ie8 fix

Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

Windows' Endgame. Desktop Linux's Failure

By | June 19, 2011, 1:59pm PDT

Summary: After almost 20-years of ruling the computing world, Windows is on its way down. Linux will not be the winner though.

“After nearly a decade, Microsoft’s reign as a monopoly is over.” … “The latest real-world data on web usage confirms that Microsoft’s once-dominant position in the world of personal computing is crumbling.” That’s not me, the Linux guy speaking. No, that’s Ed Bott, who’s as much a Windows fan as I am a Linux fan. Ed’s the one, not me, who’s saying that “if Windows 8 flops on phones and tablets, Microsoft’s future is very dim indeed.

Desktop Linux’s future isn’t any better. Windows isn’t declining because of Linux’s security or stability benefits. No, as Ed points out, it’s declining because of the rise of mobile computing. Apple’s iPhone and iPad are the ‘villians” in the mystery of who killing Windows. And, they’re also killing off the traditional desktop Linux.

When I say this though I don’t mean that Windows won’t still be on computers in 2021. It will be. What it won’t be though is the dominant computing platform. Unlike Ed, I do think that Microsoft is moving too late to a mobile, tablet-based computing paradigm. Windows 8 will be too little, too late.

Linux, however, is in a funny place. Linux, through Android, is becoming an important operating system for end-users. Most people don’t know it though. If you ask them “Could you use Linux?” If they even know what Linux is, they’ll say “No.” Ask them can they use their phone, they’ll say “Yes, of course.”

We’ve seen this before People having been using Linux without realizing it for years now thanks to Google, Yahoo, and the thousands of other major Web sites that rely on Linux for their server operating system. We’ll see this in the future not only with the continued rise of Android but with all the other mobile Linux systems such as HP’s webOS, Google’s Chromebooks; and MeeGo.

None of these though are traditional Linux desktops. Only Ubuntu’s Unity comes from what most of who’ve been using Linux for years think of as mainstream Linux. Perhaps Unity will become a major player in the mobile space. I fear it may also be a case of too little, too late, but we’ll see what we see.

So it is that while I’m now more sure than ever that Linux, thanks to its presence in servers, cloud, and mobile devices, will eventually be more important than Windows, I also think that almost no one will know it. Linux will–indeed already is–become the foundation on which many other user systems will be built. But both desktop Windows and Linux are going to decline.

Related Stories:

As Microsoft’s monopoly crumbles, its mobile future is crucial

Is the iCloud the end of the Linux & Windows desktop?

The first Chromebook Review: Samsung Series 5

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
167
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Windows' Endgame. Desktop Linux's Failure
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Sure, I can use my phone, but I rather have a Windows phone than an android based system of any kind. I have both, windows and android phone and I like windows better by far.
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian
And I prefer Osmoroid fountain pens with square tips to ball point pens, and I use both. Ultimately, this is an irrelevant point.
@DannyO_0x98: ... really "open" -- contrary to what advertised -- it is still based on Linux. So while *desktop* does not promise much for Linux, mobile gives it a chance.
At the moment, I belive the needs of the few are - users who want / have windows based smartphones.
@DeRSSS

Yes its based on a highly modified closed source kernel. If Google at had followed your so called "true" Linux path they'd still be bickering over using vi or emacs as the default editor, what UI to use, and the phone carriers would have dropped them.

Android is not Linux, not even close. Android is an OS designed to make profit for Google. You call all keep pointing and Android and the never freaking ending stories of how Linux is the king of supercomputers (who cares other than a bunch of academics and FOSS evangelists, my Grandma who happily uses Skype and Photoshop/Premier Elements sure doesn't) and how LibreOffice is better than OpenOffice.

Keep grasping at straws, it helps build up your forearm muscles.
0 Votes
+ -
@kyleoster Linux kernel is protected by GPL licence which ensures all public modifications must be open-sourced. By associating Vim or GUI with Linux kernel you clearly show you have no idea what you're talking about
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian

weeeeeeeeeeeeeh!
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian

Grandpa used to say, "never bite the hand that feeds you".
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian
THE REPORTS OF MY DEATH(S) HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED........
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian
We're all very happy for you. However, the majority don't prefer Windows on their phone.
0 Votes
+ -
@freetulisten To be fair, the majority don't prefer iOS, Android or WP7. The majority wanted to play Angry Birds. Who cares what the OS is.

Android will fail if they don't find a good marketplace. Ultimately, kids want to click and buy an album, click and stream in a pod cast, click and watch movies, click and play games. For example, what if I was on my Android phone and wanted to buy games "like Angry Birds" that will definitely work on my instance of Android. how do I find that on the phone?

Android has lots of cool features, but for the power-mom, if it doesn't work with two thumb tabs the same way as the soccer mom next to her who she has coffee with, its not good.
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian wrote "I rather have a Windows phone than an android based system of any kind"

I also prefer a linux desktop - however, it seems we are both in the minority.
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian It seems to me that the article, rather than trying to provoke the usual Windows vs Linux skirmish, is suggesting that the traditional desktop OS--of whatever flavor--is likely to become less important as mobile devices dominate.

It's mildly irritating, however, that Bott claims that "desktop Linux still can?t crack the 1% level", when evidence for this seems either missing or opaque. Here's the "methodology" cited by NetMarketShare for this conclusion:

"We use a unique methodology for collecting this data. We collect data from the browsers of site visitors to our exclusive on-demand network of live stats customers. The data is compiled from approximately 160 million visitors per month. The information published is an aggregate of the data from this network of hosted website statistics. The site unique visitor and referral information is summarized on a monthly, weekly, daily and hourly basis.

In addition, we classify 430+ referral sources identified as search engines. Aggregate traffic referrals from these engines are summarized and reported on. The statistics for search engines include both organic and sponsored referrals. The websites in our population represent almost all countries on earth."

It appears, in other words, that NetMarketShare claims to be able to detect OS market share by analyzing web traffic. Maybe this is possible; I'd like to learn more.

If Linux' market share is 1% or less, that's just fine with me. I use Linux (and sometimes Windows 7) for my own reasons--not the reasons of others.
0 Votes
+ -
1 % shhare
SoYouSaid 20th Jun
@FeralUrchin I agree 100% with your reasoning. Quote " If Linux' market share is 1% or less, that's just fine with me. I use Linux (and sometimes Windows 7) for my own reasons--not the reasons of others."

I believe that the numbers they forject for each OS are from a much smaller base than they quote that they access to. Players in the IT world like IBM, etc don't waste there time spending millions of $ on 1% market opportunity. End of story.
@FeralUrchin

So NetMarketShare can say what the OS market share is of the visitors to the sites that they monitor.

Most Web Stat Analytics do the same thing, it's easy to do. You could do it yourself on you're own website with (probably) any web based programming language happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Jediguardian windows phone 7 is pretty bad. I tested it out last night for the first time where I actually sat down and used it for a few minutes. I found the menus clunky and hard to understand, unless the phone I was using had no apps at all I couldn't actually find the applications. They have a long way to go before they can compete with android.
0 Votes
+ -
We can be sure of one thing: GPL will ensure
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 19th Jun
a diverse open source community with ever-growing choice.

And with that choice comes brisk vendor participation.

Microsoft cannot win unless they get into the open source game and become Agile.

Having NDA-bound shakedowns of big corporations for alleged ip infringed software patents is not championing their cause--it is slowly hurting their market position, or rather, their monopoly.

Oracle has tried to reign in OpenOffice.org--it forked.
Oracle is trying to reign in Google on ip infringed JavaME (by Dalvik). Their suit, will turn out to be frivolous.

Open source code will thrive but simply go by a different name through time all in the name of innovation, choice, without exploitation.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate

That's a strange parallel universe you come from DTS, are the laws of physics different as well?

Twenty years, less than 1% and when my PVR stuffs up, I know who to blame - Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows' Endgame. Desktop Linux's Failure
Return_of_the_jedi Updated - 19th Jun
@tonymcs@...

Your less than 1% argument is so 2007'ish.
You need to apt-get update your "Linux" knowledge.
You can start by researching "What is Linux".

PS. Your MC$E knowledge is NOT transferable. The "E" is a misnomer.
0 Votes
+ -
@tonymcs@...
it's now 2%
Mr Jedi - very clever to use "$", original too. People like you ruin any chance to get more people to even try Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
@dev/null@...
and don't even know it. All those GPS devices, all those Android phones, all those personal routers and wireless APs are sitting there running Linux without any problems. The only problem is, most of these devices don't surf the websites being evaluated by NetMarketShare so they don't show up on any metrics. They just work.
0 Votes
+ -
Mr Jedi - very clever to use "$", original too. People like you ruin any chance to get more people to even try Linux.

I doubt it. Most people's minds seem to already be made up.
0 Votes
+ -
Re Parallel Universes
Mah 21st Jun
@tonymcs@...
I am not sure what you are ranting on about tonymcs. What exactly has parallel universes and laws of physics got to do with DTS's post? Either has hit a raw nerve, or you have been watching far too many sci-fi movies, or possibly both.
0 Votes
+ -
Sun always talked about being open, but then moved slow as molasses to produce anything useful.

Im sure zealots like you will give open source a different name. This way you can sweep all the OS failures under the rug and jump on the new bandwagon. Just like you try to do by calling Android, Linux. It may have some components in it, but nobody knows and nobody cares. I dont see all those ANdroid users flocking to Linux on the desktop.
0 Votes
+ -
They don't have to.
jasonp@... 20th Jun
@otaddy
What they might flock to is an Android based netbook. I know it hurts to admit that Android is Linux, but painful or not it is. Linux at it's core was not build from the ground up to be a desktop operating system. This is where the nature of open source steps in. Google has shown that it can be molded into a smart device OS that people find useful. Many other embedded device manufacturers have shown that it can be molded into numerous applications including GPS devices, routers, access points, DVRs, security devices, medical devices, etc. With no licensing costs, this means the only cost is tailoring the OS to meet your needs. Nobody has come up with the "perfect" desktop solution yet. A truly successful Linux desktop experience will almost certainly look like the Apple universe, where a single vendor controls the OS and hardware. Some would say that this flies in the face of the open nature of Linux, but I'd argue that this viewpoint is flawed. It's this very open nature that will allow a vendor to customize a platform to their hearts content, just like has been done in all the other verticals I mentioned above. The user probably won't even be aware they're using Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
Sun failed to see the value of open source (Java) until it was too late
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 20th Jun
@otaddy
And when they did, they split out JavaSE from JavaME, the former being GPLv2.
@ jasonp@...
"Linux at it's core was not build from the ground up to be a desktop operating system."

And Windows at it's core was not build from the ground up to be a server operating system... But Linux works much better on the desktop than Windows does on the sever.

Actually, I'd go further, and argue that Linux makes a better desktop OS than Windows does, and has done so since at least 2002-2004 (depending on how you want to measure).

As far back as that, I've known non-techie pre-teen girls to install newbie-friendly versions of Linux by themselves, and accountants/financial advisors to convert their servers and more than half the desktops in their office (by desktops-users' choice) to Linux, without the benefit of an IT staff. I myself (a book-dealer) have been using Linux as my main or only desktop for over a decade.

It's not been a question of suitability for task, or even market preference, but monopoly power and marketing.

You may be right about imitating Apples vertical-market approach, but I think you're mistaken. Consumers are showing a growing interest in "unlocked" (call it "rooted" or "jailbroken", if you prefer) Android phones and tablets, and even Apple users show a distinct interest in such options for their "iStuff". The more these technologies become ordinary, commodity products, the more difficult it will be to convince customers that they must, or should, accept vendors' arbitrary restrictions.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Priest

Ah, no. Nobody cares whether what they buy is open source or not. Linux is certainly not killing Microsoft's monopoly. Apple is.
@CobraA1 LOL! That Apple with less than 6% market share is killing Windows 90% market share. You people are too delusional and stupid to take seriously.
0 Votes
+ -
@JoeHTH

your figures are from over a year ago. This year it's Apple, 8%, Windows, 85%, Linux 5-8% (hard to measure) and Other 1-2% (BSD Unix, Solaris, BeOS (and clones), AmigaOS (and clones), Dos (and clones)). The decline of Windows is real. These concerns are for Personal Computers only. That includes desktops, laptops and netbooks. It does not include 'mobile devices'.

Linux is growing, as is Apple. Steven is concerned that the growth will be stopped because nobody will care. it is possible that he is right. But, the PC long slow demise will continue for at least 20 years for desktops, and probably 50 years for notebooks/netbooks.

Servers are in our future, but Linux already dominates that market. Small plug-in pre-set-up units probably. Those on the market now virtually all run Linux. The "Cloud" model there would be for the tablet to be the client, with the power on the server. I could see a Wifi server in every home, with connection to the homes devices (aka the Jetson's robots), and reliance on net based servers for big tasks.

Users will not need to know anything about Linux, but the Gear Heads and Makers among us will. But, by that time, it won't look or act like today's desktop Linux. Servers already don't. In that environment, a GUI is a waste of resources. Hence the 'death' of Desktop Linux.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate

I can remember before about 10 - 13 years the first time I knew Linux as OS and (people say) is better than windows. But seriously, I did not see it evolve in desktops/laptops as main OS replacing windows,, I don't see what makes Linux fans go on to the conclusion that open source is the way to win!

Look at the figures, windows market share is affected by handheld devices, and mainly by apple, who don't care about open source anyway!
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate
diverse, ever-growing choice = fragmentation
Not a good thing, from what I've been hearing.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Will Pharaoh Updated - 20th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
I see Anonyflagger is here
Will Pharaoh 20th Jun
@Will Pharaoh
What part didn't he want people to see - that proprietary (closed source) companies are the ones making money to pay the bills and developers, so going open source isn't an option, or the part where closed or open, is all the same to the vast majority of people - It's a non-issue?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Have you visted any Datacenters lately?
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 20th Jun
@Will Pharaoh
Didn't think so. Pay attention to trends like:

o Open Virtualization Alliance
o RHEV-D
o kvm

You'll get it one day or be running Linux and not even know it. But I hope you get it.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate,

"Microsoft cannot win unless they get into the open source game and become Agile."

Agile is a software development methodology and it is not specific to any platform or licensing scheme.

"Oracle has tried to reign in OpenOffice.org"

OpenOffice and LibreOffice (or whatever it's called) don't really have a large enough user base to matter.

GPL and Open Source is a great way for developer's to share ideas and code for common problems. It's also a great way for companies to collaborate on platforms in order to create a level playing field as far competition. However, not everything can be open source. When companies invest development dollars, they have to get a return on their investment in order to continue to fund development projects. Without IP protections (i.e. proprietary software), companies won't gain the competitive advantage necessary to get that return. Only you pundits (Linux zealots, Microsoft shills) see the world as either one or the other.
0 Votes
+ -
GPL and open source both promote collaboration and sharing
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 20th Jun
@bmonsterman

Proprietarianism is responsible for raising global costs and is exploitative.
0 Votes
+ -
@bmonsterman

Agile Development is a Software Development method.

Agile movement is a human physical trait.

Agile management is a Business Style.

The term agile does not directly mean anything about writing software.
0 Votes
+ -
@YetAnotherBob,

"The term agile does not directly mean anything about writing software."

True dat. It's all contextual.
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz,

Proprietarianism is the very heart capitalism. In general, a free market economy lowers cost be encouraging competition. Maybe what you are talking about is monopolistic behavior, which can occur in a free market economy. Large companies bring economies of scale which further reduces costs. If a company becomes to large they gain too much influence over markets, which they influence to their advantage. THAT is exploitive. However, don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Not all proprietary software is evil.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Altzimers Advocate
"Microsoft cannot win unless they get into the open source game and become agile"
Sorry dude Microsoft won out decades ago, how did you miss it?
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate LOL! Microsoft has been dominating Linux for decades. Linux is irrelevant. I'd love to see my mother try using Linux, especially when something goes wrong. It would be a laugh riot.

Linux is irrelevant. Microsoft destroys them on desktops, and will continue to do so. Microsoft destroys them in the server markets, and the enterprise market. The people who work on Linux are idiots who don't know what they're doing. No gaming support. No standardization. Fragmentation out the wazoo.
Steve, when do you realize, that just because you want Microsoft and Windows to fail and perish, at all cost, it won't actually neccessarily happen? And no Linux doesn't and won't succeed either. Android is not Linux's success (there could be any other kernel under it, either open-source or proprietary), and it's not really in succesful in the server market either, as Windows Server sales still generate 3x times more than do Linux server sales (source: IDC).

I would like to say, that get your facts before posting something as ridicolous as this article - but I just know too well that you won't, and will continue your wishful thinking journalism.
IDC figures count servers shipped with OS. Yes MS SBS has a big lead in this market.

Windows doesn't have 3 times the Unix server processing capacity (for servers the one true measure, we don't all run little x86 boxes).

Linux has failed in the one market that's in decline; desktops. It's a run away success in HPC, server and embedded. 3 out of 4 ain't bad.
0 Votes
+ -
The best 3 of 4 indeed
schmandel@... 20th Jun
@Richard Flude
There's a condition known as windopia, it's a blinding nearsightedness brought about by only seeing the world of computing through a Windows desktop.

The "baroque monstrosity" desktop environment that one is supposed to live completely within is dying and should be. In my acquaintance, Windows and KDE are premier examples, mental prisons carried through to perfection.

Thinner and lighter frameworks for application access make sense as applications separate from the particular appliance on which they happen to run at the moment.
0 Votes
+ -
@ff2
Android is not Linux's success (there could be any other kernel under it, either open-source or proprietary)

Yeah, but there isn't "any other kernel under it", there's Linux under it and it's precisely because of the thousands of hours of time and labour, often freely given, that has made Linux what it is today. A superior kernel to the one used in Windows. Noticeably Apple's success took off when they abandoned System 9 and went with the BSD Hack OSX - also a Unix based system.
So, your belittling of the Linux kernel is hasty.
The fact the linux kernel exists, with all the open source tools, means that people are starting to write systems to run on top of it that concentrate on the user experience.

Linux has been ready for desktop use for the last 8 years or so - I know, because I've been using it for that long, on the desktop, and I'm no IT engineer. What kept it from becoming "the next big thing" (which would have killed it dead in terms of freedom and configurability - as Canonical and their users are now finding out) was Microsoft's brilliance in anti-competitive market manipulation.
0 Votes
+ -
Li
km4hr@... 20th Jun
@salparadyse
What's killing (killed?) "Linux" on the desktop is that there no such as one Linux desktop. There's are hundreds of incompatible distro's. Having the same kernel doesn't make them the same in the end user's eyes. Linux has no identity. Everybody can look at a PC and tell whether it's a Windows or Mac. But desktop Linux is faceless. The biggest drawback with desktop Linux is software installation. For example, why are different repositories neccessary? Why can't as basic as software be the same? Why can't I go directly to a vendor's website and install the Linux version of their software? With Windows it's extremely easy. But with Linux you'd better know what you're doing or you'll be working on it for hours. One web site I visited recently had one button to click for Windows, one for Mac, and about six for Linux. The Linux user had know what distro they were using and be able to identify by it's icon. That's rediculous. Even when you are successful installing Linux apps you often don't get an entry in the startup menu. You have to find the executable and run it yourself. Absolutely absurd!
@salparadyse

"Noticeably Apple's success took off when they abandoned System 9 and went with the BSD Hack OSX - also a Unix based system." ---- Ummmm noooooo Apple's success took of when they went to an Intel chip and gave their systems the capability of running a Windows OS.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux is not Windows
ScorpioBlue 20th Jun
@km4hr@...
That's because you look at things as if it were Windows and that everything should be like Windows. Linux is not Windows. You seem to suffer from the windopia syndrome mentioned above.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix