Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

1991's PC technology was unbelievable

By | April 17, 2011, 7:28pm PDT

Summary: ZDNet’s 20th anniversary: Thinking about the computer industry from a 20-year perspective makes my head hurt, a lot.

The year was 1991.

The radiowaves were blasting Bryan Adams, C+C Music Factory, Paula Abdul, Color Me Badd, and EMF.

Beverly Hills: 90210, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, In Living Color and Northern Exposure had all been renewed for second seasons.

Thinking about the computer industry from a 20-year perspective makes my head hurt, a lot. I can still wax nostalgic, but it takes more than three cups of coffee on a Sunday evening to pry the memories from the inner recesses of my 41-year-old brain.

For the technology industry, particularly as it relates to information technology and personal computing, 1991 was a year of transitions. By most accounts, nothing particularly important happened in 1991 per se that you could nail on a board that created a watershed event that we are still living with today.

(Okay, the Web was first turned on by Tim Berners-Lee at CERN in 1991. But literally, there was nothing on it at the time. And yes, Linus started work on Linux.)

However, the year that preceded it, 1990 and year that followed, 1992, are particularly notable. Windows 3.0 was released the year before, and Windows 3.1 would be released in the next.

Still, the transition itself — to use the title from EMF’s 1991 hit song, was unbelievable, in the sense that a storm was brewing that would eventually change everything.

That storm was the Microsoft and the GUI storm that would eventually bring us to the computing model we are using today. If you believe the Steve Jobs iPad snake oil, the era that which probably began in 1991 — The Golden age of PCs and Microsoft Windows — is the one that is now coming to its end.

You’ll have to excuse me while I stare up in the sky with my reptilian eyes and look for the giant Apple-shaped fireball heading this way.

In 1991, I was 21 years old, just out of school and entering the workforce. My exposure to computers prior to that time were Apple ][’s, Commodore 64’s, TRS-80’s, Atari 800s, DEC Rainbows and the first IBM PC Clones.

During summer jobs, I also worked with small minicomputers like the DEC PDP-11 and the multiuser XENIX-based Altos 386. When I was in school, I was even able to get my hands on powerful graphical workstations like the Apollo and the NeXT, which was way ahead of its time.

But now it was time to hunker down and become an adult.

One of the first jobs I had was being a bench tech for a large retail consumer electronics and computer store in Yonkers, New York. People would buy computers and need software installed on them. We also repaired systems.

So this exposed me to an awful lot of stuff out in the wild.

This was the same year CompUSA started selling computers in retail, and had just begun to displace ComputerLand, a 1980s-era retail computer chain.

It really strains my brain when I think about the systems that were typical of that day. We were still on the Intel architecture, as we are today, but the state of the art chip generation at the time was the i486 (80486). Back then, clock speeds of CPU’s were still measured in Megahertz (Mhz).

So the fastest PC at the end of 1991, a 80486DX was 50Mhz, could execute about 40 million instructions per second and had a peak dhrystone MIPS output of 50. It had about a million transistors on the die, which was huge achievement for the time.

That was on the very high end of the PC scale.

If they were up to date, companies were running 386-based systems, which ran at 33Mhz, 25Mhz or less. And by and large, most places were still using 5Mhz or 10Mhz 8088s like on IBM PC-AT’s and original IBM PC’s. If you were doing engineering and CAD work, maybe you bought a 486.

A friend and colleague who was at NASA at the time told me they were just starting to replace their original PCs in the mail room with 12Mhz 286 systems in 1991.

<– Next Page

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

42
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
dejan001 Updated - 15th Oct
Wrote the better part of a novel on it. Was good discipline as the memory would only hold about four thousand words, a good length for a chapter. After hitting that mark I'd have to plug in the cassette recorder (a 'high quality' model for use with the computer...reality was it had a sticker pasted on it. It was an off the shelf cassette player) and wait for the whole tape to be read to the next 'empty' spot before it would record what I'd written. ANY thing hiccup and I lost it.

I also spent an afternoon entering the program that would create a 'ball' that could 'bounce' on the TV. Actually a circle no dimensions to it. I think my daughter still has the old girl in a closet somewhere.
Indian Astrology by astrologer Dr. Sudhanshu
places to visit in France
Watch Full Movies Online
Igrice Games
Weight Watcher Soup
personalized gifts for kids
0 Votes
+ -
Dam I wasn't born till 1995 xD and my first pc was a p3 at 400mhz with windows 98 512 mb of ram and 8th of space my parents got it in 1999
0 Votes
+ -
my first computer was a tandy trs model 80 with a cassette drive to store programs and data you had to program everything to work with the keyboard using programs like basic ah the good old days
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
Churlish Updated - 19th Apr 2011
larrymsn --

How about a (pre-Tandy) Radio Shack TRS-80 Color Computer 2, also with a cassette player for storage, hooked up to a off-the-shelf 13" television as a monitor, with a paleolithic dot matrix printer for hard copies? The printer didn't ship with noise dampening headphones, but OSHA would probably require them today.

Although the CoCo2 boasted 64K of RAM, the upper 32K were reserved for "hi-res" (256x192) graphics ... possible within 32K, because the low-low color depth crammed multiple pixels into a single byte. You felt like a real hacker when you learned to POKE values into the graphics memory, then PEEK them back out for use in the lower 32.

I'd peck away for hours at games -- mostly Zork -inspired text adventures -- written in BASIC. These were either my own inventions or game code painstakingly transcribed line-by-line from Rainbow magazine. (...Whose name would draw a decidedly different demographic these days, now that I think about it.) :-)

I'd save those whopping 4K-32K programs to cassette, only lose them more often than not to the evil CLOAD ERROR when I tried to restore them.

Early PCs taught me the fine arts of programming and swearing.
0 Votes
+ -
@Churlish

I was a CoCo fan; especially running OS/9.
0 Votes
+ -
@Churlish I had a CoCo also. Wrote the better part of a novel on it. Was good discipline as the memory would only hold about four thousand words, a good length for a chapter. After hitting that mark I'd have to plug in the cassette recorder (a 'high quality' model for use with the computer...reality was it had a sticker pasted on it. It was an off the shelf cassette player) and wait for the whole tape to be read to the next 'empty' spot before it would record what I'd written. ANY thing hiccup and I lost it.

I also spent an afternoon entering the program that would create a 'ball' that could 'bounce' on the TV. Actually a circle no dimensions to it. I think my daughter still has the old girl in a closet somewhere.
0 Votes
+ -
dheady --

Ha! I remember the "high quality" / "computer grade" cassette recorders and tapes that Radio Shack peddled.

My experience was that a normal, cheapo audio cassette would lose data about 50% of the time, whereas an expensive, branded Radio Shack-approved "computer cassette" would retain its data at least 0% longer. happy

I had much more patience when I was younger.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
Computer_User_1024 Updated - 29th Jun
@Churlish Back in the 80's my first computer was the Vic 20, after which our family started using the commodore 64 and commodore 128. We also had a Timex Sinclair 1000 at one time or another.

Anyway with these computers we only had a cassette at first as well and it took forever to load programs off it. We would by Ahoy!, Compute (published by Ziff Davis), and Computes Gazette (also published by Ziff Davis) magazines as well as Transactor and Run magazines and I would spend hours typing in the programs and saving them to cassette to later reload and run them. This taught me a lot about programming. I even learned to understand binary from these magazines. I was the type of guy who used a cartridge to break the flow of a game, look at the machine language and reroute a subroutine so Instead of (dec)rement x or y, or whatever, maybe just jmp past the life removing code so that I could go on with a game, and see more content of it's content. It was fun for me to do and a challenge. Later, of course we moved on to 1541 and 1571 floppy drives.

In 1990 or so my father acquired a machine (thrown out from a hospital that he had worked at) that ram CPM, this monster was heavy and had 8" floppy drives. With the word processor I believe you could only edit 1 page, save it, then create a new document for the next page. It was not until the early to mid 90's that I had exposure to IBM compatible PC's, DOS and Windows 3.0 and up.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
mustangj36@... Updated - 17th Apr 2011
I guess I missed out on all of the early computer fun. I was vaguely aware of them in '91 but my office's most advanced tech tools were paper tape adding machines and desktop calculators. The prices of PC's in '91 were too high for a hobby that didn't do much relevant to my life so I wasted money elsewhere. It wasn't until 2000, just before I turned 50, that I got my first PC. It was a Celeron based HP with a price heavily subsidized by Compuserve to bring it under $400. I gave it to a neighbor a few years ago and it still works for her.
0 Votes
+ -
Irritating
gtvr 18th Apr 2011
Could you please not BOLD and ITALIC every other WORD in the article, it really BREAKS UP the flow of reading.

Or is your article JUST that EXCITING?
0 Votes
+ -
It was really fun to be a PC gamer back then. All the Config.sys Autoexec.bat tinkering for mouse driver/soundcard driver (I had an Ultrasound soundcard... oh fun), boot disk and Copy Protection "Key Disk" it could literally take hours just to play a game.

Then along came CD-ROM games that needed even bigger driver footprint for memory... and no, you can't just boot a CD-ROM because different CD-ROM interface standards( hence the driver)

For a longest time Windows games just weren't as good as DOS game until DirectX 3, and then the 3D card war...
0 Votes
+ -
Samic -- Ha! You're right about the configuration gymnastics that early-nineties PC games required. There weren't many games whose actual gameplay was harder than their installation. happy

Jason P. -- Thanks for the nostalgia!
0 Votes
+ -
QEMM was the best memory manager
Joe_Raby 18th Apr 2011
I was able to get 638/640k free on almost every DOS system - something you couldn't do with EMM386.

Also, you forgot to mention LANtastic - it was far and away the lightest network protocol at the time. Netware was a pig on RAM, and Banyan wasn't much better.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
Scott Raymond Updated - 18th Apr 2011
@Joe_Raby You could get over 700k of ram if you used only CGA video and freed up the upper memory blocks reserved for EGA/VGA.
0 Votes
+ -
I still remember the "zrrrrr tac tac tac,.. tin tin tin ssrrrrrgg" sound of a dialing internet conection wink
0 Votes
+ -
fher98 -- That's onomatopoetry. happy
0 Votes
+ -
memmaker
pjotr123 18th Apr 2011
I used to free extra kilobytes of RAM, by using memmaker /more in DOS. Life was good when I had freed another kilobyte. :P
0 Votes
+ -
Nice trip down memory lane, Jason.
kenosha77a 18th Apr 2011
Of course, at the time, I was heavy into VM machines on my Amiga 1000 platform. (A favorite topic of yours.)

I learned (very slowing, I might add due to hardware restrictions) dBase III, Quattro Pro -- yeh, I was of a different mindset, back in the day -- and Word Perfect DOS based programs on my Amiga Transformer software. The virtualization worked but, OMG, was it slow!

However, the hardware/software VM Mac emulator for the Amiga worked just fine and as I posted on David's blog, I ran HyperCard much faster on my Amiga 1000 than comparable Apple based computers.

But, because of work requirements, I had to enter the world of Microsoft and PC software and, as a result, all your salient article points I experienced myself.

At work, I used PCs. At home, I used my multi talented Amiga systems. Hey, one has to satisfy both right and left brain requirements.

PS .. one technology that still exists today from that era is OS/2 .. something that should warm your heart. As you probably know, OS/2 is still used as the OS in some portable ATM machines. (Only last year, I happened to witness an ATM machine being serviced at some State Welcoming Center and I happened to notice that familiar welcoming startup screen.
0 Votes
+ -
Remember DR-DOS, Compact DOS and HP NewWave
kenosha77a Updated - 18th Apr 2011
I really liked DR-DOS over MS-DOS and of course, Compact DOS would only work on Compact PCs.

I actually got my engineering group to install HP NewWave software on their computers so we could use long file names and folders to organize our files.

Then came MS Windows 3.1 and the rest was history.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
deadmgrwalking 18th Apr 2011
IMHO, IBM pricing the Developer's SDK for OS/2 at $3000 and Microsoft pricing Windows Developer's SDK for $300 had a lot to do with developer acceptance and subsequently user acceptance. As Apple shows us today, it's still all about the APPS.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@deadmgrwalking That is indeed a very good point, although I am not sure if it was always priced that high. Still, back then, the app ecosystem was controlled by very large companies, not as much as the one man shops that exist on mobile today. So $3000 didn't mean as much to the larger firms.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
babyboomer57 18th Apr 2011
Ohhhh the memories....

Can you imagine if the kids these days had to live with what we had available back then? On the plus side, if you built your own systems you could use the same case for years, until the ATX system boards/power supplies came out. Then you had to change everything.

I remember fondly when I could download a photo at 56k and watch my 1 meg Trident SVGA card draw the screen in under a minute. Of course that was much later, '93 or '94. Can you imagine how long it would have taken if it were possible to download a modern webpage back then?

And I agree with you on OS2, it was really amazing for it's time. Kind of a dog on the hardware I had to run it on though. By the time I could afford a powerful enough system to run it correctly it was already long forgotten.

At least these days having the 'latest and greatest' hardware is not such a necessity. A good dual core with 3 gig RAM and a 250 gig HD will get most any job done, as long as you are not a CAD or video production user. It is nice to know it is there when I wear out what I have now, though.

Thanks for taking me back on memory lane, Jason.
0 Votes
+ -
OS/2 and Windows
WilErz 19th Apr 2011
Supporters of unsuccessful products often claim their preferred product failed because of 'poor marketing'. Sometimes it's true, but often it isn't. Windows 3.x was a better product for the early-1990s market than OS/2 or Windows NT, primarily because it had much lower hardware requirements, as well as better compatibility with existing hardware and software. From a 'whole product' perspective, Windows NT wasn't really better for the average user until Windows XP (Windows NT 5.1), and OS/2 was never as good as either.

On a technical level, NT was clearly the most advanced of the three, followed by OS/2, with Windows 3.x/9x at the bottom. Nevertheless, Windows 3.x/9x was the best match for the broad market requirements. The technical advantages of OS/2 or Windows NT required much more expensive hardware, and Dos software, which was the standard, tended to run much more slowly (or not at all). Since Windows ran on top of Dos, Windows users could simply exit to Dos to run software with compatibility issues. OS/2 and NT users couldn't.

Windows NT eventually caught on because Microsoft included a 32-bit version of the Windows API, Win32, allowing developers of Windows apps to port their software to the new OS relatively easily. Microsoft also created an interim release of Dos/Windows, Windows 95, that included a subset of Win32, making Win32 available to developers before hardware caught up with NT's requirements. IBM's refusal to agree to a 32-bit Windows API being included in OS/2 (alongside the primary OS/2 API) is actually what led to the Microsoft/IBM split, but it's the key technical advantage that allowed Windows NT to eventually triumph in the market.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@WilErz Well, that's an effective way to re-open up a 20-year-old flame war if I ever read one. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Different perspectives
WilErz 19th Apr 2011
@ jperlow

I suppose it's a matter of perspective. happy

To you it's an old flame war. To me it's one of several market failure myths (along with Windows versus Mac, MS Word and Excel versus Wordperfect and Lotus 1-2-3, VHS versus Betamax, Qwerty versus Dvorak and others) that's still held up by proponents of interventionist economic policy to 'demonstrate' that market competition leads to sub-optimal outcomes. Many of these myths were investigated years ago, by Prof. Stan Liebowitz at the University of Texas, and none of the ones he looked at held up under scrutiny.

The fact that these market failure myths continue to be repeated long after many of them were debunked is what bothers me, not OS/2 or Windows per se. Indeed, I'd probably have chosen OS/2 over Windows (at least until NT came along), because the technical details of an OS matter to me. I imagine it would have depended on how much Dos-compatible hardware and software I had owned, and how compatible it was with OS/2. At any rate, as a technically advanced/demanding user, I don't think my own preferences reflect those of the market 20 years ago, which arguably chose Dos/Windows for good reasons.
0 Votes
+ -
"She told me during my OS/2 demo that she knew how to tweak her WIN.INI file.

I knew right then and there she was a keeper."

LOL! That sounds familiar. I knew my (now) wife was a keeper when I found out she loved homebrewed beer and wanted to visit Antarctica.

Reading your article was a trip down memory lane for me too. I remember those old DOS days, and your article brought back the time and trouble we used to spend on memory managers back then. And how about adventures in getting modems to dial up back then, with data bits, stop bits, parity, and all that nonsense?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
preilly2@... 8th May 2011
I still remember a PC Magazine cover from what must have been this same era: "486/66 Screamers!!". The first computer I used at work was a 386 running Windows 3.11.
0 Votes
+ -
Wife's Kaypro "laptop" circa 1990
preilly2@... 8th May 2011
What a dinosaur that was! No hard drive---two floppy drives, one to load programs from, one for storage. Calling it "portable" was only true in relation to other computers of the time.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
redwood49931@... 14th May 2011
Thanks for the memories!
First actual PC I purchased was a Tandy 1000SX, with 1 meg of ram. Remember the post chip set, I had an extra 360k of ram, the first machine out with it. Spent $2900 on it and drove to Dearborn, Mi to pick it up. Actually had to talk to the Radio Shack rep for five states and tell him I wasn't putting a Christmas Card under the tree for my THREE year old. Took alot of razzing for spending that kind of money on a TOY. But before my son was 4 he could read, write and do tree digit addition, subtraction and multiplication. Yea I guess it was a waste; he and his wife now works for IBM in Rochester, MN. Oh and he got two four year degrees @ Michigan Tech in four years and didn't pay any tuition out of pocket. What a waste of time and money.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
Jonathan D Schuster 11th Aug
I only got as far as the part about configuring Extended/Expanded memory. Then I vomited. Thanks ever so much for re-awakening traumatic memories I had long suppressed.
0 Votes
+ -
Jason, I started college in 1991. I was 17 years old, a recent immigrant from the Soviet Union, who begged his Mother and Father to scrape enough money to buy a Gateway (remember the cowpatches?) 386SX (disabled math-coprocessor!!!!) 16MHz PC with 4 MBs of RAM and an 80MB hard drive. Of course I majored in computer science, and fondly remember running Matlab and Turbo Pascal and Turbo C++ on it, as well as coding 386 Assembly on it. I installed a Gravis Ultrasound card on it, remember, the first cheap (relatively speaking happy wavetable supporting card? Then, in 1993, I spent a couple of hours in a computer lab at NYU downloading about 21 floppies with the 0.99 version of Slackware Linux, and repartitioned my hard drive with FIPS to run both Linux and DOS! Yes, I ran Linux and X-Windows on a 4 MB 386SX!!! That was the beginning of a new era for me, and the road that eventually brought me to graduate school and serious enterprise IT software projects I work on now. Thank you for a wonderful article that brought a tear to my eye, reminding me of all the countless winter evenings, spent tinkering with the GCC compiler and Linux kernel modles.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow - What a trip down memory lane. I was 29 in 1990 and got my first computer. I experienced 90% of what you described.
Awesome article
0 Votes
+ -
Back in early 1977 when I was in high school we were connecting to a DEC mainframe over a 110 baud (yes you read that right) acoustic modem with a dial desk phone and using an old Western Union teletype (Model 33 ASR) with a paper tape reader as a terminal.

At that time we never dreamed what we would have in 1991 much less 2011. It was all science fiction then.

Thanks for the look back including the rare reference to "mishegas".
0 Votes
+ -
I still remember the horrors of modem and printer configuration. At one of the first places I worked I brought in a daisy-wheel printer to print forms. The owner decided to buy a laser and had a choice of Canon at $2k or HP at $2.2k. Both I and his tech consultant told him, "Definitely get the HP," but he chose the Canon to save $200. The software/data we were running literally took 1 minute to generate each page (self-editing legal documents), so we would just let it run all night.

We would have both the daisy-wheel printer and laser doing printing and they would match up. At some point the laser would start kicking pages out at the wrong spot. We spent a YEAR trying to find out what was wrong. Local Canon tech support couldn't help, regional couldn't help, even the NATIONAL headquarters couldn't help. Finally, after a year, the local folks said, "We have a customer who does graphics. Maybe they have an idea." We spoke with them and they said, "We know your problem. The daisy-wheel prints edge to edge, 66 lines per page. The laser has a dead zone of about .25 inches at the top and bottom. That comes out to only about 63 lines. There's something called the Vertical Motion Index (VMI) that tells the printer how far to move between each line (dpi). You have to reduce the VMI so it will print 66 lines in the printable area rather than 63."

A YEAR to find that out! (HP could have probably told us in a week--we kept telling the owner, "This is why we told you to get the HP!")
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 1991's PC technology was unbelievable
dejan001 Updated - 15th Oct
Wrote the better part of a novel on it. Was good discipline as the memory would only hold about four thousand words, a good length for a chapter. After hitting that mark I'd have to plug in the cassette recorder (a 'high quality' model for use with the computer...reality was it had a sticker pasted on it. It was an off the shelf cassette player) and wait for the whole tape to be read to the next 'empty' spot before it would record what I'd written. ANY thing hiccup and I lost it.

I also spent an afternoon entering the program that would create a 'ball' that could 'bounce' on the TV. Actually a circle no dimensions to it. I think my daughter still has the old girl in a closet somewhere.
Indian Astrology by astrologer Dr. Sudhanshu
places to visit in France
Watch Full Movies Online
Igrice Games
Weight Watcher Soup
personalized gifts for kids

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix