Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Death of a Canon DSLR

By | June 20, 2010, 11:33am PDT

Summary: Alas, Poor Rebel XSi, I knew him, Dr. Mitarai.

Alas, Poor Rebel XSi, 私は彼を知っていた, Dr. Mitarai. We see him in his final moments, watching the sticky buns, shutter seizing.

As many of you may know, besides my technology writing here on ZDNet, I also do food blogging on my personal website, Off The Broiler.

Much of what I do on Off The Broiler is food photography — I like to try to reproduce the dining experience at restaurants for my readers, so I do a lot of close-up food shots.

While I do produce high-quality photos for my food blog, much of it is credited to the SIGMA 50mm f1.4 prime lens (fixed focal length) that I have been using for the past two years.

Since the photos are destined for the web and I consider myself very much an amateur photographer and not a pro, I can’t justify spending $1600.00+ on a Pro-level camera body.

Instead, every few years or so, I upgrade the technology using consumer-level cameras, and when I travel, I tend to use inexpensive point-and shoots, such as my Canon PowerShot G7, which has served me very faithfully for about 4 years.

Being a former Canon employee (I worked at the company’s US headquarters on Long Island from 1994 to late 1996 where I helped launch the first website for Canon USA)  I know the company can produce very high-quality camera equipment and lenses, and I’ve been a Canon adherent, user, and consumer for over 25 years.

I’ve owned pro-level 35mm film SLRs such as the Canon EOS-1, and I know exactly what sort of long Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) Pro-level units like these are supposed to have.

When I was an employee of the company, I visited Canon’s Jamesburg, NJ-based national service center on several occasions and frequently spoke to technicians who would tell me about what expected performance and repairs cost on Pro cameras had relative to consumer units did at the time. A consumer level camera should have around half the life of a pro SLR, which should be 10 years plus for a pro unit.

Arguably, that was 15 years ago, but camera construction methods and basic mechanical assemblies haven’t changed significantly, it’s the digital CMOS/APS sensors and system logic boards that have progressed.

That being said, I’m a bit disappointed in Canon that my current DSLR appears to have died way before its time.

Exactly two years ago, in June of 2008, I bought myself a Canon XSi kit. I figured it would have an expected lifetime of about four years, as the mechanical assemblies and the body frame don’t have the same level of robustness as a Pro-level camera would.

Today my luck run out. In the middle of shooting photos at my local farmer’s market, the camera just… seized. I was hit with an “Error 99″ which upon casual Googling indicates that it covers a wide range of failures.

I tried pulling the battery out for a while, and attempted to reset. No good.

I tried cleaning the lens and body gold contacts (which seems stupid since I haven’t removed the Prime lens in about two years and it was pristine clean when I removed it) and still no go.

I tried looking to see if the shutter was out of alignment, but the louvers were perfectly straight. However, when the camera is turned on, the louvers “buckle” and I notice a weird motor sound. Can’t be good.

Now, I’ve never heard of a camera having a heart attack or onset of diabetic shock, but two years seems like a relatively short lifetime, even for a consumer device.

Indeed, my shooting sessions are intense, I often take several thousand exposures in a single afternoon because I like to “bracket” my exposures and walk the f-stop for different depth-of-field and lighting effects.

Still, I can’t imagine the designers of the XSi intended the unit to die that early or my shooting habits could kill a camera body that quickly, and I’d hardly call taking a lot of exposures as abuse. Two years is a very short lifespan, even for a consumer DSLR.

I’m going to be sending the XSi in for repair, and hopefully it won’t be an expensive one. However, I  know from my experience that it probably won’t be a good prognosis, especially if the shutter mechanism is completely shot. That’s easily $200.00+ in parts and labor since the camera is out of warranty.

That being said, I’ve already ordered my new camera body to replace it, a Canon T2i. I hope it lives at least 3 to 4 years, but Canon, you’ve really shaken my consumer confidence this time.

Have you had a consumer-level DSLR die an early death as well? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
69
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
cococan Updated - 16th Jul 2010
.
a life?? Well, I guess your hobbies ARE your life!!
0 Votes
+ -
nt.
0 Votes
+ -
Typically $180-$200.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
jperlow 20th Jun 2010
@Bruizer not worth repairing unless Canon does the right thing and offers to replace the shutter at their cost.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
justthisguyyouknow 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow Why would you expect to receive a free out-of-warranty repair? Just because you have a blog?
0 Votes
+ -
Cheaper than a new camera.
Bruizer 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow

Why would Canon do that as it is long out of warrantee? The repair takes about a week including shipping.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
PenultimateUser 20th Jun 2010
We all know Canon as well as the others differentiate builds by their focal points, different levels of weather proofing, clean ISO levels, etc and shutter count. The number of shots you were taking suggests you should have known to move up the food chain. Still, I feel for you. One still should expect products to last longer than a sitcom.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
jperlow 20th Jun 2010
@lyoung Well, it's hard to say whether or not I was killing the unit with my exposure habits. An entire 1-week vacation worth of photos in New Orleans was about 4000 shots, I really don't think that's excessive. A major BBQ event in NYC, 2000, a restaurant photo shoot, 600-1000 depending on the lighting. Considering that I travel for a living and my more frequently used camera is the G7, and it's lived twice as long as the XSi, it's a bit disconcerting.

Still, I would hate to have spent $1600.00 on a higher end body, shot the same number of exposures and had the camera die early as well. I've been hearing similar reports from other people who've been in that boat. $800 every two years for a technology refresh isn't so bad for a hobby, but I really expect better from Canon.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
PenultimateUser 20th Jun 2010
@jperlow I'll adjust my comment. While you obviously will bump up against shutter life with the lower end camera as you well know, you still have a right to be mad. Checking a few sites I read shutter life for a mid range camera should be in the 50,000 range. This repair should be free.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
clfitz 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow
Two years? I dunno about that. I still have a Pentax MX that I bought new in 1979. I've shot thousands of rolls of film with it and it still works. The TTL meter is off by about a half-stop, but I have a handheld meter that I use when I want to be exact.

I just bought my first digital SLR, and I hope I get more than five years out of it. If it doesn't last any longer than that, I'll have to rethink how committed I am to photography.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
David Chernicoff 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow

I'm fairly active in the Canon community and I've rarely heard about early shutter death with the "prosumer" bodies. The 20D I passed down to my daughter has about 60K clicks on it, the 40D I use to shoot high school sports and such has about 30K on it, and my newest body, a 5DII that replaced the original 5D (which I sold with about 20K on it) has nary an issue, but only has about 10K on it.

As far as the G7 goes, the G-series are tough little cameras. My son has yet to destroy ther G9 I gave him and it goes on a lot of scouting trips to the back end of nowhere. The G10 I carry daily, shows pocket wear, but no mechanical issues, though it has less than 5K clicks on it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ok lets get this straight...
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow... $800 for a refresh every two years isn't bad for a hobby, but yet $200 for a repair isn't worth it? Grant it be, a new XSi from Best Buy, body only is $550. But if the optics are fine, and overall you are happy with the existing camera, then get it repaired.

As for "Canon doing the right thing" what sucking up to you and repairing an out of warranty product? If they sold you the product, and said that it would function for 1 year, or we warranty it, seems to me they held up their end of the sale. If I buy a car, and it has a five year 50,000 mile warranty, and it breaks down after 5 years of at 60,000 miles, do I expect the dealership to repair it for free?? no. I get the darn thing repaired, and pay the man.

When it comes to warranty repairs, seems to me that the bloggers on this site are a little egotistical to think that a company has to sell their soul to Jason Perlow to fix something out of warranty or he will give them a poor review...
0 Votes
+ -
I'm with you too....
kingtj 21st Jun 2010
@jperlow -- The typical consumer electronics product warranty of "1 year" is a scam, all in all. It's simply the shortest time period a company can honor a warranty without resorting to measuring it in MONTHS, which would look bad at even an initial glance. Anything that's sold as a "prosumer" class product should easily last a lot longer than that, even with "heavy use", or else it wasn't engineered sufficiently well.

When you consider that the typical color laser printer has a FAR more complex interaction of its components to produce a single page of print, yet they're almost always good for many tens of thousands of pages of printing, it doesn't seem much to ask for a camera shutter to be able to open/close a similar number of times in its lifespan!
@jperlow

You should also know the physical aspect of the XSi's mechanical shutter really does not compare the electronic shutter of the G7.

But basically, on one 1 week trip to New Orleans, you burned through 4% of your rated life of the shutter. 2% at a BBQ (a single day). .6-1% at a single restaurant in the evening.

Over a two year period, you might be a good 100-200% over the rated life.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
focusfree 20th Jun 2010
Shutter life is measured in exposures not clock time. Adjust your expectations accordingly.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
SoccerDad#2 21st Jun 2010
@focusfree - I agree completely. And with digital, the average person will likely take 3-5 pictures with digital than if they were shooting film. Why? Having to pay to process the film, get it developed (and even the act of just changing film canisters) causes one to be a little stingy with the shutter release. OTOH, it's easy to hit the delete key with digital. Too bad people don't understand that mechanical things have a finite life.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
tburzio 20th Jun 2010
I really liked consumer gadgets, and I thought it was the end all. Then, I bought a coal fired steam engine that you ride on, and I haven't bought a gadget in a couple of years. We've been looking for machines that are alive, and golly, turns out we already made them and forgot...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
Serton 21st Jun 2010
@tburzio What?
0 Votes
+ -
Unreasonable expectations
Economister Updated - 20th Jun 2010
"I often take several thousand exposures in a single afternoon"

Given your own description of your picture taking, my guess is that you take 100K to 200K pictures each year. If a consumer level mechanical shutter gives out after two years, you have gotten your money's worth.

Stop bitching and buy a pro-level camera or just get it repaired by Canon. Warranty replacement after a quarter of a million plus shutter operations is ridiculous.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
jperlow 20th Jun 2010
@Economister You're assuming I've hit 100K exposures per annum, I posit that because I travel for a living and only use the camera when I am at home, I haven't hit anywhere near that a year. I traveled 42 weeks in 2008, approximately 24 in 2010 for business. Most of which I've used my point-and-shoot.
0 Votes
+ -
Counter
Economister 21st Jun 2010
"Several thousand" "often" do add up. Were you gone for the entire 42 weeks or maybe you were home and using the camera on weekends?

In any event, Canon probably has a shutter operations counter buried deep in their camera electronics somewhere. Take it in and you may get the answer. If your use has exceeded the shutter design life you will have your answer.

It is in my view unfair to try to blame Canon when you "often" use the camera as a professional photographer - volume wise. Were you hoping to pressure them into a free repair because you are a ZDnet blogger?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
PollyProteus 21st Jun 2010
@Economister - I agree with this, Jason's cutting corners and then crying about it (which, sadly, is the typical American "instant gratification" mentality, and yes, I'm a 51 year old American who's also a USMC Veteran, so I've earned the right to say this).

@Jason - I've never had a DSLR die on me, however I have to say that your buying the entry level DSLR and expecting to take as many photos as you've done is akin to buying a stock Yugo and entering it unmodified in the Daytona 500 and then crying because the engine blew up while trying to keep pace with all the NASCAR capable vehicles.

Spend the money it takes to get a camera and lenses that will take the punishment you subject it to but also remember that even pro model cameras need love and care and the occasional return to factory for a checkup.
But not anymore. In the past year, I've had some pro equipment go out of whack and need servicing. The process was just as mindless, frustrating and expensive as having consumer equipment repaired. So this is another reason that, if you have found a piece of consumer equipment that works for you, you should stick with it. One of the things that Consumer Reports points out is that mass-produced mid-range gear often has better quality than limited-run "high-end" gear. The reason is that the company has put more effort into ironing out the design and process for something that they make scads of. Practice makes perfect, I guess.
0 Votes
+ -
Consumer Reports?
rag@... 21st Jun 2010
@terry flores Do people still believe the stuff they print?
0 Votes
+ -
Sigma is crap
rag@... 21st Jun 2010
The Error 99 likely came from the Sigma lens. Sigma is too cheap to pay for licensing from Canon, so they reverse engineer their products.

Their cameras are especially crappy, but their lenses appeal to amateurs who are too cheap to pay for OEM.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
PollyProteus 21st Jun 2010
@rag@... I disagree. Sigma makes pretty decent lenses. I've got a Sigma 18-200 general purpose lens that I've owned for over four years and I've litterally taken many thousands of photos through, everywhere from close up, well lit through far away in poorly lit halls and everywhere in between and the lens has NEVER failed me.

To be fair I also have higher end Nikkor lenses which have never failed me either.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
rag@... 21st Jun 2010
@PollyProteus I used to do photography for a living for many years, and I can assure you that Sigma is crap. Their focusing mounts feel like they use sawdust for a lubricant. They're cheap and made to stay that way. And as I said, they're too cheap to pay for Canon's license, so your new camera will likely not work with an old Sigma lens.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
PollyProteus 21st Jun 2010
@rag - I wouldn't buy an old lens for a new camera unless it was a very special lens for some reason that was important to me.

That said, even from professional and semi-professional photographers I've heard good things about Sigma. It's evident from what I've heard that Sigma has stepped up to give their lenses better quality.

Would I pay equal dollar for a Sigma over a Nikkor? Not on your life, I like the quality of glass from Nikkor, but if I'm looking for what amounts to as a general use lens (such as my 18-200), something that I'll take to more rough and tumble locations where the potential to damage the lens is higher, then I'd rather spend less on a Sigma.

But again, as I stated previously, the Sigma I bought four years ago is living up to my expectations for what it cost me ($600).
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
Stuka 21st Jun 2010
Always sad to see a good camera go before its time. The T2i should work out nicely for you though.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
srj@... 21st Jun 2010
Well - just how many exposures have you taken with that body? Do you know? As you probably know Canon does not publicize how many exposures you can expect to get for the consumer level cameras. That is only done for the more expensive bodies whose shutter assemblies are made to withstand more use. So - back to my question - how many exposures have you made with this body?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
reibertg@... 21st Jun 2010
Didn't have a camera die, per se, but I did have a 75-300mm lens get stuck on my Xti and not come off for some reason. The cost to have it removed by a certified Canon service center was more than the price of a new camera. So I now have two Canons...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
keitha73 21st Jun 2010
How many actuations did the Rebel XSI have on it? That's pretty easy to check.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
yvrprasad@... 21st Jun 2010
Even after replacing my last two Canon Camcorders after dying on me, I'm still with a 7 months old Canon HD Camcorder, Don't know why, I finally end up with canon again after going through all reviews. Can Canon do any in averting these cardiac arrests on these items????? (Hmm... Canon)
0 Votes
+ -
Exposures vs Years...
SoccerDad#2 21st Jun 2010
Having owned two DSLRs by Canon, I have to wonder - just how many exposures do you have on this camera? As I understand it, the Rebel line (of which the XSi belongs) has a 'design life' of approx 10,000 exposures. The mid-grade line (20D, 30D, etc) has a design life of approx 50,000 exposures and the Pro line (Mark II) at 100,000 exposures.

Between the two cameras I have, my Digital Rebel is at just over 12,000 exposures & my mid-grade (30D) just surpassed 30,000 exposures - and both are working fine.

With all of that said, your article (and your blog entries) never have mentioned just how many exposures you've captured on this camera. I never reset the counter - so it is easy for me to track. I will say, I can't believe I've captured 40,000+ pictures (but with my hard drive bulging at the seams, I know it is the case). As an amatuer sports photographer, it's easy to take 300-400 for one soccer game (and it keeps me from yelling at the refs - what a bonus!).

So, the question has to be: Did you get as much use out of your camera as it was designed to provide? As a photojournalist, I would have figured you could justify spending 2X more for the body to get 5X more design life - but that's just my opinion.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
davidjduncan 21st Jun 2010
Ah, Jason, I'm looking at my Canon EOS S2i as I write this. And, I'm thinking that you are a lucky guy to have one coming your way. Then I'm thinking: everything fails eventually! You know, like "death" in living systems [entropy] or "stop" in a non-living system.
So, just like in real life, your Canon EOS Xsi has died. You should celebrate the joy that it has brought to your visual life. And, you should reflect upon the good times it gave you. Like any good photographer, you had a relationship with that camera!
I know, I know, it has died too soon. Such is life in the real world as much as in the technological world! Attempting to discover why it died is, well, dead-end!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
CodeCurmudgeon 21st Jun 2010
That is kind of quick, but then you are running a far higher duty cycle than the typical amateur photographer.

My Leica M-2 is still going strong after about 50 years of service. Of course at the rate I've been using it lately, it'll probably not be worn out yet in 2060.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
pemnet@... 21st Jun 2010
On the exploded view of your camera and its pro counterpart do you know or can you have one of your former Canon colleagues tell you which parts are made of plastic material and which parts are metal. Of the electronic equipment I have seen over the years to cut down on weight and to bring the cost closer to consumer level pricing and to reduce manufacturing costs, a good number of metallic parts are replaced by strong, albeit, plastic parts. It would be very interesting to see which metal parts were replaced with plastic ones. See if you can get your hands on a failed, useless camera body and tear it open to see for yourself. I'm sure you will not be surprised by what you find.
0 Votes
+ -
Count 'cycles' not 'years'
Whack! 21st Jun 2010
Camera manufacturers design their mechanisms to endure a certain number of 'cycles' or exposures. For consumer cameras this is usually a lot less than pro gear; say half. So a consumer camera may be designed for 15,000 cycles and pro gear for 30,000 cycles. These were the expected lifespans for Nikon Nikkormat vs. Nikon F. I don't know what the design life of current models is, but probably something similar...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
fromthehip 21st Jun 2010
I feel for you and have to wonder about the quality too. I bought a Canon XT-1 35mm SLR in 1979, and the only maintenance has been a cleaning. It still works just fine. Heck, I have several older cameras that still function just fine (some as far back as the late 1800s). Granted, things have gotten a little more complicated, with auto-focus and auto-metering, but I would expect a longer life out of your current camera.

I went with Nikon when I stepped up to a DSLR, and I have been very happy. I expect more than 2 years, and, if I remember right, the warranty period is 5 years (though that might just be one of the lenses).

Good luck with your next one.

FTH
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
levinson 21st Jun 2010
Maybe an extended warranty would be a good idea for you!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
hornkt@... 21st Jun 2010
You would think that since it is nearly impossible to unseat nikon over photo quality, that Canon would do the next best thing and be known for "OVERALL QUALITY". Nope guess that seems like too much work.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
fairportfan 21st Jun 2010
I own a Mamiya-Sekor 500 MSX i bought in 1978, and an Olympus Pen FT, which hasn't been built since 1972 (i bought it in a pawn shop in 2000, to replace one i brought home from Viet Nam that was stolen in a burglary).

Both are working Just Fine - though the Pen FT does have a non-operational meter.

(The optical setup in Olympus's E330 - or whatever its exact number was - was based on the Pen FT, which has no prism hump though it is a SLR, and the new Micro 4/3 bodies i've seen look exactly like a Pen Ft...)
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
nfiertel 21st Jun 2010
Any product including the best of the best inevitably has flaws that show up as a probability curve increasing as the use or age of the product increases. It is the nature of..well..Nature. Nothing made is identical to all other products of the same run. What can one say about the camera? It broke. Is it consistent with this product in its failure rate. Who knows? Was it a good choice for a fairly heavy user of its functions? Perhaps not. A true pro Canon costs a LOT more than any of the models mentioned in the blog and a 1600 camera is considering advanced amateur in terms of its longevity expectations. The Canon 5D MkII is on the cusp of being professional and in terms of its picture quality the equal of the more expensive siblings but in terms of absolute mechanical dependability one must spend even more. Facts of life..The cheap slr of the film days that ran forever is long gone. Save your money longer for what supplies your needs and buy up to the level that you can afford. A repair is not the end of the world especially if it is from Canon or Nikon, Pentax or Sony. They will do it right and it is a lot cheaper than a replacement body.
0 Votes
+ -
Too many clicks, brother...
hdinin 21st Jun 2010
I'm a fine art photographer, and was a photojournalist, a commercial, editorial and illustrative photographer for 35 years. Except when shooting allowed using a Leica (rarely) or called for a Hasselblad, I've used Canon professional equipment exclusively since 1975, starting with the F-1, and currently using the 5DMkII and the 7D. I haven't taken as many photos with any one camera in all that time, as you apparently have in two years with what you admit is a consumer body. You've gotten more than ample value, IMO. Suck it up, and fix it and pay the bill. Or buy a new body that's better suited to the high volume shooting practices you prefer. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
geoff@... 21st Jun 2010
It cost me $135 to have my Canon SD950 fixed. A great point and shoot, same error, just froze on turning on one day. I would have bought a new one but all of the replacement point and shoot Canon's have given up on having a true optical view finder. If you have ever used an LCD in direct sunlight you understand why having a true optical view finder is critical, therefore I had it fixed. It does come with a 90 warranty if I recall correctly.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
Capt. Midnight 21st Jun 2010
After two dead Canon consumer grade cameras (one film,
one digital) and two forays trying to get them repaired
(in warranty) by the techs at Jamesburg. My solution, buy an Olympus.
0 Votes
+ -
wrong measure
jreuter 21st Jun 2010
SLR camera life is measured in shutter releases, not years. Example: and EOS 7D has a rated shutter life of 150000 cycles. How many *shots* did you get out of that XSi?
0 Votes
+ -
SNAP
sacredblack 21st Jun 2010
Hi Jason,

Yep I had a 1000d (Rebel XS in your country) which gave me a similar photo to yours one day. 2 months out of warranty and was to cost A$490 to fix and only A$690 to replace. I replaced it with a 450D (Xsi) and a 3 year extended warranty.

My main use for this camera is timelapse so the 1000d had already shot at least 50,000 frame but it's meant to last for 100,000. I imagine that it was dust that caused the crash as I was in the middle of a dust outback location shooting a frame every 2 seconds and changing lenses etc.

Fingers crossed.

Steve R.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
common sense 21st Jun 2010
I bought a Nikon D 5000 last year, and am admittedly not snapping as much as you, one of the sales/marketing items on the website says: Durable, high precision shutter
"Testing to over 100,000 cycles assures precision and long shutter life."
While this doesn't constitute a warranty, it could be useful if there is an early "death" of the shutter. Does Canon publish a similar claim?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
shsdarwin 21st Jun 2010
Jason,

I've got to be honest and say that a few thousand shots in an afternoon does to me sound like a lot of use for a consumer grade camera (even if it is a Canon). I own the same camera, although here in Australia it's called the 1000D. The construction is robust and above average when compared to similar priced cameras.
Have you been able to find details on the amount of exposures the camera is supposed to last. The shutter and mirror being the main moving parts, I'd expect one of those to go sooner than any other part of a DSLR.
It'd be good if there is a amount of exposures life expectancy for these cameras, much like a memory module has a certain amount of expected read / write cycles lif span.

Seb
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Death of a Canon DSLR
cococan Updated - 16th Jul 2010
.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix