where Sun and Oracle wouldn't push through the code that had been written to solve the issues.

    Finally one of the fears that pushed people into creating The Document Foundation to run LibreOffice (as Mozilla runs Firefox and other projects) has happened. It seems that Oracle announced they would drop OpenOffice.

    So, forking encourages innovation and competition, collaboration and increases the chances of a project surviving beyond it's owner's whims.

    A smart move indeed happy
    Regards from Tom happy
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Tom6
    28th May
  • ZDNet Blogger

    RE: Mint 11: The
    @beranger I've used them both. LibreOffice is simply better.

    Steven
    ZDNet Gravatar
    sjvn@...
    23rd May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    @sjvn In which way is better? just because you say so? It's only a recent fork, how could it become better overnight?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    beranger
    24th May
  • RE: Mint 11: The
    @beranger@...
    Before there was LO, the was GOO, which Novell took the lead in maintaining a patch set improving performance and some other things. These weren't committed to OO.o because of various reasons, one being code ownership.

    All of those patches could be immediately rolled into LO, though, making the product significantly better than OO.o (though not WRT GOO) literally overnight.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    daengbo
    24th May

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources