Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

OIN outmanuevers Microsoft, buys Linux patents

By | September 9, 2009, 8:13am PDT

The Open Invention Network seems to have one upped Microsoft.  Or has Microsoft one upped OIN?

Either way, it’s win-win for Linux.

Yesterday, OIN, whose mission is to defend Linux and open source from patent trolls, purchased 22 Linux related patents Microsoft recently sold to Allied Security Trust.

OIN chief executive Keith Bergelt would not say how much OIN spent on the patents but said it was a “meaningful amount.”

He said the open source community lucked out because the seller, AST, is not a patent troll. AST, not an investment vehicle, recently purchased the patents from Microsoft to “ensure that they did not fall into the hands of non-practicing entities that could seek to assert the patents against Linux products,” the press release stated.

Bergelt does not take issue with Microsoft’s rights to assert and sell its intellectual property but he did question why the software giant blocked OIN from the bidding.

Was it an overight? Or an attempt by Microsoft to circulate potentially dangerous IP bombs into the patent troll community?

The patents covered open source software related to operating systems and desktop and broader applications, Bergelt said. Some of them were purchased from former Unix vendor SGI.

“I don’t begrudge Microsoft’s opportunity to generate a fair return on their IP but I’m concerned about a strategy of selling Linux related and open source software patents to trolls,” Bergelt said to this blogger. No, they have not done this before and I’d hope it doesn’t happen again.”

He said it’s possible that leaving OIN out of the bidding was an oversight on Microsoft’s part — but not probable.

“I can’t imagine how they could justify it,” Bergelt said about Microsoft’s IP execs not being informed about OIN. “It [appears to be] an elegant way of insulating [the company] from criticism by [trying to]sell it to a troll.”

Again, AST is not a troll, Bergelt emphasized. But did Microsoft know that?

Sure, Microsoft made some money on the Linux related patents. That has to be annoying to OIN members who paid for them.

But this is a win-win for Linux. It demonstrates that Microsoft has not been able to cook up an uber mega legal case against Linux (maybe?) if it is selling Linux related patents to smaller entities.

And the more Linux related patents Microsoft sells, the fewer it owns.

It also demonstrates that OIN is functioning very well in the marketplace. For the money it paid, the Linux defense organization — which is backed by IBM, Novell and Red Hat, among others —  has gained more patents to its own growing portolio and prevented the trolls from gaining control of  22 linux related ones. The OIN protfolio is now just south of 300 patents and more are coming.

OIN created 45 of its own and has another 45 patent applications in the works designed to protect the Linux roadmap over time.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Paula Rooney is a Boston-based writer who has followed the tech industry for almost two decades.

Disclosure

Paula Rooney

Paula Rooney owns no stock in the companies that she covers. She holds a 401K that is managed by Morgan Stanley.

Biography

Paula Rooney

Paula Rooney has covered the software and technology industry for more than 20 years, starting with semiconductor design and mini-computer systems at EDN News and later focused on PC software companies including Microsoft, Lotus, Oracle, Red Hat, Novell and other open source and commercial software companies for CRN and PCWeek. She received a silver award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors in 2005 for her profile on Linus Torvalds and edited and co-authored "Partnering With Microsoft," a book about Microsoft's channel published by CMP Publishing in 2004. Rooney graduated from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in 1997. In her off time, she enjoys scuba diving, sailing, sun worshipping, running, reading, surfing (the net) and hanging out with her family. She resides on the shores of Scituate, Massachusetts.

7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Your definition of an Open Source company is too limited.
Zogg 9th Sep 2009
There is nothing stopping commercial entities from building very marketable products around Open Source technologies. Spring and Hibernate are two very obvious examples, albeit not ones directly related to these 22 particular patents. Or consider a company that sells a popular gadget that happens to run a Linux kernel internally, such as a Tivo.

It is companies like these that fear becoming targets of patent trolls.
0 Votes
+ -
Win-Win for Linux distro's!
Christian_<>< 9th Sep 2009
As long as the Open_Source movement steamrolls ahead little by little the M$ Regime will deteriorate over time.
Is it fair to say that OIN out maneuvered MS if you cannot tell if the patents have value? Surely, the open-source community would have something great on their hands if they got ahold of something significant, but if these things can't be used then I believe its easy to see that OIN paid more than these things are worth and that will certainly be true if they cannot make money of these patents.
0 Votes
+ -
"Outmanuvered?" If MS cared, or wanted to assert against open source, why sell in the first place?

The theory of "patent troll" seeding is conspiracy theorization at its peak. Who is more likely to get sued? A company that makes lots of money, or a company that doesn't? How much money would a patent troll get suing an open source org?

I suppose the next step in the conspiracy theory is that MS is desperate for the cash.
0 Votes
+ -
A likely scenerio is that OIN
GuidingLight 9th Sep 2009
was tricked into purchasing patents with money they did not wish to spend.

You are correct, if Microsoft really cared, they would have never sold them.
There is nothing stopping commercial entities from building very marketable products around Open Source technologies. Spring and Hibernate are two very obvious examples, albeit not ones directly related to these 22 particular patents. Or consider a company that sells a popular gadget that happens to run a Linux kernel internally, such as a Tivo.

It is companies like these that fear becoming targets of patent trolls.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux buying patents?
Joe_Raby 9th Sep 2009
Stallman must be rolling over in his grave.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix