ie8 fix
Click Here

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Open Ajax breaks Microsoft disability advantage

By | August 5, 2010, 5:48am PDT

Summary: The IBM-led OpenAjax Alliance has announced new tooling technologies aimed at helping the disabled navigate Web 2.0 sites, a real breakthrough for accessibility.

Folks who are blind or physically disabled have long had only one choice of platform. Microsoft’s ecosystem had all the innovations they needed, and Microsoft supported those developments.

This was politically potent. When a move was made toward, say, an open source data format like ODF, Microsoft could trot out advocates for the disabled to say how unfair this was to them.

No more. Or maybe not much more.

The IBM-led OpenAjax Alliance has announced new tooling technologies aimed at helping the disabled navigate Web 2.0 sites, a real breakthrough for accessibility.

Ajax may seem like great stuff to the sighted, but how is a blind person to understand what is happening as they mouse over a word cloud? This has been a big problem for many years.

It took a huge effort to solve. The Alliance has over 100 members, including Microsoft. Solving the problems of Ajax is more important to all players than maintaining a monopoly on accessibility.

And this does not necessarily threaten Microsoft’s dominance of clients, in the near term. If a blind person was looking to buy a PC today, I’d still recommend a Windows machine to them.

But the world is moving away from PCs. It’s moving to Kindles and iPads and iPhones. Solving the Ajax problems on Windows Servers maintains Microsoft’s momentum. The client difficulties are another subject.

OpenAjax has a number of very well-written white papers on the site, including this one on the basic technology, this one on browser technology, and this one on deployment strategy. OpenAjax is ready for prime time. It’s a very good thing.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years.

At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog.

DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air.

My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Open Ajax breaks Microsoft disability advantage
dr4ape 6th Aug 2010
It's good to hear about projects working to improve accessibility of web pages. It would be better if the sites and articles discussing accessibility were themselves meeting current WAI guidelines for accessibility. Unfortunately this article and site fail verification (checked by Cynthia Says) in several areas. One example is the following paragraph:

"OpenAjax has a number of very well-written white papers on the site, including [this one] on the basic technology, [this one] on browser technology, and [this one] on deployment strategy. OpenAjax is ready for prime time. It?s a very good thing."

In brackets is the same wording being used as links to 3 different pages. It would have been much clearer just to use the relevant wording [basic technology], [browser technology], and [deployment strategy] as links.

I look forward to reading more accessible articles on ZDNet in the future.
0 Votes
+ -
as a developer who creates A AA and AAA compliant sites or trys to anyways, hearing that anyone is working to help the disabled navigate web 2.0 sites or social media sites etc is awesome news and I eagerly wait a follow up to see what really comes of this.
0 Votes
+ -
no JAWS for Nix???
mswift@... 5th Aug 2010
You mean open source software has never been ADA compliant??? No wonder people use Windows. Any company of any size has some disabled employees. Hard for me to believe that IBM and *Nix have never had a JAWS equivalent.
0 Votes
+ -
@mswift@... Surprised me, too. But Ajax does things that are very difficult to describe, if you lack the vision for it. What most folks have done is to create a special "dumbed down" version of a site for the sightless, but that's not really a good solution.
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn: Two questions: 1) Does this really have to do with AJAX? Where's the XML? What you describe can be done with old school JavaScript and has been a bane to all navigation based on client-side scripting. 2) Isn't different media CSS sheets supposed to solve these problems and isn't HTML5 supposed to make it easier to do so?
It's good to hear about projects working to improve accessibility of web pages. It would be better if the sites and articles discussing accessibility were themselves meeting current WAI guidelines for accessibility. Unfortunately this article and site fail verification (checked by Cynthia Says) in several areas. One example is the following paragraph:

"OpenAjax has a number of very well-written white papers on the site, including [this one] on the basic technology, [this one] on browser technology, and [this one] on deployment strategy. OpenAjax is ready for prime time. It?s a very good thing."

In brackets is the same wording being used as links to 3 different pages. It would have been much clearer just to use the relevant wording [basic technology], [browser technology], and [deployment strategy] as links.

I look forward to reading more accessible articles on ZDNet in the future.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix