ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

The EU won't stand in the way of Microsoft & Friends acquiring Novell's patents

By | January 19, 2011, 3:46pm PST

Summary: CPTN Holdings-a Microsoft-led group that also includes Apple, EMC, and Oracle–has the European Union’s blessing to acquire Novell’s patents, but there’s still obstacles in the proposed deal’s way.

CPTN Holdings–a Microsoft-led group with fellow-members Apple, EMC, and Oracle–isn’t just still try buying Novell’s patents, the group’s patent acquisition attempt recently received an OK from the European Commission (EC) vice president and competition commissioner Joaquín Almunia.

As Florian Mueller, an European intellectual property activist pointed out in his blog, Emma McClarkin, a British conservative from the East Midlands, asked the EC, on behalf of a constituent, that they were concerned about “Microsoft recently purchasing a large number of patents from Novell. This move strengthens the hold Microsoft has over its competitors, which could potentially harm consumer choice and increase prices. Is the Commission aware of this situation? If so, does the Commission believe there have been any infractions by Microsoft of EU competition laws?”

On behalf of the EC, the European Union’s (EU) executive branch, Almunia replied, “The Commission is aware of the proposed acquisition by CPTN Holdings, a consortium of technology companies which includes Microsoft Corp, of a portfolio of 882 patents from Novell. On the basis of the information currently available at this stage, it appears unlikely that the proposed transaction requires a notification to the Commission under the Merger Regulation.

Almunia went on, “Furthermore, in addition to the consideration under the Merger Regulation, the Commission has currently no indication that the mere acquisition of the patents in question by CPTN Holdings would lead to an infringement of EU competition rules.”

That doesn’t mean that the CPTN deal will have clear legal sailing in Europe. Once CPTN reapplies to buy Novell’s patents, we can expect to see the Open Source Initiative and Free Software Foundation Europe to renew their protests against the deal to the German Federal Cartel Office. It does suggest that the EC is not going to start any actions to further investigate or hinder the deal.

Regardless of what happens with the EU, the deal will face opposition in the U.S. The OSI, has just announced that the group is also protesting the transaction to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Thanks to a January 14 filing with the U.S.’ Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), we now know a little more about the patents that Novell is attempting to sell to CPTN. The bulk of them, which now appears to number 861 once outdated and duplicate patents were removed from the pool, are concerned with server management, security, identity and collaboration software.

CPTN may yet face some competition for the patents though. A close reading by Pamela Jones of Groklaw of Novell’s Definitive Proxy Statement reveals that a group or company designated as Party E, which is neither Microsoft not CPTN, is still interested in purchasing some of Novell’s intellectual property. According to the filing, “On January 13, 2011, a representative of Party E clarified that their interest is in a transaction related to an acquisition of the patents and patent applications being sold pursuant to the Patent Purchase Agreement, ‘and maybe more.’”

So, who knows, Microsoft and chums may still not end up with Novell’s patents. Stay tuned patent deal watchers; this transaction is far from done.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The EU won't stand in the way of Microsoft & Friends acquiring Novell's patents
JoeHTH 11th Feb 2011
@sjvn@... No, you're a Microsoft and Apple hating idiot, whose views on the two should never be taken seriously. For God's sake, you champion Google, a company that collected American citizen's private data and sold it.
0 Votes
+ -
or do you feel that open source companies are entiltled to more then any other compnay is allowed?
@Mister Spock
That's because Steven thinks Microsoft, Apple, EMC, and Oracle are run by demons.

He would rather sell his soul to Google.
@Mister Spock Actually, my stand in this particular case comes from the fact that I'm both anti-patent and I'm anti-patent litigation. Oracle, a member of the CPTN is an open-source powerhouse. I may disagree with them a lot how they manage their open-source projects, but both internally and in many of their products, they're open-source supporters. They've also shown, like the other members of the alliance, that they've no problem suing over patents and other IP issues.

Steven
@sjvn@... Well said. I think software patents are a part of what is hurting innovation in computer science. The USPTO doesn't have the technical knowhow to assess whether a patent is a patent on something that's common sense. A good example is Apple's patent on object oriented messaging system, how is that any different from any other interprocess communication system (it's not).
@sjvn@... No, you're a Microsoft and Apple hating idiot, whose views on the two should never be taken seriously. For God's sake, you champion Google, a company that collected American citizen's private data and sold it.
0 Votes
+ -
Who Invited the EU To This Party?
Lazarus439Z Updated - 20th Jan 2011
I suppose I missed the previews, but where does the EU get the right to have an opinion, let alone a potential veto over what one US company (or collection thereof) decides to buy another US company?

I certainly don't recall the Federal Trade Commission getting a veto over the formation of AirBus, which is a cooperative, if not outright merger, of several European aircraft companies, with the active support, both moral and financial, their respective governments.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix