Apple: The next generation
Summary: Can Apple continue in the footsteps of Steve Jobs, or should they forge their own new direction?
In 1997, Steve Jobs returned to the floundering company he helped found, and turned it into one of the most successful tech companies in history. His recent passing leaves a huge void, as Apple had become an extension of his uncompromising drive and vision.
Steve Jobs had laser-like focus. There are numerous stories about his foibles as a person, but there can be no denying that he made a nearly superhuman effort to create technology that was both attractive as well as functional. I've posited that maybe his personality was required to accomplish what he did in the short time he was with Apple.
Also See:
The question that people have been asking since Steve Jobs stepped down as CEO in August is, "How will Apple continue with Steve gone?" Well, there are rumors that Steve Jobs left a four-year product roadmap before he died. Also, Steve set up a training program to teach company executives how to think like him.
Apple still has Jonathan Ive, the industrial designer at Apple whose sense of aesthetics and simple elegance mirrored those of Steve Jobs. Even with that major advantage, however, I don't believe that a product roadmap and training program will be able to duplicate the will and imagination of Steve Jobs.
Tim Cook is an excellent administrator, and streamlined the business processes of Apple into a finely-tuned, well-oiled machine. But that's not the same thing as a man who eschewed focus groups and made himself the customer that Apple made products for. Steve Jobs wasn't afraid to be uncompromising. He wasn't afraid to say no to something he didn't like. And he demanded the best efforts from his employees. If he felt that someone hadn't put their all into developing a product, he wouldn't even look at it. He would just send them back to try again.
There are, of course, stories about what happened at Apple when Steve wasn't directly involved in the entire product development process. The MobileMe incident, which resulted in Jobs berating the development team and replacing the executive in charge, is well-known. The most successful products from Apple were directly supervised by Steve Jobs, and his imprint can be felt in the quality of those products.
So where does Apple go from here? They're still the most successful computer company in the world. They made some of the most popular consumer technology in history; game-changing technology that improved existing devices in ways that no one else had conceived of before. Can they keep that momentum without Steve Jobs?
I don't think there is any one person in the world that could embody all of the different qualities and quirks of Steve Jobs that made him so successful. Jony Ive is there for product design. Tim Cook keeps things running smoothly, but I don't see him as being the passionate, crazy, rude visionary that Steve Jobs was. They need one more person that can fill that void. Someone that can be that focus group. Someone that can browbeat the employees into giving their all. Someone that isn't afraid to take chances, and keep saying no until a product is ready to ship.
Is there someone out there like that? Someone already working at Apple, waiting to be noticed? Or someone on the outside that we don't know yet? Unless Apple can find this "missing link", they may need to reconsider their strategy. Instead of trying to be Team Steve, maybe they should consider forging their own new path for the future.
See also:
- Replicating Steve: Can Apple recreate Jobs' intangibles?
- CNET News: How can Apple replace Steve Jobs' celebrity? It can't
- Michael Dell on HP, Apple in 1997, and Steve Jobs
- Without Dennis Ritchie, there would be no Jobs
- Humanizing technology: The 100-year legacy of Steve Jobs
- Apple in the enterprise: The road forward
ZDNet Roundup: Steve Jobs tribute
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I don't think Bill Gates would work for Apple
He is too busy doing humanitarian work that Steve Jobs was too selfish to do.
Are not you trolling? Jobs was never selfish, he signed Apple to become ...
Also Gates has nothing to do with the future of Apple's management anyway.
Jobs was very selfish
He never contributed anything personally in private.
And I agree that Gates will have nothing to do with Apple. I put it right in my subject line. Too bad because Apple would benefit from having someone like Gates at the helm.
Still, I am more upbeat on Tim Cook. I think he is a fine leader. He has already proven himself to be far more generous than Jobs by starting a charity program at Apple. Under Job's leadership, Apple didn't give back to the community at all.
RE: Apple: The next generation
RE: Apple: The next generation
LOL... silly troll. "Jobs was never selfish"...
http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/02/news/companies/elkind_jobs.fortune/index2.htm
[i]"When Jobs had his own illegitimate child, also at the age of 23, he too struggled with his responsibilities. For two years, though already wealthy, he denied paternity while Lisa's mother went on welfare. At one point Jobs even swore in a signed court document that he couldn't be Lisa's father..."[/i]
Gates?
cme on, Gates is just not in the same league, he only will be remembered for creating a monopoly using the dirtiest tactics.
He retired when he realized the game was going too fast fot him (Internet? internet is a fad...)
RE: Apple: The next generation
RE: Apple: The next generation
funny... Bill Gates purposefully sets up his philanthropy for his own personal recognition... puts hiw name on everything and loves how people call him such a great guy. Its great he does some stuff to help out, but his motives are not as pure as you suggest. I think much higher of the people who never talk about what they do.... they do it because they really care and want to help, and do not want any recognition for it.
RE: Apple: The next generation
RE: Apple: The next generation
re:
RE: Apple: The next generation
Personally, I think Gates could have done more good in the world by staying with MS instead of leaving it to run a charity organization. After he left, MS was stagnant for a decade. Despite having a lot more resources, MS was getting beaten by competitors. Only recently has the company started to do some innovation.
If he stayed, he would have kept the company off Ballmer and maybe would have bought a lot of great tech to the market benefiting a lot more people.
Also, I wouldn't call someone selfish if they're working for $1 per year to move tech forward. Again, I'll reiterate my view. Bringing better technology to the world benefits the world more than giving away $30 billion dollars (which works out to be less than $5 per person).
Isn't Scott Forstall that guy?
RE: Apple: The next generation
i Agree in in reference to attitude about those around him...Thanks!
RE: Apple: The next generation
RE: Apple: The next generation
Amazon did the DRm Free thing first.
RE: Apple: The next generation
Without Apple and Jobs, would we have access to DRM free music today?
It took the bargaining power of iTunes to break the model content providers wanted, without that companies like Sony would still be installing rootkits.
RE: Apple: The next generation
RE: Apple: The next generation
I see this as a no win for the new CEO