Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
Summary: Red Hat's CEO said the business models enabled by the Linux platform, namely cheap innovation, quick scale out and mass collaboration, is directly responsible for the success of top Web 2.0 companies including Google, Facebook and Amazon
Google and Facebook owe their success largely to Linux -- not the technology per se, but to the cheap innovation and mass collaboration it enables, Red Hat's CEO says.
Yes, free, as in freedom, but also free as in free beer, said Jim Whitehurst, CEO of Red Hat.
Had it not been for the no cost software, open licensing and mass collaboration, all business models enabled by Linux and open source, none of the top Web 2.0 companies -- including the cloud crowd -- would have been able to lift off, scale and run their businesses.
Backrub.Stanford.edu, a little experiment begun in the mid 90s that become Google, was written in Java and Python and on Linux. More importantly, the technical innovation that came at such a low pricetag is what changed the game forever, the Red Hat CEO said.
"Google would not exist today if it were not for Linux. Initially, the business model of throwing it out and making it free and scalable.. those business models only work if you can start them and get innovation going cheaply. If you can't innovate cheaply, the amount of innovation stalls," Whitehurst said at LinuxCon, which is being held this week in Vancouver.
Could Facebook have built and scaled its infrastructure without Linux and open source? Whitehurst said no.
"The power of innovation that Linux [enables] from a business perspective is hallmark about what open source has done for Web 2.0," he noted. "Web 2.0 would not exist in its current form if it weren't for the business model of Linux."
Linux Foundation Exec VP Jim Zemlin noted during his opening keynote Wednesday that Red Hat is expected to break $1 billion in revenues this year.
Whitehurt said he takes exception to analysts who describe Linux as simply a solid alternative to traditional platforms when it has become the default platform for next generation application development and platform computing.
Wall Street knows: Red Hat's stock has returned a 400 percent increase in price over the past 10 years while Microsoft's has flattened and dipped some, he added.
Red Hat is a huge beneficiary from open source but Wall Street trading platforms, Facebook, Google and cloud companies are even bigger beneficiaries, he said, noting that 75 percent of stock exchanges now run Linux.
"Now we have large companies doing the innovation ... Google, Amazon and facebook are defining the next generation roadmap and where the next innovation is coming. It's not Sun and Microsoft, but what's happening in open source," Whitehurst added.
Whitehurst said open source projects are also more powerful in defining next generation technologies than traditional software companies, citing the successes of Hadoop and Cassandra in the big data movement.
"Innovation is happening in open source first and then established companies are working to implement them," he added.
"Linux is enabling business models that have nothing to do with technology [because]customers can do it cheaply, scale it and build businesses based on it," he added.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
But its Windows Machines that make them a success
Interesting
It's funny you say this, because these numbers are debatable. The wc3stats OS site claims the Linux pie slice is around 5%, whereas Microsoft (Years ago... At that) conjectured Linux usage at roughly 8%.
Statistics are difficult to trust, and are often very misleading. While I might be a Linux fan, it doesn't make me lose my objectivity. WinP7 is such an example. I don't trust current statistics (e.g. The recent drop in market share for MS). Likely they're floating a little above that number, but the statistics don't cover the entire scale well.
Such are the woes of statisticians- their task I do not envy :)
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
I'm not quite sure what the numbers are. I don't mean to claim any knowledge pertaining to some accurate depiction of the current Linux marketshare. But I do understand the basics of statistics, and if there is anything that you ever learn is that they are very flaky.
And I daresay, why not? I've many friends that use Linux (or BSD, etc etc) on a rather large scale. At home I have 4 boxes and a laptop all running distributions of Linux.
On an overall global scale (device vs device), quite likely the Linux share is much higher.
Hell, take into account all the network devices that are running it underneath. VMWare ESX servers? What's under that hood? Etc etc. The list goes on.
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
I'm going to call BS. Your wireless router at home? Probably runs embeded linux. Got a Tivo? Yup, linux runs that too. Maybe your stats are looking at desktop users, but just about every home using broadband has a device running embeded linux.
That's Low for Just Desktop Linux
The 0.76% figure for Linux is a low figure even for just desktop Linux. "Machines connected to the Internet" that run Linux are clearly much higher than that even if you exclude Android.
Clearly the stat you are quoting must have been just for desktop Linux. Even for desktop Linux, though, more reasonable numbers seem to be in the 1.5% neighborhood. I'm guessing that number is from Net Applications, which also happens to be seemingly the only web hit analyzation company that claims Linux desktop usage has gone down rather than up over the past couple of years.
Awake much???
The majority of servers on the net are linux, the majority of routers, firewalls, switches, hubs and other networking boxes are linux. Want to try that again??
Great article again Steve! Keep it up!
Doesn't matter. That's not where MS competes.
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
If FreeBSD and the other free *NIXen (that's actually correct grammar) would have matched the demands we wouldn't have known what Linux is today - but then this article would have been giving credit to FreeBSD or whatever *NIX that would have took the place Linux has.
This Article Is By Paula Rooney
Just a note: This article is from Paula Rooney, not Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols.
Small percentage
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
If it were not Microsoft using their illegal monopoly against Linux the number would be higher.
Any company who are against Linux are against technological progress for humanity in general - Microsoft uses its monopoly (and patents) against innovation constantly.
The fact that due to said illegal monopoly I have to actually fund the bas*ards through paying tax - I mean - WHY DO THE POLICE, HOSPITALS, ETC NEED WINDOWS????
My tax money is helping legal threats against linux....
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
Parasites more like.
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
Google place should be in the most stinking bin the city could find.
RE: Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source
http://cassandra.apache.org/
"Cassandra was open sourced by Facebook in 2008, and is now developed by Apache committers and contributors from many companies.
http://www.chromium.org/
"The Chromium projects include Chromium and Chromium OS, the open-source projects behind the Google Chrome browser and Google Chrome OS, respectively.
Owe? As in in debt?
[Irony mode on] I thought the whole idea of Linux is that it's all created by a bunch of little communists who doesn't want money or recognition?
[Irony mode off]
Headline Is a Figure of Speech
The headline is a figure of speech, and it is talking about some portion of the credit for success, not literally some kind of debt.
Besides, open source takes its cue from the model for scientific research, not some political ideal like communism. Have you ever heard the quote, "Information wants to be free"?