Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Google Music Beta: Cloud music done right

By | June 3, 2011, 3:00am PDT

Summary: A first look at the new Google Music Beta. Not many bells and whistles, but it’s a great start.

Recently I had the pleasure of receiving an invite to the Google Music Beta program. Initial reviews of the product were less than favorable. However, very soon afterward, Google released an update to the software that seems to have improved things substantially.

If your Android device doesn’t have the new music app, it’s a simple matter of downloading it from the Android Market. Google provides and impressive amount of storage for the beta: users can currently upload up to 20,000 songs.

Getting set up is fairly straightforward. Using your existing Google account, you download and install the desktop application. You can configure it to pull your music from Windows Media Player, iTunes, or simply define a directory full of music files. Your system then uploads your music in the background–and you can even limit the upload speed so it doesn’t throttle your internet connection.

Once you have music files stored online, you can start listening to them right away. You can play them over the internet through the Android app, and you can also play through the web-based app. You also have the option of configuring the player to download music from your account as it plays so it can be cached for offline usage.

Admittedly, when playing music over a smartphone connection, your available bandwidth is going to affect the quality of the playback. If you have 4G connectivity, or even 3G, there should be no problem. I would not recommend trying to play music over a lower speed connection. Also, keep in mind that this will count towards your data usage if you do not have an unlimited data plan.

There is no facility for purchasing music through the service yet. It is primarily a type of store and forward cloud service for your existing music. I have several thousand songs from my CD collection online with the Google Music service now, and I find it to be a simple, elegant music storage system.

This is the kind of service where the cloud really shines, providing immediate access to data–in this case, music–to any location where you have internet access. All you need is a web browser or the Android app installed on your smartphone or tablet, and you’re good to go.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Scott Raymond has been a technologist and system administrator for over 25 years.

Disclosure

Scott Raymond

I am the IT Manager for a high end audio and network systems integrator in northern Califronia. My wife works at Adobe Systems, Inc. Whenever I write an article that might involve Adobe or its products, I add a disclaimer at the top of the article to make sure she is not involved in any way. We have a small bit of stock with AT&T and no other major investments that would cause conflict.

Biography

Scott Raymond

Scott Raymond has been a technologist and system administrator for over 25 years. Starting as a hobbyist in his teens, Scott quickly learned that he could translate his passion and knowledge into a full-time career. He currently works as the IT Manager for a high end audio and network systems integrator in northern California. He has written technology articles for various publications in the past and began contributing to ZDnet as a guest blogger on Jason Perlow's Tech Broiler. Scott and Jason met in New York in the 1990s where they co-managed the New York City Palm Pilot Users' Group.

In his spare time, Scott is a trained chef and avid bicycling enthusiast, as well as a voracious reader of historical, science and horror fiction. He is a huge fan of pop culture, with a wide range of interest in TV shows, movies and games.

57
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google Music Beta: Cloud music done right
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
Cloud music is pointless when you have 16 to 32 gb of storage on a smart phone. Apple is going to charge money for their so called 'icloud service'.

A Zune pass make more sense when you can have millions of songs in the 'cloud'. Microsoft should roll out Zune service to other platforms.
@owlnet: ... or not; just check his articles like "CES: Failed Tablets That Weren't: Success Despite Predictions of Doom" -- failed tablets turned out to be real fail.

Or when Scott claimed: "When I first heard that Apple had put the antenna on the outside of the phone where people would normally hold it, I thought that was a tremendously bad idea." -- iPhone 4 antenna proved to be many times more sensitive to weak signal, keeping connections alive when usually constructed antenna failed (-122 dB agains -114 dB, according to research by AnandTech). And shorting GSM and Wi-Fi antennas turned out to be ridiculously rare thing in reality -- almost no one of buyers wanted to take "bumper" when Apple offered it for free for three months last year.

Whether Google's music services are done "right" will be better seen on Monday, when we will know what Apple has to offer.

Many bloggers thought that Google Wave or GoogleTV were supercool things, but, as of now, the former is dead and the latter is undead (second version is coming).
@denisrs
Do you tire of your position? There is a large number of very nice things that were not developed by Apple. And some people do not like the price tag that comes along with it.
@hoaxoner: does nice things. Kinect by Microsoft is quite nice thing, for example. Google Maps, too. Countless.

And I do not go with religious zeal screaming that "Google hates you" unlike what Scott Raymond does with relation to Apple -- exposing himself as Google's blinded fanatic.
@denisrs The Kinect is a repackage/relabeled product that wasn't created by Microsoft. All they did was take existing technology and hook it up to a game console.

The Kinect was really created by an Israeli company called PrimeSense, using technology that has being used for over 30 years to create the product.

The only part that MS did was write the software API ... and that outsourced to a company called Rave.
@wackoae: ... technology to mass-production. This is what actually changes the world, not inventions themselves.

It is similar to case of Apple buying in 2004 small firm that developed capacitive touch screen technology and software, completing their work and turning user experience with mobile devices upside-down -- with iPhone and, later, with iPad.

(Of course, Apple, unlike Microsoft, did not get the technology completely ready -- it took years to be completed; nor idea of capacitive smartphone/pad was bought, it was Apple's internal -- but you get the point.)
@denisrs You keep paying for the koolaid. I'll sip mine for free. Enough said.
@owlnet
Huh?
0 Votes
+ -
Poor Linux support, as in no Linux Music Manager. Why would they want you to download a local app for this anyway?
@eholcroft@...
I don't think you need one for bigger operating systems, the browser should be enough.
@hoaxoner The entire "cloud" idea only work if you have unlimited bandwidth and zero downtime.
Right because the average consumer wants to spend weeks uploading their collection to the cloud. And with no way to purchase new music with Google. Which means users have to use a separate service like Amazon or iTunes just to buy new music. May as well use Amazon cloud music if you're going to do that.
@dave95.
I actually agree, but the differentiator here is the 20 GB or whatever it is for free, that's pretty nice.
@dave95.
It uploads automatically unlike Amazon music (you have to upload manually).

You get 20,000 song storage with Google, only 5GB on Amazon.

You can edit tags on Google, no dice on Amazon.

Both are cool services though.
0 Votes
+ -
@dave95. 20,000 songs - play anywhere - FREE
0 Votes
+ -
Sort of...
lukeiamyourfather 3rd Jun
@blueskip

The beta is free but that doesn't necessarily mean the public service will be free.
0 Votes
+ -
I've always wanted to upload and listen to my music via poor bandwidth conditions! Thanks Google for making my dream come true! grin

Meanwhile, I'll continue to rip music locally to my hard drive where those bandwidth issues are negated, and my Zune, which allows me to take my music anywhere I go.
0 Votes
+ -
not for me...
0 Votes
+ -
I'll stick with a dedicated music device, the whole storing music in the cloud thing doesn't interest me especially when its going to be taking up bandwith.
Zune already kills this and iTunes, unless Microsoft screws it up, especially since this has no actual music store and iTunes is not only crap, but about to charge for their iCloud.
0 Votes
+ -
Sure it does
wackoae 3rd Jun
@JoeHTH That must explain why the services is about to be canned by MS.
@wackoae - WRONG!
0 Votes
+ -
@wackoae

Despite rumors, I don't think it'll be canned kinned. However, I don't think we'll be seeing any new Zune hardware, which is a shame, since the Zune HD is a seriously nice piece of hardware.
@JoeHTH I bet you believe that the only reason that iTunes has more users is marketing too right? BTW, do you want to edit your claim about charging for iCloud since you were just making assumptions when you posted it.
0 Votes
+ -
I got my invitation yesterday but I am wondering why I would actually use the service until purchasing music is possible.
@BoloMKXXVIII It automatically syncs music with ITunes, so anything, so whatever I add to the library is added automatically in the background (had to change the settings to reduce the upload speed though - w/ cable UL speeds are severely restricted). You can purchase music anywhere, load it into a compatible player's library or put it into a specific folder/dir that Google Music will check regularly for additions. Google doesn't want to get into the music business world themselves.
0 Votes
+ -
I'll Just Keep Using Rhapsody
ancientprogrammer 3rd Jun
I don't really need cloud services since I don't want to pay for exorbitant data airtime fees to download music. I can carry playlists from Rhapsody with me with no need for an Internet connection and the core music I really like and ripped from CD's is only around 2GB and also easy to carry along with no fees, no ulterior behavioral tracking, no advertising.
Sounds like another great waste of time. LOL

Have fun with that
As someone who has 943 live shows - 17,000 songs - for one band (GD), having an online repository for it for free is absolutely incredible. I wonder how Apple's iCloud will work with songs that aren't "purchased" but are live recodings and unofficial things like that?
0 Votes
+ -
@jivester
for me to have access to my 600 GB music collection on my android (local storage obviously doesn't work).
@jivester I think you could always set up access to it via a server... Dunno if Google Music will do it, but it will allow accessing your music remotely until it finishes uploading.
0 Votes
+ -
SubSonic anyone?
rkylemyers 3rd Jun
I just don't get why one would even bother uploading music when you can download Subsonic for free? You choose what you want to share, and you are only limited by your storage space, and bandwidth. Runs on an android app, and if you set up a free dyndns you have easily remembered access through any browser.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't mind free
Wesley A 3rd Jun
If nothing else, I'll use it as an online backup for my music library.
are you kidding.....if you only have three(3)songs maybe but my 450 GB of music would be done uploading by christmas maybe.......I've tried , and written google.........rescue rick
please!..............what do you have?.....three songs?
Zune is dead. Its creator left MSFT under the weight of its failure some time ago. (He was also the creator of the original Xbox, you know, the one that never made MSFT any money.)

iCloud as announced today is a full music library and streaming service at $25.00 a year.

Its going to destroy Rhapsody and Zune's business, and put a hit in Pandora's.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple Owns the Music Market
CowboyJake 3rd Jun
Why waste your time, Apple owns this market and their products work better than anything Google does.
My enite music collection us at my whim. I am loving it and I didn't pay an additional dime for it. Add this to gmail and Google apps.. its definitely a win
Ok Scott, and how many of those tracks do you really own? for every one 'borrowed' from a friend Google is helping you add value to a counterfeit copy that is driving a dagger into the heart of copyright value and artists in general. Think about it.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@jmyates01 All of them are ripped from my CD collection or purchased online. I don't appreciate you automatically assuming I'm a thief.
hands down beats the Amazon Cloud currently. hopefully it stays free =) ..yay for unlimited data plan on phone
Wow ... this works great. I have my Galaxy Tab with app 14GB of Music and my Galaxy 4G with 8GB of music. So I'm pretty much travelling with music. But now I uploaded 4500 songs to Google Music (most included in the above mentioned) .... it's running smoothly from the cloud on WiFi, 4G or 3G. Plus the Google Music organizes it better AND includes 99% of the correct covers. I'm impressed with the service for now for sure
Until Apple does it better.
I think this is a good idea.I don?t know why people are so critic with it.I wish it was avalaible in Spain.
I just got my invite today for Google Music Beta...and guess what...there's no interface to "Share with friends"...Who are the MOUTH BREATHERS RUNNING THIS COMPANY....what part of social networking do they not get...a freaking trained code monkey should have known to include this!!! Worthless IDIOTS!!!
@Anon2012 And any moron on the planet can see why they didn't from a legal stand point, well just about any moron I guess.
0 Votes
+ -
OMG WHY.
roger.cornwell@... 3rd Aug
Yes you can get your music where ever you are and Yes you can download for later, But if your into your music as much as I am you wont want too loose the QUALITY and also wait for it too be cached, I have a 80 gig Ipod and also a 16gig Iphone, No music on the Iphone as its a PHONE. Batteries dont last long as it is so why all this, Pointless and a WAIST of BW. Total waste, Also wont be free for long, Google dont do nothing without making money. PERIOD.
0 Votes
+ -
attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?

? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet

turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari
islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)0
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix