ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Ubuntu Linux will try for the business desktop

By | October 23, 2011, 2:54pm PDT

Summary: Ubuntu has long been popular on the Linux enthusiast desktop, but, so far it hasn’t been very popular on business desktops. Canonical plans on changing that with its next version.

Say hello to Ubuntu Unity with its built-in cloud.

Say hello to Ubuntu Unity with its built-in cloud.

I use the Linux desktop at work, but I’m in a tiny minority. Most people use Windows. Canonical, Ubuntu Linux’s parent company, plans on getting at least some Windows users to switch though with its next long term support (LTS) release.

Canonical has announced that it would be extending the support and maintenance period for the April 2012 LTS Ubuntu Linux release for desktop users from three years to five years. The move comes in response to what the company claims is “increasing demand for Ubuntu desktops in corporate environments where longer maintenance periods are the norm. It brings the desktop product into line with Ubuntu Server which continues with five years of support for LTS releases.”

In a blog posting, Ubuntu’s founder, Mark Shuttleworth, expanded on this. “We need to do justice to the fact that 12.04 LTS will be the preferred desktop for many of the world’s biggest Linux desktop deployments, in some cases exceeding half a million desktops in a single institution. So 12.04 is also an opportunity to ensure that our desktop is manageable at scale, that it can be locked down in the ways institutions need, and that it can be upgraded from 10.04 LTS smoothly as promised. Support for multiple monitors will improve, since that’s a common workplace requirement.”

That desktop, by the by, is going to stay Unity. There will be no return to a GNOME 2.x style desktop, never mind GNOME 3.x. According to Shuttleworth, “The nail-biting transitions to Unity and Gnome 3 are behind us, so this cycle is an opportunity to put perfection front and center. … That’s an opportunity to work through the whole desktop interface and make sure we’re using exactly the right weight in each place, bringing the work we’ve been doing for several cycles fully into focus.”

Welcome to Ubuntu 11.10: Oneiric Ocelot (Photo Gallery)

Shuttleworth expects that there will be a lot of fit and polish work to come before Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is ready to deploy on the corporate desktop. He continued, During UDS [Ubuntu Developer Summit] we’ll build out the list of areas for refinement, polish and ‘precisioneering [sic]‘, but the theme for all of this work is one of continuous improvement; no new major infrastructure, no work on pieces which are not design-complete at the conclusion of the summit.

When Shuttleworth says no big changes, he means it. “While there are some remaining areas we’d like to tweak the user experience, they will probably be put on hold so we can focus on polish, performance and predictability,” said Shuttleworth. “I’d like to improve the user experience around Workspaces for power users, and we’ll publish our design work for that, but I think it would be wisest for us to defer that unless we get an early and effective contribution of that code.” In short, the Unity interface you see today is pretty much the Unity you’ll see in April 2012.

Canonical wants to make darn sure that the desktop is mature and ready to go because according to their own research, “LTS releases have become particularly popular with Ubuntu business users. Canonical’s own survey data shows over 70% of server users are deployed on LTS versions of the product. Bringing this extended support to the desktop is a response to similar popularity in businesses of the desktop LTS releases.”

Here's Ubuntu's Long Term Support Plans

Ubuntu's Long Term Support Plans

What does LTS mean for business users? According to the company, “The first two years of the LTS period will benefit businesses by including hardware updates (through regular point releases) allowing them to keep up to date with the latest hardware upgrades. Maintenance updates will continue for a further three years. Businesses can now rely on always running an LTS version regardless of their hardware refresh rate.”

In addition, “PC manufacturers can now standardize their business-focused range of PCs on an LTS release with a five year support period. This is a more compelling proposition to bring to their customer base especially aligned with the Ubuntu Advantage support programs from Canonical which will fully support the new LTS period.”

Can they do it? It’s possible. I’ve looked at Windows 8 and I sure don’t see anything about Metro, its new interface, that business users are going to want.

In addition, Ubuntu already has baked-in cloud-computing. While no one has announced an Ubuntu Unity tablet, I keep looking at Unity and I keep seeing a tablet interface. In short, Ubuntu’s already a post-PC desktop, and that will be no small advantage in the twenty-teens.

In the past, users stuck with XP rather than upgrade to Vista. Indeed, it’s only been in the last few weeks that more people have finally moved from XP to Windows 7. I expect most users to stick with Windows XP or 7 in the next three to five years, but as the desktop wanes and more and more of us use smartphones and tablets for our business computing, there just might be room for a well-supported desktop Linux to gain a niche to call its own.

Want to know more about why you might want to use Ubuntu for your business desktop? Check out Canonical’s business desktop site.

Related Stories:

Ubuntu Linux 11.10: Unity comes of age (Review)

Ubuntu Linux heads to the clouds

Gallery: Installing the latest Ubuntu Linux: Ubuntu 11.10

The Linux desktop is dead. Long live the Linux desktop.

What’s coming in Ubuntu’s new Unity Linux desktop

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

109
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Ubuntu Linux will try for the business desktop
total_loss 28th Jan
@mswift@... Then stick with $microblow, because it is way faster, not slower.
0 Votes
+ -
Latest Ubuntu Game Changer
cowboycraig 23rd Oct
The latest Ubuntu makes me think this is possible. The "App Store" style method of installing apps is epic in the right direction. Think the Ubuntu dev's are finally realizing that people don't want to know ANYTHING about apt-get or rpms. They want to install apps like on an iPad.
@cowboycraig
Dude, what are you talking about? Graphic installer has been around for many years. It is called synaptic. Click on the menu, go to system and launch it. Why do you talk about apt-get?
@kirovs@... Synaptic is not part of Ubuntu 11.10. Ubuntu 11.10 has transitioned completely to their app-store style package interface for the desktop. That's what he is talking about.
@SJVN: STOP THE PRESSES!! THIS IS __THE__ YEAR OF LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!!!!!
@kirovs@... Applications are not packets.
@kirovs@...
I almost exclusively use apt-get, recently moved my laptop and desktop from Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.10 (I tried using LUbuntu first, but had many weird issues, then went to KUbuntu as I've always liked the KDE interface, but continued having issues related to hardware. finally put Unity Ubuntu on my desktop and did not do what I did to screw the other ones up. and all is working fine for now. Until I decide I really want that one part of my sesytem to work properly...)

at least apt-get tells me what it is going to do before it does it. Not to mention installing anything not from the app store (especially non-.deb packages) can not be done from the app store.
@cowboycraig Nothing about Linux is a game changer.
@cowboycraig
I love it and I actually use Linux all the time now as a result. It's sleek, smooth, works great, looks great. I love it. It's time for Linux to move into the mainstream now. Ubuntu will be the driving force. Mr. Shuttleworth, make it happen.
@cowboycraig

Ubuntu 11.10 is nasty, however Kubuntu 11.10 is quite impressive. I'm looking forward to Kubuntu 12.04 and 5 year LTS.
@Alan Smithie

It's all a matter of personal preference. I'd rather be hit by a bus, repeatedly, until the end of time than use KDE. But that's just me.
@Alan Smithie
I will most likely switch back to KDE with 12.04, I miss having plasmoids, I used to have an entire desktop devoted to plasmoids, to monitor everything, from hardware tracking to keeping up to date blog pages open.
0 Votes
+ -
I have to say, Unity is a regression
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate Updated - 23rd Oct
I have been in the Ubuntu camp and still am only because I have chosen with 11.10 to switch to Xubuntu (running Xfce4).

Unity is a regression because it removes features what were central to the popularity of the Gnome 2.x interface.

Incremental improvements that enhance the Desktop Experience make sense, but Unity broke the Desktop Experience by forcing the user to 'dumb down' and accept the Unity way of doing things.

I'll stay with Xubuntu for the time being but Shuttleworth made a strategic mistake in taking it upon himself to decide what's best for everyone--that is 'elitist' and is why I've never liked Apple. Choice has been taken away.

I cherish choice and so should you.

Thanks Steve
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate I have to agree. I tried Ubuntu 11.10 with Unity and it slowed down my productivity so much that I removed it altogether and chose Xubuntu. Xfce has improved drastically in the past few years and to me it is better than Unity, GNOME 3, and KDE. [Posted from by Xubuntu]
0 Votes
+ -
Good deal. My AAO tops off at 150MB when Desktop is reached
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 23rd Oct
@statuskwo5
Everything snaps with Xubuntu. Fast, lean, mean.
@statuskwo5
Agree. Tried last week end and if I want MS Windows performance I will use MS Windows, if I want MAC style features I will use (and I am writing this from MBA) mac. Linux for me was everything about liberty to do whatever I think was right to be done with the computer and of course the speed. On the Unity desktop I tried the right click on the different task bars in order to modify them and ... nothing. So after few years of pleasure with Ubuntu / eeebuntu & CO. I will move to LMDE with Xfce.
And regarding Linux as productivity laptop / desktop, it is absolutely capable. Most of European public services in France and Germany and using different flavors of Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz :

DESKTOP LINUX in any shape or form IS and always HAS BEEN a regression.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate I agree, I hate Unity.
@Peter Perry Don't know about Xubuntu, but as a former looong time user of KDE and Gnome and I see no loss of productivity with Unity. Takes a while to get used to and I did feel frustrations in the beginning, but once done, it's at least as productive. Does a better use of screen space for one. My only complain is that I hit a few minor bugs, but I assume these will eventually go away.
I was a Ubuntu user since 8.04 up until 11.04. I am done with Ubuntu, I use Xubuntu and Linux Mint now. I hate Unity.
0 Votes
+ -
I hate to admit it
Michael Alan Goff 23rd Oct
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

but after trying Xubuntu in my VM... I found that it runs so much quicker than Unity. No clue why, though.
@Michael Alan Goff
How much quicker? Did you time it?
0 Votes
+ -
For specific applications? Or just starting? One thing that I've timed right as of now is using Ubuntu Tweak's janitor. When I used it at first, I had Unity. After waiting for 30 seconds for it to start, I gave up. I clicked the x and moved on with my day.

When I started it on Xubuntu, it was done around 4 seconds later with the entire thing.

That's just an example, of course.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

I am sure Unity will be made more customizable. I feel Ubuntu can have the best of both worlds if the developers can have a bottom panel that can be added optionally to work like the 'Classic Desktop'. This should be done without having the user to log off & log in again.
This Classic bottom panel will win hearts & minds and everyone can be happy.
The advantage of the bottom panel (Classic Desktop) is that at a glance one can see the names of all the files that are open. (Unity doesn't do that). It requires less clicks to get work done. Space does not come at a premium in large Desktops. Helps in Multitasking.

Those who do not require the bottom panel can simply remove it and immerse themselves in Unity.

Canonical & Ubuntu give your users the choice, please.
@IndianArt Precisely!
0 Votes
+ -
@IndianArt Unity by default is hiding the vertical panel. If configured never hiding the panel, it takes the same click as the classic desktop to get work done.

Classic desktop (Gnome 2) is also available in Ubuntu 11.10
0 Votes
+ -
The major annoyance I have is...
djchandler 24th Oct
@IndianArt
Why is the window menu on the desktop panel in Unity? It's not saving enough space vertically to justify such a cumbersome arrangement. If you have more than one window open on a single desktop, it's certainly cumbersome as well as counter-intuitive.

Disabling desktop graphic effects (Compiz) in Gnome workaround (which gives the user a Gnome 2.x like environment) and KDE is a big shortcoming as well. No 3D effects at all makes me feel like my desktop experience has regressed a dozen or so years.

Unity is clearly aimed at hand held devices, although I'm not sure why. Does Canonical have some deal with an OEM?
0 Votes
+ -
"Classic desktop (Gnome 2) is also available in Ubuntu 11.10"

Wrong.

Ubuntu comes with Gnome 3.2 by default.
@IndianArt

I've tried Unity, and abandoned it for precisely the reason you mention; the lack of a bottom panel just slows me down (I run a lot of apps and tend to move between them often).

This is progress? Installing Gnome and using the Gnome "Classic" gives me back that bottom panel, but at the cost of less flexibility.

In other words, I've taken a step backwards.

Time to take another look at the Xubuntu and Lubuntu desktops, which are also faster...
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * 'Unity is a regression because it removes features what were central to the popularity of the Gnome 2.x interface' The forced move to Gnome 3.x removed the Gnome 2.x interface, surely? Unity is a response and moves in a different direction.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz
After being the guy who said "Stick with it" since 11.04 Alpha, I've finally given up and gone over to GNOME3 and Fedora. It's nice.

p.s. I hate being that guy -- "Try distro X"
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

I have to concur about Unity - to me it is one unholy mess. Fine for a tablet, but forget it for the desktop. I tried to use Gnome-fallback and quickly ran into a "problem" - the inability to add launchers to the panels. I was about ready to completely write off 11.10, until I spotted a post that informed the reader that you can get the panel properties popup by using 'ALT+RightClick' (formerly RightClick alone to get that popup). One ten minute obscenity laden tirade later, and many of my custom launchers were created. It is s--- like this that pisses off annoys me. I would expect this sort of crap from M$ ('ribbon' anyone?).
0 Votes
+ -
@fatman65536
How to enable desktop effects is all I need now.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

Unity is good if light work is intended, such as surfing, e-mail, social networking and multimedia playback. As such, it makes a great interface for my netbook. But I use Kubuntu for my laptop. KDE is a bit cumbersome compared to XFCE, but I've found XFCE in the past to be a bit too light for my needs.

Now it's been a couple years since I've tried XFCE, so maybe it's time I gave it another look. But I've grown comfortable with KDE despite its annoying quirks, so XFCE better have improved quite a bit since I've last used it to convince me to chance.
0 Votes
+ -
Run it from a pen drive. Zero risk.
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 24th Oct
@Michael Kelly nt
@Dietrich T. Schmitz

There have been a lot of double standards from the Linux crowd and Im glad to see you speak out against them.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
I don't mean any disrespect, but waah-waah. If you want to go all engineering on your Linux box, go ahead. Just don't force the average consumer to do that. They want something that works and does what they tell it to do and they depend on guys like us to make it work when it's broken. Shuttleworth wants to make a competitive product and 11.10 has done just that. They're advancing Linux like never before. Sorry, Mr. Schmitz, but it's people like you that have kept Linux ass-backwards for years.
0 Votes
+ -
you are actually dead right
thx-1138_@... Updated - 28th Oct
@Galidari .. you have to say, all things being equal, that when the die-hard Linux community don't like a dumbed down UI the likes of Unity, that the exact opposite has to be true of all mere mortals that are new to Linux.

With a background in psychology, i'd say Shuttleworth has Ubuntu headed in the right direction for the "average Jane & Joe" ... and let's be completely frank, that's the crown jewel audience for any desktop OS vendor.

I'm with you on this one.

+1000
0 Votes
+ -
RE: I have to say, Unity is a regression
Rabid Howler Monkey 24th Oct
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate wrote:
"Choice has been taken away.

What planet do you live on!? You can alternatively download the installer for Xubuntu (which you, in fact, did), Kubuntu or Lubuntu. In addition, even with Ubuntu defaulting to Unity, you can download, install and log into the desktop environment of your choice.

You are not forced to run Unity on Ubuntu. And you have LOTS of choices as to how you can avoid running Unity on your systems.

Finally, Unity is expressly not designed for the Linux faithful.
0 Votes
+ -
@Rabid Howler Monkey

It's a choice, but it's not an obvious nor an easy choice to most people. Lack of apparent choice is just as bad as lack of actual choice, especially when you consider it is not designed for the Linux faithful whom are not familiar with the non-apparent choices. I understand the need to make things easy for newbies, but eventually even newbies want to grow, and Unity does not really allow for that whereas other desktops do.
0 Votes
+ -
@Michael Kelly wrote:
"but eventually even newbies want to grow, and Unity does not really allow for that whereas other desktops do.

Most PC users just want to turn on the thing and run their apps. For those users wanting to grow beyond Unity, they are just a Google|Yahoo|Bing search away.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

Just like Windows 8, Unity is ugly and its mama dresses it funny.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

After trying 11.10 briefly, I went back to 10.04 LTS. Perhaps 12.04 LTS will eventually be "the answer" but for me, at this time, it's not there yet.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate

I strongly disagree about Unity being a regression. It's a different approach to the desktop and requires some re-training. It requires that you use it differently than other desktops. Once you learn how to use it you find yourself working far more effectively than in either Gnome 2 or XFCE. I find it far quicker to get to the file I want, launch the application I want, or switch between apps than I did previously. The only one thing I don't like is the menu at the top of the screen for GIMP due to the fact that GIMP opens up in 3 windows which makes it trickier to use with the menu on top.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate
I agree, Unity is a regression.

Personally, I have no problems with Apple, Canonical, or any other company coming up with some great idea, be it a beautifully designed, easy to use MP3 player or a new computer interface. But the keyword here is "great". Unity is not great, it is half-baked in its present form. Too many clicks to just launch a program, no easy way to create program shortcuts. Notebook remix in 10.04 is better.

I'd love to be able to use Ubuntu at work but not if I had to use Unity. At home, I'm sticking to 10.04 for now. I plan to go with 12.04 with gnome-fallback or perhaps Xubuntu. I'd certainly consider Unity but only if there are major improvements in usability. If it does become a great idea.
@ckx

You pointed out the whole problem with Unity in your post. Gnome 3 has the same problem. And no it's not the mouse clicks. It's that people are using these desktops the way that they have used XFCE, Gnome, and other desktops for the past 15 odd years. They're not meant to be used like that. If you start clicking away and using the Dash as it were a menu then yes, by all means you will be clicking the mouse way too much. I don't use the mouse AT ALL when launching apps. I have all my work apps on the launcher. If I wanted to use a mouse that would be ONE single click to launch anything I need. Or you could use the meta+number shortcut which is what I usually do. When it's time to relax and play a game or two I hit the meta key and type in the first one or two letters of the game that I want to play and hit enter. I can launch a game in half the time it would have taken me to find it in a menu based system. If you've ever used the program Gnome-Do or Kupfer then you'll see that Unity is pretty much the same thing. It's a program launcher that allows you to get to any file or application in no time at all. But it's power lies in the keyboard and not in the mouse.
Good luck to Canonical in this business move.
0 Votes
+ -
@daikon

Agreed.

And with the downturn in the economy continuing, I could see this being the perfect time to tout the cost-benefits of Ubuntu.
@Michael Alan Goff

Totally agree, I think its the Chinese that say smartness is using adversity as opportunity.

The tough economy does not have to hurt Canonical, it must show people the value & cost-effectiveness Ubuntu brings.
@Michael Alan Goff

Completely agree.

I think it is the Chinese that say smartness is using adversity as opportunity.

This tough economy does not need to hurt Canonical. It needs to show people the value & cost-effectiveness of using Ubuntu.
@Michael Alan Goff

@Michael Alan Goff

Completely agree.

I think it is the Chinese that say smartness is using adversity as opportunity.

This tough economy does not need to hurt Canonical. It needs to show people the value & cost-effectiveness of using Ubuntu.
@mswift@... Then stick with $microblow, because it is way faster, not slower.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix