ie8 fix
Click Here

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Red Hat CEO thinks the desktop is becoming a legacy application

By | August 18, 2011, 4:25pm PDT

Summary: In five years, Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst sees the traditional desktop becoming obsolete.

Vancouver, British Columbia—A running joke at this years LinuxCon is that “X is the year of the Linux desktop.” Jim Zemlin, head of the conference’s sponsoring organization, The Linux Foundation, started it with his keynote in noting how often he’d made that prediction and how often he’s been wrong. The current prediction, which I believe Linus Torvalds made last night was : “2031! The year of the Linux desktop.” Jim Whitehurst, CEO of Red Hat, has another year in mind for the Linux desktop though: Never. Oh, and the Windows and Mac desktops? Get ready to say good-bye to them soon.

In an interview with me, Whitehurst told me that he believes that the “Fat client operating system [the traditional desktop] is becoming a legacy application.” What he meant by that isn’t that your desktops are suddenly going to vaporize into puffs of smoke in 2016 like from some really lame disaster movie. No, his point is that the cost of maintaining and securing a desktop operating system is growing increasingly higher.

So, what he sees happening is that everyone, and it’s not just Linux, “writing their functionality for the back engine. Why would anyone with all the different platforms—smartphones, tablets, etc.—and the costs of securing all of them want to spend money on that? The cost to manage and secure a fat client is ridiculous.”

So what will replace it? He sees several possibilities. In the short run, for businesses he sees Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) becoming increasing more important. Here, he sees Citrix, which has long provided Windows desktops via its VDI platform, continuing to be the major player. “It’s Citrix’s market to lose,” said Whitehurst.

Red Hat will also play a role in VDI as well. In 2012, Red Hat will be reintroducing ts Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments (SPICE)-based VDI. On the server side, SPICE depends on KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) for its horsepower. Don’t think though that Red Hat plans on head-to-head competition with Citrix for tomorrow’s VDI desktop. They don’t.

Instead, Whitehurst said, “SPICE will be part of a packaged offering for those who want it.” He sees its market as being primary users who are already using Linux desktops, terminal applications, or Linux-based thin-clients. It’s a great offerings, but as for using it to run say “20,000 Windows desktops?” No, that’s Citrix’s market.”

So what kind of desktop does he see the enterprise user moving to, since after all, there’s only so much you can do with any tablet or smartphone? Whitehurst thinks it will probably be based on a KVM-based cloud and using a Web browser as its primary interface.

He added that he thinks Google’s Chrome operating system looks promising and that he plans on trying out the Samung Chromebook himself sometime soon. You see, unlike many CEOs,Whitehurst is also a techie. His first exposure to Linux was running Slackware on his own. Today, he runs Fedora 15 as his desktop. He knows Linux. As Red Hat gets ready to become the first billion-dollar open-source company, it’s clear he knows business. He knows the desktop. If he says the fat-client desktop is getting ready to become yesterday’s news, I’m inclined to listen to him.

Related Stories:

Red Hat CEO: Google, Facebook owe it all to Linux, open source

Google’s Chrome operating system gets a much needed update

Red Hat delivers strong first quarter, rides data center upgrades

Fedora 15’s five best features

Red Hat’s Future Linux Desktop

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

93
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Red Hat CEO thinks the desktop is becoming a legacy application
incrediblesolv 27th Aug
he is partly right with one exception. Internet access has to be ubiquitous before this becomes reality. It also has to be reliable. I predicted way back in 2006 that the world was going mobile and that programs will be available virtually (no called through the cloud) I was laughed at. Now that it is mostly true there still remains one large block for both predictions to come true. trust. People have to trust that the source is not going to lose any of their data. When you have a physical drive in your hand as long as its working that data is yours, only yours. But when you upload it - you have no idea which country that physical data is being stored in or if it will last forever. With power cuts becoming the norm in some countries the traditional laptop or desktop still has a huge role to play. However unless you are running a gaming machine you no longer need to have the most powerful monster machine. Yet the trust issue will always remain.
Cannot wait to see what kinda eggs will be on his face when ChokingBook gets canned next year like WebOS today due to zero market interest.
@LBiege Chrome is getting interest but the cost to convert to the platform is several hundred thousand over sticking with IE.

The problem is that a lot of companies are invested in IE and Windows Technologies.

My company looked at this approach and reasoned they couldn't justify it in this market so they made a Move to a newer IE.
@Peter Perry
I have seen this problem so often in the past, and I thought this IE lock-in was a thing of the past. Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and various other browsers have collectively just under 50% of web access usage, and testing websites and selecting technology that will allow all browsers to be used is very straightforward. However I have see companies that allow lazy or incompetent IT departments turn away between 25%-48% of potential customers and billions of dollars of revenue simply because they can'y be bothered to do their job properly. Also, by not bothering to do their homework when writing web applications, IT department bosses lock themselves into expensive lock-ins or re-writing or fixing of internal web applications because they didn't bother to spend 5 minutes selecting a portable scripting solution. The problem here is the tail wagging the dog, because of company IT directors who don't understand anything about IT and just take their subordinates' word for it when they say it can't be dome, or it is too expensive, when what they really mean is "I can't be bothered to do it", or "I am not competent to do it".

The big savings with Chromebooks come from eliminating the very high desktop support and maintenance costs of Windows. You have to do this by either remove the desktops completely from selected people who will use server based web apps exclusively. A lot of information workers can make this change very painlessly and at little initial cost. For those who need Windows applications, Chromebooks + desktop virtualization can remove some of the maintenance overhead associated with Windows desktops. However this requires an IT department competent in servers rather than desktops, and many companies, particularly smaller ones, employ low quality IT staff who can do little more than provide desktop support.

It should also be noted that not all desktops need to be replaced - you can put Chrome browsers on Windows desktops and access the same web apps in the same way as on Chromebooks - although the Windows desktop retains its high maintenance cost.

Basically, there are huge savings to be made on Windows support, but the first step to achieving this is to switch to Chrome or a fully HTML5 compatible browser and make sure your web apps are too. A good way to do this is to test for both Chrome browser and the latest IE in your office. If it works for both then your application is HTML5 compatible.

If your IT department is are not prepared to take this simple step, you can forget the savings and stick to your expensive Windows desktops, and your expensive Windows desktop support staff.
@Mah Except we live in the real world...
@Peter Perry Chromebooks are a massive dud. Nobody, especially enterprise, wants a gimped, web only OS that comes on an overpriced netbook. They certainly don't want to put up with Google, who has no service or support. That's what's laughable about Google. They think they can sell to the enterprise with serving and supporting them. I've read tons of stories for managers that have stated trying to get Google to support products is impossible. Besides, a web browsing OS is completely useless.
@LBiege Yeah, that comment made me feel more secure choosing SUSE over RedHat. Sheesh.
@LBiege

Yeah, like I want to do my work from a smartphone or tablet! It's thoughts like this that keep linux down!
The Desktop will never be obsolete but the OS will be replaced by the likes of embedded systems from MS, Linux / Google and Apple.
@Peter Perry

Now Peter, stop baiting the trolls with logic, you know that they can't handle that and will sputter and foam a the mouth!
The only thing Whitehurst got right was the year of the
Linux desktop!
0 Votes
+ -
Never...
cosuna 19th Aug
@wizard57m@... : and date shared by Windows 8 tablet adoption.
@cosuna What Windows 8 tablet adoption?
@cosuna
You say it as if Windows 8 is out already.
@Zc456
He also says it like everyone will buy one.
0 Votes
+ -
Get Real Folks. RedHat RHEV 3.0 is RedHot.
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 18th Aug
KVM Dude.
0 Votes
+ -
Get real yourself, Mr. Schmitz
Mister Spock 18th Aug
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
Red Hat CEO's is just attempting to make Linux appear more relevant the it actually is.

I suspect that you knew that already, and that you are attempting to put on " a brave face".

plain
@Mister Spock
+1
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
What exactly is your experience level with RedHat?
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 19th Aug
@Mister Spock
Just curious.
This whole Mr. Spock 'schtick' that you've adopted is silly. Try demonstrating some knowledge.
@Mister Spock OUCH!...
  • Flagged
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Troll
You first...
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Suddenly...
cosuna 19th Aug
@Mister Spock : Facebook, Twitter, Google and, yes, Android are *NOT* based on Linux...

...the London Stock Exchange is NOT based on Linux...

...several hundred space probes are NOT Linux based...

...92% of the Top500 supercomputer don't run Linux (http://top500.org/stats/list/37/os)....

I wonder what importance that OS could have... I just wonder...
0 Votes
+ -
cosuna, so what?
William Farrell 19th Aug
@cosuna

So you want me to list the comapnies all running on MS software? It will take forever, but if you're willing to stick around and read it all happy
So you want me to list the comapnies all running on MS software? It will take forever, but if you're willing to stick around and read it all

Well no wonder there's a lot of junk software running out there.

wink
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
Yeah, for the techies in the 1% market share. If you want a good machine, you outfit it with an OS that doesn't requre compiling, building, rendering and what not to get it to much more than e-mal and surfing. The main market is made up of USERS, not techies who want to spend all their time trying to get something to work. The 'nix out of box experence is even worse than Microsoft's is and especially HP's setups.
0 Votes
+ -
@tom@...
I answered 3 or 4 simple questions, then Fedora install all by itself, reboots and you have a perfectly working system, on the internet, and with all the apps you need, and in half the time. Unlike Windows where you have to have separate installs for Office, Reader, etc....

I support 1/3 less Windows systems than linux, but have 3 times the issues with the Windows systems.

So, lets see your facts, or get under the bridge.
@tom@... Maybe you should actually try Linux before writing about it. Maybe you could enlighten us as to exactly what required "compiling, building, rendering", because as 'linux for me' states, Fedora requires like 5 questions answered: system name, admin password, disk to install onto, user name, and time zone. Oh I see, those questions are too difficult for you maybe?

BTW: KVM (One of Redhat's main products) out performances HyperV, with any guest OS, by a large margin, and KVM supports USB passthru, something MS is not even working on. (I guess MS decided you don't need USB in VMs)
@linux for me

Which version of Windows? And are you doing a proper hardening of the systems to prevent user tinkering? Probably not...
0 Votes
+ -
Ironically...
cosuna Updated - 19th Aug
@tom@... : the market is neither made by your so-called "techies", nor by us Windows "experts".... both are just mirages...

...99% can care less what OS they have or how it works inside... they use Windows for the apps... but suddenly the useful app is the browser... and the iPad is what's got the "coolest" new apps...

... so yes... even though its "limited" (by our "expert" standard only)... can't use a keyboard and a mouse (also another "expert" invention created to mimic the human interaction, while touch is really the best way)... and can't run Windows.. they are what people want... and that's being exposed by the numbers...

...just ask HP and Acer... and they both know the (wrong) answer...
@cosuna

"... so yes... even though its "limited" (by our "expert" standard only)... can't use a keyboard and a mouse (also another "expert" invention created to mimic the human interaction, while touch is really the best way)... and can't run Windows.. they are what people want... and that's being exposed by the numbers..."

Are you being sarcastic or idiotic?
0 Votes
+ -
I notice lately
theo_durcan 19th Aug
@Rama.NET
all the MS cheerleading squad congratulating themselves with +1 marks.
@theo_durcan
+1 Windows windows rah rah rah
0 Votes
+ -
"So, what he sees happening is that everyone, and it?s not just Linux, ?writing their functionality for the back engine. Why would anyone with all the different platforms?smartphones, tablets, etc.?and the costs of securing all of them want to spend money on that? The cost to manage and secure a fat client is ridiculous.?

I guess they figure if they say it enough times, it will actually come true. The problem with the desktop, and desktop apps, is that while web apps, and more recently mobile apps, were rapidly evolving, the former were not - at least in the areas of user experience, the incorporation of online features, and the setting up of a compelling market place infrastructure. In fact, the iPad can be seen as the precursor to the modern PC, which hopefully Windows 8 will bring. Windows 8 needs to create a new dynamic app ecosystem around the PC, to drive the PC upgrade cycles once again. Windows is running on fumes, because its app ecosystem - particularly in the consumer market - is sputtering. As always, what makes a platform strong, is its APPLICATIONS, APPLICATIONS, APPLICATIONS! Windows apps need to be in vogue again for the PC to be reborn.
0 Votes
+ -
Well he's wrong this time
adacosta38 18th Aug
VDI is just another more efficient way delivering the desktop and it will ensure the continuity of the Windows desktop and its dominance over the 0.75% market share operating system known as Linux. The Linux freaks for years have been predicting the demise of the Windows desktop and they will look to any current fud as a means to an end to support their weird desire to see Windows in the rear-view mirror. Trust me, it won't be happening.

With WebOS dead (which you Stephen raved about and how its Linux and it will be killing Windows), its just another sad example Linux being the real crap it is.

Windows 8 is shaping up nicely and will be ordained coming savior of the the industry against Apple and the iPad. Android has so far been the classic dud of a Tablet OS, case in point Motorola Xoom. Windows has evolved over the years, its adaptable and Microsoft is doing an amazing job of creating a rich touch experience that gracefully works across a variety of form factors.

Getting ready to read 100 million Windows 8 Tablets sold in the first month next year. And also prepare to read, 150 million Windows 8 licenses sold so far. It will be a thing of beauty.
@adacosta38
>>With WebOS dead (which you Stephen raved about and how its Linux and it will be killing Windows), its just another sad example Linux being the real crap it is.

Steven never gets things right. He lives in a different world always, that makes his analysis of real things totally different and never been right at least majority of times.
0 Votes
+ -
@Rama.NET
You keep using Idiot Explorer...Google has it right with ChromeBook. The only obstacle is to get the required hardware price down to make it successful. Corporations would switch in a minute if the cost of a Chromebook wasn't as high as full featured laptop.

Steven has been in the IT area a lot longer than you have. And he is correct. You just don't like when the facts don't agree with your way of thinking.

Back under your bridge!
0 Votes
+ -
@linux for me This article concerns the *enterprise* desktop, not the consumer desktop. The current cost of Chromebook devices, $380 to $430, is not really a factor for the enterprise. However, for most consumers, I agree that the current crop of Chromebooks are priced too high. Personally, I'm waiting for Google to partner with an OEM to produce a Chromebook for under $200.

For consumers to completely toss their desktops aside, they will first have to be sold on Chromebooks as companion devices. Do the desktops apps they depend upon have web app equivalents that offer comparable user experience and feature sets? Can they easily move their local app-related data to web apps in the Cloud? Is their internet connection dependable, inexpensive and fast enough to support this computing model? Can the web app vendors maintain high levels of service and security? There is also a trust factor involved.

As for the enterprise, just because traditional desktops are legacy systems doesnt mean that they will all be gone in 5 years. Some enterprises will move more quickly than others to replace their traditional desktops with thin clients/web applications and the general economy will be a driving force for many, especially within the public sector. Also, the extent to which important legacy desktop applications are embedded into an enterprises business processes will make the transition to thin clients/web applications both more disruptive and costly. And, yes, the user experience, feature set, availability and security of web applications matter to the enterprise as well. Here it is not solely a trust issue, but also a compliance issue.

Finally, a traditional desktop is NOT a workstation. This applies to both consumers and enterprise users.
@linux for me

Pot calling the kettle black? Or more appropriately, troll calling... well, let's just settle with the fact that you're a troll and call it good. Your very terminology in your post proves the point.
  • Flagged
@adacosta38

Linux crap?
Hmm...

Server market - 70% Linux
Smartphones - 33% Linux (3% Microsoft)
Supercomputers 91% Linux.

Sure are a log of folks building their worlds on 'crap'

Seems the only place Linux doesn't dominate is the soon(ish) to become irrelevant desktop market.
0 Votes
+ -
Server market in comparison to Desktop market
adacosta38 Updated - 19th Aug
@AndyPagin Is very small. I notice you mention all those segments but left out the PC which Microsoft dominates with over 95%. It shows the one sided mentality that exist in the Open Source and Linux communities. You like big numbers when its in your favor, but when its not you ignore it. Sorry, but Linux has a majority where it does not matter. 1.2 billion active Windows installations, cannot compare to the mediocre 0.75% operating system (that includes those segments you include). Also, Android is not Linux, Torvalds said it. Steven doesn't a have clue, he is more talk, come on, the guy is running Windows Server 2008 R2 at his house. I think he is just a closeted Windows user. Not because he has had to opportunity to meet Torvalds and act all fanboi around him means he is in the know, he is 100% not.
@adacosta38
I think you have confirmed the RH CEOs hyopthesis. 100 million Windows 8 tablets a year will mean 100 million less Windows desktops.

If you bother to read, the RH CEO is talking about desktops becoming a legacy, not necessarily Windows. Android tablets and phones, iPad, iPhone, Chromebooks, and yes Windows 8 tablets when they come out will all take market share from this.

I don't think the conventional desktop or laptop will die completely, but I can see it decline to half what it is now and I can see revenues from it dropping dramatically. Why do you think Microsoft is scrambling to port Windows to ARM, and has ditched .NET for HTML5 as its preferred dev platform, and is pushing HTML5 cloud applications? Answer: so that it can be run on tablets with a decent battery life, make use of web applications and because Microsoft knows what the RH CEO told us is correct.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mah

Unfortunately for you, the RH CEO's hypothesis is not that tablets and phones will make desktops a legacy. You might want to try reading the article again. Tablets will no more kill the desktop than notebooks did. People who work all day typing and doing tasks that require the precision of a mouse which a fingertip can not offer will not be using touchscreen devices in their laps.

Unfortunately for the RH CEO, he is also wrong, along with all those other folks who are predicting the demise of the desktop OS. In the enterprise, thin client computing (which is what he is talking about) will definitely lower IT costs and will dramatically impact desktop sales but the consumer market is too diverse to be replaced by cloud services. I'm sure the RH CEO will find the chrome netbook adequate for his needs but I doubt very much he has ever been asked to do a data recovery on someone's SD card.

I run far too many apps to expect that any cloud based offering could replace my Linux machine. I do CAD, 3D, graphics, video and audio. I require the ability to edit massive quantities of tags and restructure and reorganize my massive music collection. Professionally, I do things most users would never have a need to do on a day to day basis. Data recovery, computer forensics, special projects like converting old legacy documents into a modern format. Do you think MS or Google or anybody would ever offer cloud capability to convert over 5000 legacy documents into a modern word processing format?

No doubt about it that the desktop market may get smaller, but it will take a lot more than 5 years to make the desktop irrelevant.

How about this? The desktop OS will become irrelevant in X years.
@adacosta38 So you prediction is that Windows 8 tablets will rule the tablet market, Just like WP7 rules the smartphone OS market? Oh, wait a sec, hasn't Android (Its Linux in case you didn't know) moved into 2nd place in the smartphone market.
@anothercanuck
Actually Android is the top smartphone system/platform/whatever over all the rest worldwide. Android platform is seeing 550,000 new devices activated daily and not Microsoft or Apple are seeing those types of numbers with any of their phone/tablet/set-tops devices. Android is basically eating the competition alive. Apple has a good product don't get me wrong, and they have a large user base. The problem with Apple is that the new versions of their phones are being sold to already existing customers by a large percentage rather than new users/customers. The reality of the marketplace is that Android has become the 800lbs gorilla of the marketplace.
@adacosta38

"Getting ready to read 100 million Windows 8 Tablets sold in the first month next year. And also prepare to read, 150 million Windows 8 licenses sold so far. It will be a thing of beauty."

I could have sworn I read this statement regarding Vista a few years ago... Was that you, or did you plagiarize it?
0 Votes
+ -
No evidence for the idea so far...
peter_erskine@... 19th Aug
The desktop is still the most powerful, convenient and productive place to 'do computing'. Its hard to see developers giving it up, or any kind of author I guess. And any code written even if "for the cloud backend" still has to be coded in a security conscious way, to avoid hackers sending bad data to choke and crash it. So Whitehursts comments about security and cost seem misplaced.
@peter_erskine@...
Actually the RH CEO has only been reading the news. There is plenty of evidence. PC and laptop sales have dropped, HP is trying to dump its PC/laptop business, Acer's sales slumped 44% etc.
http://www.itproportal.com/2011/08/18/apple-gains-despite-dwindling-pc-sales-europe-says-gartner/
@Mah

I think there will be a shift in market share and a slow down in PC/laptop sales, but the desktop will never go away. The entertainment consumer market which previously had to rely upon desktops or laptops will be able to find media consumption devices to satisfy their needs and may not go back to using a desktop in their private lives. However, the producer market will always need a desktop computing platform. I would expect sales in this area to continue, but not at exponential growth rates. The market is saturated and computing power is saturated. There is no need to get the newest fastest CPU to get your work done. The upgrade cycle is now driven more by the need to replace failed components. It is a fact that computer and software manufacturers should consider when planning there business operations.
move back to the past with big iron serving dumb terminals and everything to do with a crappy economy and businesses holding on to their current hardware instead of upgrading.
@baggins_z
The only ones who are effected and it becomes a crappy economy for is the computer manufactures and the software companies like Microsoft. Long term Microsoft is screwed. Commodity software is quickly becoming a thing of the past. If you make a piece of software that anyone could make and that for 99% of the users out there it doesn't matter who's software they have to do that job, then you have built a crap business model that can not and will not be sustained in the future. It isn't the job of the market to protect those businesses. The mainframe market got hammered because software and hardware costs were far less in the networked desktop world. Now the power of the server is so cheap that it is now cheaper and more cost effective to go back to the thin client model. The market is always going to go where it is cheapest to get a job done regardless of who may get run over in the process. Apple, Microsoft and other companies in the computer commodity market will in the end be hammered in non-existence if they don't deal with the market changes. Apple is trying to change with the market. Microsoft has not even bothered to change with the market other than when a lot of the gamers moved from the PC to the more powerful consoles over the last few years. Everything Microsoft does is a commodity and they will be replaced with something else in time. It's just the nature of the marketplace. Will it be Linux or Apple or something else? I have no idea, but commodity products have never been a good long term product to market, and that is exactly what Microsoft is facing. Wordprocessors, spreadsheets and other office programs have reached the point where they do what 99% of the users need them to do and they don't need to be bothered to upgrade since this version does everything they need. Microsoft has tried to keep control of the Office app market by forcing upgrades by dropping support and changing file formats. That has come around to bite them in the behind now, since I see so many companies who call the outside company they are sending docs to, to find out what version of Word or whatever they are using so hopefully it will be formatted properly for them. The problem is that Microsoft isn't even compatible with Microsoft and setting the version number for the save almost never works anyway in reality for everyday company use. So Microsoft has ended up killing themselves and users are looking for something simpler and more portable now than Microsoft Office and web apps are looking very attractive to companies and users. The reality is most users simply don't need 80-90% of the options in Microsoft Office and web apps work just fine for them. This is exactly why Microsoft has started offering a web app suite to compete with Google and others because they know this is true and it's where the market is going.
0 Votes
+ -
@peter_erskine@...
Server programs are already coded this way. This is absolutely nothing new. When server programs are written they are written such that every piece of data coming from the remote computer could be formatted wrong or have an invalid input. If your server programs are not written this way, then either your vendor is a moron or your in house programming staff needs to go back and learn proper programming procedures.

The other reality of the marketplace is that more and more consumer users are using their phones and tablets to do many of the main jobs that they used to do on their desktop and laptop computer. You may think that doing email (typing) or whatever is a pain on a phone or tablet but the reality is more and more consumers are going that route. In my circle of friends and family, there are more and more basic computer users who are moving to tablets. These are the same people who never update their desktop and have problems dealing with a virus infection. Those are the type of people who are moving to tablets and phones. The marketplace doesn't show any signs of that changing for the average consumer. Tablets and phone have basically become appliances for getting things done and getting online. That is exactly how the large majority of consumers have wanted their computer to operate for years. They want it to be an appliance that they basically don't have to mess with, just use it to do get things done. You will see more and more of this philosophy of computer user enter into the Enterprise. They just want an appliance that lets them get work done. If it runs Linux, OS X, Windows, WebOS, Chrome or NewFangled OS, they simply don't care. They only care about getting work done with little to no overhead, and no training is not an issue.

Moving to thin clients by the Enterprise will result in lower support costs, easier training and it will get off the upgrade treadmill that Intel and Microsoft want everyone on. Enterprises hate the upgrade treadmill and are usually at least 2 versions behind everyone else because they don't want surprises, high update costs, constantly replacing desktops or huge issues of support and security problems. If everything is on the server then it is a snap to test new versions or stick with older versions longer and avoid the whole upgrade treadmill. Enterprises couldn't care less if they run Windows, Linux, Mac or whatever. The issue of training is also a non-issue. The only issue is cost and can they get the applications they need to do their job. The reality is that for 95%+ of the workers out there it doesn't matter what OS or platform they are on since every platform provides them what they need. If your IT department thinks they are locked into a specific platform then either they are stupid or they are lazy. There only a very few vertical markets where the software a company runs only runs on 1 or 2 platforms and it gives them a competitive advantage over their competitors. Any other IT department who tells you they can't replace whole sections of the user facing infrastructure needs to be fired immediately and get people in there who know what they are doing. For getting everyday work done it simply doesn't matter what platform you are on.
he is partly right with one exception. Internet access has to be ubiquitous before this becomes reality. It also has to be reliable. I predicted way back in 2006 that the world was going mobile and that programs will be available virtually (no called through the cloud) I was laughed at. Now that it is mostly true there still remains one large block for both predictions to come true. trust. People have to trust that the source is not going to lose any of their data. When you have a physical drive in your hand as long as its working that data is yours, only yours. But when you upload it - you have no idea which country that physical data is being stored in or if it will last forever. With power cuts becoming the norm in some countries the traditional laptop or desktop still has a huge role to play. However unless you are running a gaming machine you no longer need to have the most powerful monster machine. Yet the trust issue will always remain.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix