Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Splashtop: Linux for Windows users

By | March 1, 2011, 3:14pm PST

Summary: Most desktop Linuxes are meant to replace Windows lock, stock, and barrel, but Splashtop acts as a “as needed” replacement for Windows.

Ever just want to turn on your laptop and get right to work on the Web without any delay? If that’s you, even if you’d never consider switching from Windows to Linux, you might want to give the new release of Splashtop a try.

Indeed many Windows users, especially those with newer laptops have already been using the Linux-based Splashtop-they just haven’t known it. On Dell laptops, it’s called Latitude ON; on HP laptops, it’s known as QuickWeb; and on Lenovo IdeaPad netbooks, its Quick Start 2. Whatever the name, it’s actually an embedded Splashtop Linux variation designed for quick and easy access to the Web. On each of these laptop lines, and many others, Splashtop is there to make it fast and easy for “Windows” users to check their Web-based e-mail; look up information, write a document in Google Docs, etc., etc. without waiting for Windows to boot up.”

Now, Splashtop has made it possible for almost anyone to give this a try with a downloadable version of its light-weight Linux desktop. Unlike almost all other Linux distributions you don’t need to download an ISO image of the distribution, burn it to a CD, DVD or USB stick, and then install it on a PC to give it a try. Instead you simply download Splashtop as a Windows installation executable, run the install program, and then re-boot. Splashtop will then appear as one of your boot-up choices. From there, you simply select it and in about half the time it takes to boot up Windows, you’re in Splashtop.

There’s no learning curve to Splashtop because you’ll already know how to use it. That’s because the user-interface is Google’s Chromium Web browser-the pure open-source version of the Chrome Web browser. If you can use a Web browser, you can use Splashtop.

That’s easy to say, but is really that easy to use? I decided to find out. I downloaded the Splashtop installer and ran it on my main Windows XP workstation. This is a Dell Inspiron 530S powered by a 2.2-GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800-MHz front-side bus. This box has 4GBs of RAM, a 500GB SATA (Serial ATA) drive, and an Integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) chip set. While it runs XP SP3 and every Linux I’ve ever thrown at it just fine, it’s a wee bit low-powered for Windows 7. I also tried it on my tried and true Linux laptop workhorse: a Lenovo ThinkPad R61 with a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7500 and 2GBs of RAM.

On the Dell, I had no trouble at all installing it. The one tricky bit is that Splashtop installed itself with the Windows boot manager rather than the system’s main boot loader, the Ubuntu’s Grub2 boot manager. Most Windows users, who don’t tend to use dual-boot systems, will never see this. The only thing that it changed was I had to make two choices, one in Grub2 to get to the Windows boot manager, and then to boot Splashtop itself from the Windows boot manager.

I actually had more trouble getting it to boot on my Mint 10 Linux-powered ThinkPad. That was because there’s no Windows at all on the ThinkPad and the only way you can install Splashtop is from inside Windows. I had to actually install XP on the laptop-thanks to my near limitless supply of Windows operating system images via my Microsoft TechNet membership-and then install Splashtop. This isn’t going to change. Splashtop officials told me, “Currently, we do not have plans for [making Splashtop available as an ISO image]. The target audience is really people who have Windows on their laptops, and are suffering from slow boot times.”

I wish they did make it available in other formats, but fair enough. So was it faster then Windows? Yes, yes, it was. I was up and running on Splashtop in 11 seconds on the Dell, compared to 27-seconds with XP, and in 13-second compared to 32-seconds on the ThinkPad. I then decided, in the interest of completeness to try it on Windows 7.

Page 2: [Splashtop in Action] »

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

116
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Windows 7 is surprisingly light OS
jyrkia 27th Mar
"While it runs XP SP3 and every Linux I???ve ever thrown at it just fine, it???s a wee bit low-powered for Windows 7".

Win7 runs VERY well on those specs. It's hardware requirements went down from Vista and it can be run on really lotech machines. Meaning single core cpu (i dont remember exact values) and 512Mt RAM.

But of course linux lovers exaggerate those requirements.
until then, forget it.
0 Votes
+ -
How quaint!
Michael Kelly 2nd Mar 2011
@FADS_z

So you have absolutely no need for any application that does not exist on a MS platform? I remember those days. I even get nostalgic for the old COBOL applications that took hours to compute what it takes today's apps seconds. But eventually I come to realize that speed is an awesome feature, and that is what Splashtop offers over Windows. And as those speedy apps become available on non-MS platforms, a MS platform becomes less and less necessary. Now I'm not saying not to use the MS platform nor am I saying I do not use it, but I do open my horizons enough to consider the alternatives before making a decision.
@Michael Kelly: As an OS Linux is just fine. What prevents me from using it on anything more than server systems is the lack of applications. And poor substitutes aren't going to cut it. Until that changes Linux is going to remain a niche.
0 Votes
+ -
ye: Lack of applications?
John L. Ries 2nd Mar 2011
I think Debian is up to around 50,000 packages now and most Windows apps will run under Wine (there are some exceptions, but they're generally replaceable).

Try again.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Lack of Applications
bobiroc 2nd Mar 2011
@John L. Ries

Don't confuse quantity over quality. Not saying that all Open Source is bad as some of it is really good but a lot of it is watered down or less powerful. Also replaceable is in in the eye of the user/organization. Wine may work for many Windows Apps but it only works for a small handful of them well. Not everybody can rely on bronze, and silver compatibility ratings when they need Diamond rating which is full compatibility.
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries: most Windows apps will run under Wine (there are some exceptions, but they're generally replaceable).

It never ceases to amaze me the recommendation is to emulate the very product you're advising against. Sorry but WINE is a poor solution and it's foolish to emulate when I could just run native.

Debian is up to around 50,000 packages

Do they have Quickbooks? What about TaxCut? Photoshop? iTunes? Sorry but 50K packages means nothing if 49,990 of them aren't of interest or cheap knocks offs of the programs people want to use.
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries
If Debian does everything you want it to do, run with it.
0 Votes
+ -
@Michael Kelly I've got a hybrid setup at home, the Linux boxes are all Debian based, but I have to admit unless you are familiar with administrating a Linux system it's absolutely a horrible alternative to Windows which is by far easier to setup, use, and deploy software on. Best example? How do you setup three monitors in Windows? Basically plug them in. Linux? Download another driver, configure xorg.conf, configure the driver - reboot - repeat until it works. There is most definitely a reason Linux has yet to become a significant portion of the desktop market in developed countries.
0 Votes
+ -
@ye:

Wine : Wine Is Not an Emulator.

Also, most of your software choices suck. I mean seriously, iTunes? Why would anyone want to use a bloated ~100 MB software just to manage music, when Floola can do it in ~10 MB. Ok so you can buy music from iTunes, but that doesn't need 90 MB. If you integrate a web-interface you can add that functionality in just under a couple of MB. Also, GIMP is a pretty good alternative to Photoshop, I mean given the huge number of features it offers for FREE. Good value for money, don't you think?
0 Votes
+ -
@deXter

..in fact, I doubt that most users don't really even notice the 100MB hit these days, considering even the most conservative music-listeners have multi-gigabyte libraries..

If I went from iTunes to Floola using your reasoning, I would now have 350.09GB free instead of the 350GB free that I have on my hard drive now.. Naw, don't really miss that extra 90MB.
versus "today's" apps?

You're very likely very ignorant about the capabilities of COBOL and never coded a single line in the language, or, you're just making stuff up to try give more credence to your argument.
0 Votes
+ -
@FADS_z
Why bother? linux sucks!!
0 Votes
+ -
How profound
John L. Ries 2nd Mar 2011
@Hasam1991
A few more comments like that and Linux is sunk for sure.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah, let's all run back to Micro$oft
search & destroy 2nd Mar 2011
@Hasam1991 says "Linux sucks!!"

That must make it so!

Run! Run!

silly
0 Votes
+ -
@Hasam1991
What is remarkable, coming from Windows I had a lot of problems finding things in Linux. Coming from Linux to Windows, I have the same feeling about Windows. There are so many things I can't do in a simple way in Windows. Sometimes I think it is full of teasers, that programs are doing things at their own initiative that I didn't ask for.
0 Votes
+ -
@FADS_z That's really not the point of splashtop. Then again you probably didn't read the article....
0 Votes
+ -
@FADS_z How many win32 and .net applications do you need to quickly check webmail again?

This is meant for a fast boot into an environment that - quite honestly - fits what most people use their computer for. Checking email, checking the web (IOW, bank account, news, etc.) and being done with it. They don't care if it's Windows, Linux, blah blah blah, it gets them where they need to be faster.

Now, would I personally use it? Probably not on my current systems. They get up and running and stay that way while I do - well, far more than that. I'd find something similar to fire up on a nettop, perhaps, that wouldn't be used for anything more strenuous.

I'd be interested to see just how many people actually USE these fast-boot environments, though, versus ignore/remove them to "just get to Windows."
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
Cylon Centurion Updated - 1st Mar 2011
Oh. Maw. Gawd. 32 Seconds! The horror! At least you tried Windows 7 out, I thought for a second there that Linux user's love fest with XP was going to kick in and be the only test done. For some reason they still think XP is the only Windows OS out there, and still think it's OK to judge upon it.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
babyboomer57 Updated - 2nd Mar 2011

@Cylon Centurion 0005

That is what caught your attention? This grabbed Mine:

" This is a Dell Inspiron 530S powered by a 2.2-GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800-MHz front-side bus. This box has 4GBs of RAM, a 500GB SATA (Serial ATA) drive, and an Integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) chip set. While it runs XP SP3 and every Linux Ive ever thrown at it just fine, its a wee bit low-powered for Windows 7"

Are you freakin' kiddin' me SJV-N? I run Win7 on an Acer netbook of all things with a one gighz processor and 1.5 gig RAM and it is quite a bit faster than the WinXP that came on it. If the Dell you described is a "Wee Bit" underpowered for Win7 you have got some kind of problem with it (or between your ears, most likely).

That said, I will give the Splashtop a look, but I am sure the resolution limitations will relegate it to the trash just like every other version of Linux I have tried on my HP DV9000 - I didn't pay extra for a 17" laptop just to run it at a screen resolution popular 10 years ago. Oh, and since NONE of my printers/MFD's have Linux drivers, it will be a 'what you see is what you get' experience, I am sure.

And to think that I thought this was going to be an unbiased, informative article when I started reading it. I keep forgetting to read the title of your blog before I start reading the story, just like others do with Ed or MJF's posts, and it always gets my dander up before I realize where I am. My fault, I'll learn one day.

UPDATE - UPDATE
Just finished installing and uninstalling Splashtop on my HP DV9817CL 17" Laptop. At the end of installation, the installer notified me that my PC was not on the compatibility list, but that I could try it out anyway. Rebooted, chose Splashtop from the boot menu, booted up and tried to create a task bar (several times), stopped and said my video card was incompatible and rebooted into Windows. About what I have come to expect from all things Linux.

Oh well, was worth a try.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
ITSamurai Updated - 2nd Mar 2011
@babyboomer57 The trick is you need to determine how many miles of copper are in your PC, then divide the that by the number of people currently in the state of Nebraska, and finally divide by zero... but seriously Linux toys are fun to play with, but you're right in that they rarely ever work out of the box - and I have a lap top with near identical specs except it's a 2.0Ghz dualie... it crushes 7 it idles around 500MB of consumed memory, which is actually about 80MB lower than what my Ubuntu (LL) system idles at. 99% of the time when someone gripes about Windows it's because of aftermarket bloatware installed by Dell/Gateway etc. and they don't know how to clean it off. My lap's a Gateway that came stock with Vista (that I ran a WAMP stack off of for a while) I spent around an hour getting the garbage Gateway put on off of it and it worked like a champ, most problems with Vista were also, sorry to say - PEBKAC.

*Edit: And I did time it, my 7 system booted from power off in 23 seconds.
0 Votes
+ -
@babyboomer57

It's unfair to compare SplashTop to a full-fledged GNU/Linux distro. I suggest giving Ubuntu / openSUSE / Fedora a try and see how (most) things work straight out of the box.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
babyboomer57 3rd Mar 2011
@Dexter

Trust me, I have tried several versions of Linux over the past 2 1/2 years on this laptop. Only the next to last version of Ubuntu worked fairly well, but still could not get everything to work, even with DTS's help. I was putting up with some things, but when I tried to upgrade to the latest version it trashed my install completely and I decided enough is enough.

Ubuntu netbook does work nicely on my Acer Aspire One, however, and I use it more than Windows on that machine. It all boils down to drivers for hardware in the long run, especially when it comes to printers and multifunction devices. The manufacturers just aren't interested in providing drivers for Linux, and until they are, it will remain a toy for most people.

Windows just works on my machines without any hassles, and that is all I ask.
0 Votes
+ -
@babyboomer57
Actually, you still may need Windows to use a driver for recent hardware. Or you may need Linux if you want a recent OS with has a driver. Hardware manufacturers are not allays that keen to make drivers for no more produced hardware. And they are not always that fast in supporting other drivers.

Things are changing with the increased use of Linux, of course.

Still quite strange that there would be no driver that could support the purpose of Splashtop.
0 Votes
+ -
I'd like to introduce you to "Sleep"...
TheWerewolf 1st Mar 2011
I leave my laptop in Sleep mode when I'm not using it. It wakes to usable in about 5 seconds. I believe that beats 32 seconds or even 10 seconds - and I don't have to settle for a minimalist 'Browser' experience - let alone one I have to boot into.

As for "With a good Internet connection I could see many people using Splashtop as their main desktop. Of course, if your Internet goes out, your productivity just went through the floor, but isn?t that true for many of us anyway?" No.. not really. In fact, most of us really only GET productive when we lose the constant distractions of the Internet...

Not to mention the many places where you can't get internet at all, or have to pay high premiums for it.

Sorry, this looks like a Linux solution looking for a problem.
@TheWerewolf..

Not a fan of what happens when my sleeping laptop runs out of juice.. just sayin'.
0 Votes
+ -
@daftkey

That does suck but I find I can set my laptop to sleep and leave it overnight or even 24 hours and still have battery power. I guess if you do not plan to use it again relatively soon you just shut down.

You can also look into the advanced settings and tell it to hibernate after so many minutes of being at sleep which will not cause as much drain on your battery and still can resume your computer faster than a cold boot in many cases.
@bobiroc

..I'm just trying to help Steven out a bit by justifying the existence of the dubious advantage of yet another "H.E.L.L." (hidden embedded limited Linux) environment.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
choyongpil 1st Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson
Linux is everywhere LOL!! On HP Laptops, Lenovo netbooks, Dell laptops and there is nothing Loverock Davidson can do to stop it.
Good luck with that protest, LOL!!

Steven,
Great Article.
0 Votes
+ -
@choyongpil

But according to the Linux Fanboys Linux is no where on OEM computers so which is it? Is it everywhere or nowhere. Because they seem to think that OEMs block linux on purpose because the evil Microsoft tells them to do so. I mean it has nothing to do with people actually wanting Windows because it runs their software and gives them the features they want in an OS does it? I mean that is just silly for people actually wanting to use Windows as their primary OS. Right?
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc
Are you seriously confused by those two facts?
Linux is everywhere, from supercomputers to many boxes in your home. In telephones, in the entertainment systems when you fly.
MS has two monopoly markets. Consumer computers and soft for administrative purposes. MS took a lot of actions to protect those markets. To avoid that market share of Linux or any competitor would grow to a level that would create a level of support that would be dangerous for Windows. No need to discuss this, look at all documented evidence generated by a number of trials.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
choyongpil 1st Mar 2011
Bobiroc,
Go ahead what is the real purpose of your response?
@choyongpil

Just point out how the Linux community contradicts themselves about saying that OEMs will not use Linux because of the Evil Microsoft Monopoly (which doesn't exist BTW) but then say that Linux is everywhere at the same time.

I personally have no problem with Linux and use it myself if the need calls for it. Same goes with OpenSource software. However, the hard fact remains is that consumers, schools, and businesses prefer Windows, MacOS, or some other mainstream operating system that when installed will work with their computer hardware and software and their whole computing ecosystem. OEMs cannot offer and endless choice of Operating systems and software and will go with what people want and what sells. Even Linux being "Free" most of the time can't sell it.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
choyongpil 2nd Mar 2011
bobiroc,
My comments are mine alone I do not speak for anyone else.
0 Votes
+ -
@choyongpil: My comments are mine alone I do not speak for anyone else.

And "Linux Fanboys".
@choyongpil

I understand that but they echo of similar comments made by other Linux fanboys. Just trying to point out how the story is constantly changing by those that refuse to use facts.
0 Votes
+ -
For a long time it was true that OEMs were prohibited from shipping other OSes such as GNU/Linux on desktops alongside Windows. Times have changed, and that statement is no longer accurate in the same way. Splashtop is more of an embedded system, and I'm not sure if the rules have changed to allow you to ship a dual boot Ubuntu machine...
0 Votes
+ -
@snoop0x7b This was largely to increase their own profits not at the request of Microsoft, the key offenders that I've ever worked with Sony, Toshiba, Emachines - I wouln't even accept PCs from these manufacturers as gifts. (I've poured water on a running eMachine's motherboard and watched it continue as if nothing happened... clear sine that they're tools of the devil.)
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Rules
bobiroc 2nd Mar 2011
@snoop0x7b

"For a long time it was true that OEMs were prohibited from shipping other OSes such as GNU/Linux on desktops alongside Windows. Times have changed, and that statement is no longer accurate in the same way. Splashtop is more of an embedded system, and I'm not sure if the rules have changed to allow you to ship a dual boot Ubuntu machine..."

There are no rules other than the rule of supply and demand. Linux does not sell computers so therefore the demand is low. Low demand means minimal options or availability.

Besides if an OEM offers Ubuntu then someone will want another distro and then another distro so where does it end. They cannot offer an endless possibility of choices for an OS and then be able to support it. So they go with what people want and what sells. Simple as that.
0 Votes
+ -
Who's actually using it?
Will Farrell 2nd Mar 2011
@choyongpil
He makes a point of saying where it's at, but he never mentioned if people use it.

i could put a satalite radio in every car, doesn't say that everybody will listen to it.
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds interesting, but Windows 7 on my laptop boots in under 10 seconds. Having a fast processor, plenty of memory and a speedy SSD makes sure of that.
0 Votes
+ -
@Unusual1

Exactly.. Mine is more like 30 - 40 seconds but I do not have a SSD yet. Just a 10,000 RPM Boot Drive. Sleep mode works well and it takes about 2 seconds to come out of sleep.
0 Votes
+ -
Not sure... 1024x768 sucks really. And I am guessing there is no video acceleration. That means no YouTube, video, multimedia stuff, etc. And what about sound?

Will stick to Mint 10 on my netbook with SSD. Boot time? 8 seconds.
0 Votes
+ -
My Computer is practically instant
bobiroc 1st Mar 2011
Put Windows 7 to sleep and one tap on the keyboard and it is up a couple seconds later. Thanks but no thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
It is one thing to boot into the system. but how qick to actually browse.

I have put my Sony Vaio P Series to sleep, and have it back on in three seconds, but it takes another 20 seconds or so to lock the Gobi chipset to the ISP (if it even does it the first time).

I had Splashtop (older version , of course) on the Vaio and the difference in bootup time was not big enough to bother with, especially as there was nowhere else to go but to reboot if I wanted to do something more than browse. Plus, the UI was clunky and too different from Win7.
0 Votes
+ -
PCs and Laptops with preloaded Linux, are cheaper than the ones with Windows pre-installed. Thats the only reason for buying them! Who buys licensed OS anyways?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 2nd Mar 2011
@anay3000

Who buys licensed OS anyways?

Uh... 90%+ of the planet's entire computer using population.
0 Votes
+ -
Well to be fair...
daftkey 2nd Mar 2011
@Hallowed are the Ori ...

Not all 90% of that population actually "bought" the licensed OS.. if the question was "who uses licensed OS anyways?" then you'd have been safe with that answer.
0 Votes
+ -
@daftkey
That a large percentage of Windows users choose to use an illegal copy of Windows (and everything that goes with that) rather than legitimately use a free copy of Linux says a lot about Windows and Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Splashtop: Linux for Windows users
ItsTheBottomLine 2nd Mar 2011
@dazzlingd
"That a large percentage of Windows users choose to use an illegal copy of Windows " Have a source for that "logic"?
0 Votes
+ -
Uhm...?
daftkey 2nd Mar 2011
@ItsTheBottomLine

..sure.. like.. it's on Wikipedia?!

Seriously, though.. does anyone really have to back up as well-known a fact as "A significant proportion of the copies of Windows in use right now is pirated" for you to believe it? I'm sure someone with a little more time on their hands might be able to find you a few links, but are you really that lazy?

Or did you need some back-up to the logical thinking of:

(1) Windows accounts for about 90% of global OS market share.
(2) A significant proportion (probably > 20%) of that market share is pirated.
(3) If only 20% of the copies of Windows in use were pirated that means 18% of the world runs pirated Software.
(3) Piracy is illegal.
(4) Linux is free.
(5) If Linux accounted for 100% of the market-share of non-windows OS's, it would still be only 10%.
(6) 18% > 10%

Therefore....
(7) A larger percentage of computer users choose to use an illegal copy of Windows than a legitimate copy of Linux.

..If you need more of a picture than that, I'm sorry, you're just going to have to buy the crayons yourself.
0 Votes
+ -
"While it runs XP SP3 and every Linux I???ve ever thrown at it just fine, it???s a wee bit low-powered for Windows 7".

Win7 runs VERY well on those specs. It's hardware requirements went down from Vista and it can be run on really lotech machines. Meaning single core cpu (i dont remember exact values) and 512Mt RAM.

But of course linux lovers exaggerate those requirements.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix