Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Put on your new Red Hat Linux

By | May 19, 2011, 10:24am PDT

Summary: Red Hat’s latest Red Hat Enterprise Linux, 6.1, is now shipping and its competitors are lagged ever farther behind.

As expected, Red Hat has released its latest server business operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6.1. This is the first major update to the platform since RHEL 6 shipped in November 2010.

RHEL 6.1 features optimized KVM virtualization, new hardware support, improved operational efficiency, and high availability (HA) improvements. It also includes improved development and monitoring tools such as an updated Eclipse development environment includes enhanced breakpoint and code generation for C/C++ and Java.

The company also announced, to no surprise, that it’s improved RHEL’s virtualization and cloud offerings. The company also claimed customers will see faster performance with HP and IBM hardware. You can see it for yourself. RHEL 6.1 is available to subscribing Red Hat customers today worldwide via the Red Hat Network.

Red Hat also commissioned a study from industry analyst firm IDC to examine its long-term total cost of ownership (TCO) benefits. This study compared RHEL with running mixed environments or non-paid Linux distributions. In a statement, Al Gillen, Program VP, System Software at IDC said that “Organizations that are heavily standardized on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and compared those organizations with others that had a mixture of Linux distributions in use, and organizations that were heavily penetrated by non-paid Linux distributions. The outcome of the study found that there is demonstrable business benefit associated with having professional support for an operating system, compared to a do-it-yourself approach. The real benefits came from lower IT staff costs and reduced end user downtime.” For the full report, see Understanding Linux Deployment Strategies: The Business Case for Standardizing on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

At the same time all this is happening, Red Hat’s most direct rivals, CentOS and Scientific Linux, both RHEL clones, are having trouble keeping up with RHEL. You may not have heard of CentOS, but it’s the most popular Web server OS of all.

CentOS has been lagging behind RHEL though for the last few months. Some users, tired of waiting for CentOS to catch up with RHEL are abandoning it for Scientific Linux. While Microsoft-of all companies!–is now supporting CentOS was an optimized OS on its Hyper-V virtualization platform–specifically Windows Server R2 Hyper-V, it seems likely that the RHEL clones are going to find it harder than ever to keep pace with RHEL.

That’s by design. Red Hat wanted it that way. As Bryan Stevens, Red Hat’s CTO and VP of worldwide engineering, wrote recently, “Our competitors in the Enterprise Linux market have changed their commercial approach from building and competing on their own customized Linux distributions, to one where they directly approach our customers offering to support RHEL. Frankly, our response is to compete While Red Hat was aiming this change in how it handled its source code mostly at Oracle, which has its own RHEL clone, Unbreakable Linux, the move has also made it harder for all of Red Hat’s would-be competitors to keep up with RHEL.

At the same time, SUSE Linux is under new management. While its new owner, Attachmate, at first said encouraging things about SUSE/Novell’s future, since then though Attachmate has cut hundreds of Novell employees.

Add it all up and Red Hat has released a new strong, cloud-friendly Linux at the same time that its Linux rivals are starting to fall behind. Red Hat has long been the dominant business Linux. With these developments, I expect it to become the server Linux in the same way that Windows long ago became the desktop operating system.

Related Stories:

Red Hat’s diversification, cloud moves look promising

Survey: 56% expect that more than half of all software spend over next 5 years will be open source

Big Blue plus Red Hat plus Private Cloud equals Purple Reign?

Red Hat, Eucalyptus, Rackspace leading open source IaaS charge

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

22
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
ajaywify Updated - 30th Nov
Red Hat Linux was originally developed exclusively inside Red Hat, with the only feedback from users coming through bug reports and contributions to the included software packages.Red Hat Linux merged with the community-based Fedora Project. The new plan is to draw most of the code base from Fedora when creating new Red Hat Enterprise Linux distributions. Fedora replaces the original Red Hat Linux download and retail version.The model is similar to the relationship between Netscape Communicator and Mozilla, or StarOffice and OpenOffice.org, although in this case the resulting commercial product is also fully free software.Thanks for sharing.
Regards,
Chandler Real Estate
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
facebook@... 19th May 2011
@DonnieBoy

What innovation? Based on the comments from SJVN this looks like updates to existing functionality plus a few non-innovative cloud components.
0 Votes
+ -
Lovie......
todbran@... 19th May 2011
@facebook@...

Did you change your name AGAIN?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
facebook@... 19th May 2011
@todbran

Did I say something untrue?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
daikon 19th May 2011
Great article Steven.
Red Hat continues to set the standard in flexibility, performance and quality that customers around the world rely on for their open source enterprise environments, spanning physical, virtual and cloud deployments.
0 Votes
+ -
Is your post an ad or an opinion?
Uraturdburger 19th May 2011
@daikon

Sounds like an ad.

"Microsoft continues to set the standard for software that people have heard of".
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
daikon 19th May 2011
@Uraturdburger
It?s my opinion.

?Red Hat continues to set the standard for software and services that enterprises use?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
LoverockDavidson 19th May 2011
Oh boy, I can see the linux crowd already waiting to start up their compilers. Imagine how long its going to take to compile this one from source.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
daikon 19th May 2011
No compiling required.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
colinmeister 20th May 2011
@LoverockDavidson

Haven't you realised yet, Loverock, that out of box Linux distros don't need to be compiled - you get the binaries. Do you really not know, or are you just banging out trolls to attract attention? If the latter, then I suppose I fell for it.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
AndyPagin 20th May 2011
@LoverockDavidson

Strange, I installed RHEL 6 yesterday, took about ten minutes, and not a compiler in sight.
0 Votes
+ -
Good for you, Red Hat
Sagax- 19th May 2011
Red Hat has been in there working for and with Linux since the very early days (Red Hat was my first install in 97 or 98). While they may not deserve cudos for earth shaking innovation, they have earned esteem and appreciation for solid and reliable workmanship in Linux. I applaud them.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
tdogg219 19th May 2011
@SJVN - Could you have any more typos and grammar problems. Content notwithstanding, this article was difficult to read...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
shettinger 20th May 2011
@tdogg219 agree completely...isn't there an editor or some process where this gets proofread? Maybe try writing in this new program called Word, i dont know if you have heard about it, but it has this great feature called spellcheck. Granted its not open source, so you may want to look into open office.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
statuskwo5 20th May 2011
@shettinger "Granted [Word] is not open source, so you may want to look into open office."

I agree completely. Too many authors don't proof read. It looks like they just want to rush the story out for clicks. Pathetic.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
tdogg219 19th May 2011
"CentOS has been lagging behind RHEL though for the last few months. Some users, tired of waiting for CentOS to catch up with RHEL are abandoning it for Scientific Linux. While Microsoft-of all companies!?is now supporting CentOS was an optimized OS on its Hyper-V virtualization platform?specifically Windows Server R2 Hyper-V, it seems likely that the RHEL clones are going to find it harder than ever to keep pace with RHEL."

What on earth does that mean? Why, based on the above paragraph, are the RHEL clones going to find it harder than ever to keep pace?

"At the same time, SUSE Linux is under new management. While its new owner, Attachmate, at first said encouraging things about SUSE/Novell?s future, since then though Attachmate has cut hundreds of Novell employees."

This is simply a horribly constructed sentence.

Please, for the sake of us readers, re-read what you have typed at least once before posting.
0 Votes
+ -
not just reread the blog,
pfyearwood 20th May 2011
@tdogg219 Not just reread the blog, but reread it out loud. It is a trick I picked up from Writers' Digest and The Writer magazines. You will hear any stumbling point and be encouraged to fix it. Too often, these blogs and responses read like instruction manuals written by government agencies.

Paul
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
bitrate 19th May 2011
RedHat should have bought out SuSe and utilized some of its core components instead of watching it die a painful death at the hands of Attachmate.
0 Votes
+ -
Waves Red Hat Flag
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~-~ Your Linux Advocate 20th May 2011
You go Red Hat!
0 Votes
+ -
Novell, not SuSE lay offs
nathanr.au 20th May 2011
"At the same time, SUSE Linux is under new management. While its new owner, Attachmate, at first said encouraging things about SUSE/Novell?s future, since then though Attachmate has cut hundreds of Novell employees."

Yes, Novell is under new management, and they have cut hundreds of Novell jobs. There were some open source jobs (notably Ximian) in the cuts, but not SuSE. SuSE engineering was in Germany, and funny enough that's where the restructure has their management heading back to. SuSE in the medium term will be stronger, as they won't be held back by needing to integrate with the Netware based Novell services that were ported. They can concentrate on being a Linux distribution.

RHEL 6 is newer than SLES 11. They're currently about 18 months offset from each other in release cycles. SLES 12 should ship next year, and that will make RHEL 6 look old.

And then there's the pricing model - SLES on a VMware hypervisor you only pay per physical host; RHEL on a VMware hypervisor you pay the same amount, but per guest (VM). That makes SLES hugely cheaper and easier to grow with for VMware shops. That's the single biggest thing Red Hat could do as an improvement - fix their licensing on other vendors hypervisors.
0 Votes
+ -
Here, here...
mkpelletier@... 21st May 2011
The quality of "journalism" has really gone down with the each iteration of blogs and Internet publications. It is not just SJVN either (I have read some real shocking pieces of rubbish from Ed Bott). Just about every post I read on ZDNet is in need of editing. Spelling, grammatical mistakes, and editorializing have all become synonymous with ZDNet. However, I am not sure these posts are meant to be taken as real journalism, but rather just tech blogs. We shouldn't be too hard on those writing the posts, though. Someone over at ZDNet has to be in charge of quality control processes. Come on ZDNet get your crap together.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Put on your new Red Hat Linux
ajaywify Updated - 30th Nov
Red Hat Linux was originally developed exclusively inside Red Hat, with the only feedback from users coming through bug reports and contributions to the included software packages.Red Hat Linux merged with the community-based Fedora Project. The new plan is to draw most of the code base from Fedora when creating new Red Hat Enterprise Linux distributions. Fedora replaces the original Red Hat Linux download and retail version.The model is similar to the relationship between Netscape Communicator and Mozilla, or StarOffice and OpenOffice.org, although in this case the resulting commercial product is also fully free software.Thanks for sharing.
Regards,
Chandler Real Estate

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix